Abstract
Objective: Co-occurrence of pediatric asthma and obesity has been widely reported, yet the causal directions between these two disorders are still not well-understood. The objective of this meta-analysis is to explore whether there is a possibility of a bidirectional association for these two disorders in children and adolescents.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to August 2020. Cohort studies reporting the associations of obesity with risk of physician-diagnosed asthma or physician-diagnosed asthma with risk of obesity in children and adolescents were eligible for the review.
Results: A total of 3,091 records were identified from the four databases, with final inclusion of nine. Six studies reported the association between obesity and risk of asthma; three studies reported the association between asthma and risk of childhood obesity. As evaluated by the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale, all studies were assessed as high-quality studies. There was a statistically significant association between obesity and increased risk of physician-diagnosed asthma in children and adolescents. The pooled RR was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.28, 1.50; p < 0.001), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 81.7%; pheterogeneity < 0.001). The pooled RR in boys was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.99; p = 0.002), but such a significant association was not observed in girls (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.72; p = 0.434). For the association of asthma with risk of childhood obesity, the pooled RR was 1.47 (95%CI: 1.25, 1.72; p < 0.001) without statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, pheterogeneity = 0.652).
Conclusion: There is a bidirectional association between obesity and asthma during childhood and adolescence, suggesting that childhood obesity drives an increase in the onset of asthma; meanwhile, childhood asthma may also increase risk of obesity for children and adolescents.
Introduction
Pediatric obesity and asthma are both major chronic childhood disorders worldwide in recent decades (1, 2). Increasing epidemiological studies have focused on the concomitant rise in these two disorders, yet the temporal relationship has not been well-established (3, 4).
Moreover, epidemiological studies have demonstrated a higher risk of asthma among overweight or obese children and adults (5–7). A previous study discovered that asthma incidence increased by a 2-fold risk in obese children (8). Of note, sex may modify the obesity–asthma relationship, with boys being at a higher risk of incident asthma than the risk in girls (8). A recent meta-analysis also reported an increased risk of asthma and wheeze associated with childhood obesity (6). However, the risk was more evident in girls than in boys (6). Furthermore, asthma may also contribute to the obesity epidemic. Two US cohort studies showed that children with asthma were at higher risk of developing obesity compared to those without asthma (9, 10). A pooled analysis of 16 European cohorts also suggested that children with early-life asthma may have an increased risk of incident obesity (11).
There is no systematic review addressing the association between asthma and risk of childhood obesity, although many systematic reviews have assessed the opposite direction (6–8). The bidirectional association of asthma and obesity may be established in a critical time window in early life. Although compelling evidence has demonstrated the co-occurrence of asthma and obesity in children and adolescents, it is still unclear whether one disorder contributes to the development of the other disorder and/or vice versa. Thus, the objective of this meta-analysis is to explore whether there was a possibility of a bidirectional association for these two disorders in children and adolescents, by assessing the association between obesity and asthma risk, as well as the association between asthma and obesity risk in children and adolescents.
Materials and Methods
This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA statement (Supplementary Document 1) (12). The study characteristics are as follows: The study population should be children and adolescents. For the evaluation of the relationship between obesity and risk of asthma, the exposure should be obesity, and non-exposure should be normal weight. The outcome should be incident physician-diagnosed asthma. For the evaluation of the relationship between asthma and risk of obesity, the exposure should be asthma, and non-exposure should be non-asthma. The outcome should be incident obesity. Two researchers (L-SS and Q-LZ) independently performed the literature search, study screening and selection, and information extraction. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion. A third reviewer (Y-XS) acted as an arbitrator whenever consensus was not reached.
Literature Search and Study Selection
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to August 2020, using the Mesh terms and/or the combinations of the free words: (“obesity” or “body mass index” or “body weight”) and (“asthma”) and (“child” or “adolescent” or “children” or “adolescence” or “childhood”) and (“cohort” or “longitudinal” or “follow-up”). Google Scholar was also searched for gray literature. Reference lists of relevant studies were screened to identify other potential studies. The literature search was restricted to studies published in English. More details on the electronic search strategy can be obtained from Supplementary Document 2.
