Abstract
Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) can convert chemical energy from the fuel directly to electrical energy with high efficiency and fuel flexibility. Ni-based cermets have been the most widely adopted anode for SOFCs. However, the conventional Ni-based anode has low tolerance to sulfur-contamination, is vulnerable to deactivation by carbon build-up (coking) from direct oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels, and suffers volume instability upon redox cycling. Among these limitations, the redox instability of the anode is particularly important and has been intensively studied since the SOFC anode may experience redox cycling during fuel cell operations even with the ideal pure hydrogen as the fuel. This review aims to highlight recent progresses on improving redox stability of the conventional Ni-based anode through microstructure optimization and exploration of alternative ceramic-based anode materials.
Introduction
Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are promising energy conversion devices. Elevated operating temperatures (typically in the range of 400–1000°C) of SOFCs promote electrochemical reactions at the electrodes, eliminating the need of precious metal catalysts. Furthermore, they are capable of operating on hydrocarbon fuels directly; they can function in electrolysis mode for energy storage with excellent reversibility; they are modular, scalable, and silent. These features make SOFCs ideal solution for a wide spectrum of power needs such as stationery power supplies, auxiliary power units, and portable power devices (Singhal, 2003; Huang and Goodenough, ).
Solid oxide fuel cells typically have three major components, a dense electrolyte sandwiched between two porous electrodes: anode and cathode. The conventional cell materials are yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) electrolyte, Ni–YSZ cermets anode, and strontium-doped lanthanum manganite (LSM) cathode, respectively (Zhu and Deevi, 2003b; Kharton et al., ; Sun and Stimming, 2007; Jiang, ). In order to minimize high ohmic loss from the YSZ electrolyte due to its limited oxide ion conductivity, thin electrolyte membranes are widely applied (de Souza et al., ). Given the consideration of mechanical strength of the cells, a supported structure is often required in these SOFCS with thin electrolyte membranes. Ni–YSZ cermet anode, consisting of a significant volume ratio of Ni metal phase to meet the requirement for electronic conductivity and an YSZ phase for ionic conduction, has excellent electrical conductivity, good mechanical strength, and excellent electrochemical activity in H2 and even hydrocarbon fuels. Furthermore, Ni–YSZ cermet anode is cost effective and easy to fabricate. Therefore, anode-supported cells are widely adopted. However, the Ni metal phase in conventional Ni–YSZ anodes causes several issues for SOFCs under practical conditions, such as carbon deposition in hydrocarbon fuels and poisoning by trace amount of impurities from the fuel such as sulfur-containing species (Oudar, ; Matsuzaki and Yasuda, ; Takeguchi et al., 2002; Haga et al., ,). One of the most important limitations for Ni-based cermet anode is the poor stability in redox cycling, primarily due to the large volume change and coarsening of the Ni-phase in the cermet anode (Klemensø et al., ; Klemenso and Mogensen, ; Sarantaridis and Atkinson, 2007; Monzon and Laguna-Bercero, ). Ni experiences 69.9% volume increase upon oxidation to NiO. Such large volume change of Ni-phase will produce considerable stress in the anode and electrolyte. When the porosity in the Ni–YSZ anode cannot accommodate the volume change, the rigid YSZ network can be broken and the whole cell may even fail. Additionally, such redox cycles can be expected while fuel cells are under long-term operation, mainly due to unexpected fuel supply interruption, high fuel utilization under high current load, or gas sealing failure. Although there have been several SOFC system solutions proposed for preventing such circumstances, they will add complexity and extra cost to the SOFC system, and the accidental operation failure is still a concern. Therefore, it is more desirable to avoid the potential cell failure by improving the redox stability of anodes.
The reduction and oxidation processes for Ni and the impact of redox cycling on mechanical properties, electrical conductivity, and electrochemical performance of Ni-cermet anodes have been intensively reviewed (Sarantaridis and Atkinson, 2007; Ettler et al., ; Faes et al., ). This review intends to highlight recent progresses on improving redox stability of SOFC anodes, including modifications to Ni/YSZ cermet anodes and overview of some newly proposed ceramic materials/ceramic composite materials as potential redox capable SOFC anodes.
Ni-Cermet Anodes
The impact of redox cycling on Ni-cermet anodes has been well investigated. Reduction was found to have no significant dimensional influence on NiO/YSZ bulk ceramic, indicating the supporting role of the YSZ network (Fouquet et al., ). The mechanical strength of NiO (56 wt%)/YSZ substrate was measured by Grahl-Madsen et al. () via the four points bending tests. The mean modulus of rupture only dropped slightly from 20.3 to 17.5 MPa, suggesting that the strength of the reduced cermet relies on the sintered YSZ network. However, the electrical conductivity was significantly affected by the reduction temperature (Grahl-Madsen et al., ). An almost linear relationship between the electrical conductivity and reduction temperature was reported. Higher conductivity was obtained after the substrates were reduced at higher temperature, but the low conductivity of the substrates reduced at lower temperature could not be improved significantly by additional treatment at higher temperature. This may be attributed to simultaneous reduction and sintering of Ni (Sarantaridis and Atkinson, 2007). On the other hand, significant volume increase after re-oxidation was observed by Cassidy et al. () compared to the initial state. The authors explained that the large volume change upon re-oxidation followed by the simultaneous reduction and sintering for Ni might exceed the accommodation provided by the porosity. Based on modeling study, Klemensø et al. () suggested that the reorganization of the Ni/NiO phase during reduction and re-oxidation account for the redox instability of the anode and that the oxide growth cause damage to the YSZ network. The redox impact on microstructure of a Ni/YSZ anode-supported cell has been intuitively demonstrated by a sequence of SEM images which focus on exactly the same location during redox cycling by Malzbender and Steinbrech (). Figure 1A shows the initial dense NiO particles in the anode after sintering. Upon reduction, the Ni particles shrank evidently and the porous anode was generated as shown in Figure 1B. However, the microstructure of NiO cannot be restored after re-oxidation. Figure 1C shows that sponge-like NiO particles were formed during re-oxidation, consistent with the outward growth nature of NiO on Ni (Atkinson, ; Sarantaridis and Atkinson, 2007). The volume of the porous NiO after re-oxidation was evidently larger than that in the initial state, which caused micro cracks in the anode and even the fracture in the electrolyte. When the anode was reduced again, dense NiO particles were formed as shown in Figure 1D, but the particle size became larger and the structure became coarser comparing with that shown in Figure 1B. Additional oxidation aggravated the microstructure changes that the electrolyte crack opened larger and the NiO particles appeared to be even more fragmented (Figure 1E). However, additional reduction did not cause further deteriorative changes in the microstructure of the anode as shown in Figure 1F, in which the anode microstructure after another reduction with an additional holding time of 100 h looked similar to the re-reduced case (Figure 1D).
Figure 1
Since the cracks in the electrolyte are caused by volume expansion of the Ni–YSZ anode support, there seems to be a critical expansion limit for the support to prevent electrolyte failure. It has been established by mechanical modeling that anode-supported SOFCs can withstand about 0.1–0.2% expansion of the supporting composite during redox cycling without cracking (Laurencin et al., ; Pihlatie et al., ). For electrolyte-supported cell configuration, an oxidation strain of 0.5% for a 10 μm-thick anode layer can be tolerated (Thouless, 1991). With this target, several solutions have been proposed for improving redox tolerance of Ni/YSZ supported cells.
Microstructural optimization
The redox behavior of Ni-cermet anode seems to be affected significantly by the microstructure of Ni/YSZ and improvements can be made through optimization in the Ni/YSZ microstructure and composition (Wood et al., 2006). Itoh et al. () investigated the impact of the particle distribution of YSZ powders on microstructural stability of Ni/YSZ anodes. Coarse (~27.0 μm) and fine (~0.6 μm) YSZ powders were mixed to fabricate Ni/YSZ anodes. Comparing to uniform-sized YSZ in conventional Ni/YSZ anodes, no significant dimension and microstructure changes of the new anodes were detected during sintering in air and reduction in a reducing atmosphere, which was attributed to the optimized microstructure of YSZ frame. They also found that good long-term stability cannot be achieved by making the anode with the coarse YSZ particles alone, and additional fine YSZ particles could help achieve more stable anodes without substantial decrease in electrical conductivity and change in anode microstructure. The function of the coarse YSZ particles is to form a porous and loose frame work, which allows Ni agglomeration to form sufficient electronic conducting path, and the fine YSZ particles function as inhibitor to prevent Ni agglomeration and form connections between coarse YSZ particles. The conductivity of the Ni-cermets anode has been found to depend not only on the Ni content but also on the particle size of YSZ and the mixture ratio between the coarse and the fine YSZ.
