Abstract
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs) have received increasing attention as a renewable energy technology with the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. This review presents the advancements and challenges associated with flow field plates (FFPs) and cooling systems in PEMFC with a particular emphasis on the exploration and integration of bio-inspired designs which inspiration from natural structures offers unique solutions for uniformity of fuel and heat distribution. A comparative study on the innovative nature-inspired designs and conventional designs for FFPs and cooling systems is presented. Various fabrication methods of FFPs assessing their feasibility and economic implications are discussed. The comparative analysis aims to offer a holistic view on the current landscape and future directions in PEMFC technology, highlighting the importance of efficient design and manufacturing strategies to meet the growing demands for sustainable and efficient energy solutions.
1 Introduction
Fuel cell (FC) technology is a clean and efficient way to convert the chemical energy of fuels such as hydrogen, natural gas, methanol, and ethanol into electric energy with significantly high efficiency and much lower greenhouse-gas emission as compared to well-established internal combustion engine technologies. FCs can be categorized according to the nature of the electrolytes, including low-temperature Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cells PEMFCs, alkaline fuel cells (AFCs), phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFCs) to high-temperature molten-carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs) and solid-oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) (see Figure 1) (Steele and Heinzel, 2001), (Mekhilef et al., 2012), (), (Pan et al., 2024).
FIGURE 1
As shown in Figure 2, FCs are used in a variety of applications including primary and backup power for commercial, industrial, and residential buildings, as well as in remote or inaccessible areas. They are also used to power FC vehicles, including automobiles, buses, trains, boats, motorcycles, airplanes, submarines and drones (Sebbani et al., 2025), (Olabi et al., 2021).
FIGURE 2

Application sectors of FC technology with different power (based on (Sebbani et al., 2025)).
As PEMFCs continue to gain attention as a clean energy solution, their significance is heightened by their utilisation of hydrogen as a fuel; this type of FC efficiently converts hydrogen into electricity. The components of PEMFC include (Figure 3a) the PEM, catalyst layer (CL), gas diffusion layer (GDL), FFPs for fuel delivery and charge collection, and the cooling system. The PEM with two CLs sandwiched between two GDLs form the membrane-electrode assembly (MEA). The electrochemical reactions occurring in PEMFC (Figure 3b) are as follows:
FIGURE 3

PEMFC components (a) and description of its operation (b) (from (Madhav et al., 2024), open access).
In this process, electrons flow from the anode to the cathode through an external circuit, generating electrical power, while protons move through the PEM to the cathode to complete the reaction, forming water as the only by-product. The heat produced in the chemical reactions Equations 1–3 is removed by a cooling system located outside the FC that prevents the MEA from overheating and further degradation.
The design and optimization of FFPs have become subjects of intense research and development. FFPs not only impact the overall performance of PEMFCs but also influence such factors such durability, cost-effectiveness, manufacturability, and lifespan. Consequently, a comprehensive understanding of FFP design principles, materials selection, manufacturing techniques, and their implications on PEMFC performance is essential to unlocking the full potential of this technology (Zhang et al., 2024; Wang and Jiang, 2017; Shekhawat et al., 2011;
The FFP is a very important multi-functional component of the FC; it supplies fuel (H2) and oxidant (O2 or air) to the MEA, removes water outside the FC, collects electrons produced in the system and carries the current from the MEA to the end plates of the PEMFC stack. The bipolar plates also serves as separators between two adjacent FCs and their connector in the PEMFC stack. Bipolar plates provide fast efficient removing the heat generated in the chemical reactions Equations 1–3 by conducting it away from the MEA. The FFPs comprise ∼50–60% of the weight, ∼50% of the volume, and ∼30–40% of the total cost of the FC stack (Figure 4) (Tang et al., 2021; Song et al., 2021). It plays a vital role in distributing reactants evenly across the cell to provide efficient electrochemical reactions and longevity time. Therefore, design optimization and improvement of operating conditions contributes significantly to reduction in both weight and price of FC stack.
FIGURE 4

Weight and cost percentage of FFPs in PEMFC (from (Yeetsorn, 2010)).
Proper design and fabrication of FFPs in PEMFCs are important for optimal reactant transport, uniform gas distribution, low-pressure drop for fuel pumping, and timely water removal from the FC. All these factors highly determine the performance (i.e., resulting electric current at a given flow rate of the fuel) and efficiency (a ratio of the useful and applied energies) of the PEMFCs. Over the recent years, there has been an increased interest in optimizing the design and fabrication of FFPs for their better performance in PEMFCs. Researchers have considered various FFP designs for bipolar plates, such as serpentine, parallel, interdigitated, and mesh types or their combinations. Besides, 2D circular and 3D tubular geometry, porous, fractal, and biomimetic FFP designs, which facilitate gas distribution, control water management, and improve the overall performance of the PEMFC have been elaborated and tested. However, each design also comes with its cons and trade-offs, therefore making it difficult to select a single optimal FFP. Because of such challenges involved in the design and fabrication of FFPs, researchers have conducted a lot of studies in theoretical models, numerical simulations and experimental studies on different types of FFPs. They have figured out that proper design and fabrication of FFPs can greatly enhance the performance and efficiency, and decrease the overall cost of PEMFCs (Shaigan et al., 2021;
During the last decades, the FFP design and its influence on the efficiency and durability of FCs has been a subject of a series of review papers that confirmed existence of different combinations of the FFP geometry, material and operating conditions for better performance (Marappan et al., 2021; Yan et al., 2023; Zhang and Tu, 2024; Xiong et al., 2021). Marappan et al. (2021) analysed how different conventional flow field (FF) configurations, such as serpentine, parallel, interdigitated, and pin-type, affect the efficiency, water management, pressure drop, and overall performance of PEMFCs. The review synthesizes findings from numerous experimental and computational studies to present a comprehensive understanding of the impact of the FFdesign on PEMFC operation. The paper also discusses the advantages and limitations of conventional designs. Yan et al. (2023) provided a detailed analysis of various conventional FFP designs and their influence on FC performance metrics such as power output, efficiency and durability. The authors synthesized recent advances in materials and fabrication technologies for FFP and discussed their implications for improving PEMFC efficiency. Zhang and Tu (2024) explored different designs of FFP in PEMFC and addressed challenges like gas distribution, water flooding and high pressure drops, summarized recent advancements in FFP designs and manufacturing techniques aimed at improving gas diffusion, water management and efficiency. The review also discussed the role of computational modelling and experimental validation in design optimization. Xiong et al. (2021) discussed various modelling techniques used for design optimization of FFP, including computational fluid dynamics (CFD). They review different materials used for bipolar plates, such as graphite, metals, and composites, evaluating their performance, cost, and durability. The paper also explored various fabrication methods, including machining, moulding, and additive manufacturing (AM), highlighting advancements and challenges of each one.
This review paper aims to provide an in-depth examination of FFP designs in PEMFCs with a special emphasis on the bio-inspired designs. The bio-inspired designs follow geometry of natural structures like plant leaves, human lungs and arterial systems, which are estimated as an outcome of evolutionary optimization. Therefore, the FCs with bio-inspited designs of FFPs exhibited higher output power, better water management capacity, and more uniform reactant distribution over the PEM. It was confirmed by numerous theoretical, experimental and CFD studies, which are reviewed and analysed here. Through a meticulous analysis of existing literature and a synthesis of key findings, we will delve into the historical evolution of FFPs and cooling systems, elucidate the critical parameters that govern their design, explore the materials employed in their fabrication, and discuss the various manufacturing techniques used. Additionally, we will evaluate the methods to assess FFP performance, including mass transport, pressure drop, and power output.
In our review, we will focus on promising bio-inspired designs and compare them to conventional FFP designs. We will also connect FFP designs and manufacturing techniques with the actual cost of FFPs in the market, highlighting the economic aspects. Moreover, we will emphasize the important role of coolant channels in improving PEMFC performance and reducing overall weight.
By navigating this comprehensive overview of FFP design, readers will gain valuable insights into the fundamental principles and the latest developments in the critical aspects of PEMFCs. Ultimately, this review aims to contribute to the ongoing progress in the field, inspiring researchers and engineers to push the boundaries of FFP design and drive the widespread adoption of PEMFCs as a clean and sustainable energy source.
2 Role of FFP in PEMFC
The FFP of PEMFCs must be designed for the attainment of several factors, responsible for the overall performance and efficiency. The FFP ensures not only easy transportation of reactants, but also uniform distribution of the fuels, low pressure drop for their pumping through the FFP and MEA, and effective water management in the system. Apart from the functions above, the FFP must also offer optimum electrical and thermal conductivity (
Ruan et al., 2016;
).
