ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Assessment, Testing and Applied Measurement
Teaching Effectiveness in Agricultural Higher Education: Insights from PCA-Based Indexing and AHP Constraint Prioritization
SREENANDA S. ANAND 1
Girijesh Singh Mahra 2
Rabindra Nath Padaria 2
S R Bishnoi 2
MRINMOY RAY 2
Satyapriya . 2
SUBHASHREE SAHU 2
PRATIBHA JOSHI 2
MISHA MADHAVAN M 2
YOGESH B M 2
R R Burman 3
1. ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute Karnal, Karnal, India
2. ICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
3. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: Teaching effectiveness is a critical determinant of learning quality, skill development, and academic performance in agricultural higher education. However, empirically grounded assessments remain limited in Indian agricultural universities, where challenges related to pedagogy, student engagement, and institutional support persist. This study develops a multidimensional, statistically derived Teaching Effectiveness Index (TEI) to evaluate student-perceived teaching effectiveness across three premier agricultural institutions. Methods: Data were collected from 180 postgraduate students using a structured questionnaire comprising 75 sub-indicators across three dimensions: Pedagogical Proficiency, Learning Engagement, and Educational Environment Dynamics. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to derive empirical weights for constructing the TEI, and institutional differences were assessed through non-parametric tests. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied in parallel to identify and prioritize student-perceived constraints affecting teaching effectiveness. Results: The Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) achieved the highest TEI score (0.74), followed by GBPUAT and BHU (0.71 each). PCA indicated that innovative teaching strategies, technology integration, meaningful internships, and resource adequacy contributed most strongly to teaching effectiveness. AHP analysis ranked research-related constraints as the most critical barriers (priority weight = 0.267), followed by knowledge-development (0.229) and course-related constraints (0.206). Discussion: Prominent challenges included the non-provision of research funds, inadequate laboratory facilities, limited software-related guidance, and insufficient practical exposure. This study demonstrates the value of integrating PCA-based empirical weighting with AHP-based prioritization to produce a comprehensive, scalable framework for evaluating teaching effectiveness. The findings underscore the need for targeted reforms to enhance pedagogical innovation, strengthen research and digital infrastructure, and expand experiential learning opportunities in agricultural universities.
Summary
Keywords
Agricultural higher education, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Principalcomponent analysis (PCA), Student-perceived constraints, teaching effectiveness
Received
05 December 2025
Accepted
19 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 ANAND, Mahra, Padaria, Bishnoi, RAY, ., SAHU, JOSHI, MADHAVAN M, B M and Burman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: SREENANDA S. ANAND; Girijesh Singh Mahra; S R Bishnoi; Satyapriya .
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.