ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Digital Education
Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Transformative Assessment: Designing Teacher Literacy at the Crossroads of Ethics, Pedagogy, and Human Relationships
Provisionally accepted
- 1University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
- 2Universita Telematica Pegaso, Naples, Italy
- 3Universita degli Studi di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The rapid proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in educational settings necessitates a redefinition of assessment practices, raising crucial questions regarding the relationship between automation and pedagogical ethics. While AI offers opportunities for efficiency and personalization, there persists a risk of a technocratic drift that threatens the relational dimension of teaching. This study explores the perceptions of trainee teachers regarding the integration of AI in assessment, investigating the transformation of practices (RQ1) and the competencies required for an "AI-literate" teacher profile (RQ2). Adopting a convergent mixed-methods design, a survey was conducted on a sample of 662 teachers enrolled in qualifying courses (60 ECTS) at the University of Foggia and the University of Bergamo. Data collected via a CAWI survey were analyzed using Spearman's correlation and thematic analysis supported by text mining. The data reveal a "conscious resistance": despite possessing a good level of technical comfort, pedagogical trust in AI remains low (M=4.83/10). Inferential analysis highlights a training paradox: trust does not correlate with the technical training received (ρ=0.36), but rather with the perception of concrete support (ρ=0.57). Qualitatively, concerns regarding dehumanization and a demand for a principle of subsidiarity emerge. The study suggests that technical competence is insufficient for AI adoption. A Critical AI Literacy that integrates ethics and pedagogy is required, restoring decision-making control to the teacher to ensure fair and humanizing assessment.
Keywords: AI literacy3, Artificial Intelligence in Education1, Ethics5, Formative Assessment2, TeacherAgency4
Received: 18 Dec 2025; Accepted: 22 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Vinci, Agrati, Berardi and Beri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Viviana Vinci
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.