• Distribution of reactant gases:
The core operation of a PEMFC involves the supply of hydrogen and oxygen to the anode and cathode, respectively. FFPs are meticulously engineered to ensure a homogeneous distribution of these gases across the MEA active surface. Achieving an even distribution is pivotal for uniform chemical reactions throughout the MEA (
Lim et al., 2016), (
Obayopo et al., 2012), (
Tiss et al., 2014).
• Heat management:
Effective thermal management is essential for the performance and longevity of PEMFCs. The electrochemical reactions
Equations 1–
3within the cell generate heat, which, if not properly dissipated, can increase the temperature of the PEMFC and negatively affect its components. FFPs, constructed from conductive materials, are critical for the uniform distribution of heat throughout the cell (
Wang et al., 2011;
Nöst et al., 2018).
• Water management:
Water management within a PEMFC is also crucial for its efficiency. The generation of water as a by-product of electrochemical reactions necessitates a delicate balance in water handling. Excessive water accumulation can lead to FC flooding, obstructing gas flow to the MEA and reducing the performance. The design of FFPs addresses this challenge by enabling precise water removal and maintaining proper hydration, thereby optimizing cell performance (Zhang et al., 2015;
2.1 FFP designs
We can categorize the design of FFP into two primary groups: conventional designs along with their modifications, and bio-inspired designs that are derived from natural models, as illustrated in Figure 5.
FIGURE 5

Classification of FFP designs in PEMFC (Merdjani et al., 2024).
2.1.1 Conventional designs and their modifications
The existing designs of FFP in PEMFC can be broadly categorized into conventional designs, their combinations (synthetic or hybrid design) and novel/modified designs. Conventional designs typically include parallel, serpentine, interdigitated and pin-type (or mesh-type) FFPs. The serpentine design involves channels that snake and forth across the flow field, that increases the path length for reactant gases and, therefore, the hydraulic resistivity of the FFP. The design may be based on a single serpentine channel (Figure 6a) or several parallel channels (Figure 6b). The parallel FFP includes straight channels that run from one end of the plate to the other (Figure 6c). The pin-type/mesh-type design replaces traditional channels with an array of pins or grooves that protrude from the plate by creating a more open FF(Figure 6d). The interdigitated design is composed by the interlaced parallel channels with open ends (Figure 6e) (Sierra et al., 2014; Sauermoser et al., 2020). The single-channel serpentine design is accepted as a ‘golden standard’, and novel FFP designs are usually compared to the efficiency of the serpentine cathode FFP at the same operating conditions. Different designs can be taken at the anode side for more uniform fuel distribution and heat generation, while the serpentine design is mostly used at the cathode side for better water removal. Any combinations of different conventional and non-conventional designs at two electrodes could be used. The most advancing designs and operating conditions, and their specifications are summarized in Table 1.
FIGURE 6

Schematic images of conventional FFP designs: single-channel serpentine (a), five-channel serpentine (b), parallel (c), pin-type (d), and interdigitated (e) (from (Sauermoser et al., 2020), open access).
TABLE 1
| N | Design | Type of study and operating parameters | Ref | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() Parallel Trapezoid Baffle | ![]() Staggered Trapezoid Baffle | CFD* and exp** Active area: 26.95 cm2 (55 mm × 49 mm) Thicknesses of the bipolar plate, GDL, CL, and membrane: 1.5 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.01 mm, and 0.0508 mm, respectively Operating Temperature: 348.15 K | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 2 | ![]() Sinusoidal channels at the cathode side | CFD and exp Active area: 25 cm2 The flow rates were maintained at 0.2 L/min at the anode and 0.5 L/min at the cathode Operating temperature: 333.15 K | Vijayakrishnan et al. (2020) | |
| 3 | ![]() | CFD and exp Active area: 25 cm2 Flow rate: 2.05e−7 kg/s at the anode inlet, and 1.67e−6 kg/s at the cathode Operating pressure: 1 bar Operating temperature: 323 K | Velisala and Srinivasulu (2018) | |
| 4 | ![]() | CFD Length L = 30 mm W = 0.25, 0.35,0.5 mm H = 0.15, 0.35, 0.55 mm Velocity: 0.2 m/s | Wan et al. (2020) | |
| 5 | ![]() Parallel Z-shape FFP (top left) Serpentine of Z -2Z -3Z - S -2S –W shapes Novel modified W-shaped FF(bottom right) | Exp Operating Temperature: 40°C–100°C Pressure: 0.4–0.7 bar Voltage: 7–11.4 V Flow rate of hydrogen: 3 L/min Startup of FC: 1–3 s | ||
| 6 | ![]() parallel and parallel-serpentine-parallel flow field | CFD Active area: 510.4 mm2 Inlet mass flow rates anode: 3.07 x 10^7 kg/s cathode: 8.15 x 10^6 kg/s | ||
| 7 | ![]() carbon bipolar plate at the cathode side | Exp The channel width was limited to 0.6 mm Depth:1 mm Active area: 20 cm2 (10 × 2cm) | ||
| 8 | ![]() 3D stepped flow fields | Exp Length of channel: 50 mm Width of channel: 1 mm Height of channel: 2 mm Width of Rib: 1 mm Height of Rib: 2 mm Inlet mass flow rates Hydrogen: 1.6 x 10−6 kg/s Air: 2.4 x 10−5 kg/s | Lu et al. (2024) | |
| 9 | ![]() 3days-printed serpentine FF | Exp Active area: 5 cm2 The flow rate of hydrogen and air 0.2 L/min Thickness of the flow plate: 10mm | Yoo et al. (2022) | |
| 10 | ![]() sinusoidal wave flow channel | CFD Channel length: 90 mm Channel width: 2 mm Channel height: 1 mm Rib width: 1 mm | Zhou et al. (2022) | |
| 11 | ![]() shifted sinusoidal wave flow channels | Exp Active area: 2 cm2 Operating temperature: 343.15 K Depth of channel: 0.6 mm | Mojica et al. (2021) | |
| 12 | ![]() Trap-shape channel | CFD Channel length (Lch): 50 mm Channel width (Wch): 1 mm Channel height (Hch): 1 mm Trap length (L trap): 2, 5, 8, 11, 14 mm Trap width (Wtrap): 0.25 mm Land or shoulder width (Wland): 1 mm Operating temperature: 353K | Ramin et al. (2019) | |
| 13 | ![]() (a) Traditional serpentine design (b) multi-serpentine design (c) hybrid design | Exp Active area: 25 cm2 Channel depth: 2 mm Operating temperature: 333.15 K Stoichiometry for hydrogen is 1.4 oxygen is set to 1.2 | ||
| 14 | ![]() (a) Novel A (b) Novel B (c) Serpentine channel | CFD and exp Active area: 80 cm2 Channel depth: 1.5 mm Width: 2 mm Length: 2 m | Xu et al. (2024) | |
| 15 | ![]() Discontinuous S-shaped | CFD Active area:6 cm2 The length of channel: 50 mm Width and height of channel:1 mm The inlet and outlet angle:120° | ||
Modifications of conventional design of FFP with their dimensions and operating parameters (*CFD means numerical simulations, **exp means experimental study).
As it follows from the variety of designs presented in Table 1, the attempts to improve performance of the FFP in fuel delivery (lower pressure drop), more uniform distribution of the gases, water management (easy and fast water removal from the FC), and higher electric voltage at given flow rate of the fuels and based on (i) modifications of the channel’s shape (rows N1, 4, 5, 12); (ii) variations (N3, 8, 9) or (iii) combinations (N6, 7, 13, 14) of conventional designs; and (iv) waved channels (N2, 10, 11, 15). The obtained rise in efficiency of the FC, advantages and disadvantages of each FFP design are summarized below.
Wang et al. (2020) (N1 in Table 1) combined numerical simulations and experimental tests to evaluate the effect of baffle plate arrangements in PEMFCs. The baffle plates, which optimize reactant distribution and enhance mass transfer, significantly improve FC performance; the study found that incorporating baffle plates increased the peak power density by 15.3%. Advantages include better water management and enhanced reactant distribution, while disadvantages involve potential increased pressure drop for fuel pumping and the need for precise manufacturing.