Fouquet et al. () studied the influence of NiO and YSZ particle sizes and sintering temperatures on dimensional changes of NiO/YSZ bulk ceramics and found that smaller size of initial NiO particles and lower sintering temperature were beneficial for improving redox stability. The particle size distribution of NiO was found to be a very effective factor. Lower length expansion of the bar samples was observed with finer NiO particles. The benefit from lower sintering temperatures was attributed to the less rigid YSZ network and higher porosity to better compensate volume changes of Ni upon redox cycling.
Kim et al. () investigated thermal/redox cycling stability of NiO/YSZ composite powder composed of nano-sized NiO crystallized (20–30 nm, 40 wt%) on YSZ powder (0.3 and 10 μm, 60 wt%) prepared by decomposition of aqueous Ni-based solution. The anode made from NiO/YSZ composite powder, which had a high homogeneity and plenty of contact sites between Ni and YSZ, exhibited an excellent tolerance against thermal and redox cycling. The electrical conductivity decreased by 10% from 1450 to 1250 S cm−1 over 20 redox cycles at 800°C, while the conductivity for the conventional NiO–YSZ mixing powder decreased by 47% from 1200 to 600 S cm−1 (Figure 2). They concluded that the functional NiO/YSZ composite powder would suppress the degradation of anodes and enhance the long-term redox stability of the cells at elevated temperatures.
Figure 2
Waldbillig et al. (2005) found that anode samples with coarse microstructure experienced no volume change or cracking upon redox cycling. Fine structured anode samples did not change in volume after reduction, but expanded between 0.9 and 2.5% after oxidation. The samples were significantly cracked after oxidation. The amount of expansion and cracking could be reduced by lowering the Ni content of the anode (Ettler et al., ). However, the Ni content in the substrate must be sufficient to meet the requirement for electronic conductivity. Waldbillig et al. fabricated graded anode functional layer to gradually decrease the Ni content near the electrolyte membrane (Figure 3A). The redox tolerance of the cells was evidently improved when the Ni content was lowered. They also added an oxidation barrier layer with finer microstructure to the bottom of the cell to restrict the oxygen flowing into the anode (Figure 3B). Both types of microstructural modification effectively improved the cell redox tolerance compared with standard baseline redox tests (Waldbillig et al., 2007). Although the cell tolerance to a certain depth of oxidation was enhanced, the stability of the cells in multiple redox cycles may be problematic for these solutions.
Figure 3
By performing dilatometric measurements, Pihlatie et al. () found that highly porous samples were most stable in redox cycling. The cumulative redox strain, dL/L0, increased significantly when the as-sintered porosity decreased from 34 to 9% as shown in Figure 4. The most stable cermets showed a maximum cumulative redox strain not exceeding 0.1% during three redox cycles at 850°C. Electrochemical testing on Ni–Sc YSZ symmetrical cells showed that isothermal redox cycling at 850°C did not significantly alter the electrode performance and improvement in the electrochemical performance of the anode on low temperature redox cycling was observed. Such improvement was attributed to small Ni grains and an undamaged ceramic structure observed in the sample redox-cycled at lower temperature.
Figure 4
Ni-infiltrated YSZ anodes
The investigations on microstructural modifications for Ni-based cermet suggest that better redox stability can be achieved with a robust YSZ network, which can tolerate the expansion of Ni during oxidation to form fine NiO particles (Fouquet et al., ). The conventional Ni-based cermet anodes have to go through high-temperature sintering process which inevitably coarsens NiO particles. Infiltration is considered an efficient method to achieve this desired microstructure. To apply this fabrication technique, porous YSZ substrates are usually pre-sintered at high temperatures to form rigid networks. Aqueous Ni-based salt solution is subsequently infiltrated into the porous YSZ substrates and then treated at a relatively low temperature to form NiO. Nano-sized Ni particles coated on porous YSZ substrates can be obtained through such low temperature decomposition and in situ reduction. Additionally, compared with the conventional cermet anodes, a less amount of NiO is required for the infiltrated anode to meet the electronic conductivity requirement (the Ni percolation threshold of 30 vol%), since Ni network can be efficiently formed by nano-sized particles on YSZ surface. Reducing Ni content may mitigate the redox issues for Ni-based cermets. Based on these advantages, Ni-infiltrated YSZ cermets were considered as a possible solution for the redox problem.
Busawon et al. () investigated Ni infiltration into porous YSZ structures as a possible solution to the redox degradation of Ni-based SOFC anodes and anode supports. The cermets containing 12–16 wt% Ni prepared by infiltration exhibited conductivity above 300 S cm-1 at room temperature. Its conductivity dropped by 20% after one redox cycle, but it was not accompanied by bulk dimensional changes. The dimensional stability was also attributed to the microstructure of the infiltrated anode.
Recently, redox stable SOFCs with Ni–YSZ cermet anodes (30 vol% NiO) prepared by infiltration method were reported by Buyukaksoy et al. (). They infiltrated polymeric NiO precursor into a porous YSZ layer (~10 μm thick) pre-sintered on a 170 μm-thick electrolyte supporting membrane. A Ni–YSZ cermet consisted of porous YSZ coated by nano-sized Ni particles was obtained. Furthermore, benefited from the low-temperature processing, internal stress between the Ni/NiO and the YSZ substrate was low during the redox cycling. The power density of the SOFCs degraded less than 1% after 15 cycles as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5
The Ni-cermet anodes prepared by infiltration methods exhibit enhanced redox stability, but the long-term stability of small Ni particles at SOFC operation temperatures is questionable since coarsening of Ni particles may cause degradation in cell performance and in turn weaken redox tolerance. Some low surface energy oxides such as MgO, TiO2, Mn3O4, and Cr2O3 were added to the anode cermet to suppress Ni coarsening (Tsoga et al., 1996; Zhu and Deevi, 2003b). These additives were expected to retard the coarsening of Ni particles during the high-temperature operation of cells, improve the mechanical properties of anode by assisting in the sintering of YSZ, and enhance the wettability of Ni particles by acting as anchoring sites at the anode/electrolyte interface. Tikekar et al. (2006) further investigated reduction and re-oxidation kinetics of Ni–YSZ cermet with and without small amount of oxide additives (4 mol% of CaO, MgO, and TiO2) and found that the oxide additives were effective to suppress the kinetics of both reduction and re-oxidation, although by different mechanisms, thereby improving redox tolerance of Ni-cermet anodes.
Although the infiltration method has been demonstrated as an effective way to improve redox stability of Ni-cermet anodes, implementation of this method in large-scale cell production is still problematic, since it typically requires special care to ensure that infiltration solutions go into the anode substrate pores without flooding and the process often needs to be repeated several times to obtain proper Ni loading. In general, it is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly for applications. Additionally, the redox issues resulting from the Ni-phase is still unresolved. Therefore, substitutions for Ni are widely investigated as an alternative way to solve the redox issues for SOFCs.
Ceramic Anodes
The Ni-phase in Ni-based cermets functions as the electronic conducting phase in the SOFC anode and the substitution materials must meet the requirement for electronic conductivity at the operation conditions. They also should have good chemical compatibility with other components used in SOFCs. Alternative transition metals, such as Cu, Ni–Cu, and Ni–Fe, have been considered and some of them have demonstrated better coking resistance than Ni-cermets (Gorte et al., ; Kim et al., ; Ishihara et al., ). However, the redox issue still remains for these metals since they can also be easily oxidized under the typical SOFC operating conditions. Considering the tolerance to oxidation, precious metals should be a good choice. However, they are far more expensive for practical use, especially when significant quantities are needed to meet the electronic conductivity requirement. Some ceramic materials which are stable in a wide range of oxygen partial pressures under SOFC operating conditions may have much smaller volume change, arising from oxygen non-stoichiometry, during redox cycling when compared with the transition metals. They also have considerably lower cost than precious metals. Therefore, electronic conducting ceramic materials have drawn great research interests as alternative SOFC anodes.
