CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Assessment, Testing and Applied Measurement
This article is part of the Research TopicAI for Assessment, Testing and Applied MeasurementView all 5 articles
Artificial Intelligence for Educational Measurement: Where is the Value for Education?
Provisionally accepted- Cito (Netherlands), Arnhem, Netherlands
 
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are not intrinsically valuable to education, but rather lend their value from contributing to educational goals. However, when it comes to educational measurement, it is often unclear whether and how AI systems help us to achieve our goals. In this paper, we introduce a way of thinking that helps to clarify how the rules and structures governing educational assessments are impacted by AI systems. Based on a conceptual analysis of the literature, we outline three core elements that should be contemplated when integrating AI systems into assessment: the educational measurement context, the prioritization of different facets of assessment validity, and the social contract between student and teacher. We apply our way of thinking to analyze case studies of AI in item construction, assessing written work, and grading assistance. We show how requiring active reflection on educational aims can inform the realization that gains in subsidiary aims such as efficiency do not provide sufficient warrant for making the move towards AI. We hope that this new way of thinking can instigate critical reflection on what we value in education and how assessments can be designed to reflect those values.
Keywords: Educational Measurement, artificial intelligence, validity, social contract, educational assessment
Received: 31 Jul 2025; Accepted: 04 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 van Haastrecht, de Groot and Kruis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: 
Max  van Haastrecht, max.vanhaastrecht@cito.nl
Joost  Kruis, joost.kruis@cito.nl
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
