Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Environmental Economics and Management

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1538921

Direct Market Valuation Method to Evaluate Economic Value of Provisioning Ecosystem Services on Household Income in Zambia's Bangweulu Wetland

Provisionally accepted
Greyford  TemboGreyford Tembo*Kawawa  BandaKawawa BandaMisheck  Lesa ChunduMisheck Lesa ChunduChisanga  LyobaChisanga LyobaHenry  ShichingabulaHenry ShichingabulaImasiku  NyambeImasiku Nyambe
  • University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Wetlands are known to be one of the most productive and valuable ecosystems that provide important and diverse benefits to people around the world, contributing to provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting services. However, very few studies have focused on the monetary value of provisioning ecosystem services and their contribution to household income. This paper aims to investigate the monetary value of provisioning services and their contribution to household income in the Bangweulu Wetland and surrounding areas, Zambia. A direct market valuation method was employed to quantify the products collected from the Bangweulu Wetland and surrounding areas and to assess their contribution to household income. Primary data, including household survey questionnaires, field observations, field measurements and key informant interviews, were employed. The research employed statistical techniques, including the estimation of mean frequencies, averages and the Pearson Chi-square test. Stratified random sampling was employed to sample 340 households in six districts. Also, purposive sampling was employed to sample seventeen key informants from government departments and traditional leaders. Major products collected include freshwater, crops, fish, woodfuel, grass, livestock rearing, reeds, papyrus, wild products and clay soil. However, freshwater had no significant monetary value and contributed minimally to household income. The Pearson Chi-square test showed that social factors such as gender, residential status, and house type significantly influenced the utilisation of various wetland resources, including crops, fish, woodfuel, reeds, papyrus and freshwater. In contrast, factors such as age, family size and employment level had no significant impact on resource utilisation. The gross monetary value of these services was estimated at US$ 11.7 million annually, the total cash income estimated at US$ 9.94 million and the total net monetary value estimated at US$ 10.5 million. Fishing and agriculture accounted for the largest contribution to household incomes (66.9% and 25.3%, respectively). These statistics underscore the critical role played by the Bangweulu Wetland in sustaining local livelihoods. Consequently, policymakers should carefully consider the economic value of the Bangweulu Wetland's ecosystem services in their planning and as an integral part of potential poverty reduction strategies.

Keywords: Bangweulu Wetland, Poverty reduction, policymakers, ecosystem services, Livelihoods, Resource utilisation

Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tembo, Banda, Chundu, Lyoba, Shichingabula and Nyambe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Greyford Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.