ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Ecosystem Restoration
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1527023
This article is part of the Research TopicRestoring Our Blue Planet: Advances in Marine and Coastal RestorationView all 5 articles
Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Restoration Strategies for Coastal Vulnerability in Jiangsu Province, China: A Multi-Factorial Assessment
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Geographical and Planning, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, China
- 2City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
- 3University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The coastal region of Jiangsu Province, a critical ecological and economic zone in eastern China, faces significant spatial vulnerability due to combined natural and anthropogenic pressures. This study employs a multi-factorial assessment framework integrating Geographic Information System (GIS) tools to analyze vulnerability across three dimensions: basic conditions, ecological environment, and human activities. Key findings reveal distinct spatial disparities in vulnerability, quantified through a vulnerability index (VI) ranging from 1 (highest vulnerability) to 5 (lowest).Statistical results indicate that 5.49% of the coastal zone is classified as high vulnerability (VI=1) and 21.15% as relatively high (VI=2), primarily concentrated in inland areas such as Ganyu, Lianyun, and Binhai districts. Conversely, 39.31% of the region exhibits moderate vulnerability (VI=3), while 32.04% and 2.02% are categorized as relatively low (VI=4) and low vulnerability (VI=5), respectively. Notably, inland regions consistently show higher vulnerability compared to coastal areas, contradicting initial assumptions of uniform north-south gradients. Spatial analysis further demonstrates that central coastal zones (e.g., Dafeng, Dongtai) exhibit lower vulnerability due to balanced human-environment interactions, whereas northern and southern inland regions face intensified pressures from urbanization, industrialization, and land subsidence.To address these disparities, this study proposes targeted ecological restoration strategies, including: (1) infrastructure reinforcement in high-vulnerability inland areas; (2) wetland conservation and reforestation in ecologically sensitive zones; (3) sustainable land-use planning to mitigate human-induced degradation; and (4) community-based adaptive management frameworks. These recommendations aim to enhance resilience while balancing socioeconomic development and environmental protection.This research provides a data-driven foundation for policymakers to prioritize interventions in Jiangsu's coastal zone and offers a replicable methodology for vulnerability assessments in other deltaic regions.
Keywords: Coastal vulnerability, Ecological environment, Human Activities, Remediation measures, Jiangsu Province
Received: 12 Nov 2024; Accepted: 12 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hou, Liu, Liu and Yao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Binglin Liu, School of Geographical and Planning, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, China
Weijiang Liu, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
Nini Yao, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, England, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.