Abstract
Progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) is a group of rare diseases characterized by progressive myoclonus, cognitive impairment, ataxia, and other neurologic deficits. PME has high genetic heterogeneity, and more than 40 genes are reportedly associated with this disorder. SEMA6B encodes a member of the semaphorin family and was first reported to cause PME in 2020. Herein, we present a rare case of PME due to a novel SEMA6B gene mutation in a 6-year-old boy born to healthy non-consanguineous Chinese parents. His developmental milestones were delayed, and he developed recurrent atonic seizures and myoclonic seizures without fever at 3 years and 11 months of age. He experienced recurrent myoclonic seizures, non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), atonic seizures, and atypical absence seizures during the last 2 years. At different time points since onset, valproic acid, levetiracetam, piracetam, and clobazam were used to control the intractable seizures. Notably, NCSE was controlled by a combination of piracetam with clobazam and valproic acid instead of intravenous infusion of midazolam and phenobarbital. Due to the limited number of cases reported to date, the clinical description of our case provides a better understanding of the genotype–phenotype correlations associated with PME and indicate that piracetam may be effective against NCSE in patients with SEMA6B-related PME.
Introduction
Progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) is a group of disorders associated with focal and generalized seizures, myoclonus, and progressive neurological deficits (1). PME primarily presents as myoclonic seizures; however, generalized tonic–clonic, tonic, and atypical absence seizures have also been reported (2). PME is a genetically heterogeneous disorder, and the common causative genes associated with PME are CTSB, NHLRC1, EPM2A, MTTK, CLN2, and CLN6;
besides these, there are more than 30 other causative genes which are relatively rarely associated with PME (3–6).
SEMA6B (OMIM:608873) was first reported to be associated with PME in 2020 by Hamanaka (7), and only 11 patients with PME have been reported to date. The small number of mutations observed in SEMA6B in patients with PME has limited our understanding of how SEMA6B plays a role in the pathogenesis of PME. In addition, the treatment experience is also very limited (8).
In this report, we present the clinical and genetic data of a child with PME caused by a SEMA6B gene variant. The new genetic evidence presented herein strengthens the gene–disease relationship, and we believe this case report will improve clinicians’ understanding of the disease. In addition, this report expands the mutation spectrum of SEMA6B to provide early diagnosis and genetic counseling to such patients. Furthermore, to our knowledge, this is the first report to mention piracetam as an option to manage non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in PME.
Case Presentation
The proband was a 6-year-old boy born to healthy non-consanguineous Chinese parents. There was no remarkable medical history in the family. He had a healthy younger sister and was born at full term following an uneventful pregnancy.
His developmental milestones were delayed, and he did not have head control until the age of 10 months, could not sit without support until 17 months, and could walk without support only at 32 months, but with an unsteady gait. Hence, he was diagnosed with developmental delay at a local hospital. At 3 years and 11 months, he developed recurrent myoclonic seizures without fever. His parents reported his seizure onset as head nodding or fall. The video EEG monitoring showed delta waves during wakefulness, and interictal EEG was characterized by multifocal spikes or spike-and-wave discharges, sharp waves, slow waves, and generalized spike or polyspike–wave complexes. Ictal EEG showed bursts of 1.5–2.5 Hz generalized spike-wave complex while surface electromyogram showed a brief silent period (<200 ms), symptoms included nodding or drop attacks, consistent with negative myoclonus. Surface electromyography also captured hypersynchronous myoclonus electromyography discharges (<200 ms) while myoclonic jerks involving the trunk and limbs, consistent with myoclonus. He was given valproic acid (VPA; max dosage = 28.6 mg/kg.d) and levetiracetam (LEV; max dosage = 66.7 mg/kg.d), and he remained seizure-free for more than 1 year. Because of the motor regression caused by this bout of seizures, he could not walk at all until becoming seizure-free at 4 years of age. During the year when he was seizure-free, he could walk with a steady gait and learned more skills. At 5 years of age, he experienced recurrent myoclonic seizures with head nodding. He was administered clonazepam (CZP; max dosage = 0.67 mg/kg.d), topiramate (TPM; max dosage = 1.7 mg/kg.d), zonisamide (ZNS; max dosage = 12.9 mg/kg.d), and ketogenic diet, but none of these were effective. At 5.5 years of age, he was admitted to our hospital for the first time, and his interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) showed bursts of diffuse irregular spike-and-wave discharges, whereas his ictal EEG showed a burst of generalized spike-and-wave discharges; furthermore, his video monitoring revealed myoclonic seizures and atypical absence seizures. Clobazam (CLB; max dosage = 0.94 mg/kg.d) was added, and this kept him seizure-free for 3 months. Perampanel (PER; max dosage = 0.12 mg/kg.d) was added after the seizures returned, and he was seizure-free for another 3 months.