Vijayakrishnan et al. (2020) (N2 in Table 1) explored the impact of a sinusoidal channels at the cathode side on the PEMFC performance. Both numerical simulations and experimental tests were conducted on 5 × 5 = 25 cm2 and 10 × 10 = 100 cm2 FC. Results showed that the novel sinusoidal FFimproved water removal and enhanced performance, increasing the power density by 7.7% compared to conventional serpentine FFP. Combining sinusoidal and serpentine flow fields further increased the power density by 14%. Advantages include better water management and higher power density, while disadvantages involve potential complexity in manufacturing.
Velisala and Srinivasulu (2018) (N3 in Table 1) explored the performance of PEMFC with different flow channel configurations. Both numerical simulations and experimental tests were conducted on single (1-S), double (2-S), and triple (3-S) serpentine flow FFPs. The results showed that the 3-S configuration achieved the highest performance, with a 12.5% increase in power density compared to the single serpentine configuration due to improved reactant distribution and water removal. The study highlights advantages such as enhanced mass transport and reduced concentration losses, while disadvantages include the increased complexity and higher pressure drop for fuel pumping.
Wan et al. (2020) (N4 in Table 1) involved numerical simulations to optimize the M-like flow channel design. The M-like channel showed better performance (21.3% higher) in terms of heat and mass transfer compared to conventional designs. The optimized design resulted in reduced entropy generation and enhancing overall efficiency of the FC. Advantages include improved thermal and fluid management, while disadvantages could involve the complexity of manufacturing such channels.
Lu et al. (2024) (N8 in Table 1) explored the performance of 3D-printed FFP with novel stepped design of the channels width. The study, which includes both numerical simulations and experimental validation, found that the design significantly improves the mass and heat transfer, resulting in a 15% increase in power density compared to conventional designs. Advantages include improved efficiency and better water management, while disadvantages involve the complexity and cost of 3D printing of the complex multi-layer cell.
Yoo et al. (2022) (N9 in Table 1) explored the development and performance of bendable PEMFC using 3D-printed flexible FFP. The study includes experimental evaluations of the FC in both flat and bent positions. It was found, the PEMFC achieved a peak power density of 87.1 mW cm-2 when bent, compared to 30.2 mW cm-2 in the flat position. This enhancement is attributed to the compressive stress on the MEA during bending, which reduces ohmic and charge transfer resistances (advantages). The research highlights the potential of 3D printing in creating cost-effective, high-performance flexible FC with simple structures.
Zhou et al. (2022) (N10 in Table 1) examined the impact of an opposite sinusoidal wave flow channel on the performance of PEMFC. Through numerical simulations, the study explores how variations in the amplitude and period of the sinusoidal wave affect FC performance. The findings indicate that this novel flow channel design significantly enhances mass transfer and water removal capabilities, resulting in improved overall performance. The optimized flow channel design achieved an increase in power density in 16.6%, attributed to better gas distribution and reduced flooding. The main advantages include enhanced efficiency and effective water management, while potential disadvantages involve the complexity of fabricating such intricate designs.
Mojica et al. (2021) (N11 in Table 1) investigated the performance of PEMFC with converging-diverging flow channels. This design aims to enhance convective mass transport and improve overall cell efficiency. The study combines numerical simulations and experimental tests, finding that the converging-diverging channels lead to a 12% increase in power density compared to conventional flow channels. The improved performance is attributed to more effective reactant distribution and reduced concentration polarization. The main advantages include better mass transport and increased efficiency, while disadvantages involve potential complexities in channel manufacturing.
Ramin et al. (2019) (N12 in Table 1) investigated the impact of trap-shaped flow channels on the performance of PEMFCs. Through both numerical simulations and experimental validation, the study demonstrates that the innovative trap-shaped channels significantly improve power density by enhancing reactant distribution and water management. The results showed an increase in power density by 18% compared to conventional flow channels. The advantages of this design include more uniform gas distribution and reduced flooding, while disadvantages may involve increased complexity in the manufacturing process and potential high pressure drop for fuel pumping.
Xu et al. (2024) (N14 in Table 1) investigated the performance of a novel coolant channel design for PEMFCs. The study employs both numerical simulations and experimental tests to analyse the impact of the designs on thermal management and overall cell performance. The findings revealed that the novel designs significantly enhances heat removal, leading to improved temperature uniformity and a 15% increase in power density compared to conventional serpentine design. Advantages include better thermal management and increased efficiency, while disadvantages might involve the complexity and cost of implementing the new coolant channel design.
Therefore, modifications of the shape of the channels (trapezoidal, waved, stepped, m-shape, w-shape, S-shape, etc.) and their arrangement on the FFP (z-type, multi-serpentine, hybrid serpentine in combination with parallel, etc.) allow improvement of the FC efficiency in 7.7%–21.3%. The increase in efficiency of the FFP designs N1-15 cannot be accurately compared due to different size and operating parameters of the prototypes and different CFD models used in numerical simulations. In general, modifications of the cross-sectional shape of the channels (trapezoidal N1, stepped variation in the channel width N8, trap-shape width changes N12) increased the efficiency in 15.3, 15% and 18%, accordingly. Since the channels with varied width provide better flow mixing, it could be the main mechanism for improvement of the fuel distribution and heat transfer to the electrodes and, finally, to the cooling system. Waved channels in both in-plane (N2, N10, N15) and orthogonal (N11) planes also produce higher flow mixing that leads to the increase in the efficiency in 2.2, 16.6, 12, and 17%, accordingly. Flows in the waved channels does not experience sudden turn (180°) like in the serpentine flow, and the hydraulic resistance of the channels is reasonably low compared to the single-serpentine design. Therefore, such FFPs need lower pressure drop for pumping of the fuels at any given flow rate. Replacement of regular sudden turn 180° of the channel in the n-serpentine design by smooth circular arches (N3) increased the efficiency in 1.5%. A combination of parallel with single-serpentine (N6) increased the efficiency in 10%. Therefore, replacement of rectangle turns in (
It is difficult to say, whether a combination of the elements (waved walls and cross-sectional geometry of channels, their location on the FFP, smoothed turns, combination with convenient designs) will produce a more efficient design, because the FC has a very complex composition, structure, chemical, physical and mechanical processes inside it. Anyway, the comparative analysis confirmed a significant importance of better flow mixing, low hydraulic resistance of the channels and low electric resistance of the components of PEMFCs for improvement of their efficiency in >20%. The disadvantages of almost all novel designs are connected with complex systems of channels which are difficult and costly for manufacturing.
2.1.2 Bio-inspired designs
Biologically inspired design (BID) methodology offers a systematic approach for designing based on natural tree-line flow fields that based on the length and width/diameter scaling in the consequent bifurcations of channels/tubes (Murray’s law) as explained in Equation 4 (
BID involves precise design steps, such as recognizing and applying biological techniques. Case studies have demonstrated the application of BID in creating innovative designs, such as fish-inspired and bird-inspired robots, and mastication robots. The principal gaining traction is Murray’s law (Pentelovitch and Nagel, 2022; Luo et al., 2020; Wang and Deng, 2022; Molina et al., 2020).
