ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Perceptions, pedagogies, and challenges in critical thinking education. A faculty perspective
Provisionally accepted- 1Investigative Biology Teaching Laboratories, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
- 2Office of Curriculum Development and Instructional Support, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Critical thinking is an essential skill in higher education, vital for students' academic success and their ability to address complex, real-world problems in the era of AI and misinformation. This study employs both quantitative and qualitative methods to investigate how critical thinking is taught and assessed in undergraduate courses at a research university, with a focus on faculty perceptions and teaching practices in gateway and non-gateway courses. The authors developed and validated a survey to investigate faculty perceptions of teaching critical thinking, utilizing 14 critical thinking skills identified in the literature. Faculty survey responses reveal discrepancies between how critical thinking skills are included in learning outcomes and how they are taught, highlighting the importance of explicit critical thinking training, particularly in gateway courses. Gateway courses show noticeable gaps in students' perceived preparedness for critical thinking compared to non-gateway courses. The faculty employed many creative active learning techniques and group work to teach critical thinking. Non-graded activities were preferred to assess students' critical thinking skills. A qualitative survey with the faculty also identified barriers, including student and faculty attitudes, their abilities to learn and teach critical thinking effectively, and a lack of resources, including time and institutional support. The findings highlight the need for explicit but not time-consuming critical thinking instruction, particularly in gateway courses, to help students build a strong intellectual foundation, positioning undergraduates for academic success and preparation for their future careers.
Keywords: introductory gateway courses, Critical Thinking, Explicit teaching, Implicit teaching, learning outcomes, Barriers to teaching, hidden curriculum
Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 09 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Sarvary and Schmidt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mark Akos Sarvary
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.