Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pain Res.

Sec. Pain Mechanisms

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1633424

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Neuromodulation for Chronic Pain: Mechanisms and Clinical ImplicationsView all articles

Extreme Pulse Dosing of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: How Low Can You Go?

Provisionally accepted
Mayank  GuptaMayank Gupta1Amy  ReinertAmy Reinert1C.  O. WestC. O. West2Rose  AzaldeRose Azalde2Kerry  BradleyKerry Bradley2*
  • 1Neuroscience Research Center, Overland Park, KS, United States
  • 2Nevro Corp., Redwood City, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background. Pulse dosing of high frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz (10 kHz SCS) may offer comparable clinical benefits as continuous 10 kHz SCS, but extreme pulse dosing (EPD) has not been studied. Methods. Patients using an implantable pulse generator (IPG) with 10 kHz SCS to treat chronic back or leg pain were enrolled. After baseline assessments, patients underwent 'EPD titration' starting at an EPD setting of 3%. Patients who preferred the EPD tried progressively lower EPD settings (0.6%, 0.3%, 0.14%, 0.06%), each for 7-10 days, until reaching an EPD they did not prefer over that previously tried. Patients were then followed up for 3 months at their lowest preferred EPD. All study visits included assessment of adverse events and patient-reported outcomes, including the numeric rating score (NRS) for pain intensity, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the PROMIS-SF for sleep disturbance. Device charging information was uploaded from the IPG at each visit. Results. Eighteen patients completed testing (13 M/5 F; mean age, 61 years); 14 patients (78%) reporting a preferred EPD (at any setting) to standard 10 kHz SCS. Among 18 patients, the most common lowest preferred EPD was 0.14% (28%), followed by 0.06% (22%) and 3% (17%). All post-SCS pain scores were lower than pre-SCS pain scores (median NRS, 8.5 vs 3.0; p =.004). For overall pain, NRS values did not vary significantly across timepoints after the pre-SCS period (median range, 3.0-4.0; p >.05). Similarly, patient satisfaction, PGIC, ODI, PCS, and PROMIS-SF scores for EPD did not vary significantly from those at baseline. Daily IPG recharge times were significantly shorter using the patient's lowest preferred EPD than at baseline (median minutes, 3.0 vs 31.8; p =.0001). Conclusions: EPD 10 kHz SCS may offer the same pain relief and quality-of-life benefits as standard 10 kHz SCS, while reducing recharge requirements and potentially lowering the risk of therapy habituation.

Keywords: 10 kHz, Chronic low back pain, Duty cycling, high-frequency stimulation, pulse dosing, Spinal Cord Stimulation

Received: 22 May 2025; Accepted: 27 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gupta, Reinert, West, Azalde and Bradley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kerry Bradley, Nevro Corp., Redwood City, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.