ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Integrating English Case-Based Discussions with International Literature Review: An Innovative Approach to Cultivating Clinical and Research Competencies in Medical Postgraduates
Provisionally accepted
- First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: The integration of clinical proficiency and research literacy remains a critical challenge in postgraduate medical education globally. Traditional teaching models often fail to bridge the gap between hands-on clinical training and scientific inquiry, particularly in skill-intensive areas such as electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation. In China, medical postgraduate programs, which combine residency training with academic research, face additional barriers, including limited exposure to international academic standards and insufficient English proficiency for accessing high-impact literature. To address these gaps, we implemented an innovative pedagogical model integrating English-language, case-based discussions derived from top-tier journals with collaborative research projects. This approach aimed to synchronize the development of clinical competency, research skills, and global academic engagement among medical postgraduates. Methods: A total of 98 clinical medical postgraduates rotating through the Cardiology Department of Jinzhou Medical University Affiliated First Hospital between 2021 and 2023 were included. All participants underwent a 4-month rotation. The educational intervention consisted of weekly ECG-based case discussions using clinical challenges published in high-impact international journals (e.g., JAMA Internal Medicine, Circulation). Sessions involved case analysis, student presentations, guided literature reviews, and academic writing exercises, supported by expert feedback. Outcomes were evaluated via theoretical examinations, a validated satisfaction and self-assessment questionnaire, and tracking of academic achievements. Results: The theoretical exam pass rate was 100%, with 79.6% of students scoring above 90 points (out of 100). Questionnaire results indicated that 98.0% of respondents were highly satisfied with the teaching model. All students reported improvements in self-directed learning and clinical problem-solving abilities, and 86.7% noted significant gains in research capabilities. Academically, participants published 24 papers, including two in SCI-indexed journals. Several students received awards such as the National Scholarship and Provincial Outstanding Graduate awards. Discussion: The integration of English-language case discussions with literature review appears to be an effective approach for simultaneously enhancing clinical and research competencies among medical postgraduates. This model offers a replicable strategy for fostering integrated clinical and academic skill development, though further multi-institutional validation is needed.
Keywords: Case-based teaching, Clinical competency, Medical english, professional degree postgraduates, Research capability
Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 29 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chang, Li, Xu, Liu, Fu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zhaolong Xu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.