As potential SOFC anode materials, suitable ceramic candidates need to meet the following requirements (Goodenough and Huang, ; Fu and Tietz, ; Ruiz-Morales et al., 2011). (1) Electronic conductivity. It is suggested that the electronic conductivity should be above 1 S cm−1 for the functional anode materials. (2) Electrocatalytic activity. Fuels should be well electrochemically oxidized on the materials. (3) Stability. They must be chemically compatible with other contacted components, including electrolytes and current collectors under fabrication and operating conditions. Their electrochemical properties should not degrade upon operation time due to reactions with fuels. (4) Thermal compatibility. The thermal expansion of the materials should match other contacted components to insure good contact during thermal cycling. Many ceramic materials with different structures, including perovskite, fluorite, pyrochlore, and tungsten bronze, have been studied as SOFC anode candidates (Sun and Stimming, 2007). Among them, the ABO3 perovskite-type materials exhibit good stability at high temperatures and tunable properties by adjusting the types and amount of the cations. A lot of perovskite ceramic materials have been studied as anode candidates and some of them have demonstrated promising redox stability.
Chromites
LaCrO3-based perovskite materials are stable and conductive in both reducing and oxidizing atmospheres. They are widely used as interconnect materials and have also been demonstrated as anode candidates (Tao and Irvine, 2003; Zhu and Deevi, 2003a). Since LaCrO3 is a p-type conductor, divalent cations such as Sr2+, Ca2+, Ni2+, and Mg2+ are often doped into its A or B sites, according to their radii, to enhance its electrical conductivity (Primdahl et al., ; Ruiz-Morales et al., ). Tao et al. investigated (La,Sr)CrO3 with Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu as B-site dopants, which accept lower coordination numbers and may enhance oxide ion migration. They increased doping ratio to 50%, expecting to increase oxide ionic conductivity by forming a percolation passage for oxide ions (Tao and Irvine, 2003). Due to the structural instability of Fe-, Co-, Ni-, and Cu-doped ones under anode conditions, only La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3 turned out to be a promising redox stable electrode candidate. Its electrical conductivity reached 38 S cm−1 in air and 3 S cm−1 in wet H2 at 900oC. In wet H2, a relatively low polarization resistance of 0.2 Ω cm−2 was also observed for this material. Compared with other LaCrO3-based materials, the enhanced performance for La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3 was attributed to the potentially enhanced mixed ionic and electronic conduction. Although oxide ionic conductivity is not required for the ceramic anode materials, it is known that the catalytic reaction in the anode can be promoted by extending active sites from three phase boundaries to the anode bulk (Zhang et al., 2013).
Symmetrical SOFC performance and redox stability of La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3 electrodes have been studied by Bastidas et al. (). The polarization resistance of La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3 electrode was measured on YSZ electrolyte membranes using three-electrode half-cell technique at 900°C. The cells were stabilized sequentially in humidified hydrogen, reformate, and then humidified oxygen for 30–60 min in each atmosphere and for four cycles. The polarization resistance exhibited slight degradation after the first cycle, but then became stabilized, indicating remarkable redox stability of La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3. The symmetrical cell with La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3–YSZ (70:30 wt%) as both anode and cathode on a 200 μm-thick YSZ electrolyte exhibited maximum power densities of 300 mW cm−2 in wet H2 and 230 mW cm−2 in wet CH4. Such cells were also demonstrated to function in electrolyzer mode. In order to further improve electrocatalytic activity, La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3–YSZ–GDC composite electrodes were also investigated in anode and cathode conditions (Ruiz-Morales et al., 2007b). It was found that the anode polarization resistance could be optimized by introducing a certain amount of GDC. The symmetrical SOFCs with an 180 μm-thick YSZ electrolyte achieved a maximum power density of 0.4 W cm−2 in H2 at 950°C. Microstructure optimization has also been applied to La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3-based electrodes by using poly (methyl methacrylate) PMMA microspheres as template. The peak power density of symmetrical cell with La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3–YSZ electrodes was improved to 0.5 and 0.3 W cm−2 in H2 and CH4, respectively at 950°C (Ruiz-Morales et al., ).
Y0.8Ca0.2Cr0.8Co0.2O3–SDC composite has been reported by Yoon et al. (2011) recently as a high performance redox stable ceramic anode for SOFC. The anode in YSZ electrolyte-supported cells exhibited comparable performance in H2 as the Ni/YSZ anode and showed good sulfur tolerance. The linear expansion of Y0.8Ca0.2Cr0.8Co0.2O3 was less than 0.08% at 800°C when changing from 0.21 to 4.5 × 10−19 atm and no performance degradation for the cell with Y0.8Ca0.2Cr0.8Co0.2O3–SDC anode was observed after four redox cycles.
Titanates
Another interesting perovskite family is SrTiO3-based materials. Reduced donor-doped SrTiO3 can exhibit very high electrical conductivity which is close to or above 100 S cm−1 at 800°C in reducing atmosphere (Moos and Hardtl, ). Due to the suppressed oxygen vacancies and slow Sr diffusivity, the defect equilibration of donor-doped SrTiO3 materials under different oxygen partial pressures is quite slow, resulting in a strong dependence of electrical conductivity on material treatment history. Without equilibration in low at high temperature for a sufficiently long time, the electrical conductivity is often quite low (Kolodiazhnyi and Petric, ). However, such slow process of equilibration improves tolerance to redox cycling that the high electrical conductivity can be restored after a short period of exposure to air. Consequently, this feature makes the donor-doped SrTiO3 materials potential redox stable anode candidates for SOFCs.
Hui and Petric () reported rapid changes in conductivity of Sr0.88Y0.08TiO3 (sintered in 7% H2 at 1400°C) after a sudden oxygen partial pressure change at 800°C from 7% H2 to air or vice versa. The changes reached a plateau after some time indicating that the processes were diffusion-controlled and the surface reaction at 800°C for both oxidation and reduction was fast for this material. The electrical conductivity was found reversible on oxidation and reduction, but the reduction took much longer time, indicating that the incorporation of oxygen into lattice is much easier than the release of oxygen from the lattice. Fu et al. reported that the electrical conductivity change of a porous Sr0.93Y0.07TiO3 sample (sintered in 4% H2/Ar at 1300°C for 10 h and then annealed in Ar at 1100°C for 3 h to simulate the cathode sintering condition, porosity 15%) in five redox cycles at 800°C (Fu and Tietz, ). Only slow degradations were observed. Considering the short recovery time in reducing atmospheres, this material showed good redox tolerance. Recently, Burnat et al. () performed the redox cycling of La0.2Sr0.704TiO3 at 800°C over a period of 120 h as shown in Figure 6. Similar behaviors were found after exposing the anode to oxidizing atmosphere for 30 min. One hundred percent of the initial conductivity was restored after 12.5 h retreatment in reducing atmosphere. This recovery process of conductivity was found fully reproducible under the given experimental conditions. After six cycles, the initial conductivity could still be recovered. Redox stability of SrNb0.01Ti0.99O3–YSZ composite was also reported by Gross et al. (). After two redox cycles at 700 and 800°C, the conductivity of the porous samples was almost recovered in a short period of time. Interestingly, also due to the slow equilibration in different , the conductivity of dense Nb-doped SrTiO3 was found almost independent of the oxygen partial pressure at 500–800°C (Hashimoto et al., ). Similar tolerance to oxidation was also reported for dense (La0.3Sr0.7)0.93TiO3 sintered in reducing atmosphere by Li et al. (). The reason for such different conductivity change on oxidation is not clear, but it may be ascribed to the difference in the samples, such as composition, phase purity, pretreating history, and density.
