SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Environmental Citizen Science

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1609084

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Sustainable Watershed Resource ManagementView all articles

Citizen Science in River Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review of the Whys and Hows

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Geography, Faculty of Social & Historical Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 2Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

River monitoring is a prevalent focus within citizen science projects. Despite numerous reports and institutional manuals detailing the monitoring techniques employed in individual projects, there is a notable lack of comprehensive academic research on the diverse methods and objectives utilized by citizen scientists in river monitoring. This study conducts a systematic literature review to clarify the specific objectives of these citizen science projects and the primary methods used to achieve each objective. We followed the PSALSAR methodology for systematic reviews in environmental science (Mengist et. al., 2020) to assess information on global citizen science initiatives in river monitoring available in both published and grey literature. We ultimately reviewed 97 documents from three databases: Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Google. These documents revealed a dominant focus among river-based citizen science projects on objectives related to water quality and river ecosystem health. Methods were varied, and many common methods are routinely applied to multiple objectives. The study provides a framework that links the main objectives to the primary methods, serving as both a practical guide for new initiatives and a valuable index for academic research.

Keywords: Stream monitoring, Volunteer-based monitoring, Participatory science, Water Quality, community-based, Systematic reveiw

Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Shao and Bishop. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Isabel J Bishop, Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.