SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr., 23 May 2024

Sec. Pediatric Cardiology

Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1340495

Research gaps in the neurodevelopmental assessment of children with complex congenital heart defects: a scoping review

  • 1. Research Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria

  • 2. Institute of Neurology of Senses and Language, Hospital of St. John of God, Linz, Austria

  • 3. Institute of Linguistics, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

  • 4. Division of Social Psychiatry, University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

  • 5. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Heart Center Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria

  • 6. Department of Inclusive Education, University of Education Upper Austria, Linz, Austria

Article metrics

View details

1

Citations

2,6k

Views

1,1k

Downloads

Abstract

Background:

Children with congenital heart defects (CHD) are at risk for a range of developmental disabilities that challenge cognition, executive functioning, self-regulation, communication, social-emotional functioning, and motor skills. Ongoing developmental surveillance is therefore key to maximizing neurodevelopmental outcome opportunities. It is crucial that the measures used cover the spectrum of neurodevelopmental domains relevant to capturing possible predictors and malleable factors of child development.

Objectives:

This work aimed to synthesize the literature on neurodevelopmental measures and the corresponding developmental domains assessed in children aged 1−8 years with complex CHD.

Methods:

PubMed was searched for terms relating to psycho-social, cognitive and linguistic-communicative outcomes in children with CHD. 1,380 papers with a focus on complex CHD that reported neurodevelopmental assessments were identified; ultimately, data from 78 articles that used standardized neurodevelopmental assessment tools were extracted.

Results:

Thirty-nine (50%) of these excluded children with syndromes, and 9 (12%) excluded children with disorders of intellectual development. 10% of the studies were longitudinal. The neurodevelopmental domains addressed by the methods used were: 53% cognition, 16% psychosocial functioning, 18% language/communication/speech production, and 13% motor development-associated constructs.

Conclusions:

Data on social communication, expressive and receptive language, speech motor, and motor function are underrepresented. There is a lack of research into everyday use of language and into measures assessing language and communication early in life. Overall, longitudinal studies are required that include communication measures and their interrelations with other developmental domains.

Introduction

One in 100 newborns is affected by a congenital heart defect (CHD) (1). Twenty-five percent of them have a severe CHD that requires early corrective heart surgery within the first year of life (1). In about one third of these severely affected children, a genetic-syndromic disease causes the heart defect(s) (2). Since surgical and cardiological pediatric therapy protocols have improved over the last few years, around 80%–90% of children with CHD now survive to adulthood (3, 4).

Children with CHD are at risk for a range of developmental disabilities that challenge cognition, executive functioning, self-regulation, communication, social-emotional functioning, and motor skills (58). Studies have reported a prevalence of learning disability in 20% of children (9, 10), autism spectrum disorder in up to 10% (9, 11, 12), ADHD in up to 5% (13) and visual impairment in around 5% (14).

Despite the extensive knowledge gained about the developmental profiles of children with CHD, little is known about predictive and moderating developmental factors related to quality of life and psychosocial well-being. While only 5% of the variance in cognitive outcomes can be explained by surgical factors (1517) and 1% by the choice of a cardiopulmonary bypass (18), up to 33% is determined by innate patient- and family-related variables (19, 20). Numerous studies have shown that the total length of stay in hospital is another predictor of cognitive outcome (21). However, with regard to developmental trajectories, a large proportion of the variance currently remains unexplained. There is great diversity in children with CHD, for instance, in the type of heart defect and its pathophysiological consequences, the palliation needed and its cardiocirculatory consequences, the variety of etiologies and the family resources available.

In 2012, the American Heart Association/American Academy of Pediatrics (5) highlighted the increased developmental risk for children with CHD and the need for ongoing developmental surveillance to maximize neurodevelopmental outcome opportunities. In 2020, the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative established a consensus-based, standardized battery for the content and timing of neurodevelopmental assessments for children with complex CHD with the goal of promoting consistent neurodevelopmental care and quality improvement (22, 23). The recommendations include core and extended versions of age-specific assessment batteries.

This scoping review aims to provide a concise snapshot of the measures used to investigate neurodevelopmental domains of children with complex CHD between the ages of one and eight years. The research question was: To what extent do the standardized neurodevelopmental assessment tools cover the spectrum of neurodevelopmental domains relevant for capturing possible predictors and malleable factors of child development?

Materials and methods

The methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley (24) was used for this scoping review: (1) identify the research question; (2) identify relevant studies; (3) select studies; (4) chart the data; and (5) collect, summarize and report results.

The data synthesis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Studies were identified by searching the electronic database PubMed. Initial searches were conducted to identify relevant literature. Each search used the keywords “congenital heart disease” and one or more of the keywords from the following list: “mental health,” “quality of life,” “psychosocial outcome,” “neurodevelopmental outcome,” “social communication,” “parent-child interaction,” “language,” “social cognition,” “family,” “self-esteem,” “anxiety,” “depression”, “functional outcome.”

The quality of the studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (

25

) with a maximum score of 7 points. One point was allocated to each of the following categories:

  • a)

    representativeness of the sample (e.g., all syndromes were included, no exclusion due to ethnicity, language or cognitive function);

  • b)

    sample size (adequate);

  • c)

    adequate control group available;

  • d)

    clear definition of the neurodevelopmental measures used;

  • e)

    clear description of the domains assessed

  • f)

    the study reported on outcomes; and

  • g)

    appropriate statistical analysis was conducted and included.

Original articles were included in the review if all of the following criteria were met: (i) study participants were diagnosed with complex CHD and (ii) children aged between 1 and 8 years were included; (iii) the article was in English, peer-reviewed and from the period 1980–2021; (iv) standardized quantitative methods were used to evaluate neurodevelopment; and (v) the study had a fair to good quality [adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score >2]. Studies based exclusively on questionnaires or interviews without direct assessment were excluded.

Four authors (Raphael Oberhuber (RO), Nikoletta Deluggi (ND), Regina Wiltsche (RW), Marina Blum (MB)) conducted the initial searches, and after initial exclusion at the title and abstract levels, 270 articles remained. These 270 articles were again independently screened at the title, abstract and text levels. The remaining 170 articles were then reviewed by two researchers [Johannes Hofer (JH) and MB] at the text level, which resulted in a final selection of 78 articles with 100% agreement. The reference lists of the selected articles were examined for the possibility of additional relevant studies; however, no additional studies were found. Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of the review process.

