ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. For. Glob. Change
Sec. Forest Management
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2025.1594324
Characterizing timber harvest occurrence and intensity to inform forest carbon management across the eastern United States
Provisionally accepted- 1Arbor Custom Analytics LLC, Pittsfield, United States
- 2The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, United States
- 3American Forest Foundation, Washington, DC, United States
- 4University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Timber harvesting plays an important role in determining how forest management practices influence carbon storage and sequestration patterns. We analyzed recent harvesting patterns across the eastern United States to quantify harvest area, intensity, and type of silviculture across timberlands. We observed timberland area harvested to vary considerably depending on how harvest occurrence was defined, ranging from 7.8 to 23.4 million hectares harvested between approximately 2016 and 2022. Harvest intensity, as measured by basal area removed in a stand if a harvest occurred, was similar across all ownerships, states, and regions (mean percent of basal area removed was 44.2 ± 29.3% [mean ± standard deviation]), but forest type-level differences were apparent, e.g., harvest intensity was greatest in aspen/birch forests in the Lake States (mean percent of basal area removed of 59.1 ± 31.2%). Policymakers, forest managers, and carbon project developers require an accurate assessment of baseline harvest rates to estimate potential tonnes of additional carbon dioxide equivalents generated in a forest carbon offset project. Using localized timber harvesting patterns derived from historical data will assist in prioritizing the silvicultural prescriptions with the greatest positive climate impacts while additionally informing policies and investments that value the natural capital that forests provide.
Keywords: Timber removals, forest inventory and analysis, Forest ownership, Carbon baselines, Carbon accounting
Received: 15 Mar 2025; Accepted: 06 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Russell, Chamberlain, Riley, Mushegian, Gunn, Belair and Busby. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Matthew B. Russell, Arbor Custom Analytics LLC, Pittsfield, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.