Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Ecosystem Restoration

This article is part of the Research TopicEcological Restoration of the Degraded Dryland EcosystemsView all articles

Functional Diversity and Ecological Niches of C₄ Climate-resilient Species to Guide Island Ecosystem Restoration

Provisionally accepted
Vanézia  RochaVanézia Rocha1Maria  M. RomeirasMaria M. Romeiras1Maria  José VasconcelosMaria José Vasconcelos1Maria  Cristina DuarteMaria Cristina Duarte2*
  • 1Universidade de Lisboa Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 2Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Arid ecosystems impose particularly harsh conditions on plants. To thrive, many species have evolved a range of adaptive traits, among which those with C₄ photosynthesis are recognised for their high efficiency in hot and dry environments. Therefore, these species are considered crucial for the restoration and management of dry tropical ecosystems. However, their ecological and functional roles remain poorly understood on oceanic islands such as Cabo Verde. This study, based on herbarium records, GBIF occurrences, and validated field data, presents an analysis of the functional diversity of 162 C₄ species (4,846 occurrences) recorded in the Cabo Verde Islands, representing about 21.6% of the vascular flora of the archipelago. The species were characterised by their functional traits (including life cycle, habit, salinity tolerance, and photosynthetic subtypes NADP-ME, NAD-ME, and PEP-CK), altitudinal distribution, and climatic preferences for temperature and precipitation. The results reveal marked differences in ecological distribution between C₄ eudicots and monocots: eudicots are more frequent in arid and saline habitats at low elevations, whereas monocots occupy a wider ecological range. C₄ halophytes, in particular, show promise for nature-based solutions such as coastal revegetation and soil restoration in degraded areas. The analysis highlights species with strong potential for revegetation and ecosystem management, especially in insular contexts exposed to water scarcity and climate stress. Salinity-adapted annuals and perennials are especially relevant, along with C₄ lineages linked to photosynthetic subtypes that confer enhanced environmental resilience. This functional and ecological assessment provides a scientific basis for selecting climate-resilient species to support revegetation and sustainable management of fragile dry tropical island ecosystems. Indeed, understanding the functional differences between C₄ monocots and C₄ eudicots is essential for developing climate-smart revegetation strategies. The approach adopted here promotes the conservation of biodiversity through functional perspectives, offering a model of ecological action in vulnerable regions under climate change. The findings underscore the ecological preferences of the C₄ species and highlight their potential contributions to ecosystem function, resilience, and restoration.

Keywords: C4 Eudicots, C4 Monocots, Cabo Verde, Climate-resilient species, Tropical Oceanic Islands, Ecosystem restoration, Halophytes, Trait-based ecology

Received: 25 Sep 2025; Accepted: 20 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Rocha, Romeiras, Vasconcelos and Duarte. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Maria Cristina Duarte, mcduarte@fc.ul.pt

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.