At 6 years of age, the recurrent seizures made him lethargic all the time, and he suffered from dysphagia with constant drooling. Long-term video EEG was performed as soon as he visited our center. The video EEG showed continuous diffuse delta activity during wakefulness as the markedly abnormal background; interictal EEG showed periodic diffuse paroxysmal multiple spike-and-wave complex, and usually, a second or so of suppression was seen afterward. Meanwhile, ictal EEG showed continuous discharges of 2–2.5 Hz generalized slow spike-and-wave complexes and polyspike-and-wave complexes, the video capture revealed the symptoms of continuous staring, subtle behavioral arrest, impaired awareness, constant blinking, and myoclonus of the limbs and eyelids. The ictal status could last for hours, which was regarded as NSCE according to its diagnosis criterion. His hypotonia became very severe, and he showed little response to language and little ability to verbally communicate. He was admitted to the intensive care unit for NCSE, pneumonia, and lethargy. NCSE persisted despite high-dose midazolam (dosage, 20 μg/kg⋅min IV drip) and an IV drip of phenobarbital (40 mg/kg.d), and mechanical ventilation was required for 6 days at a time in the intensive care unit. During this period, interictal EEG during sleep showed periodic occurrence of diffuse paroxysmal multiple spike-and-slow-wave complexes, and usually, a second or so of suppression was seen thereafter (Figure 1A). Meanwhile, ictal EEG indicated diffuse slow waves of high amplitude at 2–3 Hz with spike-and-wave complexes (Figure 1B) along with impaired awareness and subtle clinical ictal phenomena. He was successfully weaned from the mechanical ventilator after withdrawal of phenobarbital and midazolam. After administering high-dose oral piracetam (max dosage, 225 mg/kg.d) combined with oral clobazam (CLB; dosage, 0.68 mg/kg.d) and valproic acid (VPA; dosage, 21.6 mg/kg.d), he regained consciousness and the seizures gradually decreased; the seizures completely stopped in 10 days. The EEG taken after seizure remission showed no ictal episode. After 40 days, both his motor skills and language skills had returned to baseline levels. At the last follow-up, which was 4 months later, he was still seizure free.
FIGURE 1
(A) Interictal EEG at 6 years of age showing periodic occurrence of diffuse paroxysmal multiple spike-and-slow-wave complexes and usually a second or so of suppression seen thereafter. (B) Ictal EEG at 6 years of age indicating slow waves of high amplitude at 2–3 Hz with spike-and-wave complexes. (C) At 6.5 years of age, this EEG was taken when the seizure was controlled: no ictal episode was noted during monitoring.
Repeated cranial MRIs were unremarkable. Extensive laboratory testing, including liver and renal function, organic acids in urine, and amino acids in plasma, showed normal results. During his last follow-up at 6.5 years of age, he had been seizure-free for 4 months with the combination treatment of piracetam, clobazam, valproic acid, and zonisamide. His height, weight, and head circumference were 108.5 cm (–2 SD), 16.9 kg (–2 SD), and 48.5 cm (–2.0 SD). He could walk without support in an unsteady way, could respond to simple spoken requests, and could say simple words like “mama” and “dada.” His muscle tone improved as well. The EEG showed no ictal episode during monitoring (Figure 1C).
