Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND PEDAGOGY article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Higher Education

From Implicit to Explicit: Overcoming Common Barriers to Teaching Critical Thinking Through an Innovative Online Module

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ithaca, United States
  • 2Cornell University College of Arts and Sciences, Ithaca, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

In higher education, critical thinking is a fundamental skill vital for academic success and future career readiness. Despite its recognized importance and expectations for proficiency, many college graduates are perceived as inadequately prepared, largely due to the implicit nature of its instruction and common barriers instructors face, such as time constraints and lack of training and resources. This study addresses both the need for explicit critical thinking instruction and instructors' challenges by developing a discipline-independent online module for first-year students that can be readily integrated into existing courses. The module, piloted at Cornell University, helps students to both define critical thinking and recognize its importance, providing a foundational understanding that is applicable across disciplines. It includes reflective tasks, interactive scenarios, and videos to enhance students' understanding and identification of how, when, and why the process of thinking critically is used during academic and non-academic situations. Assessment through pre-and post-module surveys revealed significant improvements in students' confidence in identifying, recognizing, and utilizing critical thinking, especially among those with limited prior experience. These results demonstrate that an accessible, explicit approach to critical thinking instruction can effectively build students' foundational understanding and confidence, offering a scalable solution to address the persistent gaps in critical thinking development across higher education.

Keywords: Critical Thinking, Curriculum Design, Explicit instruction, higher education, Online Learning, student equity, Transferable skills

Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 13 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Schmidt, Sarvary, St. Juliana and Specht. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Christina M. Schmidt

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.