Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CORRECTION article

Front. Energy Res., 25 November 2025

Sec. Process and Energy Systems Engineering

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1739191

Correction: Contribution to a standardized economic and ecological assessment methodology for e-fuel production in Germany

  • 1German Aerospace Center (DLR) e.V, Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, Department of Energy System Integration, Stuttgart, Germany
  • 2German Aerospace Center (DLR) e.V, Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Institute for Networked Energy Systems, Stuttgart, Germany
  • 3Research Center for Energy Economics (FfE) e. V., Munich, Germany

A Correction on
Contribution to a standardized economic and ecological assessment methodology for e-fuel production in Germany

by Heimann N, Raab M, Wulff N, Haas S, Pichlmaier S and Dietrich R-U (2025). Front. Energy Res. 13:1297299. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2025.1297299

Equation 9 in [Section 2.2 line 332] was erroneously given as ACCa=FCI·IR·1+IRy1+IRy1+IR·y9.

The correct equation is ACCa=FCI·IR1+IRy1+IRy1+y191.

Equation 8 in [Section 2.2 line 328] was erroneously given as [TCI=FCI·1workingcapital1].

The correct equation is TCI=FCI1workingcapital

Equation 6 in [Section 4.3 line 559] was erroneously given as NPCkg=1.53+0.92+247.1+0.5M2018a248,807.8ta=12018kg.

The correct equation is NPCkg=0.7+0.92+247.1+0.5M2018a248,807.8ta=12018kg. Its equation number has to updated to (10).

Text correction

[With an assumed interest rate of 5%, see Table 1, and equation (9) the ACC equals 1.53 M€2018 a−1. Given the values of Table 7, the OL results 0.49 M€2018 a−1. In Table 10 the intermediate and the main result of the OPEXind calculation is shown].

A correction has been made to the section 4.3 Economic analysis:

“[With an assumed interest rate of 5%, see Table 1, and equation (9) the ACC equals 0.7 M€2018 a−1. Given the values of Table 7, the OL results 0.49 M€2018 a−1. In Table 10 the intermediate and the main result of the OPEXind calculation is shown.]”

The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: comparability, energy-transition, techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment, power-to-x process, standardizing

Citation: Heimann N, Raab M, Wulff N, Haas S, Pichlmaier S and Dietrich R-U (2025) Correction: Contribution to a standardized economic and ecological assessment methodology for e-fuel production in Germany. Front. Energy Res. 13:1739191. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2025.1739191

Received: 05 November 2025; Accepted: 11 November 2025;
Published: 25 November 2025.

Edited and reviewed by:

Uwe Schröder, University of Greifswald, Germany

Copyright © 2025 Heimann, Raab, Wulff, Haas, Pichlmaier and Dietrich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nathanael Heimann, bmF0aGFuYWVsLmhlaW1hbm5AZGxyLmRl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.