Blood samples were obtained from all family members for genetic analysis after obtaining written informed consent from the parents. Notably, karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis, whole-exome sequencing, and mitochondrial genetic testing performed when he was 3 years old could not identify the cause of his illness. This is because these tests were performed in 2019, which is before the first report of the SEMA6B gene being associated with the disease. However, at 6 years of age, trio whole-exome sequencing was performed using xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0 (IDT) on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina). The bioinformatics analysis was performed following the previously described pipeline (9). A de novo nonsense mutation (NM_032108.3:c.2023delG; p.Val675Phefs*10) in SEMA6B was identified, and the variant was classified as likely pathogenic according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines (10). The mutation was confirmed by Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3730XL DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
Sequencing chromatograms of the de novo variant in our patient (black arrow).
Discussion
We identified a novel SEMA6B variant in one PME patient, and this reinforces the notion that SEMA6B is an underlying pathogenic factor in PME. SEMA6B is highly expressed in the human brain and is expressed at lower levels in various other tissues (11). It encodes a protein of the class 6 semaphorin family, the members of which are involved in various processes, such as neural crest cell migration, axon guidance, and cerebellar development (12). The gene was first reported to be associated with PME by Hamanaka in 2020. They identified four frameshift variants (c.1976_1982del/p.Ala659fs, c.1991del/p.Gly664fs, c.1950_1969dup/p.Arg657fs, and c.1982_1991del/p.Gly661fs) in the last exon of SEMA6B in five unrelated families, all of which had a child presenting with PME. The RNA analysis of lymphoblastoid cells of an affected individual in their study showed that the mutant allele escaped nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and they found that zebrafish expressing truncated variants of the NMD (–) region showed defective neuron development in the brain and enhanced pentylenetetrazol-induced seizure behavior. The author suggested that the gene was dominant-negative or had gain-of-function effects rather than showing haploid deficiency. Upon searching for reported cases of SEMA6B variants, we found seven other variants reported in the literature (6–8, 13–15). All of the variants are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 3.
TABLE 1
| Clinical data | Our case | Individual 1 Hamanaka et al. (7) | Individual 2 Hamanaka et al. (7) | Individual 3 Hamanaka et al. (7) | Individual 4 Hamanaka et al. (7) | Case Li et al. (13) | PME25 Courage et al. (6) | PME83 Courage et al. (6) | Patient 1 Song et al. (14) | Patient 23# Song et al. (14) | Case Li Shu et al. (15) | Case Rebecca Herzog et al. (8) |
| Nationality | Chinese | Japanese | Japanese | Israeli | Malaysian | Chinese | Canada | Australian | Chinese | Chinese | Chinese | NA |
| Gender | Male | Male | Female | Male | Female | Female | Female | Male | Female | Male | Male | Female |
| variant | c.2023delG (p.V675fs) | c.1950_1969dup (p.R657fs) | c.1976_1982del (p.A659fs) | c.1991del (p.G664fs) | c.1991del (p.G664fs) | c.1960_1978del (p.L654fs) | c.2032delG (p.E678fs) | c.1993delC (p.R665fs) | c.2056C>T (p.Q686*) | c.1483G C>T (p.G495W) | c.1934delG (p.G645fs) | c.2067G>A (p. W689*) |
| Inheritance | De novo | De novo | De novo | De novo | De novo | De novo | NA | De novo | De novo | De novo | De novo | NA |
| DD | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| Intellectual disability | Severe ID | Severe (IQ = 25 at 17 years) | Severe (IQ = 25 at 12 years) | Severe | Severe | + | Moderate ID | Severe ID | NA | NA | NA | + |
| Language | Few words | Few words | Few words | No words | No words | Few words | NA | NA | No words | NA | No words | Simple words |
| Microcephaly | + 2.0 SD | − | −2.0 SD | −2.5 SD | + | NA | − | − | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Regression | Motor and verbal skills | Motor skill and dysarthria | Motor skill | Motor and verbal skills | + | + | No definitive cognitive decline | + | + | − | NA | + |
| Ataxia | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NA | NA | NA | + |
| Intention tremor | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Myoclonus | + | + | + | NA | + | + | + | + | NA | NA | NA | + |
| Spasticity | + | + | + | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | + |
| Motor disturbance | Wheelchair | Wheelchair | Wheelchair | Wheelchair | Walking with support | Running and jumping with a little difficulty | Wheelchair | Wheelchair | Walking with support | NA | NA | Wheelchair |
| Brain MRI | Normal | Normal | Mild cerebellar atrophy | Small vermis | Normal | Herniation of the cerebellar tonsils | NA | NA | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Clinical data and variants in SEMA6B-related progressive myoclonic epilepsy reported to date.
