Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. For. Glob. Change

Sec. Forest Management

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2025.1498430

This article is part of the Research TopicLandscape management can promote socioecological benefits and leverage environmental marketsView all 7 articles

Rising from the Ashes: Treatments Stabilize Carbon Storage in California's Frequent-Fire Forests

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States
  • 2Blue Forest Conservation, Sacramento, California, United States
  • 3Vibrant Planet, Truckee, ca, United States
  • 4Verra, Washington D.C., United States
  • 5Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service (USDA), Albany, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The stability of seasonally dry Western mixed-conifer forests is threatened by the history of fire suppression, logging, and now increasing climate-driven aridity. Durable aboveground carbon storage in living trees-a key ecosystem service of these fire-adapted forests-is at risk due to the disruption of natural fire cycles. Restoring the relationship between fire and forest structure is essential for long-term resilience. Fuel and density reduction treatments can help reestablish this balance by reducing fire severity and enhancing forest function.We evaluated the effectiveness of 216 thinning treatments implemented across Central California (2015-2023) using a natural experimental design and a novel matching framework. Treatments were measured using a dynamic baseline which represents the expected trajectory of a treated site had it remained untreated, accounting for local climate, vegetation, and disturbance conditions. Treatments reduced average fire severity by 32% and the prevalence of high-severity fire by 88%. Larger treatments (>6 ha) were especially effective, seemingly acting as fuel breaks when located near fire perimeters (<250 m). Notably, treated areas continued to sequester and retain carbon during the extreme 2020 drought, while untreated areas declined. Despite intentional biomass removal, carbon levels in treated forests matched or exceeded baseline levels by year seven.These results highlight the role of treatments in restoring resilient forest structures, reducing fire severity and drought mortality, effectively stabilizing live carbon pools, and providing support for landscape-scale management frameworks in fire-adapted forest ecosystems across the western U.S. in a future of intensifying aridity and stochastic fire occurrence.

Keywords: Difference-in-differences, Dynamic baseline, natural experimental design, Wildfire, Forest carbon

Received: 18 Sep 2024; Accepted: 31 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 O Yackulic, Elias, Gilbert, Shannon, Koontz, Plumb, Sloggy and Duffy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Ethan O Yackulic, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States
Katharyn Duffy, Vibrant Planet, Truckee, ca, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.