Recently, the concept of mimicking nature to enhance the design of FFP in PEMFC has garnered considerable attention. These innovative designs are inspired by the efficient transport mechanisms observed in natural systems, aiming to replicate their high efficacy in FCs. For instance, the branched and stepped FF designs draw their inspiration from the intricate network of veins in leaves or the vascular systems in animals as shown in Figure 7 (
FIGURE 7

Bio-inspired designs of FFP in PEMFC. (a)Sauermoser et al. (2021), (b)
TABLE 2
| N | Design | Dimensions and operating parameters | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() In-plane lung-type | Active area: 49 cm2 Bipolar plate thickness:10 mm Channel width:1 mm Channel depth:1 mm Operating temperature 333.15–353.15 K Pressure:1–5 bar | Exp |
| 2 | ![]() Ginkgo leaf Net leaf | Active area: 25 cm2 Channel width: 0.8 mm Channel depth: 0.8 mm Hydrogen flow rate: 350 cm3/min Air flow rate: 1900 cm3/min Operating temperature: 353 K Inlet relative humidity: 100% Absolute pressure: 101 kPa | Kang et al. (2019) Exp |
| 3 | ![]() Wave-cuttlefish FFP | Active area: 2 cm2 Channel length: 20 mm Channel width: 1 mm Channel height:1 mm Rib width: 1 mm Operating temperature: 343.15 K | CFD and Exp |
| 4 | ![]() Fractal cathode FFP | Active area: 25 cm2 Depth of flow channel: 1 mm Thickness of the FFP 8 mm (6 plates) | Exp |
| 5 | ![]() | Active area: 50 cm2 Channel width: 0.8 mm Channel depth: 1.1 mm Operating temperature 55°C–75°C | Suárez et al. (2022) Exp |
| 6 | ![]() Bio-inspired sinusoidal | Active area: 4 cm2 Channel depth: 1 mm Channel width:1 mm Operating temperature: 298.15K | Ke et al. (2023) CFD and Exp |
| 7 | ![]() T-type fractal | Active area: 25 cm2 Inlet channel width: 5 mm Outlet channel width: 1 mm Channel depth: 1 mm Width scale: = 0.917–0.925 Number of the outlets: 64 Operating temperature: 353.15 K | Sauermoser et al. (2021) Exp |
| 8 | ![]() Leaf-type branching | Active area: 25 cm2 FFP dimensions: 51 × 51 mm FFP thickness: 2.9 mm Channel width: 1 mm Channel height:1 mm Angle to the inlet channel: 15, 18, 22.5, 30, 40° | CFD and Exp |
| 9 | ![]() Lung-type fractal cathode FFP | Active area: 6.25 cm2 FFP thickness: 9.6 mm Number of outlets: 256 Dimensions of the outlet channels: 400 × 800 μm with 1.18 mm spacing between them | Exp |
| 10 | ![]() leaf vein flow channel tree shape flow | Active area: 9.84 cm2 FFP thickness: 3 mm Channel depth: 0.4 mm | Exp |
| 11 | ![]() Snowflake bionic flow channel | Active area: 25 cm2 Channel depth: 1.5 mm Inlet diameter: 3.5 mm | Li et al. (2022a) CFD and Exp |
| 12 | ![]() Spiral channel | Active area: 2500 mm2 Inlet channel width: 1 mm Outlet channel width: 0.5 mm | CFD and Exp |
| 13 | ![]() nautilus bionic channel | Channel width: 0.6 mm Outlet channel height: 1.2 cm Circular rib width: 0.6 mm Channel height: 1 mm | Li et al. (2023a) CFD |
| 14 | ![]() Artery-inspired flow field | Active area: 49 cm2 Channel dimensions: 1 × 1 mm Operating temperature: 20, 35, 50, 65, 80°C | CFD and Exp |
| 15 | ![]() Spider bionic flow channel | Active area: 10.24 cm2 Channel depth:1 mm Inlet channel area:16 mm2 | Yao et al. (2022) CFD |
| 16 | ![]() Fishbone-shaped design | Active area: 25 cm2 Channel length:1 mm Channel width:1 mm | Wang et al. (2021) CFD |
Examples of bio-inspired designs of FFP in PEMFC.
A range of studies has compared the performance and efficiency of bio-inspired and conventional FFP designs in PEMFCs. Badduri et al. (
Ke et al. (2023) (N6 in Table 2) investigated the effects of bio-inspired sinusoidal channels on the performance of PEMFC. Through both numerical simulations and experimental tests, the study evaluated how this design can increase the power density produced by PEMFC. The results showed that the sinusoidal flow channels significantly enhance oxygen transport and reactant distribution, leading to a 15% increase in power density compared to serpentine flow channel. The advantages include improved mass transport and reduced oxygen starvation, while disadvantages involve the complexity and potential cost of manufacturing. Sauermoser et al. (Sauermoser et al., 2021) (N7 in Table 2) investigated the impact of varying channel widths in tree-like T-type fractal FF on PEMFC performance. Since the outlets of the T-type fractal with six to seven generations uniformly distributed over the square or rectangle area of MEA, the reactants are delivered to the PEM more uniformly. The experimental study with relative humidity of hydrogen RH = 50%, 60%, 70% revealed, a decrease in the width-scaling parameters α led to improved PEMFC performance. The best performance were detected at RH = 70%, and the corresponding performance was 11% lower compared to the serpentine FFP at the same flow rates and RH. Among the disadvantages is water accumulation in the channels, which is the main reason for reducing power density.
Li Y. et al. (2022) (N11 in Table 2) examines the use of a snowflake-shaped bionic FF to enhance PEMFC performance. By integrating the advantages of leaf vein and lung-shaped channels, this design aims to improve gas supply uniformity and reduce pressure drop. Utilizing a 3D multi-physics FC model, the study shows that the snowflake bionic design significantly reduces pumping work and enhances flow uniformity (advantages). For the peak power density, the snowflake FF design had a 27%, 66% and 45.5% higher values compared to the leaf vein, lung-type and double-serpentine FFS, accordingly. After optimization, the non-uniformity of the fuel flow rates between the outlets of the FF was reduced by 29.98% compared to the non-optimized design.
Yao et al. (2022) (N15 in Table 2) explored the performance improvements of PEMFC using a spider web-inspired FF design. Through both numerical simulations and experimental studies, the research demonstrated that the spider bionic FF significantly enhanced reactant distribution and water management. Compared to serpentine flow channels, the spider bionic design improved power density by 9% and reduced pressure drop by 13%. These enhancements are attributed to more uniform distribution of reactants, as well as better removal of water from the channels (advantages). Wang et al. (2021) (N16 in Table 2) examined the effectiveness of a nature-inspired fishbone-shaped cathode FF in PEMFC. Using numerical simulations and experimental analyses, the study found that this bio-inspired design significantly improved mass transport and water removal compared to parallel flow field. Specifically, the fishbone design enhanced power density by 18% and reduced pressure drop by 22% (advantages).
Therefore, bionic nature-inspired designs for reactant flows in FCs are promising due to higher increase in the FC efficiency (>20% and 40% compared to the serpentine and parallel designs, accordingly), low pressure drop for fuel pumping and better water management. The efficiency of such designs is based on the evolutionary optimized systems of arteries in human and animals, and plant roots and leaves for transportation the biological fluids at low energy expenses and low uniform pressure drop that corresponds to the Murray’s law (4).
As it follows from the detailed review of the main features of the bionic FFPs, they provides higher increase in the power density and overall efficiency compared to the improved convenient designs and their combinations (hybrid FFPs). The ∼20% rise in power density was achieved by a combination of bifurcated and interdigitated geometry based on the Murray’s law (4) (N1 in Table 2); the wave channel followed the cutterfish pattern (N3 in Table 2); the T-type fractal FFP with five generations of bifurcations drilled in five parallel plates (N4 in Table 2); the snowflake-type FFP followed the Murray’s law (4) (N11 in Table 2); and the fishbone-shaped FFP (N16 in Table 2). The highest increase in the performance was shown in the snowflake-type FFPs inspired by human lung geometry, plant leaves geometry, and their combinations (up to 45.4% rise in the power density). Note, many of the designed geometries, have numerous connections between the channels (loops) that allows the water accumulated in the channels to be removed along different ways, because the networks with loops allow different flow pathways that is beneficial for flooding prevention. The designs N2, 8, 11, 13, 14, 16 in Table 2 are efficient for water removal and low pressure drop for fuel pumping due to presence of numerous connections between the channels (loops). This observation could be very helpful for future trends in development of FFPs for PEMFCs.
Based on the examples provided in Tables 1, 2, a wide range of conventional and bio-inspired FFP designs have been explored in the literature. While conventional designs such as serpentine, parallel, or baffle-based channels prioritize simplicity and manufacturability, bio-inspired configurations like lung-type or leaf-patterned FF aim to mimic the optimized flow networks, which are abound in nature. To clarify the strengths and trade-offs of each category, Table 3 presents a comparative summary of their main advantages and disadvantages.
TABLE 3
| Flow field type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional | • Simple design and low-cost fabrication • Proven reliability • Good water removal (serpentine, parallel) | • No uniformity of distribution • High pressure drop • Risk of flooding and dry zones |
| Bio-inspired | • Uniform flow and temperature • Low pressure drop • Improved water management | • Complexity of design and fabrication • Sensitive to operating conditions • Still under development • Limit adoption in industrial FC systems |
Advanced design for the cooling channels in bipolar plates of PEMFC.
