METHODS article
Front. For. Glob. Change
Sec. Forest Management
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2025.1586743
Estimating medium-term (40 years) carbon uptake in living biomass from Life Terra's afforestation and reforestation actions: Challenges and recommendations
Provisionally accepted- 1IFER - Monitoring and Mapping Solutions, Jílové u Prahy, Czechia
- 2Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- 3CREAF - Centre de Recerca i Aplicacions Forestals, Barcelona, Balearic Islands, Spain
- 4Stichting Life Terra, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 5IFER - Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research, Jilove u Prahy, Czechia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study presents a comprehensive methodology for estimating potential biomass and carbon accumulation in European afforestation activities expected over a 40-year timespan, developed for the Life Terra project (LIFE19 CCM/NL/001200). We synthesized data from allometric equations, Yield tables, National Forest Inventories, and National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reports across four European biogeographic regions: Alpine, Atlantic, Continental, and Mediterranean. While Life Terra encompasses six planting categories (ecological restoration, timber plantations, agroforestry/food forests, gardens, green infrastructure, and others), our analysis focused primarily on timber plantations due to data availability and reliability constraints. The study showed significant regional variations in planting density and growth patterns. Initial planting densities in timber plantations varied substantially across biogeographic regions (1,869-7,702 trees/ha), following exponential decline patterns over time.By year 40, individual tree biomass estimates ranged from 0.08 to 0.20 t/tree across regions and species types (conifers and broadleaves), with survival rates varying between 22.0% and 49.7%. This translated to stand-level biomass estimates of 54.7-232.6 t/ha at age 40 years. Our biomass estimates generally aligned with country-specific literature and IPCC default values, though showing considerable variation across sites, highlighting the importance of local conditions in tree growth and stand dynamics. The study provides a robust framework for assessing carbon sequestration potential in European afforestation projects, while acknowledging key uncertainties related to survival/mortality rates and climate change impacts. This methodology remains open to refinement through additional biomass equations and revised Yield tables. The future field validation studies should also include nontimber plantation categories that are not covered here.
Keywords: tree growth, tree survival/mortality, tree biomass, Carbon Sequestration, National Forest Inventories, growth and yield tables, planting density
Received: 03 Mar 2025; Accepted: 14 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Palmero-Barrachina, Blazek, Sabaté, Sauras-Yera, Allasia-Grau, Nadal-Sala, Kallen, de Santana and Cienciala. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Santi Sabaté, Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, 08007, Catalonia, Spain
Emil Cienciala, IFER - Monitoring and Mapping Solutions, Jílové u Prahy, Czechia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.