ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pain Res.

Sec. Veterinary and Comparative Pain

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1589082

Tailoring Treatment: Dog Breed Status Influences Pain Assessment and Treatment in Emergency Veterinary Care

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Comparative Behavioral Research and Thinking Pets Program, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 2Translational Research in Pain, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 3Berry Consultants LLC, Austin, Texas, United States
  • 4Department of Statistics, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States
  • 5Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 6Emergency Critical Care, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 7Comparative Pain Research and Education Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
  • 8Center for Translational Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • 9Thurston Arthritis Research Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Several studies have demonstrated that veterinarians hold breed-specific beliefs about canine pain sensitivity. However, it remains unknown whether these beliefs impact how veterinarians recognize and treat pain in a clinical setting. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if there were differences in the assessment and treatment of pain across patients admitted to a veterinary emergency room (ER) from different breeds. Methods: Veterinary ER records were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the effects of breed on the assessment and treatment of pain in canine patients admitted to a single academic ER over a two-year period. Extracted data included patient signalment and information documented in medical evaluations completed by ER clinicians. Results: The final sample included records from 3,744 patients across 69 breeds/breed types. Patient breed and the service the patient was transferred to from the ER were significantly explanatory for differences observed in pain scores and pain management plans assigned. The effect of breed and transfer service remained robust when accounting for covariates. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Certain breeds were assigned pain scores lower than average, while other breeds were assigned higher than average pain scores despite a lack of evidence that these breeds presented with less or more painful conditions. As breed-specific beliefs do not align with experimental measures of pain sensitivity, the present findings have implications to help refine pain education and medical decision-making and ultimately improve patient care.

Keywords: canine pain assessment, dog pain management, veterinary emergency care, Breed differences, Retrospective study

Received: 06 Mar 2025; Accepted: 27 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Caddiell, White, McNamee, Lynch, Lascelles and Gruen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Margaret Elizabeth Gruen, Comparative Behavioral Research and Thinking Pets Program, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.