Figure 1

A standardized data extraction form was used to extract data from the included articles. For each article, the following data were extracted: (i) study title, (ii) names of authors, (iii) Digital Object Identifier, (iv) year of publication, (v) journal, (vi) details of the study population, (vii) number of participants, (viii) percentage of male participants, (ix) ethnicity of participants, (x) inclusion criteria, (xi) exclusion criteria, (xii) study type, (xiii) outcome measures, (xiv) methods/tests used, (xv) main findings of the study. The standardized neurodevelopmental measures extracted were categorized into four main domains: cognition, psychosocial functioning, language/communication/speech production and motor functioning. Table 1 lists the domains assigned to the set constructs.

Table 1

DomainsCognitiveSpeech-Language (incl. speech motor)Psycho-socialMotor
Constructs:Non-verbal development
Visual perception
Executive functioning
Attention
Memory
Adaptive skills
Social cognition
Vocabulary expressive
Vocabulary receptive
Grammar expressive
Language receptive
Gesture Use
Social communication
Narrative skills
Speech-motor functions
Intelligibility
Child's quality of life
Emotion and Behavior
Social functioning
Mental health
Gross motor skills
Fine motor skills
Overall motor skills

Domains and assigned constructs.

Results

Seventy-eight articles met the inclusion criteria of the study. The majority of these (57/78; 73%) were published in the United States, and the remaining 21 in other high-income countries. No study was conducted in a middle- or low-income country.

The publication years of the articles ranged from 1995 to 2021, with a median of 2013 (SD = 5.7). All studies were published within the past 28 years, and 60% in the last ten years.

Most studies (58%) used a retrospective, cross-sectional, or mixed study design, while the remaining 42% used a prospective and/or longitudinal design. The adapted NOS scores for the studies included ranged from 3 to 7 for a maximum of seven points, with a mean of 5.4. Table 2 lists all longitudinal studies included and all other studies with a NOS score >4. A total of 12.125 participants, ranging in age from 1 month to 15 years, were included across the articles. All extracted measures referred to the age group 1–8 years. The number of participants ranged from 10 to 1.770, with a mean of 155 (SD = 236.5). Thirteen different patient cohorts were found (Table 3). Forty-seven (59%) articles used data taken from these 13 cohorts.

