Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Environmental Policy and Governance

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1594740

This article is part of the Research TopicPolicy and Governance Frameworks for Environmental and Human Rights DefendersView all articles

Silent Violence in the Just Transition: Structural Barriers, Governance Design, and the Hidden Costs of Climate Policy

Provisionally accepted
Bianca  Ifeoma ChigbuBianca Ifeoma Chigbu1*Sicelo  Leonard MakapelaSicelo Leonard Makapela1Ikechukwu  UmejesiIkechukwu Umejesi2
  • 1Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
  • 2University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The concept of silent violence refers to the hidden harm embedded in policy and economic systems, manifesting as the repression of activists, displacement of communities, and exploitation of labour across transitions to low-carbon economies. This article examines how structural barriers embedded in global just transition policies and energy governance frameworks produce forms of silent violence (SV) that disproportionately harm marginalized communities. Drawing on a comparative, multi-case analysis from Bolivia, Canada, South Africa, and Brazil, the study argues that SV is not accidental but a governance-enabled outcome, manifested through policy loopholes, non-consultative permitting, regulatory capture, and enforcement failures. Conceptually, SV is framed as a subset of structural violence that remains legally unframed, institutionally normalized, and largely invisible in climate policy discourse. The article advances a typology of silent violence, ranging from soft forms (epistemic exclusion, procedural marginalization) to hard forms (criminalization, state repression, and lethal harm). We introduce the Silent Violence Continuum as an analytical tool to map how different governance instruments condition escalating harms under the guise of sustainable development. The study contributes to critical climate justice scholarship by showing how SV operates as a design feature of transition governance rather than a failure.The article calls for the integration of silent violence metrics into climate policy evaluation to support more equitable, transparent, and non-violent transitions.

Keywords: Just Transition, Silent Violence, Structural violence, Climate justice, energy governance, marginalized communities, Policy design, Institutional Power

Received: 16 Mar 2025; Accepted: 20 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chigbu, Makapela and Umejesi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Bianca Ifeoma Chigbu, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.