The inclusion criteria of this meta-analysis were as follows: (1) Studies should use a cohort design. (2) The study population should be children or adolescents. (3) For the evaluation of the association between obesity and asthma risk, the exposure of interest should be obesity, and outcome should be physician-diagnosed incident asthma; for the evaluation of the association between asthma and obesity risk, the exposure of interest should be physician-diagnosed asthma, and outcome should be incident obesity. (4) Studies should use the age- and sex-specific body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity in children (13). A child being obese was defined by BMI ≥ 95th percentile according to a children growth chart from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (14). (5) Physician-diagnosed asthma could be based on assessment from the medical records or clinical diagnosis, or self-reported with being diagnosed by a physician as having asthma. (6) Studies should provide risk estimates as risk ratio, rate ratio, hazard ratio, odds ratio, and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) or standard error. When there were multiple risk estimates in a study, we used the one adjusted for most of the potential confounders.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) not cohort studies, cross-sectional character of the analyses, or outcome of interest being present at baseline; (2) no obesity information; since the meta-analysis focused on the bidirectional association between obesity and asthma, studies that only reported risk information on other weight status or categories, such as per unit of BMI increase, overweight (85th ≤ BMI < 95th percentile), or overweight and obesity (BMI ≥ 85th percentile), were excluded from the review; (3) no information on physician-diagnosed asthma; studies that only reported information on wheezing or asthma medications were excluded from the review; and (4) no useful risk estimates. When more than one study was reported in the same study population, or newer data were available, we selected the most recent study.
Information Extraction
A structured extraction form was used to collect information from the eligible studies. This form included details on the study author, year of publication, study location, participant source, study period, cohort size, number of cases, age at baseline, sex, exposure assessment, outcome ascertainment, risk estimates, and confounder adjustment.
Quality Assessment
Two authors (L-SS and Q-LZ) independently evaluated the study quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (15). Where there was disagreement, a third reviewer (Y-XS) acted as an arbitrator. This tool was developed to evaluate the quality of non-randomized studies by using a star system in which a study was judged on three broad perspectives, including the selection of the study groups, the comparability of the groups, and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest (15). This tool identified “high” quality choices with a star. Each numbered item within the “Selection” and “Outcome” categories can be given a maximum of one star (15). A maximum of two stars can be awarded for “Comparability.” More details on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale could be obtained from Supplementary Document 3. There is no formal cut point to determine high-quality studies. According to the cut point used in the previous meta-analyses (16, 17), a study with a total score of ≥7 was considered as a high-quality study in this review.
Statistical Analysis
We used the relative risk (RR) to measure the associations of obesity with risk of asthma, and asthma with risk of obesity. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistic. A significant heterogeneity was considered at I2 > 50% (18). When there was significant between-study heterogeneity, the pooled RR was calculated using random-effects model (19); otherwise, fixed effects model was employed. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot, as well as Begg's test and Egger's test (20, 21). All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14.0 (Stata, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
The literature search identified 3,091 total records from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases, and 2,306 records remained after 785 duplicates were removed. A total of 2,264 records were excluded after screening the titles and abstracts. After reviewing the full texts of the remaining 42 studies, 12 studies were excluded because of not reporting information on obesity during childhood or adolescence; 10 studies were excluded because of not reporting information on the physician-diagnosed asthma; 7 studies were excluded because of not being cohort studies, cross-sectional character of the analyses, or the outcome being present at baseline; 2 studies were excluded because of no useful risk estimate; and 2 studies were excluded because of newer data available. The references of the excluded studies after the full-text review are listed in Supplementary Document 4. Thus, we included nine studies in the final analysis, of which six studies reported the association between obesity and risk of asthma (22–27) and three studies reported the association between asthma and risk of obesity (9–11) (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Association Between Obesity and Risk of Asthma
For the obesity–asthma association, 1,112,758 children were included in the meta-analysis, with 74,066 children developing incident asthma. Three studies were conducted in the US, two studies in China, and one study in Sweden. For the obesity assessment at baseline, one study was conducted in children aged from 2 to 17 years old; one study was conducted in children at the age of 4 years old, and four studies were conducted in children aged more than 6 years old. For the physician-diagnosed asthma assessments, one study was conducted in children aged from 2 to 17 years, and other studies were conducted in children aged more than 7 years old. Studies by Ho et al. and Lee et al. had <3 years follow-up for outcomes to occur. More details of the characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis could be obtained from Supplementary Document 5. The definitions of asthma varied from study to study. Studies by Lang et al. and Black et al. assessed asthma status based on electronic health records, and four other studies assessed asthma status based on parents- or self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma. More details of the definitions of asthma are shown in Supplementary Document 6. In addition, all the studies were evaluated as high-quality studies, which indicated low risk of bias (Supplementary Document 7).