Table 2

Ref. (#)DesignNInclusion criteriaExclusion criteriaAge (m)Standardized ND measuresCont.Main findingsNOS
(26)long100All children at NICU of the study site needing ≥1 cardiac surgical procedure prior to 8 monthsAdditional genetic diagnosis6, 12–16, 24BSDI-II, Revised Gesell Developmental Index gross motor quotient, Alberta Infant Motor ScaleN/AEarly motor outcomes worse in CHD with single ventricle physiology; high rate (43%–67%) of referral for early intervention services5
(27)long106infants < 3 months with CHD scheduled for repair using CPB≥36 weeks gestation, congenital syndromes0–24BSID, PDMS, ASQN/ASignificant gross motor difficulties at 8 months
Fine motor skills decrease from 8 to 24 months
5
(28)long10CHD children <17.3y 3y after H/HL tx domiciled in UK/IrelandN/A15.6–183.6GMDS, BAS, CBCL, Rutter B Scale, MFQN/A33% behavior problems 12 months after tx and 75% 3 years after tx; prevalence of depression 23% at 12 months after tx and 13% at 3 years after tx5
(29)long64CHD children with high risk of developmental delayNot speaking English21–48BSID-III, WPPSI full scale IQ, WRAVMAN/Amany patients (20%–27%) who scored in the average range of BSID-III at age 2 showed deficits at age 46
(30)long293The SVR trial and extension study followed neonates with CHD at 15 US centers for ≥6 yearsN/A36–72HRQOL, BASC-2, Peds-QL, and FS-II(R)N/ALower SES and less maternal education associated with greater early delays in communication and problem-solving6
(31)long35SV physiology born in or transferred to Toyama University Hospital between January 2002 and April 2012. 3 years of age at first testing.Gestational age was less than 36 weeks or if they had genetic or malformation syndromes and history of CNS disease.36–96BSID II or III at 3 years and WISC 4 at 8 years.HCWeight at birth and stage II (second surgical stage: bilateral Glenn shunt) correlated with MDI; CHD children were more likely to require special education services.6
(32)long68School starters undergone at least one invasive procedure for correction/palliation of a major heart defectDiagnosed ND syndromes54–66WPPSI, NEPSY, BSI (GSI), Maternal Worry Scale, Impact on Family Scale, CBCLN/Anon-significant drop in the mean CBCL Total Problem Behavior Score in the Intervention group; no differences in school functioning,6
(33)long99CHD children with high risk of DD if undergone ≥3 evaluations in the follow-up clinic,No exclusion based on race, language, or coexisting conditions0–36BSID IIIN/ACognitive and language scores declining in subjects with syndromes but not in those without; Predictors of development: age, need for tube feeding, cardiopulmonary bypass time, time since last hospitalization6
(34)long294Tx-free survivors from SVR trial (HLHS or other related single right-ventricle abnormality and a Norwood procedure was planned)cardiac anatomy that prohibited either the MBTS or the RVPAS or a major extracardiac abnormality that could independently affect the likelihood of transplant-free survival36–72BASC-2, ASQ; BSIDN/AChildren with Adaptive Skills Composite scores < 2 SD at the age of 6 months more likely to have DD at 14 months6
(35)ps94neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome after Norwood procedureN/A24BSID-IIN/AMean PDI scores significantly higher and the incidence of psychomotor delay was significantly lower in the RVPA era6
(36)c/s58Children with CHDBMI > 95th PC, body temperature >37.8°C, food allergies, dentofacial deformities, tooth loss from caries or trauma, dental pain, orthodontic and orthopedic treatment, any syndromes, neurological or cognitive changes, chronic use of medications, being under speech therapy, children not eating consistently36–60Montreal Children's Hospital Feeding Scale OMES-E, the Child language test (ABFW),HCCHD group displayed a significant increase in the likelihood speech alterations compared to the control. chance of speech impairment decreases as age advances6
(37)ps109Cases with prenatal diagnosis of complete ACCNo complete ACC0–72ADSI, WISC IV, Stanford Binet Intelligence ScaleN/AIsolated complete ACC associated with a favorable outcome.6
(38)c/s102Children with CHD meeting the American Heart Association/American Academy of Pediatrics high-risk criteria for ND delaynot English-speaking; acquired cardiomyopathy;51.6–56.4WPPSI-III/IV, Woodcock Johnson III Test, VMI, WRAVMA, CCC-II, ABAS-II, BRIEF, Conners’ Parent Rating Scale-Revised-Short Form, CBCL, SRSN/AND scores did not differ based on cardiac anatomy (1V vs 2V); both groups scored lower than norms on fine motor and adaptive behavior skills, children with genetic conditions scored worse6
(39)c/s265HLHS and other single right-ventricle anomalies;
data from the Pediatric Heart Network SVR trial
N/A60–72ASQ, VABS, BASC-II, Peds-QL, CHQ-PF50, Functional Status II ®N/APatients in the lowest SES tertile reported lower functional status and lower fine motor, problem-solving, adaptive behavior, and communication skills at 6 years6
(40)c/s1737–45 days old CHD infants with SV physiology with stable pulmonary and systemic blood flow predicted to undergo a SCPCprematurity, SGA, systemic oxygen saturation <65%, creatinine >1.0 mg/dl, absolute neutrophil count <1,000 cells/ml, prior use of ACE inhibitor or other clinical situation preventing ACE inhibitor use6–14BSIDN/AHigher BNP associated with impaired growth and poorer ND outcomes6
(41)rs106Patients
Referred to the NICU CHD program January 01.01.2014 to 01.01.2015
<6 months age0–36standardized neurological exams, BSID IIIN/A53% below the ASQ-3 cutoff in the gross motor domain, 29% in the problem-solving domain, BSID-III scores <85 in 23%–41% of the population.6
(42)rs329Children with CHD and detailed postoperative temperature data, developmental evaluation at ages 1 years and/or 4 yearsAny infant with a lowest rectal temperature greater than 18°C12–48BSID; WPPSIN/AND outcome not significantly affected by the early postoperative body temperature profile of the infant6
(43)ps31patients requiring ECMO post-Norwood<5 years60–84VABS-II
PedsQL
matched surviving non- ECMO controlsVABS-II in normal range and comparable between ECMO-cases and non-ECMO control; the perceived physical appearance is lower among ECMO survivors by patient and proxy report.6
(18)rs1,770Children with CHD and a cardiac surgery using CPB at 9m, available BSID-I/II data at 6 months and 30 months of ageChildren treated with a primary strategy of cardiac transplantation10–18BSIDN/APDIs and MDIs lower than normative means, risk factors for lower PDI: lower birth weight, white race, presence of a genetic/extracardiac anomaly; risk factors for lower MDI: lower birth weight, male gender, lower level of maternal education, presence of a genetic/extracardiac anomaly6
(44)ps250The SVR trial and extension study followed neonates with CHD at 15 US centers for ≥6 years; 6 years findings on Tx-free survivorsN/A72VABS-II, BASCII, PedsQl 4.0N/AAt 6 years, children with HLHS show difficulties in areas of adaptive behavior, behavioral symptoms, QoL, and functional status. Risks for adverse outcomes: sociodemographic factors, measures of greater course complexity6
(45)ps277The SVR trial and extension study followed neonates with CHD at 15 US centers for ≥6 years;
Findings on Tx-free survivors
cardiac anatomy prohibiting MBTS or RVPAS or an extracardiac abnormality affecting the likelihood of Tx-free survival14–36ASQ
BSID-II
N/AASQ scores significantly lower than normal ASQ domain scores at 3 years; More complications, abnormal growth, and evidence of feeding, vision, or hearing problems independently associated with lower ASQ scores; Impaired ND at 3 years in children with single right-ventricle anomalies6
(46)c/s105Infants with CHD <8 weeksGestational age < 36 weeks, known syndrome or genetic anomaly associated with abnormal ND, ECMO prior to surgery22–26ITSEA, BSID-IIIN/ADelayed ND; Social-emotional outcome similar to Australian norms in all domains but better than the American-based norms in the Internalizing domain. Higher maternal education is associated with better ND outcomes and better scores in the internalizing and externalizing domains.6
(47)ps611–41 months old children with cyanotic or hemodynamically impaired CHDChildren with history of hypoxic birth, prematurity, hypoglycemia, epilepsy, neurologic disease, or a genetic syndrome1–41BSID-IIIHCPatients showed significantly lower mean scores in all BSID-III subscales.6
(48)rs53<1 year at time of cannulation and receiving cardiac surgery for a CHD before initiation of ECMOECMO before surgical repair ECMO due to CDH12–54BSID, Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale, Mc-Carthy Scales of Children's Abilities, WISCN/ANo survivor with an aortic cross-clamp time >40 min had a normal cognitive outcome6
(49)ps35Children with CHD 5–10 years after corrective surgery for TOF or VSDN/A60–120oral and speech motor control function test (TFS), oral and speech apraxia test (Mayo Test)N/AChildren with preoperative hypoxemia due to cyanotic defects at higher risk for dysfunction in speech/language than those with preoperative hypoxemia due to acyanotic defects.6
(50)c/s24All HLHS patients ≥3 years after at least two stages of the Norwood procedureN/A36–72WPPSI-R, PPVT, Beery VMI; VABS; IQ testingHC
siblings first cousin
Median full-scale IQ and adaptive behavior scores patients: 88 and 91, family controls scored higher, significant differences in adaptive behavior6
(51)ps94Children with CHD needing early surgical correctionN/A0–64.2WPPSI, PPVT, PDMS, CBCL, VABS
WeeFIM
N/ABoys with CHD at enhanced risk for neuromotor impairments and activity limitations6
(52)c/s93Children with CHD and a Norwood–Sano repair at ≤6 weeksN/A18–24BSID-IIIN/ANo difference between HLHS and non-HLHS group for cognitive, language and motor scores; dominant right ventricle anatomy predictive of lower language and motor scores6
(19)c/s90≥1 invasive procedure for correction or palliation of a CHDChildren with developmental or psychiatric syndromes48–61.2NEPSY
WPPSI-R.UK, CBCL; BSI, Maternal Worry Scale, Parenting Locus of Control Scale, Family Environment Scale, Significant Others Scale
children with mild heart defectsCompromised neuropsychological outcomes associated with a combination of cyanotic conditions and open-heart surgery; cyanotic and acyanotic conditions associated with sensorimotor delays; only children with complex conditions and palliative interventions at risk of poor behavioral outcomes; family processes predictors of behavioural outcomes6
(53)c/s86Children with CHD and an open-heart surgery and a birth weight >2,000 g,Perinatal complications, noncardiac malformations, genetic abnormalities, physical or mental disorders96Short-form WISC-III NL
NEPSY
HC sex, age and education matchedObjective and subjective measures of cognitive functioning are in agreement, indicating neurocognitive deficits in children with CHD6
(54)c/s86Postoperative Children with CHD at the age of 6–12 yearsDiGeorge-velocardiofacial syndrome96NEPSY
WISC III
HCCHD children: mild motor and language deficits, Attention/EF and memory affected6
(55)ps233Children with CPB surgery between 2004 and 2009died before 6 years examination -aged ≥6 years at the time of surgery -undergone CPB surgery before enrollment61.2–81.6WPPSI-III, SON, K-ABC, WISC-III, BSID-II, Zurich Play Behavior, Zurich Neuromotor AssessmentN/ALower cognitive and motor performance after CBP; predictors for impaired ND: genetic disorder, longer length of intensive care stay, lower birth weight, postoperative seizures, and lower SES.6
(56)c/s334Infants with complex CHD and heart surgery at 6w requiring CPB but not ECMO or HT prior to 21 ± 3 months assessmentChildren who died prior to assessment and those lost to follow-up
No BSID-III
0–24BSID III
ABAS-II
N/AGTF group 8 times the number of children delayed on the general adaptive composite score. Independent OR for GTF: presence of a chromosomal abnormality, SV anatomy, total postoperative days of open sternum, total number of hospital days6
(57)ps980 < 1 years at enrollment, 9–18 months at follow up, living in USN/A9–18BSID IIIHCassociation between moderate to severe hypoglycemia and poorer 1 year ND outcomes6
(58)ps43Children with HLHS or other forms of UVHCantrell's pentalogy chromosomal defect12.2The GMDS and Alberta Infant Motor ScaleHCLower mean GMDS quotient and Alberta Infant Motor Scale scores in children with HLHS.
predictors of low developmental quotient: HLHS, clinical history of seizure and high plasma lactate levels after the bidirectional Glenn operation.
6
(59)c/s67infants with CHD admitted to the NICU from 2005 to 2013chromosomal abnormalities, not operated, no Bayley III evaluation36Bayley-III67 VLBW infants +81 HCCHD children and VLBW controls with significant deficits in language, cognition, and motor skills scores; SV infants lowest scores for language and gross motor6
(60)c/s51All Fontan survivors invited to participate at the age of 34–96mInternal pacemaker wires in place or if the parents declined34–96WISC, MRIHCHLHS group significantly lower WISC scores than the non-HLHS subgroup, neither subgroup scored significantly differently from the standard population.
Predictors for ND outcome: SES, circulatory arrest, perioperative seizures
7
(61)rs52children at two years of age with single-ventricle CHDNo genetic comorbidities24MRI and BSID-IIIHCBrain volumes smaller in patients compared with controls, CSF volumes were greater. CSF volume associated with ND outcome, accounting for 21% of variability in the cognitive composite score.7
(62)c/s77Children with HLHS or UVH born between 08/2002 and 02/2005N/A30BSID II, MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories, and CBCLHCMean MDI within average range but significantly lower than HC.
HLHS children greater delays in expressive language scores; 35% of the children with HLHS performed in the lowest 10%
7
(63)ps144Children with CHD at the age of 1y whose parents could read German fluentlyN/A12–48TAPQOL—a standardized questionnaire on child HRQoL at 1 year and 4 years of ageHCHRQoL of infants and preschool-age children with CHD is impaired in physical, motor and cognitive dimensions.7