Figure 6
Another criterion for redox-stable electrode materials is that their thermal expansion behavior must match electrolyte materials. The thermal expansion coefficients (TECs) for SrTiO3-based materials in reducing atmospheres were reported to be 11.8 × 10-6 K-1 for Sr0.7La0.3TiO3 (25–1000°C) (Hashimoto et al., ), 12.4 × 10-6 K-1 for Sr0.93Y0.07TiO3 (30–800°C) (Fu and Tietz, ), and 12.1 × 10−6 K−1 for Sr0.94Ti0.9Nb0.1O3 (100–920°C) (Blennow et al., ) which are close to those for the typical electrolyte materials (Kharton et al., ). The linear expansion of these materials was also studied in redox cycling. The chemical expansion on oxidation for Sr0.7La0.3TiO3 was about dL/L0 = 0.51% at 1000°C while a reversible value of 0.14% was reported for Sr0.93Y0.07TiO3 at 830°C. The values could be further lowered by forming ceramic composite with electrolyte materials (Kharton et al., ). As shown in Figure 7 below, the Sr0.93Y0.07TiO3–YSZ composite (65:35 vol%) only exhibited about 0.045% linear dimension change upon redox cycling at 820°C (Fu et al., ). These properties indicate that the overall redox stability of the donor-doped SrTiO3 materials is very good.
Figure 7
Blennow et al. () reported the polarization resistance of the composite electrode Sr0.94Ti0.9Nb0.1O3–YSZ (54:46 vol%) measured in a symmetrical cell configuration for 19 redox cycles at 850°C as shown in Figure 8. One redox cycle involved exposing anode in oxidizing atmospheres for 0.5–2.5 h and maintaining in wet H2 for 13 h after switching the gas. The polarization resistance increased dramatically from the initial value of 16.3–29 Ω cm2 after two redox cycles. The increased polarization resistance could be attributed to the fast oxidation and slow reduction of the titanates given that the sample was initially reduced at 980°C and the reduction during redox cycling was only at 850°C. It was noted that the polarization resistance only increased by 12% after the 19th redox cycle compared with the value after the second one. Although lower polarization resistance could be expected when testing in single cells, the value for the Sr0.94Ti0.9Nb0.1O3–YSZ electrode is still quite large for SOFC anodes compared with Ni–YSZ cermets, implying low electrocatalytic activity for this material.
Figure 8
Double perovskites
Double perovskite Sr2MgMoO6 has been investigated as an SOFC anode candidate by Huang et al. (). The electronic conductivity and catalytic activity of this material rely on the Mo6+/Mo5+ redox couple and can be improved by replacing Mg with other mixed-valent cations. Sr2FeMoO6 exhibited much higher electrical conductivity in reducing atmosphere (about 220 versus 9 S cm−1 for Sr2MgMoO6), which is attributed to the overlap of Fe 3d, Mo 4d, and O 2p bands at Fermi level and delocalized electrons from Mo 4d band (Itoh et al., ; Kobayashi et al., ; Zhang et al., 2010). Zhang et al. measured anode performance of Sr2FeMoO6 on LSGM electrolyte with SmBaCo2O5+x cathode, which yielded a peak power density of 584 mW cm−2 at 800°C in dry H2. One concern about Sr2FeMoO6 as an SOFC anode candidate is its narrow stable range at different oxygen partial pressures. The composition is not stable in oxidizing atmospheres at high temperatures due to that the total charge of the cations cannot be balanced by the oxygen cations in the perovskite structure. Therefore, high-temperature treatment of the anodes must be done in protective atmospheres. Additionally, even at low , the oxide ionic conductivity of Sr2FeMoO6 may be low due to lack of oxygen vacancies, which limits the replenishment of O2− ions to the anode surface and eventually causes anode surface decomposition and performance degradation (Goodenough and Huang, ). Therefore, improvements are needed to make this material more feasible.
Recently, Liu et al. found that the phase stability of Sr2Fe1+xMoxO6 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) at high oxygen partial pressures can be gradually improved when lowering the Mo content and Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6 was found stable in both anode and cathode conditions (Liu et al., ; Xiao et al., 2010). Furthermore, Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6 exhibited good chemical compatibility with LSGM, SDC, and BZCY electrolyte materials up to 1400°C. Its electrical conductivity at 800°C was measured to be about 20 S cm−1 in air and 13 S cm−1 in wet H2, indicating potential applications as both cathodes and anodes for SOFCs (Xiao et al., 2012a,b).
By lowering the Mo content of Sr2Fe1+xMoxO6 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1), some intrinsic oxygen vacancies were also introduced into the materials. According to neutron powder diffraction refinement results, the non-stoichiometry number δ was 0.10(2) for the as-synthesized Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6–δ, revealing the presence of oxygen vacancies (Muñoz-García et al., ). Similar result was predicted by Muñoz-García et al. with DFT + U theory (Mun oz-García et al., ; Muñoz-García et al., ). Based on first principle calculations, they found oxygen vacancies preferentially formed along Fe–O–Fe bonds rather than along Mo–O–Fe and Mo–O–Mo bonds, and Fe–O bond in Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6 was relatively weak, indicating that high oxide ionic conductivity can be expected for this material. By fabricating a thin layer of LSGM electrolyte on the sample as electronic blocking layer, the oxide ionic conductivity of Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6 was measured by Xiao et al. (2011a). The value reached 0.13 S cm−1 at 800°C in air, which is comparable to those for SrCoO3-based cathode materials. The chemical diffusion coefficient and surface exchange constant were also measured for Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6, which are comparable to those of the state-of-art cathode materials. Zhang et al. found that its surface exchange kinetics can be further enhanced by surface modification with ceria-based materials. The polarization resistance was 0.076 Ω cm2 and the exchange current density was 0.186 A cm−2 at 800°C measured on LSGM electrolytes, showing good cathode activity of Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6.
Liu et al. tested symmetrical fuel cells with Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6 as both anode and cathode on LSGM electrolyte (Liu et al., , ). The peak power density reached above 500 mW cm−2 at 800°C with H2 as the fuel, which is much higher than those symmetrical fuel cells with LaCrO3-based electrode materials. As shown in Figure 10, the symmetrical cells exhibited good redox stability that the peak power density remained stable after five redox cycles at 800°C. This feature allows the anode and cathode of symmetrical fuel cells with Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6 electrodes to function reversely by switching the gases, making it possible to in situ regenerate the cell performance from the contaminated anode. The feasibility of regenerating cell performance using Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6 anode upon redox cycling was demonstrated by exposing the anode in air at 800°C after operating in sulfur or hydrocarbon-containing fuels. As shown in Figure 9, the peak power density of the symmetrical cells was efficiently recovered after redox cycling. Due to the excellent stability and activity of Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6, the symmetrical cell was also demonstrated as an efficient solid oxide electrolysis cell by Liu et al. (). The cell was operated at 1.2 V at 850°C under highly humidified condition for about 100 h. Only slight performance drop was observed in the initial 10 h test and the current became stable in the following 90 h operation.
Figure 9
Sr2CoMoO6 and Sr2NiMoO6 were also studied as SOFC anode materials and they showed remarkably high power density in H2 and CH4 (Huang et al., ; Wei et al., 2012). Similar to Sr2MgMoO6 and Sr2FeMoO6, high cation charge in these materials makes the phase stability questionable and the oxygen ionic conductivity potentially low at high oxygen partial pressures. Wei et al. (2012) lowered Mo content up to 20% in Sr2CoMoO6 and evaluated the materials as electrode candidates for symmetrical fuel cells. It is interesting that these Sr2Co1+xMo1−xO6 (x = 0.1, 0.15, 0.2) materials exhibited much lower TEC than other Co-based perovskites (6–15 × 10−6 versus 20–30 × 10−6 K−1). Symmetrical cells with Sr2Co1.15Mo0.85O6 as both anode and cathode exhibited a peak power density of 460 mW cm−2 at 800°C, indicating its potential applications as redox stable electrodes.
Ceramic Anodes with Promoted Catalytic Activity
Ceramic anode materials may exhibit better stability than conventional Ni-based cermet materials but their overall cell performance is still relatively low. The ceramic anode performance is limited by the electrical conductivity and catalytic activity of the materials. In some cases, the cell performance can be improved dramatically by introducing a small amount of precious metal catalysts, indicating the catalytic activity may be a dominant restraint (Kim et al., ; Gross et al., ; Zhu et al., 2009; Bi and Zhu, ; Smith and Gross, 2011; Xiao and Chen, 2011; Xiao et al., 2012c, 2014).
