ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pain Res.
Sec. Musculoskeletal Pain
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1570432
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the Activity Pattern Scale (APS-GE) in a large sample of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
Provisionally accepted
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Goettingen, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Acknowledging the multidimensionality of pain-related activity patterns led to the development of a new self-report instrument, the Activity Patterns scale (APS), linking activity pacing to underlying goals. Owing to the scarcity of validated instruments assessing different dimensions of pain-related avoidance, persistence, and pacing behaviors in Germany, our aim was to develop a German version, the APS-GE and to evaluate its psychometric properties in a representative sample of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: The APS was translated and culturally adapted following the multistep approach recommended by the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons Outcomes Committee. A comprehensive psychometric evaluation was carried out in 579 patients suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain. To assess test-retest reliability, the APS-GE was administered twice to a subgroup of patients. Structural validity was tested using covariance and confirmatory factor analysis. To investigate construct and criterion validity, hypotheses were formulated based on the existing literature addressing expected correlations between APS-GE subscales and established questionnaires, and correlations between activity patterns and several functional and psychological outcomes. Results: Activity patterns varied regarding their test-retest stability. Factor analysis confirmed the multidimensional 8-factor structure proposed previously. For most APS-GE subscales, acceptable construct validity was demonstrated. Interestingly, only 62.5% of hypotheses describing expected associations of activity patterns with functional and psychological outcomes (criterion-related validity) could be confirmed.The APS-GE appears to be a change-sensitive instrument for the multidimensional assessment of pain-related activity patterns. Remaining conceptual ambiguities should be reevaluated in future studies. Discrepancies to previous investigations regarding the adaptivity of activity patterns could be due to methodological variations across studies. Preliminary implications for putative motivational mechanisms underlying behavioral dimensions are discussed.
Keywords: test-retest reliability, Internal consistency, factor structure, Criterion validity, construct validity, avoidance, pacing, Persistence
Received: 03 Feb 2025; Accepted: 27 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kästner, Donhauser, von Freytag-Löringhoff and Petzke. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Anne Kästner, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Goettingen, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.