The individual studies included in the meta-analysis reported pooled RRs ranging from 1.31 (95% CI: 1.28, 1.34) for the Lang et al. study to 1.60 (95% CI: 1.08, 2.36) for the Gilliland et al. study. There was a statistically significant association between obesity and increased risk of physician-diagnosed asthma in children and adolescents. The pooled RR was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.28, 1.50; p < 0.001), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 81.7%, pheterogeneity < 0.001) (Figure 2). The pooled RR for obesity with physician-diagnosed asthma risk in boys was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.99; p = 0.002; I2 = 73.5%; pheterogeneity = 0.010), but no significant association was observed in girls (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.72; p = 0.434; I2 = 80.8%; pheterogeneity = 0.001) (Figure 3). When we excluded one study with preschool children included in the study population, the pooled RR for children at school age was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.40, 1.48; p < 0.001), and no statistical heterogeneity was detected (I2 = 0%, pheterogeneity = 0.980). A visual inspection of the funnel plot and formally tested by Egger's test (p = 0.834) and Begg's test (p = 0.754) indicated no evidence of publication bias.
Figure 2
Figure 3
Association Between Asthma and Risk of Obesity
For the three studies reporting asthma–obesity association, a total of 28,494 children with asthma were included in the meta-analysis, of which 1,261 children developed incident obesity during follow-up. Two studies were conducted in the US and one in European countries. For the asthma assessment at baseline, all studies were conducted in children under 8 years old. The ages at obesity assessment in the original studies varied from 5 to 18 years old. More details of the characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis could be obtained from Supplementary Document 5. The definitions of asthma varied from study to study; all studies assessed asthma status based on parent- or self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma. More details of the definitions of asthma are shown in Supplementary Document 6. All the studies were evaluated as high-quality studies, which indicated low risk of bias (Supplementary Document 7).
Zhang et al. reported that non-obese children with diagnosed asthma were at 38% increased risk of becoming obese compared with children without asthma (RR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.71). Contreras et al. reported an RR of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.18, 2.33) for European children, which was higher than the RR reported in the Chen et al. study (RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.10). For the US cohort, the sex difference was detected. Boys with asthma at baseline were at 53% higher risk of developing obesity (RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.26), while the reported RR in girls was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.54, 2.05). When we pooled the risk estimates from the three studies, the pooled RR was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.25, 1.72; p < 0.001) without statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, pheterogeneity = 0.652) (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review evaluating the association between asthma and risk of obesity in children and adolescents. In this meta-analysis, we found a bidirectional association between asthma and obesity during childhood and adolescence. Obese children were at an increased risk of developing physician-diagnosed asthma. Obese boys remained at significantly increased risk of asthma, but such a significant association was not observed in girls. Meanwhile, asthma was associated with a higher risk of developing obesity in children and adolescents.
Extensive epidemiological evidence assessed temporality of the two disorders and suggested that childhood obesity may be expected to either cause or worsen asthma (6, 28). Further studies also indicated that obesity duration may be associated with pulmonary function impairment in obese subjects (29, 30). It is worthy to note that not only the obese youth are more likely to develop asthma but also incident asthma may increase among children who are overweight (22, 25, 27). Furthermore, previous large cohort studies in the US and Australia suggested that an increase in BMI z-score and more rapid BMI gain during childhood may increase the risk of asthma in children and adolescents (31–34). The argument for causality is further supported by evidence from interventional trials that weight loss may improve the asthma-related outcomes (35).
Interestingly, sex-stratified subgroups showed that the association between obesity and asthma risk was significant among boys but not among girls in this meta-analysis. A previous study also reported that obese boys had higher risk than obese girls (boys: RR = 2.47; 95% CI, 1.57, 3.87; p < 0.001; girls: RR = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.51, 3.03; p = 0.63) (8). However, such was not the case in an updated meta-analysis that reported a more evident risk in girls (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.56; p < 0.001) than in boys (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.40; p < 0.001) (6). The prevalence of childhood asthma is higher in boys than in girls, while the prevalence of adult asthma is higher in women than in men. The reversal of sex difference may occur around puberty, indicating that sex hormones might play a role in the development of asthma (36). A previous study indicated an interaction between sex hormones and obesity on asthma development, but the exact mechanism was not well-known (37). The effects from the age may modify the gender difference in risk of developing asthma, considering that obese adolescents compared with school-aged children might have different risk factors for developing asthma such as hormonal factors (38). Further investigations on the effect of age on the gender difference of obesity–asthma association would be noteworthy. Moreover, sex may influence lung development and physiology starting at fetal lung developmental period (39). Surfactant production in the female neonate lung appears to be earlier than in male neonates, which may result in relatively lower airway resistance than male neonates (39, 40). Thus, preterm male fetuses, compared with females, have a higher prevalence of respiratory distress syndrome. In addition, compared with girls, boys have larger lungs but smaller airway diameters to their lung volume (39, 41). Thus, boys may be more vulnerable to later asthma than girls (40).