2.2 Coolant channels in FFP
The design of coolant channels in FFPs involves a balance between maximizing heat removal and minimizing the disruption to fuel and oxidant distribution across the FC. These channels are not merely conduits for coolant flow; they are a critical part of the FCs architecture including their size, shape and flow path, influencing everything from the FC’s thermal and hydraulic performance to its electrical efficiency and material durability. The coolant fluid is typically water, glycol mixture or a base fluid with nanoparticles; the last one gets more attention recently from researcher to develop (Li C. et al., 2022;
FIGURE 8

PEMFC cooling techniques (from (
TABLE 4
| N | Geometry | Highlight | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Coolant: liquid cooling Location: Anode and cathode Geometry: parallel channels with square cross-section Dimension:0.61 × 0.42 mm | |
| 2 | ![]() | Coolant: liquid (water) Location: Anode and cathode Type of channels: 12 parallel straight channels | Pei et al. (2019) |
| 3 | ![]() | Coolant: liquid Geometry: serpentine co-flow, cross-flow and counter flow Number of channels: 15 | Lin et al. (2019) |
| 4 | ![]() | Coolant: water-steam cooling (phase change material) | Neofytidis et al. (2023) |
| 5 | ![]() | Coolant: water Location: Anode Geometry: parallel and serpentine FFs | |
| 6 | ![]() | Coolant: evaporative cooling Geometry: parallel micro channels | Li et al. (2023b) |
| 7 | ![]() | Coolant: Air and metal foam Location: cathode Geometry: parallel Active area: 100 cm2 | |
| 8 | ![]() | Coolant: Air/liquid Location: cathode Geometry:Zigzag channel | Liao et al. (2021) |
| 9 | ![]() | Coolant: liquid (glycol) Geometry: straight and wavy channels |
Advanced design for the cooling channels in bipolar plates of PEMFC.
The materials, geometry and operating conditions of the cooling systems for PEMFC stacks given in Table 4 are briefly summarized below. Their benefits and limitations are discussed. Celik et al. (
Pei et al. (2019) (N2 in Table 4) investigated the use of separated coolant flow channels for the anode and cathode of PEMFCs. This cooling approach allows for independent temperature control on both sides, improving overall thermal management. The main advantages include enhanced temperature uniformity and reduced thermal stresses, leading to more stable FC operation. The study found that this design significantly increased power density by 13% compared to conventional single-loop cooling systems, and improved water management by reducing the risk of flooding.
Lin et al. (2019) (N3 in Table 4) optimized both the configuration and operating parameters of liquid-cooled PEMFC stack. The study focused on liquid cooling as the primary cooling method, which enhanced thermal management and operational stability. The main advantages of this approach included improved temperature control and temperature uniformity over the MEA, which are critical for the efficient operation of PEMFCs. The results show that the optimized configurations and parameters led to a significant increase in power density by 9.5%.
Neofytidis et al. (2023) (N4 in Table 4) explored the implementation of a two-phase liquid cooling system for high-temperature PEMFC. This cooling method leverages phase change (water-steam) to manage thermal loads effectively. The advantages include enhanced thermal management and reduced complexity due to the pumpless design. The study found that the innovative cooling system improved power density to 0.18 W/cm2 at 180°C.
Li Y. et al. (2023) (N6 in Table 4) investigated the thermal management of PEMFC using various micro-channel configurations with flow boiling. The study focused on experimental analysis of three different micro-channel designs to evaluate their effectiveness in cooling. The advantages of using flow boiling in micro-channels include higher heat transfer coefficients and better temperature uniformity compared to traditional single-phase cooling methods. The results demonstrated that the optimal micro-channel configuration significantly reduced the maximum temperature by up to 15%.
Liao et al. (2021) (N8 in Table 4) investigated zigzag-shaped channels for both reactant and cooling fluid flow management. The study highlighted the significant impact of these channels on enhancing the uniformity of reactant distribution, achieving a more uniform temperature distribution, and improving overall performance despite an increase in pressure drop. Key findings showed that zigzag channels enhance mass transfer, leading to a 12% improvement in current density distribution and a 15% reduction in temperature variance across the FC. Additionally, the zigzag design resulted in a 20% increase in pressure drop.
Therefore, modifications in the shape (waved, zigzag, etc.) and location of the cooling channels can significantly increase the overall efficiency (by 10%–13%) and enhance the uniformity of temperature distribution (by 15%–55%), which is essential for FC technology. A successful combination of proper modifications in both FFs and cooling channels to achieve a synergetic effect remains a key challenge for future development. Moreover, bridging the gap between CFD-based predictions and experimental validations remains a major obstacle, especially in large-area FC systems where multi-physics interactions are complex. In this context, Huo et al. (
3 Materials and manufacturing for FFPs in PEMFCs
There are several alternative ways in which FFPs can be made for PEMFC. All of them can be produced by materials selection, followed by shaping or forming the plate. Afterwards, machining or etching is done to create the gas flow channels, and finally the surface is treated to achieve high hydrophobicity and longevity of the material. Among these characteristics, include easy electrical conductivity, lightweight, and corrosion resistance, which are proper to graphite and many types of polymers. They include methods of injection molding, hot pressing, and stamping used to form the plates in PEMFC (Wilberforce et al., 2017;
The choice of manufacturing technique depends on.
1) Cost efficiency: Additive manufacturing through electrochemical deposition ensures long-term cost efficiency due to reduced material wastage and a means to incorporate the design of complex shapes without a proportional increase in production costs. However, the cost for set up and materials at the preliminary stage could be more than the costs for simplified FFs.
2) Design complexity: Different manufacturing techniques allow for varying levels of complexity in design, the complexity of FFPs depends on channels dimensions, integration of features and material compatibility.
3) Scalability: Traditional processes such as compression molding are most scalable even today for high on volumes of products, although new developments that are becoming a reality in the AM realm may soon equalize the differences (Karimi et al., 2012), (Yoon et al., 2008), (Mehta and Cooper, 2003), (Tang et al., 2021).
A classification of materials for FFPs is presented in Figure 9. The developmental target for PEMFC technology and FFPs according to the U.S department of energy, are presented in Table 5 (Tang et al., 2021). Based on the given literature review and Tables 1–4, the overview of materials and manufacturing technologies is given in Table 6.
FIGURE 9

Classification of materials for PEMFC FFPs (from (US Department of Energy, 2016b)).
TABLE 5
| Characteristic | Units | 2025 targets | 2020 targets | 2015 status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Plate weight | 0.18 | 0.4 | ||
| Lifespan | hours | 8,000 | 5000 | - |
Technical indicators of bipolar plate according to the U.S department of energy.
TABLE 6
| N | Material | Technology | Manufacturer/provider | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graphite | Machining | Manufactured by Kunshan Sunlaite New Energy Technology Co. Ltd (China) | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 2 | Graphite | CNC milling | Vinpro technologies | Velisala and Srinivasulu (2018) |
| 3 | Graphite | CNC milling | PROTIUM-20 fuel cell | |
| 4 | Metallic | 3D printing | //// | |
| 5 | Flexible photopolymer (TangoPlus) | 3D printing | 3D-printed by Stratasys (Minnesota, United States) using Objet 350 Connex3 3D printer | Yoo et al. (2022) |
| 6 | Graphite | CNC machining | National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) | Mojica et al. (2021) |
| 7 | Stainless steel 316L | SLM 3D printing | Stainless steel BPPs fabricated using Selective Laser Melting (SLM) | Lu et al. (2024) |
| 8 | Stainless steel 316L | Machining | Coated with carbon-based material by Precors® | |
| 9 | Graphite | laser sintering (SLS) technology | fabricated by WonATech south korea | |
| 10 | Gold-coated | layer-wise printed circuit board (PCB) | Fabricated using a Roland-40 CNC setup (Roland, United States) | |
| 11 | Graphite | CNC milling | Graphene porous sponge inserts from Graphene Supermarket (Ronkonkoma, NY, United States) | Suárez et al. (2022) |
| 12 | Graphite | CNC milling | Manufactured by by HySA Systems Competence Centre, University of the Western Cape, South Africa | Sauermoser et al. (2021) |
Materials and fabrication techniques for FFP.
The manufacturing cost of FFP is one of the main criteria in order to select an appropriate method for fabrication. Table 7 gives an overview of the cost incurred for different types of FFP fabrication. The Table shown, the costs has been decreased significantly during the past decade. This is mostly credited to the continued improvement in 3D printing technology, together with the advances in other means of production. The use and development of these methods promise good opportunities for cost reduction, as well as for additional flexibility and increased accuracy in the manufacture of the FFP conditions, which probably have to be considered in their future design.
TABLE 7
| N | Technology/company | Material | Past cost (CAD $) | Current cost (CAD $)2024 | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingdao Tennry Carbon Co., Ltd | graphite | 20–30$ (2014) | 8–12$ | |
| 2 | Jiangsu Yanchang Sunlaite New Energy | metal | 45–60$ (2016) | 29–40$ | |
| 3 | Shanghai Sunki Technology Co., Ltd | graphite | 50–70$ (2015) | 30–40$ | Shanghai Sunki Technology Co (2024) |
| 4 | Hebei Aegis Metal Materials Co., Ltd | Titanium | 250$ (2012) | 150$ | |
| 5 | Fuel cell store. Texas,US | Graphite | 90$ (2010) | 52$ | Plates (2024) |
Fabrication costs of FFP’s with 5 × 5 = 25 cm2 area in 2024.
