Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Water and Wastewater Management

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1586893

Comparative assessment of combined concentration and extraction methods for Influenza A and B virus detection in wastewater

Provisionally accepted
Till  FretschnerTill Fretschner1*Edgar  Elon ZeislerEdgar Elon Zeisler1Steffi  SchellerSteffi Scheller1Andreas  AurenzAndreas Aurenz1Beate  SchneiderBeate Schneider2Marcus  LukasMarcus Lukas2Ulrike  BraunUlrike Braun2Timo  GreinerTimo Greiner3Jakob  SchumacherJakob Schumacher3Hans-Christoph  SelinkaHans-Christoph Selinka1Birgit  WaltherBirgit Walther1René  KalliesRené Kallies1
  • 1Section II 1.4 Microbiological Risks, German Federal Environment Agency, Berlin, Germany
  • 2Section III 2.5 Waste Water Analysis, Monitoring Methods, German Federal Environment Agency, Berlin, Germany
  • 3Unit 32 Surveillance, Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Berlin, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Influenza, caused by Influenza A and B viruses, represents a significant global health burden due to recurrent seasonal epidemics and the risk of pandemics. To gauge the large volume of seasonal influenza cases, it may be helpful to complement classical surveillance systems with additional approaches such as wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE), which can aid in the early trend assessment of seasonal epidemics. WBE has emerged as a promising tool for population-level surveillance, enabling the detection of viral nucleic acids in wastewater and offering unique advantages over individual-based surveillance. This study evaluates the performance of different combinations of virus concentration (i.e.i.e., PEG precipitation, centrifugal filtrationfiltration, and silica membrane filtration) together with two distinct RNA extraction methods for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses in wastewater. Composite samples from four wastewater treatment plants in North Germany were analyzed using precipitation, filtration, and automated extraction protocols. Method performance for six combinations was evaluated by quantitative recovery of viral RNA and a spike-and-recovery experiment. Recovery efficiencies were determined from controlled spiking experiments, which provide a standardised method of comparison but may not fully reflect the complexity of real wastewater samples, in which viral genomes may be fragmented and associated with solids. The combination of PureYield™ filtration and Maxwell® RSC extraction (PYC/_EX1) consistently demonstrated the highest recovery rates for both Influenza virus A and B, achieving recovery efficiencies of up to 80.444.4% and 72.376.4%, respectively. This method also enabled reliable PAGE \* Arabic \* MERGEFORMAT This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article detection of low viral loads, which is critical for an early detection of rising incidence. Our findings underscore demonstrate the importance of rigorous method evaluation to optimize WBE for influenza surveillance. By providing robust, sensitive, and reproducible protocols, this study highlights the potential of WBE to improve public health preparedness, enables timely interventions and reduces the spread of influenza viruses within communities.

Keywords: Influenza Virus, Wastewater-based epidemiology, Recovery efficiency, methodperformance, method evaluation, wastewater, ddPCR, early detection (of emerging pathogens)

Received: 03 Mar 2025; Accepted: 27 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Fretschner, Zeisler, Scheller, Aurenz, Schneider, Lukas, Braun, Greiner, Schumacher, Selinka, Walther and Kallies. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Till Fretschner, Section II 1.4 Microbiological Risks, German Federal Environment Agency, Berlin, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.