Although there is strong evidence that obesity may raise the risk of asthma, the present systematic review suggests that asthma may be also associated with a higher risk of developing obesity. Of note, sex difference was also observed for the association of asthma with risk of developing obesity in the US cohort (10). Boys with asthma at baseline were at higher risk of developing obesity than girls during follow-up (10). It is interesting that male sex may not only dominate moderating effects of obesity on asthma but also asthma on obesity development (10).
The development of these two childhood disorders may be a consequence of early-life alterations in the gut microbiome (42). Certain early life events such as mode of delivery, breastfeeding, and antibiotic use may alter the microbiome development and lead to microbiota disturbances (43). The complexity of early-life changes in gut microbiome such as delayed microbiome development and suppressed Clostridiales and Bacteroidetes populations may contribute to obesity and asthma (43, 44). Obesity may alter the gut bacterial community structure including production of bacterial-derived or modified metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) or bile acids, which play a role in the asthma development (45).
Obesity and asthma also share some etiological factors, such as a common genetic predisposition (46, 47). It is suggested that identified genes such as ACE, ADRB2, PRKCA, and TNF may influence both asthma and obesity simultaneously (46–48). Maternal smoking during pregnancy and utero exposures to ambient air polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons have been reported as risk factors for both disorders during early life (49–51). Obesity and asthma may have common predisposing factors such as physical activity and diet (5). Moreover, children with asthma who used medication such as inhaled corticosteroids may increase the risk of obesity (4, 11). The development of asthma and obesity may be driven by different mechanisms. Further studies are still necessary to determine plausible mechanisms and understand how these mechanisms might interact with each other in the etiology of these two disorders.
A major strength of the meta-analysis is the large sample size, which could provide sufficient statistical power and greater reliability (precision) of the estimates. Moreover, we explored the temporal relationship of these two disorders in cohort studies, which may have relatively lower risk of presenting biases, such as reverse causation and recall bias, compared with other types of epidemiological designs (case-control or cross-section design) (52). Our study also has some limitations. First, there was significant heterogeneity among study results for the association between obesity and risk of asthma. To ensure the homogeneity of the included studies, we set relatively strict eligibility criteria. There are still several potential sources for the observed between-study heterogeneity. For example, the age of study population, socioeconomic status, and genetic diversity varied from study to study. For example, Lang et al. included children aged from 2 to 18 years (both preschool and school-aged children), but the other five studies only included the school-aged children with ages from 7 to 18 years. In the sensitivity analysis, when we excluded the Lang et al. study, the pooled RR of the remaining five studies slightly increased, but the statistical heterogeneity disappeared. Second, residual confounding inherent in the original studies may distort the associations. For example, the studies by Ho et al. and Black et al. did not adjust for comorbidities such as rhinitis, eczema, and food allergies in the multivariable models, which may lead to residual confounding. We conducted sensitivity analysis by excluding these two studies from the meta-analysis. The pooled RR of the remaining four studies, which considered the adjustment for the comorbidities in the analyses, did not change materially compared with the overall results (RR for sensitivity analysis = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.28, 1.34; p < 0.001). Third, the definitions of asthma varied from study to study. Physician assessment of asthma has been widely used as a method to assess the asthma status in epidemiological studies, but asthma diagnoses may be influenced by differences in clinical practice and heath care in different regions (53). We were not able to address these potential misclassifications inherent in the original studies. Fourth, since the BMI itself may not reflect where the fat is distributed in children, using the BMI itself to define obesity may therefore either under- or overestimate the obesity (14, 54). Fifth, the studies included in the meta-analysis are mainly from the European countries, US, and China, and little is known on the obesity–asthma association in the other areas such as Central and South America, Africa, and Oceania. Previous epidemiological studies from Australia, New Zealand, and Brazil suggested that a higher BMI may be associated with higher risks of asthma or wheezing in children and adolescents (31, 41, 55–59). These evidences may support the findings from the current meta-analysis; however, we should be cautious in generalizing the results of the meta-analysis to other areas, especially where the incidences of childhood asthma and obesity are relatively low. Last, although no publication bias was detected, the test for publication had low statistical power when small numbers of studies were included in the analysis. In addition, non-English studies were not searched and considered in this meta-analysis, which may lead to biased results.
