GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Pediatr., 08 June 2021

Sec. Pediatric Immunology

Volume 9 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.684662

Commentary: Raw Cow Milk Consumption and Atopic March

  • 1. Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

  • 2. ImmunoNutritionLab at the CEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies Research Center, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

  • 3. European Laboratory for the Investigation of Food-Induced Diseases, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

  • 4. Task Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

We have appreciated the interest of Dr Baars et al. in our paper describing dietary prevention of atopic march (AM) in children affected by cow milk allergy (CMA) (). They claimed a lack of information on raw cow milk (unpasteurized cow milk) in our paper. In support of this point, they mentioned the result of a pilot study involving nine CMA children () that were able to tolerate up to 50 mL of raw milk (about 1,750 mg of cow milk proteins). This result was not confirmed by a similar study where five children with IgE-mediated CMA were orally challenged in a double-blind fashion with raw untreated cow milk, pasteurized cow milk, and homogenized/pasteurized cow milk. An extensively hydrolysed casein formula served as placebo. All patients presented significant allergic reactions from the consumption of the above three types of milk, whereas no adverse reactions to placebo were observed. The authors concluded that children with CMA cannot tolerate raw or pasteurized milk (). Although, selected components of raw milk may potentially influence the immune system, proof based on controlled studies in children are still lacking (). The authors of the PARSIFAL study concluded that raw cow milk may contain numerous disease-causing pathogens and that consumption of raw milk cannot be recommended as a preventive measure for allergy (). Accordingly, none of the claims made by the raw milk advocates (including the postulated preventive effect against allergy) withstand the FDA scientific scrutiny ().

CMA is one of the most prevalent food allergies and a major cause of anaphylaxis in childhood. Deaths from CMA-induced anaphylaxis have occurred in allergic children. Besides their effects on physical health and quality of life, CMA impose substantial economic burden on families and on healthcare system (). The treatment following the diagnosis of CMA is complete avoidance of cow milk and foods containing cow milk proteins.

There is no solid evidence suggesting potential positive effects of raw milk in stimulating immune tolerance and in preventing the occurrence of AM in children with CMA. The use of raw milk in the dietary approach to CMA children is not recommended by current guidelines provided by scientific societies EAACI, DRACMA, NICE, ESPGHAN, NIAID, BSACI, and AAP (, ). Unfortunately, the false “health benefits” claims of raw milk may cause parents of children with CMA to give raw milk to their babies, that are most at risk for becoming ill or even dying from foodborne illness as a result of consuming contaminated raw milk (). Fortunately, governmental agencies prohibit the consumption of raw cow milk especially for vulnerable groups (including infants and children) () for the risk of contamination with pathogens (Listeria, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Enterohemorrhagic, and Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli) (, ).

Cow milk allergy presents many problems for patients, their families and national health care systems, we sincerely do not believe that it is worth adding other dangers in the absence of even minimal evidence of efficacy in modulating CMA disease course.

Statements

Author contributions

LC analyzed literature, wrote and read the manuscript. RBC designed and structured the paper, wrote and read the manuscript. SC, RN, LP, and CDS analyzed literature and read the manuscript. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Summary

Keywords

allergic march, food allergy, anaphylaxis, infant formula, immunonutrition

Citation

Carucci L, Coppola S, Nocerino R, Paparo L, Di Scala C and Berni Canani R (2021) Commentary: Raw Cow Milk Consumption and Atopic March. Front. Pediatr. 9:684662. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.684662

Received

23 March 2021

Accepted

12 May 2021

Published

08 June 2021

Volume

9 - 2021

Edited by

Marzia Duse, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Reviewed by

Anna Nowak Wegrzyn, New York University, United States; Giampaolo Ricci, University of Bologna, Italy

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Laura Carucci

This article was submitted to Pediatric Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics