ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Surrendering to reality: a qualitative study on the shift in PhD pursuit intentions among Chinese humanities and social sciences master's students
Provisionally accepted- School of Education, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Previous research has extensively explored the motivations for pursuing a PhD, aiming to answer the question of "why pursue a doctorate". However, it has largely overlooked the group that ultimately abandons this pursuit. This paper takes rational choice theory as the analytical framework, and through in-depth interviews with 25 humanities and social sciences academic master's students, it explores the dynamic process and the complex factors behind the changes in the choice of, with the aim of answering the question of "Why do master's students who initially have the willingness to pursue a doctoral degree ultimately give up?". The study reveals that their decision-making process undergoes three distinct stages. That is, the stage of motivation formation based on social rationality, the stage of resource allocation based on conditional integration, and the stage of decision-making and trade-off based on survival rationality and economic rationality. This dynamic process and its decision-making mechanism are deeply influenced by individuals' social class, supporting the effectively maintained inequality theory. The conclusions offer important implications for refining graduate education policies and understanding the relationship between doctoral degree attainment and family background.
Keywords: Choices for pursuing a doctoral degree, Rational choice theory, qualitative research, humanities and social sciences academic master's students, Dynamic process
Received: 25 Jul 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 冯 and 钟. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: 勇 志 钟, zhongzhiyong@muc.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