This meta-analysis found a bidirectional association between obesity and asthma during childhood and adolescence, suggesting that obesity may increase the risk of childhood asthma, and asthma may also increase the risk of obesity. These findings shed light on the development of these early life disorders. Further studies may focus on investigating the potential mechanisms underlying these associations, as well as the systematic approaches for prevention of obesity and adequate treatments of asthma to reduce the trajectory toward these two diseases.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data analyzed in this study was subject to the following licenses/restrictions: The dataset could be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to yunxiao.shang.sj.hospital@hotmail.com.
Author contributions
Y-XS developed the research design, interpreted the results, and also had primary responsibility for the final content. L-SS and Q-LZ analyzed the data and interpreted the results. L-SS, Q-LZ, and Y-XS drafted the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning (No. 2019-ZD-0778 to L-SS).
Acknowledgments
We appreciate Dr. Zhao Yang for her constructive suggestions on the statistical analysis of the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2020.576858/full#supplementary-material
References
1.
KumarSKellyAS. Review of childhood obesity: from epidemiology, etiology, and comorbidities to clinical assessment and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. (2017) 92:251–65. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.09.017
2.
DharmageSCPerretJLCustovicA. Epidemiology of asthma in children and adults. Front Pediatr. (2019) 7:246. 10.3389/fped.2019.00246
3.
GreenTL. Examining the temporal relationships between childhood obesity and asthma. Econ Hum Biol. (2014) 14:92–102. 10.1016/j.ehb.2012.10.002
4.
FornoE. Asthma and obesity: the chicken, the egg, or more than one beast?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2017) 195:1124–5. 10.1164/rccm.201701-0082ED
5.
AliZUlrikCS. Obesity and asthma: a coincidence or a causal relationship? A systematic review. Respir Med. (2013) 107:1287–300. 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.019
6.
DengXMaJYuanYZhangZNiuW. Association between overweight or obesity and the risk for childhood asthma and wheeze: an updated meta-analysis on 18 articles and 73 252 children. Pediatr Obes. (2019) 14:e12532. 10.1111/ijpo.12532
7.
EganKBEttingerASBrackenMB. Childhood body mass index and subsequent physician-diagnosed asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Pediatr. (2013) 13:121. 10.1186/1471-2431-13-121
8.
ChenYCDongGHLinKCLeeYL. Gender difference of childhood overweight and obesity in predicting the risk of incident asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. (2013) 14:222–31. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01055.x
9.
ZhangYChenZBerhaneKUrmanRChatziVLBretonCet al. The dynamic relationship between asthma and obesity in school children. Am J Epidemiol. (2020) 189:583–91. 10.1093/aje/kwz257
10.
ChenZSalamMTAldereteTLHabreRBastainTMBerhaneKet al. Effects of childhood asthma on the development of obesity among school-aged children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2017) 195:1181–8. 10.1164/rccm.201608-1691OC
11.
ContrerasZAChenZRoumeliotakiTAnnesi-MaesanoIBaizNvon BergAet al. Does early onset asthma increase childhood obesity risk? A pooled analysis of 16 European cohorts. Eur Respir J. (2018) 52:1800504. 10.1183/13993003.00504-2018
12.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDGGroupP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. (2009) 6:e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
13.
ColeTJLobsteinT. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes. (2012) 7:284–94. 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00064.x
14.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight & Obesity. Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/defining.html (accessed September 3, 2020).
15.
WellsGSheaBO'ConnellDPetersonJWelchVLososMet al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-randomized Studies in Meta-analysis. Ottawa Health Research Institute (1999). Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed September 3, 2020).
16.
HindleyGBeckKBorganFGinestetCEMcCutcheonRKleinloogDet al. Psychiatric symptoms caused by cannabis constituents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. (2020) 7:344–53. 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30074-2
17.
AskariMHeshmatiJShahinfarHTripathiNDaneshzadE. Ultra-processed food and the risk of overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Obes. (2020) 44:2080–91. 10.1038/s41366-020-00650-z
18.