One strategy for promoting anode reactions on ceramic anode materials is to increase the number of reaction sites. Infiltration methods can be applied to extend three phase boundaries by forming nano-sized ceramic anode phases on porous electrolyte framework (Zhang and Xia, 2010; Zhang et al., 2013). As aforementioned, this method can mitigate the expansion mismatch between ceramic materials and electrolytes, potentially improving redox stability of the ceramic anodes. Fuel oxidation on ceramic materials may also be facilitated by enhancement of their oxide ionic conductivity (Fu et al., ; Ruiz-Morales et al., ; Canales-Vázquez et al., ; Li et al., ,, , ). This has been quite effective for donor-doped SrTiO3 and may also promote equilibration of SrTiO3 materials under different oxygen partial pressures (Neagu and Irvine, ; Suthirakun et al., 2011, 2012, 2014; Xiao et al., 2011b, 2013). Moreover, some catalysts can be directly introduced to the ceramic anodes for improving the overall anode performance. Additionally, because of the mixed conducting nature of the ceramic materials, the catalyst particles can be highly dispersed and stabilized by the ceramic phase without compromising stability (Zhu et al., 2009; Xiao and Chen, 2011; Xiao et al., 2012c).
Ma et al. () reported high performance and redox stable planar single cells with dimensions of 50 mm × 50 mm. The cells were fabricated on a Sr0.895Y0.07TiO3 anode support and a (Sr0.89Y0.07)0.91TiO2.91–YSZ (2:1 in volume) anode active layer, both infiltrated with 3 wt% NiO. A power density of 0.85 W cm−2 was achieved for the cells at 0.7 V at 800°C with H2 as the fuel. As shown in Figure 10, at 700°C the cells were subject to redox cycling by exposing the anode in H2 for 10 min and in air for another 10 min in a typical cycle for 200 cycles. The OCV only decreased by 1.3% and the performance of the cell decreased by 35%. It was noted that cell performance almost reached stability after 100 cycles. The degradation was attributed to the slow redox kinetics of Sr0.895Y0.07TiO3 that the electrical conductivity cannot fully recover in such a short time in H2. By prolonging the reducing time to 2 h, no evident degradation was observed for 50 redox cycles at 800°C. The good redox stability of the cells in such scale shows very promising prospect for commercial application.
Figure 10
Although ceramic anodes with infiltrated catalysts exhibit promising stability and high performance, alternative approaches to obtain such catalysts modified ceramic anodes are needed due to the limitations of the infiltration method mentioned previously. Recently, in situ formation of metal catalysts on ceramic materials has been considered as an attractive way. When multi-valent transition metals were introduced to the B site of LaCrO3-based materials to improve their catalytic activity, Ni-doping was found more effective (Sfeir et al., 2001). Such catalytic improvement was found to arise from Ni precipitation in fuel conditions (Sauvet and Irvine, 2004). Madsen et al. () observed Ru nano particles (≤5 nm) formed on La0.8Sr0.2Cr0.82Ru0.18O3 surfaces after exposure to hydrogen at 800°C. Over 50 h initial reduction, the formed catalysts improved peak power density of the cell from 200 to 400 mW cm−2. Similar observation was reported by Kobsiriphat et al. () in La0.8Sr0.2Cr1−xNixO3. Larger Ni particles (>10 nm) were found extracted from the material upon reduction and agglomeration of the catalyst particles was also found to cause performance degradation over 300 h operation. In the similar material system, Bierschenk found that such performance degradation for Pd-doped anode materials can be regenerated upon redox cycling and the process of metal particle precipitation was reversible (Bierschenk et al., ). Another material NbTi0.5M0.5O4 which can generate metal particles after reduction was reported by Boulfrad et al. () and Li et al. (). Compared with the infiltration approach, such method for generating metal modified ceramic anode is much simpler and the distribution of catalyst particles may be more homogeneous. Considering the possible interaction between these nano-sized particles and mixed ionic and electronic conducting substrates as well as reversible generation process, enhanced performance and good redox stability of these materials can be expected.
Yang et al. (2012) found that nano-sized Co–Fe alloy particles supported on a ceramic matrix can be achieved by exposing Pr0.4Sr0.6Co0.2Fe0.7Nb0.1O3 to a reducing environment at 900°C and such phase transition can be reversed by treating the composite in air at the same temperature as shown in Figure 11. When the material was applied in LSGM electrolyte-supported cells as both electrodes, the anode side turned into a composite electrode with nano-sized Co–Fe alloy particles supported on a Ruddlesden–Popper phase upon in situ reduction. The cell achieved a maximum power density of 0.96 W cm−2 at 850°C in H2 and the values were still 0.92 and 0.89 W cm-2 at 850°C in H2 containing 50 and 100 ppm H2S, respectively. Remarkably, the cell also showed relatively high maximum power density of 0.6 W cm-2 in CH4 and 0.94 W cm-2 in C3H8 at 850°C. In contrast to the low performance of the cell with only the Ruddlesden–Popper phase as the anode, the dramatically improved performance was attributed to the alloy catalysts generated during reduction. Benefiting from formation of alloy and good stability of the ceramic substrates, the cell performance was quite stable in both H2S-containing fuels and hydrocarbon fuels for hundreds of hours. The maximum power density remained stable during a total of 26 cyclic testing, indicating excellent redox-reversibility of the anode material.
Figure 11
Recently, a strategy to manipulate perovskite ceramic materials to precipitate catalytic particles by introducing A-site deficiency was demonstrated in La(Sr)TiO3-based materials (Figure 12) (Neagu et al., ) and Sr–Fe–Mo–O-based materials (Xiao et al., 2014) possibly applicable to other material systems. Xiao et al. investigated the anode performance of Sr1.9Fe1.4Ni0.1Mo0.5O6–SDC on LSGM electrolyte with LSCF as the cathode. Besides the improvement in cell performance, good redox stability of the composite anode was also demonstrated. As shown in Figure 13, the cell performance was not sensitive to the exposing time in air in contrast to that reported for the cells with SrTiO3-based materials (Ma et al., ) suggesting that the ceramic phase may have an important role in determining the stability of the modified ceramic anode materials. The impacts of the catalysts precipitation during reduction on properties of the ceramic substrate phase are not clear and may require further systematic studies in the future.
