Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Toxicology, Pollution and the Environment

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1656188

This article is part of the Research TopicNovel Materials for Hazardous Waste DisposalView all articles

Substitution mechanisms of zirconolite for nuclear waste form: a mini review

Provisionally accepted
Shiyin  JiShiyin Ji1*Chuanhang  ZhaoChuanhang Zhao1Xiuhua  JiXiuhua Ji1Chengxin  GuChengxin Gu1Youkui  ZhangYoukui Zhang1Xin  ChenXin Chen1Tao  DuanTao Duan1Tianhua  JuTianhua Ju2Chang-Zhong  LiaoChang-Zhong Liao2*
  • 1Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, China
  • 2Guangxi University, Nanning, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Zirconolite waste forms are advanced ceramic materials for the immobilisation of HLW, particularly actinides. This paper presents a systematic review of seven common substitution mechanisms of nuclear wastes in zirconolite, categorized into two types: charge-compensated substitution and direct substitution. For those substitution modes, three primary phase evolution pathways were identified: (i) zirconolite-2M to zirconolite-4M and/or to pyrochlore; (ii) zirconolite-2M to zirconolite-3O; (iii) zirconolite-2M to zirconolite-3T. The formation of zirconolite-3T or zirconolite-4M as intermediate phases is typically influenced by substitution behaviour, preparation conditions, or fabrication methods. Additionally, the substitution mechanisms of actinides (or REE analogue) in zirconolite were systematically investigated, corresponding to the seven substitution designs. Notably, the preferential occupation of An/REE in Ca sites was verified at simultaneous direct substitution in both Ca and Zr sites. Whilst extensive studies has explored An/REE substitution mechanisms in zirconolite and identified phase evolution pathways to zirconolite-3O, -3T, -4M, and pyrochlore, the substitution behaviour, radiation stability and chemical durability of these defect-fluorite derivatives warrant further systematic investigation.

Keywords: Zirconolite, Substitution mechanism, nuclear waste form, Phase evolution, actinides

Received: 29 Jun 2025; Accepted: 02 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ji, Zhao, Ji, Gu, Zhang, Chen, Duan, Ju and Liao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Shiyin Ji, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, China
Chang-Zhong Liao, Guangxi University, Nanning, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.