ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Environmental Policy and Governance
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1566904
This article is part of the Research TopicClean Heating Policy Reforms in the Context of Net ZeroView all articles
Localized Policy Design for Clean Heating Transitions: A Multi-City Analysis of Renter Preferences for Energy Efficiency
Provisionally accepted- 1Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States
- 2American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The transition to clean heating systems in rental housing is crucial for achieving net-zero emissions goals, yet current policy frameworks lack systematic understanding of how renter preferences vary across different market contexts. While existing research acknowledges split incentive barriers between landlords and tenants, analysis of their manifestation across diverse demographic groups and market conditions remains notably absent. This study employs latent class analysis of discrete choice experiment data from the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy to identify distinct renter segments and their responses to energy efficient rental options. Our study combines demographic analysis with market valuation techniques to examine how renter segments distribute across three diverse metropolitan areas -San Diego, Houston, and Durham. The analysis identifies six differentiated renter classes, characterized by systematic variation in demographic factors, housing preferences, and economic indicators. We find that while initial return multipliers exhibit significant sensitivity to assumptions about rent and energy cost differentials, indicating that the financial burden for energy inefficient rentals is considerably larger than the premium one might pay for efficient rentals (presenting a penalty-to-premium of 1.35 -1.42). The proportion of housing costs captured by landlords versus utilities varies significantly by market, increasing from 78.4% to 87.1% in San Diego, 745.9% to 89.1% in Houston, and 88.5% to 94.1% in Durham as properties move from poor to high efficiency, highlighting how regional characteristics shape the distribution of improvement costs between landlords and tenants. The study demonstrates how demographic composition systematically influences clean heating transition opportunities across rental markets, provides empirical evidence of geographic variation in renter segment distribution, and quantifies market-specific responses to efficiency improvements These findings also underscore a market asymmetry that can impede extensive energy retrofits and enable policymakers to develop targeted approaches for accelerating clean heating adoption while maintaining affordability across diverse renter populations.
Keywords: Energy Efficiency Preferences1, Energy transition2, Localized Policy Design3, Scenario Planning4, Market Segmentation5, climate adaptation6
Received: 26 Jan 2025; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Troxell, Conrad and Sussman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Graeme W Troxell, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.