Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. For. Glob. Change

Sec. Fire and Forests

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2025.1680856

This article is part of the Research TopicClimate Change, Forest Fire Risks, and Adaptation Strategies for Sustainable Ecosystem ManagementView all articles

A Novel Framework for Fire Risk Assessment in Kazakhstan: Integrating Machine Learning and Remote Sensing

Provisionally accepted
Suresh Babu  KVSuresh Babu KV1*SWATI  SINGHSWATI SINGH2Gulzhiyan  KabdulovaGulzhiyan Kabdulova3Kabzhanova  GulnaraKabzhanova Gulnara4
  • 1ONISILIOS Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) Postdoctoral researcher, Nicosia, Cyprus
  • 2Doctoral Researcher, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, United States
  • 3Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Space Monitoring of Emergencies, Institute of the Ionosphere, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • 4Director of the Department of platform solutions, Joint Stock Company “National Company” “Kazakhstan Gharysh Sapary”,, Astana, Kazakhstan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Wildfires present a significant threat to ecosystems, property, and human life in Kazakhstan. Understanding fire hazards is essential for effective management and mitigation of these risks. This study develops a comprehensive fire hazard index for Kazakhstan by integrating static, long-term landscape factors with dynamic, real-time weather and vegetation conditions. The static component employs a machine learning approach, specifically the Random Forest algorithm, trained on a dataset that includes topographic variables derived from the SRTM DEM, land cover classifications from MODIS Terra/Aqua LULC products, and historical fire occurrence data from NASA FIRMS. This model quantifies the inherent fire susceptibility of various landscapes based on these enduring characteristics. The dynamic component captures short-term fluctuations in fire risk by incorporating satellite-derived vegetation information and meteorological observations. The MODIS-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) serves as a proxy for fuel availability and moisture content. Spatially interpolated weather data such as temperature, humidity, wind speed, and precipitation provide the necessary meteorological context. The dynamic index is calculated using a modified Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) system, specifically adapted to account for the influence of live fuel moisture, as indicated by NDVI, on fire ignition and spread dynamics. The final fire risk index is created by additively combining the static and dynamic components, offering a spatiotemporal perspective on fire risk. This integrated approach allows for the assessment of both the underlying susceptibility of a landscape to fire and the immediate effects of weather and vegetation conditions. The resulting high-resolution fire hazard maps are intended to inform fire management decisions, optimize resource allocation for fire prevention and suppression efforts, and support targeted interventions in high-risk areas. This research underscores the value of combining machine learning techniques with remotely sensed data for enhanced fire risk assessment in Kazakhstan, facilitating more proactive and effective fire management strategies.

Keywords: Fire Risk, MODIS, FWI, SFRI, random forest

Received: 06 Aug 2025; Accepted: 08 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 KV, SINGH, Kabdulova and Gulnara. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Suresh Babu KV, sureshbabu.iiith@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.