Summary of all included longitudinal studies and all studies with an adapted NOS score >4.

ABAS, adaptive behavior assessment system; ABFW, child language test; ACC, agenesis of the corpus callosum; ADSI, ankara developmental screening inventory; ASQ, ages and stages questionnaire; BAS II, British ability scales II; BASC, behavior assessment system for children; BRIEF, behavior rating inventory of executive function-preschool; Beery-VMI, Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration; BMI, body mass index; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide measurements; BSI, brief symptom inventory; BSID, bayley scale of infant development; Conners, Conners' parent rating scale-revised-short form; CBCL, child behavior checklist; CCC-II, children's communication checklist; CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; CHD, congenital heart defect; CHQ-PF50, child health questionnaire 50 items; CNS, central nervous system; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; CSF, CerebroSpinal fluid; c/s, cross-sectional; DD, delayed development; ECMO, ExtraCorporeal membrane oxygenation; EF, executive functions; FS-II (R), functional status II ®; GMDS, functional status II ®; GSI, general severity index; GTF, gastrostomy tube feeding; HC, healthy control; HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; HT, heart transplantation; ITSEA, infant-toddler social and emotional assessment; K-ABC, Kaufman assessment battery for children; MBTS, modified blalock-taussig shunt; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ND, neurodevelopmental; NICU, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; NEPSY, a developmental NEuroPSYchological assessment; OMES-E, orofacial myofunctional assessment protocol; OR, odds ratio; PedsQL, pediatric quality of life inventory; SES, socio-economic status; PDI, psychomotor development index; MDI, mental development index; MFQ, mood and feelings questionnaire; long, longitudinal; Peds-QL, pediatric quality of life inventory; ps, prospective; PDMS, peabody developmental motor scale; PPVT, peabody picture vocabulary test; rs, retrospective; RVPAS, right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt; SCPC, superior CavoPulmonary connection; SV Physiology, single ventricle; SGA, small for gestational AGE; SON, Snijders-Omen nonverbal test of intelligence; SRS, social responsiveness scale; SVR, pediatric heart network single ventricle reconstruction trial; TAPQOL, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research Academic Medical Centre Preschool Children Quality of Life; Tx, transplant; TFS, total functional score; TOF, tetralogy Of fallot; UVH, univentricular heart; VLBW, very-low birth weight; VSD, ventricular septal defect; VABS, vineland adaptive behavior scales; WISC, Wechsler intelligence scale; WISC, Wechsler intelligence scale for children; WRAVMA pegboard, wide range assessment of visual motor abilities; WPPSI, Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence; WeeFIM, functional independence measure for children.

Table 3

CohortArticles (n)Articles #
Four provinces in Western Canada6(35, 52, 56, 6466)
Ghent University Hospital2(53, 54)
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia4(6770)
Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction (SVR) trial7(30, 34, 39, 44, 45, 60, 71)
Herma Heart Center Developmental Follow-up Clinic (HHCDC)4(21, 29, 33, 38)
University of California, San Francisco2(48, 72)
University of Michigan3(43, 57, 60)
Toyama University Hospital2(31, 59)
University Children's Hospital Zurich6(55, 61, 63, 7375)
Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada2(27, 76)
Clinique d'Investigation Neuro-Cardiaque2(77, 78)
Sainte-Justine University Hospital Centre.6(46, 58, 62, 7981)
ISV trial2(82, 83)

Summary of CHD cohorts.

Overall, eight longitudinal cohorts were included in the articles reviewed, with follow-ups conducted after 1–5 years.

The neurodevelopmental domains measured were distributed as follows: Cognition-associated constructs (53%) formed the main domain tested, followed by speech/language/communication (18%), psychosocial functioning (16%) and motor development (13%). Overall, a variety of standardized measures were used to describe neurodevelopmental functioning; however, the Bayley scales most prominent.

Tables 4A–C lists all extracted measures that were used in three or more publications according to domain, construct and target age group.