HigginsJPThompsonSG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. (2002) 21:1539–58. 10.1002/sim.1186
19.
DerSimonianRKackerR. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. (2007) 28:105–14. 10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004
20.
BeggCBMazumdarM. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. (1994) 50:1088–101. 10.2307/2533446
21.
EggerMDavey SmithGSchneiderMMinderC. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. (1997) 315:629–34. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
22.
LangJEBunnellHTHossainJWysockiTLimaJJFinkelTHet al. Being overweight or obese and the development of asthma. Pediatrics. (2018) 142:e20182119. 10.1542/peds.2018-2119
23.
SzentpeterySSGruzievaOFornoEHanYYBergströmAKullIet al. Combined effects of multiple risk factors on asthma in school-aged children. Respir Med. (2017) 133:16–21. 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.11.002
24.
LeeYLChenYCChenYA. Obesity and the occurrence of bronchitis in adolescents. Obesity. (2012) 21:E149–53. 10.1002/oby.20262
25.
BlackMHZhouHTakayanagiMJacobsenSJKoebnickC. Increased asthma risk and asthma-related health care complications associated with childhood obesity. Am J Epidemiol. (2013) 178:1120–8. 10.1093/aje/kwt093
26.
HoWCLinYSCaffreyJLLinMHHsuHTMyersLet al. Higher body mass index may induce asthma among adolescents with pre-asthmatic symptoms: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. (2011) 11:542. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-542
27.
GillilandFDBerhaneKIslamTMcConnellRGaudermanWJGillilandSSet al. Obesity and the risk of newly diagnosed asthma in school-age children. Am J Epidemiol. (2003) 158:406–15. 10.1093/aje/kwg175
28.
AhmadizarFVijverbergSJHAretsHGMDe BoerALangJEKattanMet al. Childhood obesity in relation to poor asthma control and exacerbation: a meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. (2016) 48:1063–73. 10.1183/13993003.00766-2016
29.
SantamariaFMontellaSGrecoLValerioGFranzeseAManiscalcoMet al. Obesity duration is associated to pulmonary function impairment in obese subjects. Obesity. (2011) 19:1623–8. 10.1038/oby.2011.1
30.
PeroniDGPietrobelliABonerAL. Asthma and obesity in childhood: on the road ahead. Int J Obes. (2010) 34:599–605. 10.1038/ijo.2009.273
31.
MamunAALawlorDAAlatiRO'CallaghanMJWilliamsGMNajmanJM. Increasing body mass index from age 5 to 14 years predicts asthma among adolescents: evidence from a birth cohort study. Int J Obes. (2007) 31:578–83. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803571
32.
GoldDRDamokoshAIDockeryDWBerkeyCS. Body-mass index as a predictor of incident asthma in a prospective cohort of children. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2003) 36:514–21. 10.1002/ppul.10376
33.
BelfortMBCohenRTRheinLMMcCormickMC. Preterm infant growth and asthma at age 8 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2016) 101:F230–4. 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308340
34.
GranellRHendersonAJEvansDMSmithGDNessARLewisSet al. Effects of BMI, fat mass, and lean mass on asthma in childhood: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med. (2014) 11:e1001669. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001669
35.
OkoniewskiWLuKDFornoE. Weight loss for children and adults with obesity and asthma. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Am Thorac Soc. (2019) 16:613–25. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201810-651SR
36.
ChinnSRonaRJ. Can the increase in body mass index explain the rising trend in asthma in children?Thorax. (2001) 56:845–50. 10.1136/thorax.56.11.845
37.
HanYYFornoECeledonJC. Sex steroid hormones and asthma in a nationwide study of U.S. adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2020) 201:158–66. 10.1164/rccm.201905-0996OC
38.
ZeinJGErzurumSC. Asthma is different in women. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. (2015) 15:28. 10.1007/s11882-015-0528-y
39.
CareyMACardJWVoltzJWArbesSJJr.GermolecDRKorachKSet al. It's all about sex: gender, lung development and lung disease. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2007) 18:308–13. 10.1016/j.tem.2007.08.003
40.
LoMauroAAlivertiA. Sex differences in respiratory function. Breathe (Sheff). (2018) 14:131–40. 10.1183/20734735.000318
41.
MandhanePJGreeneJMCowanJOTaylorDRSearsMR. Sex differences in factors associated with childhood- and adolescent-onset wheeze. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2005) 172:45–54. 10.1164/rccm.200412-1738OC
42.
