Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Higher Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1649034

This article is part of the Research TopicReimagining Higher Education: Responding Proactively to 21st Century Global ShiftsView all 3 articles

Sociodemographic Predictors and Usability Perceptions Explaining Academic Use Intention of ChatGPT Among University Students in Ecuador

Provisionally accepted
EDGAR  ROLANDO MORALES-CALUÑAEDGAR ROLANDO MORALES-CALUÑA1,2*Dario  Javier Cervantes DiazDario Javier Cervantes Diaz3Cristian  Ismael Morales CaluñaCristian Ismael Morales Caluña4Fernando  Xavier Altamirano CapeloFernando Xavier Altamirano Capelo5
  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, State University of Milagro, Milagro, Ecuador
  • 2Universidad Estatal de Milagro, Milagro, Ecuador
  • 3Faculty of Social Sciences, Business Education and Law, State University of Milagro, Milagro, Ecuador
  • 4Technical University of Ambato, Information Technology Department, Ambato, Ecuador
  • 5Faculty of Public Health, Chimborazo Polytechnic School, Riobamba, Ecuador

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has transformed how students interact with academic content. ChatGPT, as a prominent AI-based language model, has been increasingly adopted by students to support learning tasks. However, the factors influencing its academic use intention remain underexplored in Latin American contexts. Objective: This study aims to identify the sociodemographic and perceptual predictors that explain the academic use intention of ChatGPT among university students in Ecuador. Methods: A cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted with 210 students from seven Ecuadorian universities. Data were collected through a validated questionnaire encompassing six constructs: compatibility with students' learning styles, efficiency, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and intention of continued use. Descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, binary logistic regression, and k-means clustering were performed using Python in Google Colab. Results: The logistic regression model revealed that perceived usefulness (OR = 2.37) and compatibility with learning style (OR = 1.87) were the most significant predictors of high academic use intention. Cluster analysis identified three user profiles: enthusiastic adopters, neutral users, and reluctant adopters. Sociodemographic factors showed limited predictive power. Conclusions: Students' perceptions of the academic value and alignment of ChatGPT with their learning preferences are stronger predictors of usage intention than sociodemographic characteristics. These findings highlight the need for pedagogically aligned and inclusive AI integration strategies in higher education.

Keywords: ChatGPT, higher education, technology acceptance, usability, university students

Received: 18 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 ROLANDO MORALES-CALUÑA, Cervantes Diaz, Morales Caluña and Altamirano Capelo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: EDGAR ROLANDO MORALES-CALUÑA, Faculty of Health Sciences, State University of Milagro, Milagro, Ecuador

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.