#The pathogenicity of the variant is dubious. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not available; Y, year.
The symbol * stands for a stop codon.
FIGURE 3
Distribution of known variants in SEMA6B.
All variants reported to date are truncation variants in the last exon of the gene, except for the c.1483G>T variant (16). The only missense mutation c.1483G>T, which was reported by Xiaozhen et al. (16), was identified de novo in a 3-year-old boy who had apparently normal developmental milestones. This child was referred to the hospital at the age of 2 years because of the onset of seizures with eye-rolling, cyanotic lips, consciousness lapses, and right upper limb jitter as well as a gelastic seizure lasting > 15 s. Furthermore, he had good response to combination treatment of levetiracetam and sodium valproate with no recurrence noted. The functional assay showed no changes in protein length and expression and no difference in cellular distribution; however, co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed that the variant influenced protein binding of SEMA6B and PlxnA2 to varying degrees. Therefore, we believe that the pathogenicity of c.1483G>T is dubious, and more evidence is needed to support it.
Clinical presentations of all 12 reported patients (including our case) are summarized in Tables 1, 2.
TABLE 2
| Clinical data | Age of seizure onset | Seizure types | Response to ASD | EEG |
| Our case | 3 years | Focal seizures, atonic seizures, atypical absence seizures, NCSE | Intractable | Delta waves were noted during wakefulness; interictal EEG was characterized by multifocal spikes or spike-and-wave discharges, sharp waves, slow waves, and generalized spike or polyspike-and-wave complexes. Ictal EEG showed myoclonic seizures involving the trunk and limbs (4 years); diffuse slow waves were the main background during wakefulness, whereas ictal EEG showed continuous rhythmic generalized polyspike-and-wave complexes (6 years). |
| Individual 1 Hamanaka et al. (7) | 6 years | GTCS, absence seizures, atonic seizure | Intractable | Abnormal discharge in the right hemisphere (6 years), burst of diffuse irregular spikes and slow waves (9 years), and diffuse spike and slow waves in the frontal, parietal and temporal regions (14 years) |
| Individual 2 Hamanaka et al. (7) | 11 months | GTCS; complex partial seizures; atonic seizures | Intractable | Diffuse slow waves (2–3 Hz) and spike-and-wave discharges in the bilateral frontal region (3 years and 4 years), diffuse theta waves (4–5 Hz) and spike-and-wave bursts (2–3 Hz; 9 years), multifocal spikes in left parietal region and bilateral frontal regions (12 years), multispikes in the left occipital region (13 years), and slow waves at baseline (23 years) |
| Individual 3 Hamanaka et al. (7) | 2 years | Absence seizures | Responsive | Abnormal background activity (1 year), slow abnormal sleep features with a paucity of sleep spindles (13 years) |
| Individual 4 Hamanaka et al. (7) | 4 years | Atonic seizures | Intractable | Focal bifrontal epileptiform discharges accentuated during sleep (4 years), frequent frontocentral discharges during the awake state (5 years), and frequent intermittent slow spikes in the right posterior region (11 years) |
| Case Li et al. (13) | 4 years | Atonic seizures | Responsive | Diffuse spike-and-wave bursts (1.5–2.5 Hz), particularly in the frontal regions, temporary increase in myoelectric activity, interictal widespread spina wave (1.5–2.0 Hz) released continuously and irregularly (6 years) |
| PME25 Courage et al. (6) | NA | Tonic–clonic seizure, possible absence and focal seizures | NA | NA |
| PME83 Courage et al. (6) | NA | Drop attacks and absence seizures | NA | NA |
| Patient 1 Song et al. (14) | 2 years | Atonic seizures, complex partial seizures, atypical absence seizures | Intractable | Generalized slow spike-and-wave discharges (1.6–2 Hz), demonstrating intermittent discharges during sleep and continuous spike-waves during sleep |
| Patient 23# Song et al. (14) | 2 years | Na | Seizure-free | NA |
| Case Li et al. (13) | 6 months | Generalized tonic–clonic seizure | Seizure-free | Sporadic, low-amplitude slow spike-and-wave discharges in the central parietal and midline regions during sleep |
| Case Herzog et al. (8) | Birth | Myoclonus epilepsy, absence seizures | Seizure-free | Occipital hypersynchronous activity bilaterally with intermittent generalization without clinical correlates during the awake state and while asleep |
Characteristics of epilepsy reported in SEMA6B-related progressive myoclonic epilepsy.