Figure 12
Figure 13
Conclusion
Aiming at implementation of SOFCs under practical conditions, the instability issue for conventional Ni-cermet-based anodes in redox cycling has been intensively studied. The cell performance degradation can be attributed to the dramatically volume change of the Ni-phase, specifically during oxidation at high temperatures. Recent research work has demonstrated that the redox instability issues for Ni-cermet anode can be effectively mitigated by carefully tailoring the microstructure of the composites, including decreasing the initial Ni particle size, enhancing mechanical strength of the ceramic frame, and increasing anode porosity. By using infiltration method, the electrical conductivity and electrochemical performance of Ni-cermet anodes were preserved after a few redox cycles. Meanwhile, developing novel ceramic anode materials has been considered as an alternative strategy to mitigate redox instability limitations for Ni-cermet anode and has already drawn great research interests. Several potential ceramic anode candidates have been demonstrated. With judicious material design, remarkable single cell performance and promising stability in redox cycling have been demonstrated for some ceramic-based materials as SOFC anodes. These findings indicate that it is feasible to solve the redox instability issues of SOFC anodes by exploring new anode materials and optimizing anode microstructures.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (DMR-1210792) and as part of the HeteroFoaM Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences under Award # DESC0001061.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AtkinsonA. (1987). Growth of NiO and SiO2 thin films. Philos. Mag. (Abingdon)55, 637–650.10.1080/13642818708218370
2
BastidasD. M.TaoS. W.IrvineJ. T. S. (2006). A symmetrical solid oxide fuel cell demonstrating redox stable perovskite electrodes. J. Mater. Chem.16, 1603–1605.10.1039/B600532B
3
BiZ. H.ZhuJ. H. (2011). Effect of current collecting materials on the performance of the double-perovskite Sr2MgMoO6-delta anode. J. Electrochem. Soc.158, B605–B613.10.1149/1.3569754
4
BierschenkD. M.Potter-NelsonE.HoelC.LiaoY. G.MarksL.PoeppelmeierK. R.et al (2011). Pd-substituted (La,Sr)CrO3-delta-Ce0.9Gd0.1O2-delta solid oxide fuel cell anodes exhibiting regenerative behavior. J. Power Sources196, 3089–3094.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.050
5
BlennowP.HagenA.HansenK. K.WallenbergL. R.MogensenM. (2008). Defect and electrical transport properties of Nb-doped SrTiO3. Solid State Ionics179, 2047–2058.10.1016/j.ssi.2008.06.023
6
BlennowP.HansenK. K.WallenbergL. R.MogensenM. (2009). Electrochemical characterization and redox behavior of Nb-doped SrTiO3. Solid State Ionics180, 63–70.10.1016/j.ssi.2008.10.011
7
BoulfradS.CassidyM.IrvineJ. T. S. (2011). NbTi0.5Ni0.5O4 as anode compound material for SOFCs. Solid State Ionics197, 37–41.10.1016/j.ssi.2011.05.007
8
BurnatD.HeelA.HolzerL.KataD.LisJ.GrauleT. (2012). Synthesis and performance of A-site deficient lanthanum-doped strontium titanate by nanoparticle based spray pyrolysis. J. Power Sources201, 26–36.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.088
9
BusawonA.SarantaridisD.AtkinsonA. (2008). Ni infiltration as a possible solution to the redox problem of SOFC anodes. Electrochem. Solid State Lett.11, B186–B189.10.1149/1.2959078
10
BuyukaksoyA.PetrovskyV.DoganF. (2012). Redox stable solid oxide fuel cells with Ni-YSZ cermet anodes prepared by polymeric precursor infiltration. J. Electrochem. Soc.159, B232–B234.10.1149/2.082202jes
11
Canales-VázquezJ.Ruiz-MoralesJ. C.Marrero-LópezD.Peña-MartínezJ.NúñezP.Gómez-RomeroP. (2007). Fe-substituted (La, Sr) TiO3 as potential electrodes for symmetrical fuel cells (SFCs). J. Power Sources171, 552–557.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.094
12
CassidyM.LindsayG.KendallK. (1996). The reduction of nickel-zirconia cermet anodes and the effects on supported thin electrolytes. J. Power Sources61, 189–192.10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02359-2
13
de SouzaS.ViscoS. J.De JongheL. C. (1997). Reduced temperature solid oxide fuel cell based on YSZ thin film electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc.144, L35–L37.10.1149/1.1837484
14
EttlerM.TimmermannH.MalzbenderJ.WeberA.MenzlerN. H. (2010). Durability of Ni anodes during reoxidation cycles. J. Power Sources195, 5452–5467.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.049
15
FaesA.Hessler-WyserA.ZrydA. (2012). A review of Redox cycling of solid oxide fuel cells anode. Membranes2, 585–664.10.3390/membranes2030585
16
FouquetD.MullerA. C.WeberA.Ivers-TiffeeE. (2003). Kinetics of oxidation and reduction of Ni/YSZ cermets. Ionics (Kiel)9, 103–108.10.1007/Bf02376545
17
FuQ. X.TietzF. (2008). Ceramic-based anode materials for improved redox cycling of solid oxide fuel cells. Fuel Cells8, 283–293.10.1002/fuce.200800018
18
FuQ. X.TietzF.SeboldD.TaoS. W.IrvineJ. T. S. (2007). An efficient ceramic-based anode for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources171, 663–669.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.159
19
FuQ. X.TietzF.StoverD. (2006). La0.4Sr0.6Ti1−xMnxO3-delta perovskites as anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc.153, D74–D83.10.1149/1.2170585
20
GoodenoughJ. B.HuangY. H. (2007). Alternative anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources173, 1–10.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.011
21
GorteR. J.KimH.VohsJ. M. (2002). Novel SOFC anodes for the direct electrochemical oxidation of hydrocarbon. J. Power Sources106, 10–15.10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01021-7
22
Grahl-MadsenL.LarsenP. H.BonanosN.EngellJ.LinderothS. (2006). Mechanical strength and electrical conductivity of Ni-YSZ cermets fabricated by viscous processing. J. Mater. Sci.41, 1097–1107.10.1007/s10853-005-3647-3
23
GrossM. D.CarverK. M.DeighanM. A.SchenkelA.SmithB. M.YeeA. Z. (2009). Redox stability of SrNbxTi1−xO3-YSZ for use in SOFC anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc.156, B540–B545.10.1149/1.3078406
24
HagaK.AdachiS.ShiratoriY.ItohK.SasakiK. (2008a). Poisoning of SOFC anodes by various fuel impurities. Solid State Ionics179, 1427–1431.10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.062
25
HagaK.ShiratoriY.ItoK.SasakiK. (2008b). Chlorine poisoning of SOFC Ni-cermet anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc.155, B1233–B1239.10.1149/1.2980521
26
HashimotoS.KindermannL.LarsenP. H.PoulsenF. W.MogensenM. (2006). Conductivity and expansion at high temperature in Sr0.7La0.3TiO3-alpha prepared under reducing atmosphere. J. Electroceram.16, 103–107.10.1007/s10832-006-3490-1
27
HashimotoS.PoulsenF. W.MogensenM. (2007). Conductivity of SMO3 based oxides in the reducing atmosphere at high temperature. J. Alloys Compd.439, 232–236.10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.138
28
HuangK.GoodenoughJ. B. (2009). Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Technology: Principles, Performance and Operations. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
29
HuangY. H.DassR. I.DenyszynJ. C.GoodenoughJ. B. (2006). Synthesis and characterization of Sr2MgMoO6-delta – an anode material for the solid oxide fuel cell. J. Electrochem. Soc.153, A1266–A1272.10.1149/1.2195882
30
HuangY. H.LiangG.CroftM.LehtimakiM.KarppinenM.GoodenoughtJ. B. (2009). Double-perovskite anode materials Sr2MMoO6 (M = Co, Ni) for solid oxide fuel cells. Chem. Mater.21, 2319–2326.10.1021/Cm8033643
31
HuiS.PetricA. (2002). Evaluation of yttrium-doped SrTiO3 as an anode for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.22, 1673–1681.10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00485-X
32
IshiharaT.YanJ.ShinagawaM.MatsumotoH. (2006). Ni–Fe bimetallic anode as an active anode for intermediate temperature SOFC using LaGaO3 based electrolyte film. Electrochim. Acta52, 1645–1650.10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.103
33
ItohH.YamamotoT.MoriM.HoritaT.SakaiN.YokokawaH.et al (1997). Configurational and electrical behavior of Ni-YSZ cermet with novel microstructure for solid oxide fuel cell anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc.144, 641–646.10.1149/1.1837460
34
ItohM.OhtaI.InagumaY. (1996). Valency pair and properties of 1:1 ordered perovskite-type compounds Sr(2)MMoO(6) (M = Mn,Fe,Co). Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid41, 55–58.10.1016/S0921-5107(96)01623-6
35
JiangS. P. (2008). Development of lanthanum strontium manganite perovskite cathode materials of solid oxide fuel cells: a review. J. Mater. Sci.43, 6799–6833.10.1007/s10853-008-2966-6
36
KhartonV. V.MarquesF. M. B.AtkinsonA. (2004). Transport properties of solid oxide electrolyte ceramics: a brief review. Solid State Ionics174, 135–149.10.1016/j.ssi.2004.06.015