The declining cost trend of FFPs shown in Table 7 aligns with DOE reports, which indicate a significant reduction in bipolar plate fabrication costs from over $800/kW in the early 2000s to approximately $20/kW in 2016 for high-volume automotive production (U.S. Department of Energy, 2016a). a trend largely attributable to increased competitiveness among manufacturers. This competitive landscape has spurred innovations in manufacturing processes and material utilisation, driving down production costs. Additionally, the entrance of new market players and advancements in technology have further intensified competition.
4 Conclusion and recommendations
In this review, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of the design and manufacturing processes associated with FFPs and cooling systems in PEMFCs. Several key observations emerged.
1. Bio-inspired designs: The emergence of bio-inspired designs stands out as a notable advancement, offering substantial promise in enhancing PEMFC performance. These designs, which are inspired by the intricate and efficient patterns found in nature that have been refined through millions of years of evolution, show significant potential in emulating the effectiveness of natural systems. This insight points towards a promising pathway for future developments in FFP technology. The potential utility of bio-inspired FFPs in industrial applications is significant. However, their widespread adoption is contingent upon achieving cost competitiveness with conventional FFP designs. If the manufacturing costs of bio-inspired FFP can be reduced to match those of traditional designs and materials, their implementation in the industry will likely become more viable and advantageous.
2. Water management: The aspect of water management within the bio-inspired frameworks deserves focused exploration. Given the paramount importance of effective water handling for the optimal functionality of PEMFCs, bio-inspired designs introduce innovative approaches to this challenge. The complex patterns modelled after natural distributed networks (lungs, blood vessels, nervous cells, plant leaves, roots and branches, etc.) present a fertile ground for further investigation, potentially revealing methods to enhance FC durability, operational efficiency, and overall reliability.
3. Coolant channels: In addition to the significant impact of coolant channels on the performance of PEMFC, they also play critical role in reducing the overall weight of FFPs and consequently the FC stack. The design and optimization of these channels are promising, as their dimensions and size can pose substantial challenges during the manufacturing process. However, these benefits come with inherent complexity of manufacturing, where precise control over channel dimensions becomes crucial. This complexity can lead to increased costs and production difficulties, making it essential for future research to focus on innovative design solutions that balance performance with manufacturability.
4. Manufacturing advancements: Progress in manufacturing technology, particularly additive manufacturing, is opening new avenues for producing intricate FFPs. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) allows the construction of complex channel geometries and internal structures that would be impractical with traditional machining. This enables rapid prototyping and small-batch production of bio-inspired designs or integrated coolant channels without the need for expensive tooling. However, current 3D printing methods can be slow and costly for mass production, and material choices (metals vs polymers) must ensure sufficient conductivity and durability for FC use. To bridge this gap, research is advancing in high-speed metal printing, multi-material printing, and post-processing techniques (such as coating printed plates for corrosion protection. The future outlook is a convergence of these approaches: hybrid manufacturing routes that exploit 3D printing’s design freedom and traditional methods’ efficiency, leading to cost-effective production of next-generation FFPs with minimal geometric constraints.
5. Sustainable material: Material choices for FFPs are increasingly driven by sustainability as well as performance. While graphite offers excellent corrosion resistance, it is heavy, brittle, and costly to machines. Recent trends favour metals like stainless steel, aluminium, and titanium for their strength, conductivity, and recyclability, especially stainless steel, which is thin, durable, and 100% recyclable. However, metallic plates require protective coatings to prevent corrosion, though recent innovations are reducing reliance on scarce materials like gold. Polymer–carbon composites also offer low-cost, mouldable options with potential for recyclability when thermoplastic binders are used. Moving forward, material strategies should adopt a full life-cycle perspective - prioritizing recyclability, durability, and ease of disassembly - to support a more sustainable and circular PEMFC industry.
Statements
Author contributions
AM: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. NK: Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. TA: Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. MK: Writing – review and editing, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Visualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Research was funded by POB Energy of Warsaw University of Technology within the Excellence Initiative: Research University (IDUB) program (the ENERGYTECHDEMO grant). The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding and resources provided, which enabled the successful completion of this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AcarM. C. (2023). Modeling the influence of coolant flow directions on thermal performance of PEM fuel cell cooling plates with serpentine and straight flow channels. Thermochim. Acta726, 179560. 10.1016/j.tca.2023.179560
2
AfshariE.NabiJ.AtyabiS. A. (2022). “Configuration of proton exchange membrane fuel cell gas and cooling flow fields,” in PEM fuel cells. Fundamentals, advanced technologies, and practical application (Elsevier), 429–463.
3
BadduriS. R.SrinivasuluG. N.RaoS. S. (2019). Experimental analysis of PEM fuel cell performance using lung channel design bipolar plate. Intern. J. Green Energy16 (15), 1591–1601. 10.1080/15435075.2019.1677238
4
BethapudiV. S.HackJ.HindsG.ShearingP. R.BrettD. J. L.CoppensM. O. (2021). Electro-thermal mapping of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with a fractal flow-field. Energy Conversion&Management250, 114924. 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114924
5
BethapudiV. S.HackJ.TrogadasP.ChoJ. I. S.RashaL.HindsG.et al (2019). A lung-inspired printed circuit board polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Energy Conversion&Management202, 112198. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112198
6
CaiG.LiangY.LiuZ.LiuW. (2020). Design and optimization of bio-inspired wave-like channel for a PEM fuel cell applying genetic algorithm. Energy192, 116670. 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116670
7
CaoT.-F.LinH.ChenL.HeY.-L.TaoW.-Q. (2013). Numerical investigation of the coupled water and thermal management in PEM fuel cell. Appl. Energy112, 1115–1125. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.031
8
CelikS.TimurkutlukB.AydinU.YagizM. (2022). Development of titanium bipolar plates fabricated by additive manufacturing for PEM fuel cells in electric vehicles. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy47 (89), 37956–37966. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.282
9
ChadhaK.MartemianovS.ThomasA. (2021). Study of new flow field geometries to enhance water redistribution and pressure head losses reduction within PEM fuel cell. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy46 (10), 7489–7501. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.194
10
ChenH.XuS.PeiP.QuB.ZhangT. (2019). Mechanism analysis of starvation in PEMFC based on external characteristics. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy44 (11), 5437–5446. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.135
11
ChenX.ChaiF.HuS.TanJ.LuoL.XieH.et al (2023). Design of PEMFC bipolar plate cooling flow field based on fractal theory. Energy Convers. and Manag.20, 100445. 10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100445
12
China Wire Mesh Manufacturer (2024). Wire mesh filter, sintered mesh filter supplier. Hebei, China: Hebei aegis metal materials Co., Ltd. Available online at: https://aegismetal.en.made-in-china.com.
13
ChoiS. H.KangD. G.LimI. S.LimH. S.ParkC.KimM. S. (2022). Experimental study on non-uniform arrangement of 3D printed structure for cathodic flow channel in PEMFC. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy47 (2), 1192–1201. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.059
14
CooperJ. S. (2004). Design analysis of PEMFC bipolar plates considering stack manufacturing and environment impact. J. Power Sources129 (2), 152–169. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.11.037
15
DhahadH. A.AlaweeW. H.HassanA. K. (2019). Experimental study of the effect of flow field design to PEM fuel cells performance. Renew. Energy Focus30, 71–77. 10.1016/j.ref.2019.05.002
16
DihrabS. S.SopianK.AlghoulM. A.SulaimanM. Y. (2009). Review of the membrane and bipolar plates materials for conventional and unitized regenerative fuel cells. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev13 (6-7), 1663–1668. 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.029
17
DongP.XieG.NiM. (2021). Improved energy performance of a PEM fuel cell by introducing discontinuous S-shaped and crescent ribs into flowing channels. Energy222, 119920. 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119920
18
EbrahimiM.KujawskiW.Fatyeyevaand K.KujawaJ. (2021). A review on ionic liquids-based membranes for middle and high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEM FCs). Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 5430. 10.3390/ijms22115430
19
FanW.ZhaoT.JiangK.SunL.JiaS.WuQ.et al (2022). Plant vs. animal prototype for designing bio-inspired pemfc flow fields: corn veins or Murray’s law?J. Bionic Engin.19 (3), 761–776. 10.1007/s42235-022-00174-4
20
GhadhbanS. A.AlaweeW. H.DhahadH. A. (2021). Study effects of bio-inspired flow filed design on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance. Case Stud. Therm. Engin24, 100841. 10.1016/j.csite.2021.100841
21
Graphite Product, Graphite Electrode (2024). Special type graphite. Henan, China: Carburant. Available online at: https://www.tennry.com/.
