Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Drylands

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1569574

This article is part of the Research TopicSociohydrology in DrylandsView all 14 articles

Landscape Metrics Selection and Influence over Hydrological Signatures: Land Use Change's Effect over Water Resources in Chile

Provisionally accepted
Lenin Esau  Henriquez-DoleLenin Esau Henriquez-Dole1,2*Jorge  GironasJorge Gironas2Francisco  MezaFrancisco Meza3Esthela  SalazarEsthela Salazar4Cristian  HenriquezCristian Henriquez5
  • 1EcoAgsus (Interdisciplinary Network for Ecosystem Sustainability), Mendoza, Argentina
  • 2Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile
  • 3Department of Ecosystems and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile
  • 4Department of Earth Sciences and Construction, Fuerzas Armadas University ESPE, Sangolquí, Ecuador
  • 5Institute of Geography, Faculty of History, Geography and Political Science, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study evaluates how land use changes alter hydrological regimes in water-scarce regions, such as drylands, employing a novel framework integrating class-level landscape metrics (LM) and Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA). Historical (1990–2017) and future land use scenarios - Business as Usual (BAU) and Strategic Land Use Planning (PROT) - for two catchments within the Maipo River Basin in Chile were analyzed using LASSO regression to identify key LM, which reflects landscape patterns influencing hydrology. Results reveal that shape and aggregation metrics, particularly urban patch size (SHAPE_MN) and agricultural dispersion (SPLIT), could evidence strong connection between landscape dynamics and hydrology, where deviation explained in critical hydrological signatures ranges from 15% to 98% in monthly flows (IHA 1), and from 25% to 99% in extreme events (IHA 2). Urbanization in Rinconada de Maipú (RM) catchment amplifies peak flows and reduces baseflow, while rural abandonment in Los Almendros catchment stabilizes baseflow (+23%) through vegetation recovery. Future scenarios illustrate context-dependent outcomes. In Los Almendros, characterized by low anthropogenic intervention, PROT scenarios mitigate hydrological degradation more effectively than BAU. However, in the highly urbanized RM catchment, PROT's benefits are limited, requiring more actions to limit hydrological impacts. Only 64% of LM (74/116) significantly relates to hydrology in the study catchments. This approach offers a replicable tool to identify the most influential landscape metrics over hydrology in a region, streamlining actionable metrics to bridge the work of land use planners and water resources planners by integrating spatial land use configuration with water resources management.

Keywords: landscape metrics1, hydrological signatures2, global change3, society influence4, sustainable planning5, Lasso regression6

Received: 01 Feb 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Henriquez-Dole, Gironas, Meza, Salazar and Henriquez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lenin Esau Henriquez-Dole, l.henriquez@ecoagsus.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.