EEG, electroencephalogram; GTCS, generalized tonic–clonic seizures; NA, not available.
However, considering the doubtful pathogenicity of c.1483G>T, we have not included the case reported by Xiaozhen et al. (16) (Patient 23) in our discussion of the clinical symptoms of all patients below. All patients with truncation mutations presented with epilepsy and varying degrees of delayed development. The age of epilepsy onset ranged from 6 months to 10 years, and various types of epilepsy were identified. Among the nine cases with treatment and prognosis data available, two cases were previously reported seizure-free after treatment (2/9, 22.2%), two cases were responsive to anti-seizure drugs (2/9, 22.2%), and five cases had refractory seizures (5/9, 55.6%). Interestingly, the case reported by Li et al. (13) was considered to be a case of febrile seizure; in this patient, a generalized tonic–clonic seizure occurred only once, and the patient was seizure-free without any anti-seizure medication (ASM). Conversely, many other patients developed seizures at different ages and did not respond well to drugs. Furthermore, most other patients had several types of seizures and did not respond to medication. Notably, myoclonus, and atypical absence occurred both alternately and simultaneously in our case.
At present, PME treatment remains palliative, supportive, and rehabilitative, with the best current therapies having limited success in the management of symptoms. Valproic acid is the most used ASM; it has a broad range of antiepileptic activities and is effective in treating myoclonus in various epileptic syndromes. Therefore, it is usually effective in suppressing, at least temporarily, most generalized tonic–clonic seizures as well as myoclonus to some extent. The other ASMs include lamotrigine, phenobarbital, and primidone, which at high doses can cause a level of cognitive impairment that is worse than the original condition for which they were being administered, and levetiracetam (3). Clonazepam is useful but often leads to considerable sedation and increasing tolerance. Due to the partial response to clonazepam and the short-term improvement after treatment with valproic acid and levetiracetam, myoclonus tends to persist after treatment (8). Some newer ASMs are reportedly effective, such as piracetam (17), topiramate (18), zonisamide (19), clobazam (20), and perampanel (21). Some ASMs can induce or worsen myoclonus (22), and these drugs should be avoided, particularly sodium-channel blockers (phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine), certain GABAergic drugs (tiagabine and vigabatrin), and gabapentin and pregabalin (23–26). It remains unclear why these drugs exacerbate myoclonus.
NCSE is a major but easily overlooked problem in PME. It may be associated with brain damage and developmental regression, and the treatment of NCSE is particularly important as a part of PME treatment. The traditional drug therapies mainly include diazepam, phenobarbital, and midazolam; however, they had no effect in our case. Instead, high-dose piracetam quickly improved the child’s EEG and returned their motor and language capabilities to baseline levels. Therefore, we speculate that piracetam may be effective against NSCE in patients with PME; however, this needs to be supported by other case reports and/or clinical trials. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, this is the first report about the treatment of NCSE in SEMA6B-related PME.