22
HamiltonP. J.PolletB. G. (2010). Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) flow field plate: design, materials and characterisation. Fuel Cells10 (4), 489–509. 10.1002/fuce.201000033
23
HashmiS. M. H. (2010). Cooling Strategies for PEM FC Stacks. Doctoral dissertation, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität. Hamburg, Germany: Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg.
24
HermannA.ChaudhuriT.SpagnolP. (2005). Bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells: a review. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy30 (12), 1297–1302. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.016
25
HmadA. A.DukhanN. (2021). Cooling design for PEM fuel-cell stacks employing air and metal foam: simulation and experiment. Energies14 (9), 2687. 10.3390/en14092687
26
Home-Jiangsu Yanchang Sunlaite News Energy Co., Ltd. (2024). Jiangsu, China: Home-Jiangsu Yanchang Sunlaite News Energy Co., Ltd. Available online at: https://en.sunlaite.com/.
27
HuCh.ZhaoY.ZhangZ.ZhangH.ChenD. (2023). Optimization of flow field structure for proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack by multi-physics coupling simulation. Intern. J. electrochem. Sci.18 (7), 100195. 10.1016/j.ijoes.2023.100195
28
HuangH.LeiH.LiuM.WangT.LiC.GuoX.et al (2020). Effect of superior mesenteric artery branch structure-based flow field on PEMFC performance. Energy Convers. and Manag.226, 113546. 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113546
29
HuoW.FanL.XuY.BenbouzidM.XuW.GaoF.et al (2025). Digitally-assisted structure design of a large-size proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy and Environ. Sci.18 (2), 631–644. 10.1039/d4ee04713c
30
HuoW.LiuB.XuW.XieB.FanL.BenbouzidM.et al (2024). High precision and efficient simulation of large-size proton exchange membrane fuel cells incorporated with a novel alternative cooling method. Intern. J. Heat. &Mass Transf.230, 125780. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.125780
31
IjaodolaO.OgungbemiE.KhatibF. N.WilberforceT.RamadanM.El HassanZ.et al (2018). Evaluating the effect of metal bipolar plate coating on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energies11 (11), 3203. 10.3390/en11113203
32
JangJ. Y.ChengC. H.LiaoW. T.HuangY. X.TsaiY. C. (2012). Experimental and numerical study of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with spiral flow channels. Appl. Energy99, 67–79. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.011
33
KandlikarS. G. (2008). Microscale and macroscale aspects of water management challenges in PEM fuel cells. Heat. Transf. Engin29 (7), 575–587. 10.1080/01457630801922246
34
KangH. C.JumK. M.SohnY. J. (2019). Performance of unit PEM fuel cells with a leaf-vein-simulating flow field-patterned bipolar plate. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy44 (43), 24036–24042. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.120
35
KarimiS.FraserN.RobertsB.FoulkesF. R. (2012). A review of metallic bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: materials and fabrication methods. Adv. Mater. Sci. and Engin2012, 1–22. 10.1155/2012/828070
36
KeY.ZhangB.YuanW.BaiY.ZhaoY.LiuZ. A.et al (2023). Performance enhancement of proton exchange membrane fuel cells with bio-inspired gear-shaped flow channels. Chem. Engin. J.474, 145870. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.145870
37
KizilovaN. (2004). Computational approach to optimal transport network construction in biomechanics. Lecture Notes in Computer Sci.3044, 476–485.
38
LiC.XuX.HuH.MeiN.YangY. (2022b). Numerical investigation into the effect of structural parameters of parallel flow field with cooling channels on fuel cell performance. J. Electrochem. Energy Convers. Storage19 (1), 010903. 10.1115/1.4050368
39
LiN.WangW.XuR.ZhangJ.XuH. (2023a). Design of a novel nautilus bionic flow field for proton exchange membrane fuel cell by analyzing performance. Intern. J.Heat and Mass Transf.200, 123517. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123517
40
LiY.BiJ.TangM.LuG. (2022a). Snowflake bionic flow channel design to optimize the pressure drop and flow uniform of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Micromachines13 (5), 665. 10.3390/mi13050665
41
LiY.HeJ.LuoX.LiangY.ZhangY.YangZ.et al (2023b). Experimental study on flow boiling-based micro-channel configurations for the PEMFC cooling. Therm. Sci. Engin. Prog.46, 102210. 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102210
42
LiaoZ.WeiL.DafallaA. M.GuoJ.JiangF. (2021). Analysis of the impact of flow field arrangement on the performance of PEMFC with zigzag-shaped channels. Intern. J. Heat and Mass Transf.181, 121900. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121900
43
LimB. H.MajlanE. H.DaudW. R. W.HusainiT.RosliM. I. (2016). Effects of flow field design on water management and reactant distribution in PEMFC: a review. Ionics22, 301–316. 10.1007/s11581-016-1644-y
44
LinC.YanX.WeiG.KeC.ShenS.ZhangJ. (2019). Optimization of configurations and cathode operating parameters on liquid-cooled proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks by orthogonal method. Appl. Energy253, 113496. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113496
45
LuK.ZhangJ.DingH.WangZ.PanX. (2024). Numerical and experimental investigation of 3D flow field bipolar plates for PEMFCs by metal 3D printing. Fuel357, 129699. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129699
46
LuoS.ZhangY.ZhangJ.XuJ. (2020). A user biology preference prediction model based on the perceptual evaluations of designers for biologically inspired design. Symmetry12 (11), 1860. 10.3390/sym12111860
47
MadhavD.WangJ.KelothR.MusJ.BuysschaertF.VandeginsteV. (2024). A review of proton exchange membrane degradation pathways, mechanisms, and mitigation strategies in a fuel cell. Energies17 (5), 998. 10.3390/en17050998
48
MarappanM.PalaniswamyK.VelumaniT.ChulK. B.VelayuthamR.ShivakumarP.et al (2021). Performance studies of proton exchange membrane fuel cells with different flow field designs–review. Chem. Rec.21 (4), 663–714. 10.1002/tcr.202000138
49
MehtaV.CooperJ. S. (2003). Review and analysis of PEM fuel cell design and manufacturing. J. Power Sources114 (1), 32–53. 10.1016/s0378-7753(02)00542-6
50
MekhilefS.SaidurR.SafariA. (2012). Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.16 (1), 981–989. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.020
51
MerdjaniA.KizilovaN.AwotweT. W. (2024). Optimizing performance in PEM fuel cells: a simulation study of T-junction fractal flow field plate. Preprint. 10.2139/ssrn.5011186
52
MojicaF.RahmanM. A.SarkerM.HusseyD. S.JacobsonD. L.LaMannaJ. M.et al (2021). Study of converging-diverging channel induced convective mass transport in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy Convers. and Manag.237, 114095. 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114095
53
MolinaD.PoyatosJ.SerJ. D.GarcíaS.HussainA.HerreraF. (2020). Comprehensive taxonomies of nature-and bio-inspired optimization: inspiration versus algorithmic behavior, critical analysis recommendations. Cogn. Comput.12, 897–939. 10.1007/s12559-020-09730-8
54
NeofytidisC.PaloukisF.AthanasopoulosN.NeophytidesS. G.DaletouM. K. (2023). Efficient high temperature PEMFC metallic stack with innovative two-phase liquid cooling. Energy Convers. and Manag.283, 116944. 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116944
55
NöstM.DopplerCh.KlellM.TrattnerA. (2018). “Thermal management of PEM fuel cells in electric vehicles,” in Comprehensive energy management-safe adaptation, predictive control and thermal management (Springer), 93–112.
