ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. STEM Education
A Measure of College Student Trust in Their Instructor
Provisionally accepted- 1Yale University Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, New Haven, United States
- 2Indiana University of Pennsylvania Department of Language Literature and Writing, Indiana, United States
- 3Yale University, New Haven, United States
- 4Johns Hopkins University School of Education, Baltimore, United States
- 5Binghamton University, Binghamton, United States
- 6University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: In this study we aimed to develop a psychometrically validated instrument to measure college students' trust in their instructor. Recent studies have shown that student trust is positively associated with desired outcome variables like student buy-in, engagement, final grade, and intention to persist in science. Clearly defining and measuring college students' trust in their instructor can inform teaching strategies, enhance student performance, and create opportunities for more engaging classroom environments. Methods: We developed, collected, and validated a measure of student trust in their instructor. Results and Discussion: We established the Trust and Responsiveness in Undergraduate Student Teaching (TRUST) instrument, a 9-item, two factor model. Factor 1 is titled Classroom Trust and Factor 2 as Interpersonal Trust. This instrument contributes to the higher education community's ongoing efforts to increase student engagement and persistence.
Keywords: classroom trust, higher education, instrument validation measuring student trust, interpersonal relationships, relational trust, Student trust in instructor, Trust dimensions, undergraduate STEM education
Received: 27 Jun 2025; Accepted: 19 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Graham, Hanauer, Aragón, Zhang, Bennie, Gill, Zhang, Crowley, Reeves, Withers and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mark J Graham
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