Table 4

(A)12–14 months
MeasuresConstructsNumber of studies
BSID III Cognitive scaleNon-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception24
BSID III Adaptive Behavior scaleSocial Cognition, Adaptive Skills23
BSID III Social Emotional scaleSocial Cognition23
BSID II- MDISocial Cognition, Non-verbal Development/Cognition, Adaptive Skills19
WPPSI (III, IV, R: UK, R)Non-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Memory17
Vineland (I, II, III)Social Cognition, Adaptive Skills9
ABAS-(I, II)Adaptive Skills4
ASQSocial Cognition, Adaptive Skills4
Beery-VMI (I, V)Visual Perception4
NEPSY—completeNon-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Attention, Memory4
WJ-III reading and math clustersNon-verbal Development/Cognition4
KABC (I, II)Non-verbal Development/Cognition, Memory3
MSCANon-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Attention, Memory3
NEPSY—Attention/EF CDSExecutive functioning, Attention, Memory3
BSID III Motor scaleFine Motor Skills, Gross motor Skills23
BSID II—PDIFine Motor Skills, Gross motor Skills18
Vineland (I, II, III)Overall motor skills9
WRAVMAFine Motor Skills5
ASQOverall motor skills, Fine Motor Skills, Gross motor Skills4
Beery-VMI (I, V)Overall motor skills, Fine Motor Skills, Gross motor Skills4
NEPSY completeFine Motor Skills4
MSCAOverall motor skills3
PedsQL 4.0Physical health3
BSID III Language scaleVocabulary Expressive, Vocabulary Receptive, Grammar expressive, Language receptive24
BSID III Adaptive Behavior scaleSocial communication23
WPPSI (III, IV, R: UK, R)Vocabulary Receptive, Language receptive17
Vineland (I, II, III)Social communication9
WPPSI-III FSIQVocabulary Receptive, Language receptive9
ASQSocial communication, Narrative skills4
NEPSY—completeGrammar expressive, Language receptive, Narrative skills4
WJ-III reading and math clustersVocabulary Expressive, Vocabulary Receptive, Grammar expressive, Language receptive, Narrative skills4
BSID III Social Emotional scaleSocial Functioning, Emotion and behavior23
BSID III Adaptive Behavior scaleSocial Functioning, Emotion and behavior23
Vineland (I, II, III)Social Functioning9
ASQSocial Functioning4
BASC-IIEmotion and behavior, Mental health4
FS-II (R)Social Functioning4
NEPSY—completeSocial Functioning3
PedsQL 4.0Social Functioning, Child QoL, Emotion and behavior, Mental health3
(B)42–60 months
MeasurementsConstructsNumber of studies
BSID III Cognitive scaleNon-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception24
BSID III Social Emotional scaleSocial Cognition23
BSID III Adaptive Behavior scaleSocial Cognition, Adaptive Skills23
WPPSI (III, IV, R: UK, R)Non-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Memory17
Vineland (I, II, III)Social Cognition, Adaptive Skills9
BAS (I, II)Executive functioning, Attention, Memory, Adaptive Skills7
ABAS-(I, II)Adaptive Skills4
ASQSocial Cognition, Adaptive Skills4
Beery-VMI (I, V)Visual Perception4
NEPSY—completeNon-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Attention, Memory4
WJ-III reading and math clustersNon-verbal Development/Cognition4
KABC (I, II)Non-verbal Development/Cognition, Memory3
MSCANon-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Attention, Memory3
NEPSY—Attention/EF CDSExecutive functioning, Attention, Memory3
BSID III Motor scaleFine Motor Skills, Gross motor Skills23
Vineland (I, II, III)Overall motor skills9
WRAVMAFine Motor Skills5
ASQOverall motor skills, Fine Motor Skills, Gross motor Skills4
Beery-VMI (I, V)Overall motor skills, Fine Motor Skills, Gross motor Skills4
NEPSY completeFine Motor Skills4
MSCAOverall motor skills3
PedsQL 4.0Physical health3
BSID III Language scaleVocabulary Expressive, Vocabulary Receptive, Grammar expressive, Language receptive24
BSID III Adaptive Behavior scaleSocial communication23
WPPSI (III, IV, R: UK, R)Vocabulary Receptive, Language receptive17
Vineland (I, II, III)Social communication9
WPPSI-III FSIQVocabulary Receptive, Language receptive9
ASQSocial communication, Narrative skills4
NEPSY—completeGrammar expressive, Language receptive, Narrative skills4
WJ-III reading and math clustersVocabulary Expressive, Vocabulary Receptive, Grammar expressive, Language receptive, Narrative skills4
BSID III Social Emotional scaleSocial Functioning, Emotion and behavior23
BSID III Adaptive Behavior scaleSocial Functioning, Emotion and behavior23
Vineland (I, II, III)Social Functioning9
ASQSocial Functioning4
BASC-IIEmotion and behavior, Mental health4
FS-II (R)Social Functioning4
BAS-IISocial Functioning, Emotion and behavior3
NEPSY—completeSocial Functioning3
PedsQL 4.0Social Functioning, Child QoL, Emotion and behavior, Mental health3
(C)72–96 months
MeasurementsConstructsNumber of Studies
WPPSI (III, IV, R: UK, R)Non-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Memory17
Vineland (I, II, III)Social Cognition, Adaptive Skills9
BAS (I, II)Executive functioning, Attention, Memory, Adaptive Skills7
Beery-VMI-VVisual Perception4
NEPSY—completeNon-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Attention, Memory4
WJ-III reading and math clustersNon-verbal Development/Cognition4
KABC (I, II)Non-verbal Development/Cognition, Memory3
MSCANon-verbal Development/Cognition, Visual Perception, Executive functioning, Attention, Memory3
NEPSY—Attention/EF CDSExecutive functioning, Attention, Memory3
Vineland (I, II, III)Overall motor skills9
WRAVMAFine Motor Skills5
Beery-VMI-VOverall motor skills, Fine Motor Skills, Gross motor Skills4
NEPSY completeFine Motor Skills4
MSCAOverall motor skills3
PedsQL 4.0Physical health3
WPPSI (III, IV, R: UK, R)Vocabulary Receptive, Language receptive17
Vineland (I, II, III)Social communication9
WPPSI-III FSIQVocabulary Receptive, Language receptive9
NEPSY—completeGrammar expressive, Language receptive, Narrative skills4
WJ-III reading and math clustersVocabulary Expressive, Vocabulary Receptive, Grammar expressive, Language receptive, Narrative skills4
Vineland (I, II, III)Social Functioning9
BASC-IIEmotion and behavior, Mental health4
FS-II (R)Social Functioning4
BAS-IISocial Functioning, Emotion and behavior3
NEPSY—completeSocial Functioning3
PedsQL 4.0Social Functioning, Child QoL, Emotion and behavior, Mental health3

(A)–(C) extracted standardized measures used in a minimum of 3 of the extracted publications.

