SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Environmental Citizen Science
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1609084
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Sustainable Watershed Resource ManagementView all articles
Citizen Science in River Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review of the Whys and Hows
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Geography, Faculty of Social & Historical Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
- 2Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
River monitoring is a prevalent focus within citizen science projects. Despite numerous reports and institutional manuals detailing the monitoring techniques employed in individual projects, there is a notable lack of comprehensive academic research on the diverse methods and objectives utilized by citizen scientists in river monitoring. This study conducts a systematic literature review to clarify the specific objectives of these citizen science projects and the primary methods used to achieve each objective. We followed the PSALSAR methodology for systematic reviews in environmental science (Mengist et. al., 2020) to assess information on global citizen science initiatives in river monitoring available in both published and grey literature. We ultimately reviewed 97 documents from three databases: Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Google. These documents revealed a dominant focus among river-based citizen science projects on objectives related to water quality and river ecosystem health. Methods were varied, and many common methods are routinely applied to multiple objectives. The study provides a framework that links the main objectives to the primary methods, serving as both a practical guide for new initiatives and a valuable index for academic research.
Keywords: Stream monitoring, Volunteer-based monitoring, Participatory science, Water Quality, community-based, Systematic reveiw
Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shao and Bishop. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Isabel J Bishop, Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.