In conclusion, this report adds to the list of pathogenic SEMA6B variants and provides a better understanding of how different genotypes are related to the etiology of PME. These findings have important implications for the clinical management of patients with PME.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets for this article are not publicly available due to concerns regarding participant/patient anonymity. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to LC, chenli2000@126.com.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Children’s Hospital. Written informed consent from the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
Author contributions
LC was the first clinician to meet the patient when she was transferred to the hospital. JD was in charge to interpret the genetic data and drafted the manuscript along with CLiu. XZ, WZ, and QZ participated in case collection. YY, ZH, YC, CLi, TZ, JM, YX, YS, and JL were members of the treatment team of this patient and participated in the revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM201812005), Shenzhen Fund for Guangdong Provincial High level Clinical Key Specialties (No. SZGSP012), Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (No. SZXK033), and Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute Fund (No. NYKFKT20190014). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, or writing the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We wish to gratefully acknowledge the patient’s family for their kind collaboration and for granting consent for the publication. We thank Medjaden Inc. for the scientific editing of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
CLiu and WZ were employed by the Berry Genomics Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
- PME
progressive myoclonic epilepsy
- ASM
anti-seizure medication
- NCSE
non-convulsive status epilepticus
- ACMG
American College of Medical Genetics.
References
1.
Zupanc ML Legros B . Progressive myoclonic epilepsy.Cerebellum. (2004) 3:156–71.
2.
Holmes GL . Drug treatment of progressive myoclonic epilepsy.Pediatr Drugs. (2020) 22:149–64. 10.1007/s40272-019-00378-y
3.
Orsini A Valetto A Bertini V Esposito M Carli N Minassian BA et al The best evidence for progressive myoclonic epilepsy: a pathway to precision therapy. Seizure. (2019) 71:247–57. 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.08.012
4.
Zhang J Yang Y Niu X Chen J Sun W Ding C et al Clinical phenotype features and genetic etiologies of 38 children with progressive myoclonic epilepsy. Acta Epileptol. (2020) 2:1–15.
5.
Canafoglia L Franceschetti S Gambardella A Striano P Giallonardo AT Tinuper P et al Progressive myoclonus epilepsies: diagnostic yield with next-generation sequencing in previously unsolved cases. Neurol Genet. (2021) 7:e641. 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000641
6.
Courage C Oliver KL Park EJ Cameron JM Grabińska KA Muona M et al Progressive myoclonus epilepsies—residual unsolved cases have marked genetic heterogeneity including dolichol-dependent protein glycosylation pathway genes. Am J Hum Genet. (2021) 108:722–38. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.013
7.
Hamanaka K Imagawa E Koshimizu E Miyatake S Tohyama J Yamagata T et al De novo truncating variants in the last exon of SEMA6B cause progressive myoclonic epilepsy. Am J Hum Genet. (2020) 106:549–58. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.02.011
8.
Herzog R Hellenbroich Y Brüggemann N Lohmann K Grimmel M Haack TB et al Zonisamide-responsive myoclonus in SEMA6B-associated progressive myoclonic epilepsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. (2021) 8:1524–7. 10.1002/acn3.51403
9.
Zhai Y Zhang Z Shi P Martin DM Kong XJHM . Incorporation of exome-based CNV analysis makes trio-WES a more powerful tool for clinical diagnosis in neurodevelopmental disorders: a retrospective study.Hum Mutat. (2021) 42:990–1004. 10.1002/humu.24222
10.
Richards S Aziz N Bale S Bick D Das S Gastier-Foster J et al Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet Med. (2015) 17:405–23. 10.1038/gim.2015.30
11.
Correa R Sasahara R Bengtson M Katayama M Salim A Brentani MM et al Human semaphorin 6B [(HSA) SEMA6B], a novel human class 6 semaphorin gene: alternative splicing and all-trans-retinoic acid-dependent downregulation in glioblastoma cell lines. Genomics. (2001) 73:343–8. 10.1006/geno.2001.6525
12.
Andermatt I Wilson NH Bergmann T Mauti O Gesemann M Sockanathan S et al Semaphorin 6B acts as a receptor in post-crossing commissural axon guidance. Development. (2014) 141:3709–20. 10.1242/dev.112185
13.
