ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pain Res.
Sec. Musculoskeletal Pain
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1574474
Behavioral and Biochemical Changes Associated with the Analgesic Effects of (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine Alone and in Combination with Meloxicam Following Disk Puncture in Mice
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Anesthesiology, Rush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, United States
- 2Division of Preclinical Innovation, Chemistry Technologies, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville MD, Rockville MD, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Low back pain affects around 619 million people globally and is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide. Low back pain is often difficult to treat with traditional drug combinations, and opioids are prescribed for up to 60% of patients with debilitating low back pain. This study aimed at characterizing the analgesic effect of (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine, an α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor dependent analgesic agent, alone or in combination with meloxicam in a murine lumbar disk puncture model.Methods: Male and female C57BL/6J mice underwent lumbar disk puncture and developed tactile allodynia. At day 7 postoperatively, mice were randomized to receive intraperitoneal saline, (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine, meloxicam or both drugs co-administered for 3 consecutive days. Analgesia was assessed at baseline and 24 hours following each injection using von Frey testing of both hind limbs and the area under the paw withdrawal curve (AUC0-3d) was determined. Brain, spinal cord, and dorsal root ganglion tissues were obtained for immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis. Results: Prior to disk puncture paw withdrawal thresholds were 3.44 ± 0.51g before surgery and were reduced to 0.54 ± 0.38g at day 7 without a difference by sex; however, sex-specific responses were evident in other behavioral outcomes. EC50 estimates for (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine were 14.2 mg/kg (95% CI 10.3mg/kg to 19.7 mg/kg) in male and 16.9 mg/kg (95% CI 12.8 mg/kg to 22.3mg/kg) in female mice (P<0.637). (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine plus meloxicam enhanced the analgesic effect on the AUC0-3d of meloxicam alone. (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine analgesia was associated with increases in Glutamate receptor A1 & A2, p-Kv2.1, p-CaMKII and reduced BDNF protein ratios in the hippocampus, attenuated c-Fos in the spinal cord, and decreased BDNF at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). Discussion: Our findings demonstrated that the analgesic benefit of (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine is dose dependent, protein analysis suggests that (2R,6R)-HNK analgesic is associated with augmenting GluA1, GluA2, CaMKII, Kv2.1 and a reduction in BDNF protein ratios in hippocampus, decreased spinal cord c-Fos and reduced BNDF at the dorsal root ganglion. (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine also augmented meloxicam analgesia in disk puncture mice. Our finding supports further study of the clinical potential of (2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine as a non-opioid analgesic for discogenic back pain.
Keywords: (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine, lumbar disk puncture, musculoskeletal pain, allodynia, Non-opiate analgesic, glutamate receptor ionotropic (GluA1, GluA2), Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), c-fos
Received: 10 Feb 2025; Accepted: 28 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Das, Milejczyk, Basovich, Moric, Kaila, Thomas, Buvanendran and McCarthy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Robert J McCarthy, Department of Anesthesiology, Rush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.