37
KimG.CorreG.IrvineJ. T. S.VohsJ. M.GorteR. J. (2008). Engineering composite oxide SOFC anodes for efficient oxidation of methane. Electrochem. Solid State Lett.11, B16–B19.10.1149/1.2817809
38
KimH.LuC.WorrellW.VohsJ.GorteR. (2002). Cu-Ni cermet anodes for direct oxidation of methane in solid-oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc.149, A247–A250.10.1149/1.1445170
39
KimS. D.MoonH.HyunS. H.MoonJ.KimJ.LeeH. W. (2006). Performance and durability of Ni-coated YSZ anodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ionics.177, 931–938.10.1016/j.ssi.2006.02.007
40
KlemensøT.AppelC.MogensenM. (2006). In situ observations of microstructural changes in SOFC anodes during redox cycling. Electrochem. Solid State Lett.9, A403–A407.10.1149/1.2214303
41
KlemensøT.ChungC.LarsenP. H.MogensenM. (2005). The mechanism behind redox instability of anodes in high-temperature SOFCs. J. Electrochem. Soc.152, A2186–A2192.10.1149/1.2048228
42
KlemensoT.MogensenM. (2007). Ni-YSZ solid oxide fuel cell anode behavior upon redox cycling based on electrical characterization. J. Am. Ceram Soc.90, 3582–3588.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01909.x
43
KobayashiK. L.KimuraT.SawadaH.TerakuraK.TokuraY. (1998). Room-temperature magnetoresistance in an oxide material with an ordered double-perovskite structure. Nature395, 677–680.10.1038/27167
44
KobsiriphatW.MadsenB. D.WangY.ShahM.MarksL. D.BarnettS. A. (2010). Nickel- and ruthenium-doped lanthanum chromite anodes: effects of nanoscale metal precipitation on solid oxide fuel cell performance. J. Electrochem. Soc.157, B279–B284.10.1149/1.3269993
45
KolodiazhnyiT.PetricA. (2005). The applicability of Sr-deficient n-type SrTiO3 for SOFC anodes. J. Electroceram.15, 5–11.10.1007/s10832-005-0375-7
46
LaurencinJ.DeletteG.Lefebvre-JoudF.DupeuxM. (2008). A numerical tool to estimate SOFC mechanical degradation: case of the planar cell configuration. J. Eur. Ceram Soc.28, 1857–1869.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.12.025
47
LiS.QinQ.XieK.WangY.WuY. (2013). High-performance fuel electrodes based on NbTi0.5M0.5O4 (M = Ni, Cu) with reversible exsolution of the nano-catalyst for steam electrolysis. J. Mater. Chem. A1, 8984–8993.10.1039/C3TA10404D
48
LiX.ZhaoH. L.GaoF.ChenN.XuN. S. (2008a). La and Sc co-doped SrTiO3 as novel anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem. Commun.10, 1567–1570.10.1016/j.elecom.2008.08.017
49
LiX.ZhaoH. L.GaoF.ZhuZ. M.ChenN.ShenW. (2008b). Synthesis and electrical properties of Co-doped Y0.08Sr0.92TiO3-delta as a potential SOFC anode. Solid State Ionics179, 1588–1592.10.1016/j.ssi.2007.12.097
50
LiX.ZhaoH. L.XuN. S.ZhouX.ZhanyC. J.ChenN. (2009). Electrical conduction behavior of La, Co co-doped SrTiO3 perovskite as anode material for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy34, 6407–6414.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.079
51
LiX.ZhaoH. L.ZhouX. O.XuN. S.XieZ. X.ChenN. (2010). Electrical conductivity and structural stability of La-doped SrTiO(3) with A-site deficiency as anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy35, 7913–7918.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.043
52
LiuQ.BugarisD. E.XiaoG. L.ChmaraM.MaS. G.zur LoyeH. C.et al (2011). Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6-delta as a regenerative anode for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources196, 9148–9153.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.085
53
LiuQ. A.DongX. H.XiaoG. L.ZhaoF.ChenF. L. (2010a). A novel electrode material for symmetrical SOFCs. Adv. Mater. Weinheim22, 5478–5482.10.1002/adma.201001044
54
LiuQ.YangC.DongX.ChenF. (2010b). Perovskite Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6-delta as electrode materials for symmetrical solid oxide electrolysis cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy35, 10039–10044.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.016
55
MaQ. L.TietzF.LeonideA.Ivers-TiffeeE. (2010). Anode-supported planar SOFC with high performance and redox stability. Electrochem. Commun.12, 1326–1328.10.1016/j.elecom.2010.07.011
56
MadsenB. D.KobsiriphatW.WangY.MarksL. D.BarnettS. A. (2007). Nucleation of nanometer-scale electrocatalyst particles in solid oxide fuel cell anodes. J. Power Sources166, 64–67.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.080
57
MalzbenderJ.SteinbrechR. W. (2007). Advanced measurement techniques to characterize thermo-mechanical aspects of solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources173, 60–67.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.072
58
MatsuzakiY.YasudaI. (2000). The poisoning effect of sulfur-containing impurity gas on a SOFC anode: part I. Dependence on temperature, time, and impurity concentration. Solid State Ionics132, 261–269.10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00653-6
59
MonzonH.Laguna-BerceroM. A. (2012). Redox-cycling studies of anode-supported microtubular solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy37, 7262–7270.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.026
60
MoosR.HardtlK. H. (1996). Electronic transport properties of Sr1-xLaxTiO3 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys.80, 393–400.10.1063/1.362796
61
Muñoz-GarcíaA. B.PavoneM.RitzmannA. M.CarterE. A. (2013). Oxide ion transport in Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6−δ, a mixed ion-electron conductor: new insights from first principles modeling. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.15, 6250–6259.10.1039/C3CP50995H
62
Mun oz-GarcíaA. B.BugarisD. E.PavoneM.HodgesJ. P.HuqA.ChenF.et al (2012). Unveiling structure-property relationships in Sr2Fe(1.5)Mo(0.5)O(6−δ), an electrode material for symmetric solid oxide fuel cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134, 6826–6833.10.1021/ja300831k
63
Muñoz-GarcíaA. B.PavoneM.CarterE. A. (2011). Effect of antisite defects on the formation of oxygen vacancies in Sr2FeMoO6: implications for ion and electron transport. Chem. Mater.23, 4525–4536.10.1021/cm201799c
64
NeaguD.IrvineJ. T. S. (2011). Enhancing electronic conductivity in strontium titanates through correlated A and B-site doping. Chem. Mater.23, 1607–1617.10.1021/Cm103489r
65
NeaguD.TsekourasG.MillerD. N.MenardH.IrvineJ. T. S. (2013). In situ growth of nanoparticles through control of non-stoichiometry. Nat. Chem.5, 916–923.10.1038/NCHEM.1773
66
OudarJ. (1980). Sulfur adsorption and poisoning of metallic catalysts. Cat. Rev. Sci. Eng.22, 171–195.10.1080/03602458008066533
67
PihlatieM.RamosT.KaiserA. (2009). Testing and improving the redox stability of Ni-based solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources193, 322–330.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.140
68
PrimdahlS.HansenJ.Grahl-MadsenL.LarsenP. (2001). Sr-doped LaCrO3 anode for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc.148, A74–A81.10.1149/1.1344519
69
Ruiz-MoralesJ. C.Canales-VázquezJ.Peña-MartínezJ.Marrero-LopezD.NunezP. (2006a). On the simultaneous use of La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3−δ as both anode and cathode material with improved microstructure in solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta52, 278–284.10.1016/j.electacta.2006.05.006
70
Ruiz-MoralesJ. C.Canales-VazquezJ.SavaniuC.Marrero-LopezD.ZhouW. Z.IrvineJ. T. S. (2006b). Disruption of extended defects in solid oxide fuel cell anodes for methane oxidation. Nature439, 568–571.10.1038/Nature04438
71
Ruiz-MoralesJ. C.LinckeH.Marrero-LópezD.Canales-VázquezJ.NúñezP. (2007a). Lanthanum chromite materials as potential symmetrical electrodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Bol. Soc. Esp. Cerám. V.46, 218–223.10.3989/cyv.2007.v46.i4.240
72
Ruiz-MoralesJ. C.Canales-VázquezJ.Ballesteros-PérezB.Peña-MartínezJ.Marrero-LópezD.IrvineJ. T.et al (2007b). LSCM–(YSZ–CGO) composites as improved symmetrical electrodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Eur. Ceram Soc.27, 4223–4227.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.02.117
73
Ruiz-MoralesJ. C.Marrero-LópezD.Canales-VázquezJ.IrvineJ. T. (2011). Symmetric and reversible solid oxide fuel cells. RSC Adv.1, 1403–1414.10.1039/C1RA00284H
74
SarantaridisD.AtkinsonA. (2007). Redox cycling of Ni-based solid oxide fuel cell anodes: a review. Fuel Cells7, 246–258.10.1002/fuce.200600028
75
SauvetA.IrvineJ. (2004). Catalytic activity for steam methane reforming and physical characterisation of La1−xSrxCr1−yNiyO3−δ. Solid State Ionics167, 1–8.10.1016/j.ssi.2003.11.021
76
SfeirJ.BuffatP. A.MöckliP.XanthopoulosN.VasquezR.Joerg MathieuH.et al (2001). Lanthanum chromite based catalysts for oxidation of methane directly on SOFC anodes. J. Catal.202, 229–244.10.1006/jcat.2001.3286
77
SinghalS. (2003). High-temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Design and Applications. Oxford: Elsevier.