ABAS, adaptive behavior assessment system; ASQ, ages and stages questionnaire; BAS II, British ability scales II; BASC, behavior assessment system for children; BSID, Bayley scales of infant development; Beery-VMI, Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration; FSIQ, full-scale IQ score; FS-II (R), functional status II ®; K-ABC, Kaufman assessment battery for Children; MSCA, McCarthy scales of children's abilities, MDI, mental development index; MBCDI, MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories; NEPSY, developmental NEuroPSYchological assessment; PedsQL, pediatric quality of life inventory; PDI, psychomotor development index; VABS, Vineland adaptive behavior scales; WJ-III reading and math clusters, Woodcock-Johnson IIIreading and math cluster; WPPSI, Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence; WRAVMA pegboard, wide range assessment of visual motor abilities.

The extracted measures are grouped according to three age groups: a) 12–42 months, b) 42–60 months and c) 72–96 months. The constructs measured are listed, as are the numbers of studies using each measure. The colors correspond to the domains of the given measure with: orange = cognitive, gray = motor, blue = speech/language, violet = psycho-social. Measures with font color red indicate questionnaires and interviews. All other measures represent direct assessments.

Thirty-nine of the measures (54%) were used in only one study. Thirty-nine (50%) of the 78 articles excluded children with syndromes, and nine (12%) excluded children with cognitive disabilities.

Discussion

The goal of this review was to generate a concise overview of the methodology used to document neurodevelopment in young children aged 1–8 years with CHD, identify factors that are modifiable by intervention and to identify research gaps that need to be addressed by future studies.

Seventy-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, all of which were conducted in high-income countries within the past 28 years. That no study from a low- or middle-income country was found demonstrates the compelling need to extend rigorous science and innovative clinical practice by focusing on stepped care processes at the global level.

The quality of the studies included, assessed by means of an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, ranged from fair to excellent. Most studies (58%) used a retrospective, cross-sectional, or mixed study design, while the remaining 42% used a prospective and/or longitudinal design. Less than half of the studies (30/78, 38%) included representative samples that did not exclude severely affected children (2831, 3335, 3745, 4852, 56, 6063, 74, 79, 82, 84, 85). Notably, 50% of the 78 articles excluded children with various syndromes, and 12% excluded children with cognitive disabilities. This is especially true for the few larger longitudinal studies (26, 27): Children with chromosomal changes and/or additional impairments were excluded. Insufficient recruitment of children with poor cardiac outcomes and disproportionate inclusion of privileged children and families are common. Including children with special needs requires additional time and knowledge. It is challenging to combine age-appropriate testing with testing that is appropriate to the individual child's level of development. This finding is not surprising and is well known for other well-studied patient cohorts, for instance, children with hearing loss (86) and children with autism spectrum disorders (87). Epidemiological study designs are needed to ensure that all children with CHD are included in our understanding of neurodevelopment and neurodevelopmental trajectories and their potential malleability.

Longitudinal data on the neurodevelopment of children with CHD are restricted to 8 different study cohorts, where follow-ups were conducted over a maximum of five years. Despite their high quality and their scene-setting impact, these studies did not use cohorts that were broadly representative. Considering the recommendations from the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative (22), the measures chosen for neurodevelopmental trajectories were not sufficiently fine-tuned to allow malleable predictors of good neurodevelopmental outcomes to be identified.

Overall, trajectories of structural language development, especially social communication and speech production, have been less researched than other domains of cognitive functioning. With increasing age of the children studied, published data on (i) language and communication and (ii) speech motor and motor function decrease, and neurodevelopmental measures within the cognitive domain become even more predominant.

Considering the predominant use of the Bayley Scales for early infant development and the current literature pointing towards an overestimation of neurodevelopment using the Bayley III scales and possible underestimation by using the Bayley II scales (8892), there is a need for supplementary measures of early childhood neurodevelopment. However, the Bayley III language scales provide a good estimate of language development (88, 91, 92).

There remains a lack of research into measures of language and communication early in life and into everyday use of language, although social communication is expected to impact language development, social cognition, peer interaction, and mental health later in life. In addition, standardized measures of child self-regulation and parent-child interaction are missing and need to be addressed in future studies, as they represent important, potentially malleable predictors.

Overall, a variety of standardized measures have been used to describe neurodevelopmental functioning, with the Bayley scales dominating. Comparing the results of this scoping review to the recent recommendations for neurodevelopmental assessment (22, 23) highlights the importance of a clear and standardized guidance for neurodevelopmental assessments.

Given the known risks associated with CHD and the demonstrated benefit of early intervention in other populations (9396), regular monitoring and periodic neurodevelopmental assessment are critical throughout childhood in order to optimize the neurodevelopmental outcomes of patients with CHD.

Standard application of well-balanced neurodevelopmental assessment batteries across cardiac neurodevelopmental sites holds enormous promise for both clinical care and research within the CHD population.

The findings discussed above must be considered in the light of specific limitations of this scoping review and the limitations of scoping reviews in general:

Including studies only by searching the electronic database PubMed may exclude further relevant published literature and grey literature, which leads to potential bias in the findings. This can result in an incomplete representation of the evidence available. The used search terms lack infant specific formulations like regulation or attention.

In conclusion, our systematic review of the neurodevelopmental assessment tools used in children with complex CHD identified the following research gaps:

  • No data on low- or middle-income countries,

  • There is a lack of representative studies of the whole cohort of children with severe CHD: children with syndromes or intellectual disability are in most cases excluded,

  • Need for longitudinal studies that focus on a balanced use of measures for all important neurodevelopmental domains,

  • Data on social communication, expressive and receptive language, speech motor, and motor function are underrepresented,

  • Presently, there remains a lack of (i) research into the everyday use of language and language and communication measures early in life and (ii) tools to measure early social communication skills.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

JH: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MB: Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RW: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. ND: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. DH: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. JF: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. GT: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. GB: Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. RO: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funded by the parent organization „Kinderherzverein “sterreich”. Article processing charge was funded by the Johannes Kepler University Open Access Publishing Fund.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Michaela Altendorfer, the president of the “Herzkinderverein Österreich”, for her support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.

    HoffmanJIKaplanS. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2002) 39(12):1890900. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01886-7

  • 2.

    SunRLiuMLuLZhengYZhangP. Congenital heart disease: causes, diagnosis, symptoms, and treatments. Cell Biochem Biophys. (2015) 72:85760. 10.1007/s12013-015-0551-6

  • 3.

