Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Soil Processes

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1656231

This article is part of the Research TopicRegenerative Agriculture for Soil Health, Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, and Climate ActionView all 15 articles

Mitigating Ammonium and Nitrate Leaching in Rice-Wheat crop rotation: Efficacy of Neem Coated Urea and Compost co-application

Provisionally accepted
Sandeep  KumarSandeep Kumar1Arti  BhatiaArti Bhatia1*Julia  DrewerJulia Drewer2Robert  Martin ReesRobert Martin Rees3Shikha  SharmaShikha Sharma1Vinod  KumarVinod Kumar1Ritu  TomerRitu Tomer1Md  Mizanur RahmanMd Mizanur Rahman4Mark  A SuttonMark A Sutton2
  • 1Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India
  • 2Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Edinburgh Site, Penicuik, United Kingdom
  • 3Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 4Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Leaching losses of applied N are an indirect source of nitrous oxide (N2O) emission, a major greenhouse gas emitted from fertilized soils. Mineral nitrogen (N) leaching research has largely concentrated on nitrate (NO₃⁻), while ammonium (NH₄⁺) leaching remains understudied. The cultivation conditions for rice and wheat are distinctly different, impacting the leaching losses of both NH4+ and NO3-. This study investigated the influence of different N treatments, i.e. no-N control, neem-coated urea (NCU-N 100%; 120 kgN ha-1), 60 kgN ha-1 Neem coated urea + 30 kgN ha-1 compost (75% N ); 90 kgN ha-1 Neem coated urea + 30 kgN ha-1 compost (100% N) and 120 kgN ha-1 Neem coated urea + 30 kgN ha-1 compost (125% N) in comparison with prilled urea (PU, 120 kgN ha-1). Compost was applied @ 2.6 tonnes ha-1 to all integrated treatments to provide 30 kgN ha-1. The peak concentration of soil NH4+ and NO3-was delayed by two-three days in NCU and integrated NCU+compost compared to PU in both rice and wheat, due to the slow-release effect of neem oil coating in NCU. In rice, the percolation rate of water was almost half than in wheat soil. The mineral N leaching loss in rice ranged from 0.4 to 4.6 kg NH4+-N ha-1 and 0.46 to 5.12 kg NO3-N ha-1 during the two years. In an annual rice-wheat cycle, the total N leaching loss was 6.2-7.0% of the applied N fertilizer. The total mineral N loss was higher in PU than NCU by 7.8 and 10% in rice and wheat, respectively. Substitution of 25% of mineral N with compost decreased the total N leaching by 14.8 and 10.3% in rice and wheat, respectively, compared to NCU (100%). The crop N uptake increased significantly (p<0.05) with NCU and integrated NCU+compost (100%) over PU. Application of 125%-N significantly increased the total mineral N leaching. The total mineral-N leaching loss was 15.9% higher in rice than wheat across the different treatments. The integrated N application, combining 75% NCU and 25% compost, can reduce mineral-N leaching, improve nitrogen uptake and maintain economic yields in rice-wheat cropping system.

Keywords: Ammonium N leaching, nitrate N leaching, Soil nitrate-N, soil ammonium-N, Neemcoated urea (NCU), Compost, Integrated nutrient management

Received: 29 Jun 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kumar, Bhatia, Drewer, Rees, Sharma, Kumar, Tomer, Rahman and Sutton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Arti Bhatia, artibhatia.iari@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.