Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. For. Glob. Change

Sec. Forest Growth

This article is part of the Research TopicForest Landscape Restoration (FLR) and Carbon Storage DynamicsView all 9 articles

A Systematic Review on Quantifying Carbon Sequestration Potential in the North Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu

Provisionally accepted
Jaisridhar  PalanivelanJaisridhar Palanivelan1*Cinthia  FernandazCinthia Fernandaz2Valentin  PostValentin Post3S  RajkumarS Rajkumar3Nirosha  RNirosha R4Jasimudeen  SJasimudeen S5Senthilkumar  ManivasagamSenthilkumar Manivasagam2S K  RajkishoreS K Rajkishore6Vinoth  Kumar BojanVinoth Kumar Bojan1Shanmugam  RajagopalShanmugam Rajagopal1P  RajaP Raja1
  • 1ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, The Nilgiris, India
  • 2Directorate of Extension Education, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
  • 3Department of Growth and Innovations, Finish Mondial, Netherlands, Netherlands
  • 4Department of Agricultural Communications and Extension, VIT School of Agricultural Innovations and Advanced Learning, Vellore, Vellore, India
  • 5St. Stephen’s College,, Uzhavoor, Kerala, India
  • 6Department of Environmental Sciences, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Climate change mitigation strategies increasingly focus on carbon trading, with agroforestry systems presenting promising opportunities for carbon sequestration while supporting sustainable livelihoods. The Nilgiris district in India, with its rich biodiversity and significant scheduled caste population dependent on agriculture, offers a unique context for such initiatives. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature review analysing 80 articles from Web of Science and Scopus databases (2015-2025). The research employed bibliometric and thematic analyses to examine carbon sequestration potential through agroforestry systems in the Nilgiris, focusing on quantification approaches and economic valuation. Results and Conclusion: Agroforestry systems in the Nilgiris can sequester carbon at rates of 0.25-19.14 Mg C/ha/year in tree components and 0.01-0.60 Mg C/ha/year in crop components, with variation based on system design, species composition, and management practices. Agro-horticulture systems showed the highest potential (38.11 Mg C/ha), 31.64% higher than conventional agriculture. Economic analyses revealed agroforestry systems to be approximately four times more profitable than monoculture even without carbon revenues, with carbon pricing further enhancing profitability. The research proposes a methodological framework for carbon trading in the Nilgiris, addressing key challenges including high transaction costs, methodological complexities, and equitable benefit-sharing. Our proposed framework combines environmental conservation goals with community welfare by linking carbon storage and income generation opportunities. The context of our study focussed on the carbon measurement protocols and the need of an affordable monitoring system for the resource poor areas.

Keywords: Climate change mitigation, carbon pricing, biodiversity conservation, Systematic review, PRISMA guidelines

Received: 05 Aug 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Palanivelan, Fernandaz, Post, Rajkumar, R, S, Manivasagam, Rajkishore, Bojan, Rajagopal and Raja. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jaisridhar Palanivelan, drjai.extn@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.