ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Assessment, Testing and Applied Measurement
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1649324
This article is part of the Research TopicHow do we collect all this data? A performative account of International Large-Scale Assessment data collection in times of systemic diversityView all 5 articles
How to Square the Circle of Voluntary Participation in Controlled Samples?
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
- 2Universitat Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
As large-scale international comparative studies of education use controlled sampling design to ensure the reliability and validity of the data, participating countries are required to achieve certain response rates of pre-selected respondents. However, the sampled respondent has a free will to grant or refuse their participation. High rates of rejections compromise the quality of the results. The aim of this mixed methods study was to investigate what facilitates or discourages the responsiveness of respondents in studies. The sample was derived from the OECD TALIS 2024 Latvian sample – participating schools, school principals, school study coordinators and teachers. Correlation analysis showed a strong relationship between voluntary participation in the study and early completion of the survey (not postponing it until later). When respondents were asked to complete the survey simultaneously (e.g. when sitting in the same room during a meeting), less than 1% of respondents refused to participate. School coordinators (79%) indicated that there were too many different studies and surveys asking their school for participation. As many as 73% of coordinators whose schools had a low response to the TALIS 2024 survey indicated that teachers should be paid for participating in surveys as additional work, yet at the same time only 30% of teachers who refused to participate in the TALIS 2024 survey reported that money would have been a good motivator. Teachers who took part in the TALIS 2024 study identified the following as the most desirable features of surveys: 1) should be work-related, 2) can be completed during working hours, 3) compatible with mobile devices, and 4) accessible via electronically received link and login information. For all teachers and coordinators, it was most important that the survey would be short – meaning that it should possible to complete within 10 minutes, and all questions should be easily comprehendible. Overall, principal interviews showed an openness to surveys at their school, and positive keywords that featured regularly during the interviews included: "purposefully targeted", "meaningful", "in alignment with school's goals", "relevant topic", "personalised, understandable feedback in foreseeable future", "clear benefit for a respondent".
Keywords: non-respondents1, teacher surveys2, data collection3, voluntary participation4, online suveys5
Received: 18 Jun 2025; Accepted: 01 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kampmane, Van Staden and Ozola. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kristīne Kampmane, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.