ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Land Use Dynamics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1654217
This article is part of the Research TopicMoving Towards Sustainable Development: Exploring the Impact of Land-Use Policies on Land Green Utilization EfficiencyView all 19 articles
Can the ecological protection red line policy promote food security? --Based on the empirical analysis of land protection in China
Provisionally accepted- Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Currently, China's food security is confronted with multiple pressures such as farmland degradation and ecological constraints. As an important factor affecting the ecological environment of grain, strictly adhering to the ecological protection red line provides an important institutional guarantee for ensuring grain production capacity. This paper selects panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2005 to 2023 as research samples, and uses the DID model and quantile model to explore the promoting effect of the ecological conservation red line policy (ERP) on food security (FS). Empirical research shows that the ecological conservation red line policy has significantly promoted food security, and the promoting effect is higher in the western region, less significant in the eastern region, while the opposite effect occurs in the central region. The quantile model indicates that the promoting effect of the ecological protection red line policy is the strongest in areas with a higher level of food security. Furthermore, land transfer (LT) and land reclamation (LR) have strengthened this benefit, proving its mediating effect. Research suggests that government departments should enhance policy coordination and institutional guarantee for the control of ecological red lines, combine policy regulation with ecological compensation mechanisms, optimize land transfer and the capacity for multiple cropping of cultivated land, promote the construction of sustainable grain production capacity, prevent and defuse food security risks, and achieve the goal of curbing land non-agriculturalization while ensuring ecological security, further safeguarding China's national security.
Keywords: ecological conservation red line policy, Food security, land use change, Sustainable agricultural development, Ecological protection, national security
Received: 26 Jun 2025; Accepted: 31 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ming. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xu Ming, Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.