    GerstleMBeebeDWDrotarDCassedyAMarinoBS. Executive functioning and school performance among pediatric survivors of complex congenital heart disease. J Pediatr. (2016) 173:1549. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.01.028

  • 4.

    WarnesCALiberthsonRDanielsonGKDoreAHarrisLHoffmanJIet alTask force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2001) 37(5):11705. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01272-4

  • 5.

    MarinoBSLipkinPHNewburgerJWPeacockGGerdesMGaynorJWet alNeurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2012) 126(9):114372. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318265ee8a

  • 6.

    SarrechiaIMiattonMDe WolfDFrançoisKGewilligMMeynsBet alNeurocognitive development and behaviour in school-aged children after surgery for univentricular or biventricular congenital heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2016) 49(1):16774. 10.1093/ejcts/ezv029

  • 7.

    OberhuberRDHuemerSMairRSames-DolzerEKreuzerMTulzerG. Cognitive development of school-age hypoplastic left heart syndrome survivors: a single center study. Pediatr Cardiol. (2017) 38(6):108996. 10.1007/s00246-017-1623-8

  • 8.

    HuisengaDLa Bastide-Van GemertSVan BergenASweeneyJHadders-AlgraM. Developmental outcomes after early surgery for complex congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. (2021) 63(1):2946. 10.1111/dmcn.14512

  • 9.

    RazzaghiHOsterMReefhuisJ. Long-term outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: National Health Interview Survey. J Pediatr. (2015) 166:11924. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.006

  • 10.

    RybergCSunnegårdhJThorsonMBrobergM. Intellectual functioning in children with congenital heart defects treated with surgery or by catheter interventions. Front Pediatr. (2016) 4:113. 10.3389/fped.2016.00113

  • 11.

    TanASemmelESWolfIHammettBIlardiD. Implementing standard screening for autism spectrum disorder in CHD. Cardiol Young. (2020) 30(8):111825. 10.1017/S1047951120001626

  • 12.

    LobleinHJVukmirovichPWDonofrioMTSanzJH. Prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders in a clinically referred sample of children with CHD. Cardiol Young. (2023) 33:61926. 10.1017/S1047951122001469

  • 13.

    GonzalezVJKimbroRTCutittaKEShaboskyJCBilalMFPennyDJet alMental health disorders in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. (2021) 147(2):e20201693. 10.1542/peds.2020-1693

  • 14.

    VilelaMAColossiCGFreitasHPDel ValleGPellandaLC. Ocular alterations associated with primary congenital heart disease–A cross-sectional study. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. (2020) 27(1):28. 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_89_19

  • 15.

    LimperopoulosCMajnemerAShevellMIRosenblattBRohlicekCTchervenkovC. Neurologic status of newborns with congenital heart defects before open heart surgery. Pediatrics. (1999) 103(2):4028. 10.1542/peds.103.2.402

  • 16.

    GaynorJWWernovskyGJarvikGPBernbaumJGerdesMZackaiEet alPatient characteristics are important determinants of neurodevelopmental outcome at one year of age after neonatal and infant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2007) 133(5):134453. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.087

  • 17.

    TabbuttSGaynorJWNewburgerJW. Neurodevelopmental outcomes after congenital heart surgery and strategies for improvement. Curr Opin Cardiol. (2012) 27(2):8291. 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328350197b

  • 18.

    GaynorJWStoppCWypijDAndropoulosDBAtallahJAtzAMet alNeurodevelopmental outcomes after cardiac surgery in infancy. Pediatrics. (2015) 135(5):81625. 10.1542/peds.2014-3825

  • 19.

    McCuskerCGDohertyNNMolloyBCaseyFRooneyNMulhollandCet alDeterminants of neuropsychological and behavioural outcomes in early childhood survivors of congenital heart disease. Arch Dis Child. (2007) 92(2):13741. 10.1136/adc.2005.092320

  • 20.

    McCuskerCGDohertyNNMolloyBRooneyNMulhollandCSandsAet alA controlled trial of early interventions to promote maternal adjustment and development in infants born with severe congenital heart disease. Child Care Health Dev. (2010) 36(1):1107. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01026.x

  • 21.

    MussattoKAHoffmannRHoffmanGTweddellJSBearLCaoYet alRisk factors for abnormal developmental trajectories in young children with congenital heart disease. Circulation. (2015) 132(8):75561. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014521

  • 22.

    WareJButcherJLLatalBSadhwaniARollinsCKSotoCLBet alNeurodevelopmental evaluation strategies for children with congenital heart disease aged birth through 5 years: recommendations from the cardiac neurodevelopmental outcome collaborative. Cardiol Young. (2020) 30(11):160922. 10.1017/S1047951120003534

  • 23.

    IlardiDSanzJHCassidyARSananesRRollinsCKShadeCUet alNeurodevelopmental evaluation for school-age children with congenital heart disease: recommendations from the cardiac neurodevelopmental outcome collaborative. Cardiol Young. (2020) 30(11):162336. 10.1017/S1047951120003546

  • 24.

    ArkseyHO'MalleyL. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. (2005) 8(1):1932. 10.1080/1364557032000119616

  • 25.

    WellsGASheaBO’ConnellDPetersonJWelchVLososMet alThe Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. (2012). Available online at:http://wwwohrica/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxfordasp

  • 26.

    HoskoppalARobertsHKuglerJDuncanKNeedelmanH. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants after surgery for congenital heart disease: a comparison of single-ventricle vs. Two-ventricle physiology. Congenit Heart Dis. (2010) 5(2):905. 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2009.00373.x

  • 27.

    SananesRManlhiotCKellyEHornbergerLKWilliamsWGMacGregorDet alNeurodevelopmental outcomes after open heart operations before 3 months of age. Ann Thorac Surg. (2012) 93(5):157783. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.011

  • 28.

    WrayJRadley-SmithR. Longitudinal assessment of psychological functioning in children after heart or heart–lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2006) 25(3):34552. 10.1016/j.healun.2005.09.018

  • 29.

    BrosigCLBearLAllenSSimpsonPZhangLFrommeltMet alNeurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 and 4 years in children with congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. (2018) 13(5):7005. 10.1111/chd.12632

  • 30.

    BucholzEMSleeperLASananesRBrosigCLGoldbergCSPasqualiSKet alTrajectories in neurodevelopmental, health-related quality of life, and functional status outcomes by socioeconomic status and maternal education in children with single ventricle heart disease. J Pediatr. (2021) 229:28993. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.09.066

  • 31.

    HiraiwaAIbukiKTanakaTHironoKMiyaKYoshimuraNet alToddler neurodevelopmental outcomes are associated with school-age IQ in children with single ventricle physiology. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2020) 32(2):30210. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.10.017

  • 32.

