REVIEW article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Language, Culture and Diversity
School Practices for Newly Arrived Migrant Students: A Systematic Review of Policy Enactment
Provisionally accepted- CIIE – Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences of the University of Porto (FPCEUP), Porto, Portugal, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The growing presence of newly arrived migrant students challenges schools to translate integration policies into everyday practice. While the Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX) tracks national frameworks, far less is known about how these policies are implemented at the local level. This systematic review examines how schools support newly arrived migrant students in grades 5 to 9. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost without temporal or geographical restrictions, identifying 35 peer-reviewed studies published between 2009 and 2023. Using an inductive, NVivo-assisted thematic synthesis and drawing on Ball et al.'s (2012) policy enactment framework, we identified four domains of school practice: (1) reception and family engagement, (2) concentration of migrant students in particular schools, (3) placement in mainstream versus separate classes, and (4) teachers' classroom practices. Findings indicate that schools act as key mediators that interpret and adapt national guidance to local realities, often innovating through welcoming protocols, intercultural events, and peer tutoring. However, enactment is constrained by limited resources, fragmented initiatives, insufficient teacher training, and unclear policy guidance. The review advances theory by bridging policy enactment with intercultural and critical education, conceptualizing integration as a relational, two-way process rather than a predefined end state. Policy and practice should prioritize targeted funding, sustained professional development in intercultural education, multilingual resources and mediators, and cross-sector partnerships. Because most available peer-reviewed research comes from European contexts, future studies are urgently needed in underrepresented regions—including Africa, Latin America, and Asia—as well as on curriculum adaptation strategies that address cultural and linguistic diversity and on longitudinal evidence examining academic achievement and well-being.
Keywords: inclusion, integration policies, Intercultural education, migrant education, policy enactment, Teacher professional development
Received: 31 Oct 2025; Accepted: 15 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ginicolo, Silva Dias and Neves. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tiago Neves
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.