56
ObayopoS. O.Bello-OchendeT.MeyerJ. P. (2012). Modelling and optimization of reactant gas transport in a PEM fuel cell with a transverse pin fin insert in channel flow. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy37 (13), 10286–10298. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.150
57
OlabiA. G.WilberforceT.AbdelkareemM. A. (2021). Fuel cell application in the automotive industry and future perspective. Energy214, 118955. 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118955
58
PanY.RuanH.WuB.RegmiY. N.WangH.BrandonN. P. (2024). A machine learning driven 3D+ 1D model for efficient characterization of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy AI17, 100397. 10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100397
59
PeiH.MengK.ChangH.ZhangY.ShenJ.TuZ.et al (2019). Performance improvement in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with separated coolant flow channels in the anode and cathode. Energy Convers. and Manag.187, 76–82. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.020
60
PentelovitchN.NagelJ. K. (2022). Understanding the use of bio-inspired design tools by industry professionals. Biomimetics7 (2), 63. 10.3390/biomimetics7020063
61
Plates (2024). Fuel cell store. Available online at: https://www.fuelcellstore.com/fuel-cell-components/plates.
62
RaminF.SadeghifarH.TorkavannejadA. (2019). Flow field plates with trap-shape channels to enhance power density of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Intern. J. Heat and Mass Transf.129, 1151–1160. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.050
63
RuanH.WuCh.LiuSh.ChenT. (2016). Design and simulation of novel flow field plate geometry for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Heat and Mass Transf.52, 2167–2176. 10.1007/s00231-015-1737-6
64
SauermoserM.KizilovaN.PolletB. G.KjelstrupS. (2020). Flow field patterns for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Front. Energy Res.8, 13. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00013
65
SauermoserM.PolletB. G.KizilovaN.KjelstrupS. (2021). Scaling factors for channel width variations in tree-like flow field patterns for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells - an experimental study. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy46 (37), 19554–19568. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.102
66
SebbaniI.EttouhamiM. K.BoulakhbarM. (2025). Fuel Cells: a technical, environmental, and economic outlook. Clean. Energy Syst.10, 100168. 10.1016/j.cles.2024.100168
67
ShaiganN.YuanX.-Z.GirardF.FatihK.RobertsonM. (2021). Standardized testing framework for quality control of fuel cell bipolar plates. J. Power Sources482, 228972. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228972
68
Shanghai Sunki Technology Co., Ltd. (2024). Shanghai, China: Shanghai Sunki Technology Co., Ltd. Available online at: https://www.sh-sunki.com.
69
ShekhawatD.SpiveyJ. J.BerryD. A. (2011). Fuel cells: technologies for fuel processing (Elsevier).
70
SierraJ. M.Figueroa-RamírezS. J.DíazS. E.VargasJ.SebastianP. J. (2014). Numerical evaluation of a PEM fuel cell with conventional flow fields adapted to tubular plates. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy39 (29), 16694–16705. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.078
71
SongJ.HuangY.LiuY.MaZ.ChenL.LiT.et al (2022). Numerical investigation and optimization of cooling flow field design for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energies15 (7), 2609. 10.3390/en15072609
72
SongP.QiaoG.HuX.XiaX.XuG.DengZ. (2021). “Current status and research progress of bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells,” in 2021 international conference on power system technology (POWERCON) (Wuhan, China), 202–208.
73
SteeleB. C. H.HeinzelA. (2001). Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature414 (6861), 345–352. 10.1038/35104620
74
SuárezC.IranzoA.TohariasB.RosaF. (2022). Experimental and numerical Investigation on the design of a bioinspired PEM fuel cell. Energy257, 124799. 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124799
75
TangA.CrisciL.BonvilleL.JankovicJ. (2021). An overview of bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Renew. and Sustain. Energy13 (2). 10.1063/5.0031447
76
TissF.ChouikhR.GuizaniA. (2014). A numerical investigation of reactant transport in a PEM fuel cell with partially blocked gas channels. Energy Convers. and Manag.80, 32–38. 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.063
77
U.S. Department of Energy (2016a). Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2016 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. Available online at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/66805.pdf.
78
US Department of Energy (2016b). The fuel cell technologies office multi-year research. Dev. demonstration plan. Available online at: https://www.energy.gov/.
79
VelisalaV.SrinivasuluG. N. (2018). Numerical simulation and experimental comparison of single, double and triple serpentine flow channel configuration on performance of a PEM fuel cell. Arab. J. Sci. Eng.43, 1225–1234. 10.1007/s13369-017-2813-7
80
VijayakrishnanM. K.PalaniswamyK.RamasamyJ.KumaresanT.ManoharanK.Raj RajagopalT. K.et al (2020). Numerical and experimental investigation on 25 cm2 and 100 cm2 PEMFC with novel sinuous flow field for effective water removal and enhanced performance. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy45 (13), 7848–7862. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.205
81
WanZh.QuanW.YangCh.YanH.ChenX.HuangT.et al (2020). Optimal design of a novel M-like channel in bipolar plates of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on minimum entropy generation. Energy Convers. and Manag.205, 112386. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112386
82
WangH. H.DengX. (2022). The role of fluid intelligence in creativity: the case of bio-inspired design. Think. Ski. and Creativity45, 101059. 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101059
83
WangSh.JiangS. P. (2017). Prospects of fuel cell technologies. Natl. Sci. Rev.4 (2), 163–166. 10.1093/nsr/nww099
84
WangX.QinY.WuSh.ShangguanX.ZhangJ.YinY. (2020). Numerical and experimental investigation of baffle plate arrangement on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. J. Power Sources457, 228034. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228034
85
WangY.ChenK. S.MishlerJ.ChoS.ChAdroherX. C. (2011). A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Appl. Energy88 (4), 981–1007. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030
86
WangY.SiC.QinY.WangX.FanY.GaoY. (2021). Bio-inspired design of an auxiliary fishbone-shaped cathode flow field pattern for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Energy Convers. Manag.227, 113588. 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113588
87
WilberforceT.IjaodolaO.OgungbemiE.KhatibF. N.OlabiA. G. (2017). “Computational Fluid Dynamic simulation and modelling (CFX) of flow plate in PEM fuel cell using aluminum open cellular foam material,” in IEEE Texas power and energy conference (TPEC). IEEE.
88
XiongK.WuW.WangS.ZhangL. (2021). Modeling, design, materials and fabrication of bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cell: a review. Appl. Energy301, 117443. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117443
89
XuX.ZhangL.WangS.HanD.YouS.ZhouJ. (2024). Numerical and experimental analyses of a novel type PEMFC coolant channel. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy49, 652–673. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.355
90
YanH.ZhangW.QuZ.ChenN. (2023). Flow field plate of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: a review. J. Renew. and Sustain. Energy15 (1). 10.1063/5.0124224
91
YaoJ.YanF.PeiX. (2022). Design and analysis of spider bionic flow field for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Electrochem. Sci. and Technol.14 (1), 38–50. 10.33961/jecst.2022.00479
92
YeetsornR. (2010). “Development of electrically conductive thermoplastic composites for bipolar plate application in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell,” in PhD thesis. Department of chemical engineering. Waterloo, ON, Canada: University of Waterloo.
93
YooH.KwonO.KimJ.ChaH.KimH.ChoiH.et al (2022). 3D-printed flexible flow-field plates for bendable polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources532, 231273. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231273
94
YoonW.HuangX.FazzinoP.ReifsniderK. L.AkkaouiM. A. (2008). Evaluation of coated metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources179 (1), 265–273. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.034
95
ZhangC.ZhouW.ZhangL.ChanS. H.WangY. (2015). An experimental study on anode water management in high temperature PEM fuel cell. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy40 (13), 4666–4672. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.037
96
ZhangY.TuZ. (2024). Flow field design of the bipolar plates in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell: problem, progress, and perspective. Appl. Energy and Combust. Sci17, 100244. 10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100244
97
ZhangZ.WangC.ChenC.ZhengZ. (2024). Optimal design of locally improved structure for enhancing mass transfer in PEMFC cathode flow field. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy57, 798–811. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.092
98
ZhouY.ChenB.ChenW.DengQ.ShenJ.TuZ. (2022). A novel opposite sinusoidal wave flow channel for performance enhancement of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy261, 125383. 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125383
Summary
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cell, flow field plate, bio-inspired design, thermal management, manufacturing techniques
Citation
Merdjani A, Kizilova N, Awotwe TW and Kostrzewski M (2025) Advancements and challenges in design of flow field plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: a comprehensive review. Front. Energy Res. 13:1506011. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2025.1506011
Received
04 October 2024
Accepted
28 April 2025
Published
23 May 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Hugo Morais, University of Lisbon, Portugal
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2025 Merdjani, Kizilova, Awotwe and Kostrzewski.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Abdelhakim Merdjani, abdelhakim.merdjani.dokt@pw.edu.pl
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.








