ZhuangLChenHZhangSZhuangJLiQFengZ. Intestinal microbiota in early life and its implications on childhood health. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. (2019) 17:13–25. 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.10.002
43.
BokulichNAChungJBattagliaTHendersonNJayMLiHet al. Antibiotics, birth mode, and diet shape microbiome maturation during early life. Sci Transl Med. (2016) 8:343ra82. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7121
44.
PetersUDixonAEFornoE. Obesity and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 141:1169–79. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.004
45.
ShoreSAChoY. Obesity and asthma: microbiome-metabolome interactions. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (2016) 54:609–17. 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0052PS
46.
RankinenTZuberiAChagnonYCWeisnagelSJArgyropoulosGWaltsBet al. The human obesity gene map: the 2005 update. Obesity. (2006) 14:529–644. 10.1038/oby.2006.71
47.
OberCHoffjanS. Asthma genetics 2006: the long and winding road to gene discovery. Genes Immun. (2006) 7:95–100. 10.1038/sj.gene.6364284
48.
MelenEHimesBEBrehmJMBoutaouiNKlandermanBJSylviaJSet al. Analyses of shared genetic factors between asthma and obesity in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2010) 126:631–7.e1-8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.030
49.
WeitzmanMGortmakerSWalkerDKSobolA. Maternal smoking and childhood asthma. Pediatrics. (1990) 85:505–11.
50.
PowerCJefferisBJ. Fetal environment and subsequent obesity: a study of maternal smoking. Int J Epidemiol. (2002) 31:413–9. 10.1093/intjepid/31.2.413
51.
JungKHPerzanowskiMRundleAMoorsKYanBChillrudSNet al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure, obesity and childhood asthma in an urban cohort. Environ Res. (2014) 128:35–41. 10.1016/j.envres.2013.12.002
52.
KopecJAEsdaileJM. Bias in case-control studies. A review. J Epidemiol Community Health. (1990) 44:179–86. 10.1136/jech.44.3.179
53.
SametJM. Epidemiologic approaches for the identification of asthma. Chest. (1987) 91(6 Suppl.):74S−8S. 10.1378/chest.91.6.74S
54.
BarlowSEExpertC. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. (2007) 120(Suppl. 4):S164–92. 10.1542/peds.2007-2329C
55.
NoalRBMenezesAMBMacEdoSECDumithSCPerez-PadillaRAraújoCLPet al. Is obesity a risk factor for wheezing among adolescents? A prospective study in Southern Brazil. J Adolesc Health. (2012) 51(Suppl. 6):S38–45. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.016
56.
WakeMCanterfordLPattonGCHeskethKHardyPWilliamsJet al. Comorbidities of overweight/obesity experienced in adolescence: longitudinal study. Arch Dis Child. (2010) 95:162–8. 10.1136/adc.2008.147439
57.
BurgessJAWaltersEHByrnesGBGilesGGJenkinsMAAbramsonMJet al. Childhood adiposity predicts adult-onset current asthma in females: a 25-yr prospective study. Eur Respir J. (2007) 29:668–75. 10.1183/09031936.00080906
58.
HancoxRJMilneBJPoultonRTaylorDRGreeneJMMcLachlanCRet al. Sex differences in the relation between body mass index and asthma and atopy in a birth cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2005) 171:440–5. 10.1164/rccm.200405-623OC
59.
OddyWHSherriffJLDe KlerkNHKendallGESlyPDBeilinLJet al. The relation of breastfeeding and body mass index to asthma and atopy in children: a prospective cohort study to age 6 years. Am J Public Health. (2004) 94:1531–7. 10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1531
Summary
Keywords
obesity, asthma, children, adolescents, cohort studies, meta-analysis 4
Citation
Shan L-S, Zhou Q-L and Shang Y-X (2020) Bidirectional Association Between Asthma and Obesity During Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Pediatr. 8:576858. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.576858
Received
29 June 2020
Accepted
21 September 2020
Published
29 October 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Francesca Santamaria, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Reviewed by
Mariona Pinart, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers (HZ), Germany; Maria Michelle Papamichael, La Trobe University, Australia; Diego G. Peroni, University of Pisa, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Shan, Zhou and Shang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yun-Xiao Shang yunxiao.shang.sj.hospital@hotmail.com
This article was submitted to Pediatric Pulmonology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.