ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. For. Glob. Change

Sec. Forest Management

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2025.1594324

Characterizing timber harvest occurrence and intensity to inform forest carbon management across the eastern United States

Provisionally accepted
Matthew  B. RussellMatthew B. Russell1*Catherine  J ChamberlainCatherine J Chamberlain2Lynn  RileyLynn Riley3Natalia  A MushegianNatalia A Mushegian4John  Steven GunnJohn Steven Gunn2Ethan  P BelairEthan P Belair2Sebastian  U BusbySebastian U Busby2
  • 1Arbor Custom Analytics LLC, Pittsfield, United States
  • 2The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, United States
  • 3American Forest Foundation, Washington, DC, United States
  • 4University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Timber harvesting plays an important role in determining how forest management practices influence carbon storage and sequestration patterns. We analyzed recent harvesting patterns across the eastern United States to quantify harvest area, intensity, and type of silviculture across timberlands. We observed timberland area harvested to vary considerably depending on how harvest occurrence was defined, ranging from 7.8 to 23.4 million hectares harvested between approximately 2016 and 2022. Harvest intensity, as measured by basal area removed in a stand if a harvest occurred, was similar across all ownerships, states, and regions (mean percent of basal area removed was 44.2 ± 29.3% [mean ± standard deviation]), but forest type-level differences were apparent, e.g., harvest intensity was greatest in aspen/birch forests in the Lake States (mean percent of basal area removed of 59.1 ± 31.2%). Policymakers, forest managers, and carbon project developers require an accurate assessment of baseline harvest rates to estimate potential tonnes of additional carbon dioxide equivalents generated in a forest carbon offset project. Using localized timber harvesting patterns derived from historical data will assist in prioritizing the silvicultural prescriptions with the greatest positive climate impacts while additionally informing policies and investments that value the natural capital that forests provide.

Keywords: Timber removals, forest inventory and analysis, Forest ownership, Carbon baselines, Carbon accounting

Received: 15 Mar 2025; Accepted: 06 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Russell, Chamberlain, Riley, Mushegian, Gunn, Belair and Busby. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Matthew B. Russell, Arbor Custom Analytics LLC, Pittsfield, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.