Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pain Res.

Sec. Musculoskeletal Pain

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1647020

Expectations about pain management after discharge from total hip and knee replacement surgery: a qualitative study with patient and prescribers

Provisionally accepted
Ian  LiangIan Liang1,2,3*Peter  YoussefPeter Youssef1,2,3Abby  HaynesAbby Haynes2,3Chung-Wei  Christine LinChung-Wei Christine Lin2,3Ian  HarrisIan Harris4Mark  HorsleyMark Horsley5Caitlin  JonesCaitlin Jones2,3
  • 1Department of Rheumatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, 59 Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia, Sydney, Australia
  • 2School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia, Sydney, Australia
  • 3Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health Disctrict, 10N Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia, Sydney, Australia
  • 4Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
  • 5Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, 59 Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia, Sydne, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of both patients and prescribers regarding analgesia after discharge following total hip or knee replacement surgeries, focusing on opioid use and the factors influencing patient and prescriber decision making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 prescribers and 13 patients. 6 patients were interviewed before and after surgery. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted by three researchers. Results: For prescribers, three key themes were identified: 1) A patchwork of prescribing practices with diverse influences on health professional’s decisions, including the ‘norm’ of each site; 2) What counts as evidence for practice? in which prescribers relied on clinical experience, more than guidelines; And 3) Risk-benefit trade-offs that prescribers make when challenged to treat pain while minimising side effects. Analysis of patients’ data also identified three key themes: 1) (Unfulfilled) expectations of careful pain management such as evidence-based decisions and close monitoring to avoid harm; 2) Risk-benefit trade-offs: fear of pain versus fear of side effects including anxiety about both expected pain and expected side effects, and 3) Variation in self-management of opioid use due to varying interpretation of vague instructions. The views and expectations of prescribers and patients differ and sometimes conflict with each other. Conclusion: This research highlights the need for improved guidance for both prescribers and patients, and clearer communication to optimise the management of pain after discharge.

Keywords: Pain, Total knee and hip arthroplasty, opioid, Qualitative, Post op

Received: 14 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liang, Youssef, Haynes, Lin, Harris, Horsley and Jones. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ian Liang, Department of Rheumatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, 59 Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia, Sydney, Australia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.