CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Leadership in Education
This article is part of the Research TopicHate Speech and Education in the Digital Age: Challenges, Practices, and Pathways for InclusionView all articles
Educating Language in the Digital Age: Critical Thinking and Media Literacy for the Prevention of Hate Speech
Provisionally accepted- University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The expansion of digital environments has intensified information flows and profoundly transformed social communication, generating educational challenges linked to discursive polarization, disinformation, and the proliferation of hate speech (sometimes referred to as hateful language). Although critical thinking and media literacy have become established as key competences for democratic digital citizenship, predominantly technical or instrumental approaches are insufficient to address the ethical and relational complexity of these phenomena. This article proposes an integrative theoretical framework that articulates critical thinking and media literacy on the basis of Alfonso López Quintás's theory of levels of reality. From an anthropological–relational reading of digital communication, hate speech is interpreted as a manifestation of impoverished ways of relating to language and to the other, characterized by the reduction of communicative experience to instrumental levels. Against this backdrop, education is framed as a process aimed at fostering a transition toward deeper levels of encounter, ethical discernment, and communicative responsibility. Using a theoretical–conceptual methodology, the article examines media literacy as a pathway for recovering the dialogical dimension of digital communication, and critical thinking as a competence oriented toward ethical judgment and the responsible evaluation of language. As a contribution, it offers a relational model that makes it possible to understand hate speech not only as a problem of content or informational veracity, but as a deterioration of communicative bonds and the recognition of the other. Finally, it derives implications for designing educational interventions focused on language, dialogue, and communicative responsibility, complementary to fact-checking and digital competence approaches.
Keywords: Alfonso López Quintás, Critical Thinking, Digital citizenship, Digital Education, Hate speech, Media literacy
Received: 22 Dec 2025; Accepted: 23 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Rivero González. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Juan Pedro Rivero González
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.