78
SmithB. H.GrossM. D. (2011). A highly conductive oxide anode for solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem. Solid State Lett.14, B1–B5.10.1149/1.3505101
79
SunC.StimmingU. (2007). Recent anode advances in solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources171, 247–260.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.086
80
SuthirakunS.AmmalS. C.XiaoG.ChenF.HuangK.Zur LoyeH. C.et al (2012). Obtaining mixed ionic/electronic conductivity in perovskite oxides in a reducing environment: a computational prediction for doped SrTiO3. Solid State Ionics228, 37–45.10.1016/issi.2012.09.013
81
SuthirakunS.AmmalS. C.XiaoG.ChenF.zur LoyeH. C.HeydenA. (2011). Density functional theory study on the electronic structure of n- and p-type doped SrTiO3 at anodic solid oxide fuel cell conditions. Phys. Rev. B84,10.1103/PhysRevB.84.205102
82
SuthirakunS.XiaoG.AmmalS. C.ChenF.zur LoyeH. C.HeydenA. (2014). Rational design of mixed ionic and electronic conducting perovskite oxides for solid oxide fuel cell anode materials: a case study for doped SrTiO3. J. Power Sources245, 875–885.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.040
83
TakeguchiT.KaniY.YanoT.KikuchiR.EguchiK.TsujimotoK.et al (2002). Study on steam reforming of CH4 and C2 hydrocarbons and carbon deposition on Ni-YSZ cermets. J. Power Sources112, 588–595.10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00471-8
84
TaoS. W.IrvineJ. T. S. (2003). A redox-stable efficient anode for solid-oxide fuel cells. Nat. Mater.2, 320–323.10.1038/nmat871
85
ThoulessM. D. (1991). Cracking and delamination of coatings. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A9, 2510–2515.10.1116/1.577265
86
TikekarN. M.ArmstrongT. J.VirkarA. V. (2006). Reduction and reoxidation kinetics of nickel-based SOFC anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc.153, A654–A663.10.1149/1.2167949
87
TsogaA.NaoumidisA.NikolopoulosP. (1996). Wettability and interfacial reactions in the systems Ni/YSZ and Ni/Ti-TiO2/YSZ. Acta Mater.44, 3679–3692.10.1016/1359-6454(96)00019-5
88
WaldbilligD.WoodA.IveyD. G. (2005). Thermal analysis of the cyclic reduction and oxidation behaviour of SOFC anodes. Solid State Ionics176, 847–859.10.1016/j.ssi.2004.12.002
89
WaldbilligD.WoodA.IveyD. G. (2007). Enhancing the redox tolerance of anode-supported SOFC by microstructural modification. J. Electrochem. Soc.154, B133–B138.10.1149/1.2402116
90
WeiT.ZhangQ.HuangY. H.GoodenoughJ. B. (2012). Cobalt-based double-perovskite symmetrical electrodes with low thermal expansion for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem.22, 225–231.10.1039/C1jm14756k
91
WoodA.PastulaM.WaldbilligD.IveyD. (2006). Initial testing of solutions to redox problems with anode-supported SOFC. J. Electrochem. Soc.153, A1929–A1934.10.1149/1.2240085
92
XiaoG.ChenF. (2011). Ni modified ceramic anodes for direct-methane solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem. Commun.13, 57–59.10.1016/j.elecom.2010.11.012
93
XiaoG.LiuQ.DongX.HuangK.ChenF. (2010). Sr2Fe4/3Mo2/3O6 as anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources195, 8071–8074.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.036
94
XiaoG.LiuQ.WangS.KomvokisV. G.AmiridisM. D.HeydenA.et al (2012a). Synthesis and characterization of Mo-doped SrFeO3-delta as cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources202, 63–69.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.11.021
95
XiaoG.LiuQ.NuansaengS.ChenF. (2012b). Sr2Fe1+xMo1−xO6-δ as anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. ECS Trans.45, 355–362.10.1149/1.3701327
96
XiaoG.JinC.LiuQ.HeydenA.ChenF. (2012c). Ni modified ceramic anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources201, 43–48.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.103
97
XiaoG.LiuQ.ZhaoF.ZhangL.XiaC.ChenF. (2011a). Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6 as cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells with La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.87Mg0.13O3 electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc.158, B455–B460.10.1149/1.3556085
98
XiaoG.DongX.HuangK.ChenF. (2011b). Synthesis and characterizations of A-site deficient perovskite Sr0.9Ti0.8−xGaxNb0.2O3. Mater. Res. Bull.46, 57–61.10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.09.044
99
XiaoG.NuansaengS.ZhangL.SuthirakunS.HeydenA.LoyeH.-C. Z.et al (2013). Enhanced reducibility and conductivity of Na/K-doped SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3. J. Mater. Chem. A1, 10546–10552.10.1039/c3ta11631j
100
XiaoG.WangS.LinY.YangZ.HanM.ChenF. (2014). Ni-doped Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6-δ as anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc.161, F305–F310.10.1149/2.061403jes
101
YangC.YangZ.JinC.XiaoG.ChenF.HanM. (2012). Sulfur-tolerant redox-reversible anode material for direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells. Adv. Mater. Weinheim24, 1439–1443.10.1002/adma.201104852
102
YoonK. J.CoyleC. A.MarinaO. A. (2011). Doped yttrium chromite-ceria composite as a redox-stable and sulfur-tolerant anode for solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem. Commun.13, 1400–1403.10.1016/j.elecom.2011.08.025
103
ZhangL. L.ZhouQ. J.HeQ. A.HeT. M. (2010). Double-perovskites A(2)FeMoO(6-delta) (A = Ca, Sr, Ba) as anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources195, 6356–6366.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.021
104
ZhangY. X.SunQ.XiaC. R.NiM. (2013). Geometric properties of nanostructured solid oxide fuel cell electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc.160, F278–F289.10.1149/2.057303jes
105
ZhangY. X.XiaC. R. (2010). A particle-layer model for solid-oxide-full-cell cathodes with different structures. J. Power Sources195, 4206–4212.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.114
106
ZhuW. Z.DeeviS. C. (2003a). Development of interconnect materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater.348, 227–243.10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00736-0
107
ZhuW. Z.DeeviS. C. (2003b). A review on the status of anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater.362, 228–239.10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00620-8
108
ZhuX.LuZ.WeiB.ChenK. F.LiuM. L.HuangX. Q.et al (2009). Enhanced performance of solid oxide fuel cells with Ni/CeO(2) modified La(0.75)Sr(0.25)Cr(0.5)Mn(0.5)O(3-delta) anodes. J. Power Sources190, 326–330.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.035
Summary
Keywords
solid oxide fuel cells, anode, redox stability, microstructure, ceramic anode, catalyst
Citation
Xiao G and Chen F (2014) Redox Stable Anodes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Front. Energy Res. 2:18. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2014.00018
Received
02 May 2014
Accepted
22 May 2014
Published
06 June 2014
Volume
2 - 2014
Edited by
Jinliang Yuan, Lund University, Sweden
Reviewed by
Chao Xu, North China Electric Power University, China; Shaorong Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Copyright
© 2014 Xiao and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fanglin Chen, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, 300 Main Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA e-mail: chenfa@cec.sc.edu
This article was submitted to Fuel Cells, a section of the journal Frontiers in Energy Research.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.