Li Q Liu M Huang DP Li T Huang J Jiang P et al De novo SEMA6B variant in a Chinese patient with progressive myoclonic epilepsy-11 and review of the literature. J Mol Neurosci. (2021) 71:1944–50. 10.1007/s12031-021-01880-0
14.
Xiaozhen S Fan Y Fang Y Xiaoping L Jia J Wuhen X et al Novel truncating and missense variants in SEMA6B in patients with early-onset epilepsy. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2021) 9:633819. 10.3389/fcell.2021.633819
15.
Shu L Xu Y Tian Q Chen Y Wang Y Xi H et al Frameshift variant in the SEMA6B gene causes global developmental delay and febrile seizures. Neurosci Bull. (2021) 37:1357–60. 10.1007/s12264-021-00717-5
16.
Xiaozhen S Fan Y Fang Y Xiaoping L Jia J Wuhen X et al Novel truncating and missense variants in SEMA6B in patients with early-onset epilepsy. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2021) 9: 633819. 10.3389/fcell.2021.633819
17.
Roivainen R Karvonen MK Puumala T . Seizure control in unverricht-lundborg disease: a single-centre study.Epileptic Disord. (2014) 16:191–5. 10.1684/epd.2014.0654
18.
Aykutlu E Baykan B Gürses C Bebek N Büyükbabani N Gökyigit A . Add-on therapy with topiramate in progressive myoclonic epilepsy.Epilepsy Behav. (2005) 6:260–3. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.11.014
19.
Henry TR Leppik IE Gumnit RJ Jacobs M . Progressive myoclonus epilepsy treated with zonisamide.Neurology. (1988) 38:928–928. 10.1212/wnl.38.6.928
20.
Ng Y-T Collins SD . Clobazam.Neurotherapeutics. (2007) 4:138–44.
21.
Crespel A Gelisse P Tang NPL Genton P . Perampanel in 12 patients with unverricht-lundborg disease.Epilepsia. (2017) 58:543–7. 10.1111/epi.13662
22.
Striano P Belcastro V . Treatment of myoclonic seizures.Expert Rev Neurother. (2012) 12:1411–8.
23.
Genton P . When antiepileptic drugs aggravate epilepsy.Brain Dev. (2000) 22:75–80. 10.1016/s0387-7604(99)00113-8
24.
Kälviäinen R Khyuppenen J Koskenkorva P Eriksson K Vanninen R Mervaala E . Clinical picture of EPM1-unverricht-lundborg disease.Epilepsia. (2008) 49:549–56. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01546.x
25.
Augustine EF Adams HR Beck CA Vierhile A Kwon J Rothberg PG et al Standardized assessment of seizures in patients with juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Dev Med Child Neurol. (2015) 57:366–71. 10.1111/dmcn.12634
26.
Johannsen J Nickel M Schulz A Denecke J . Considering valproate as a risk factor for rapid exacerbation of complex movement disorder in progressed stages of late-infantile CLN2 disease.Neuropediatrics. (2016) 47:194–6. 10.1055/s-0036-1579784
Summary
Keywords
non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), SEMA6B , progressive myoclonic epilepsy, piracetam, frameshift mutation
Citation
Duan J, Chen Y, Hu Z, Ye Y, Zhang T, Li C, Zeng Q, Zhao X, Mai J, Sun Y, Liu C, Zheng W, Xiao Y, Liao J and Chen L (2022) Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus in SEMA6B-Related Progressive Myoclonic Epilepsy: A Case Report With Literature Review. Front. Pediatr. 10:859183. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.859183
Received
21 January 2022
Accepted
06 April 2022
Published
28 April 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Duccio Maria Cordelli, Università di Bologna, Italy
Reviewed by
Alessandro Orsini, Pisana University Hospital, Italy; Emilia Ricci, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Italy; Laura Canafoglia, Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Duan, Chen, Hu, Ye, Zhang, Li, Zeng, Zhao, Mai, Sun, Liu, Zheng, Xiao, Liao and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Li Chen, chenli2000@126.com
This article was submitted to Pediatric Neurology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.