    McCuskerCGDohertyNNMolloyBRooneyNMulhollandCSandsAet alA randomized controlled trial of interventions to promote adjustment in children with congenital heart disease entering school and their families. J Pediatr Psychol. (2012) 37(10):1089103. 10.1093/jpepsy/jss092

  • 33.

    MussattoKAHoffmannRGHoffmanGMTweddellJSBearLCaoYet alRisk and prevalence of developmental delay in young children with congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. (2014) 133(3):e5707. 10.1542/peds.2013-2309

  • 34.

    SananesRGoldbergCSNewburgerJWHuCTrachtenbergFGaynorJWet alSix-year neurodevelopmental outcomes for children with single-ventricle physiology. Pediatrics. (2021) 147(2):e2020014589. 10.1542/peds.2020-014589

  • 35.

    AtallahJDinuIAJoffeARRobertsonCMSauveRSDyckJDet alTwo-year survival and mental and psychomotor outcomes after the Norwood procedure: an analysis of the modified blalock-taussig shunt and right ventricle–to–pulmonary artery shunt surgical eras. Circulation. (2008) 118(14):14108. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.741579

  • 36.

    BarbosaMDGCasteloPMFerreiraCLPHaddadDSChiariBMSantanaMVet alCongenital heart disease in children: orofacial myofunctional aspects, eating behavior and facial temperature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. (2020) 131:109883. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109883

  • 37.

    BayramAKKütükMSDoganaySÖzgünMTGümüşHBaşbuğMet alAn analysis of 109 fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of complete agenesis of corpus callosum. Neurol Sci. (2020) 41:15219. 10.1007/s10072-019-04224-4

  • 38.

    BrosigCLBearLAllenSHoffmannRGPanAFrommeltMet alPreschool neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr. (2017) 183:806. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.12.044

  • 39.

    BucholzEMSleeperLAGoldbergCSPasqualiSKAndersonBRGaynorJWet alSocioeconomic status and long-term outcomes in single ventricle heart disease. Pediatrics. (2020) 146(4):e20201240. 10.1542/peds.2020-1240

  • 40.

    ButtsRJZakVHsuDCnotaJColanSDHehirDet alFactors associated with serum B-type natriuretic peptide in infants with single ventricles. Pediatr Cardiol. (2014) 35:87987. 10.1007/s00246-014-0872-z

  • 41.

    ChornaOBaldwinHSNeumaierJGogliottiSPowersDMouveryAet alFeasibility of a team approach to complex congenital heart defect neurodevelopmental follow-up: early experience of a combined cardiology/neonatal intensive care unit follow-up program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. (2016) 9(4):43240. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002614

  • 42.

    CottrellSMMorrisKPDaviesPBellingerDCJonasRANewburgerJW. Early postoperative body temperature and developmental outcome after open heart surgery in infants. Ann Thorac Surg. (2004) 77(1):6671. 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01362-6

  • 43.

    Friedland-LittleJMUzarkKYuSLoweryRAiyagariRHirsch-RomanoJC. Functional status and quality of life in survivors of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after the Norwood operation. Ann Thorac Surg. (2017) 103(6):19505. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.015

  • 44.

    GoldbergCSHuCBrosigCGaynorJWMahleWTMillerTet alBehavior and quality of life at 6 years for children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics. (2019) 144(5):e20191010. 10.1542/peds.2019-1010

  • 45.

    GoldbergCSLuMSleeperLAMahleWTGaynorJWWilliamsIAet alFactors associated with neurodevelopment for children with single ventricle lesions. J Pediatr. (2014) 165(3):4906. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.05.019

  • 46.

    GoldsworthyMFranich-RayCKinneySShekerdemianLBecaJGunnJ. Relationship between social-emotional and neurodevelopment of 2-year-old children with congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. (2016) 11(5):37885. 10.1111/chd.12320

  • 47.

    HalliogluOGurerGBozluGKarpuzDMakharoblidzeKOkuyazC. Evaluation of neurodevelopment using bayley-III in children with cyanotic or hemodynamically impaired congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. (2015) 10(6):53741. 10.1111/chd.12269

  • 48.

    HamrickSEGremmelsDBKeetCALeonardCHConnellJKHawgoodSet alNeurodevelopmental outcome of infants supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac surgery. Pediatrics. (2003) 111(6):e6715. 10.1542/peds.111.6.e671

  • 49.

    Hövels-GürichHHBauerSBSchnitkerRMessmerBJSeghayeMCHuberW. Long-term outcome of speech and language in children after corrective surgery for cyanotic or acyanotic cardiac defects in infancy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2008) 12(5):37886. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.10.004

  • 50.

    KernJHHintonVJNereoNEHayesCJGersonyWM. Early developmental outcome after the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics. (1998) 102(5):114852. 10.1542/peds.102.5.1148

  • 51.

    MajnemerALimperopoulosCShevellMRohlicekCRosenblattBTchervenkovC. Gender differences in the developmental outcomes of children with congenital cardiac defects. Cardiol Young. (2012) 22(5):5149. 10.1017/S1047951111002071

  • 52.

    MartinBJDe Villiers JonkerIJoffeARBondGYActonBVRossDBet alHypoplastic left heart syndrome is not associated with worse clinical or neurodevelopmental outcomes than other cardiac pathologies after the norwood–sano operation. Pediatr Cardiol. (2017) 38:92231. 10.1007/s00246-017-1598-5

  • 53.

    MiattonMDe WolfDFrançoisKThieryEVingerhoetsG. Do parental ratings on cognition reflect neuropsychological outcome in congenital heart disease?Acta Paediatr. (2008) 97(1):415. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00530.x

  • 54.

    MiattonMDe WolfDFrançoisKThieryEVingerhoetsG. Neuropsychological performance in school-aged children with surgically corrected congenital heart disease. J Pediatr. (2007) 151(1):738. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.020

  • 55.

    NaefNLiamlahiRBeckIBernetVDaveHKnirschWet alNeurodevelopmental profiles of children with congenital heart disease at school age. J Pediatr. (2017) 188:7581. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.073

  • 56.

    RicciMFAltonGYRossDBDickenBJModdemannDMRobertsonCMet alGastrostomy tube feeding after neonatal complex cardiac surgery identifies the need for early developmental intervention. J Pediatr. (2016) 169:1605. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.10.087

  • 57.

    SadhwaniAAsaroLAGoldbergCWareJButcherJGaiesMet alImpact of tight glycemic control on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 1 year of age for children with congenital heart disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. (2016) 174:1938. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.048

  • 58.

    SarajuuriALönnqvistTMildhLRajantieIEronenMMattilaIet alProspective follow-up study of children with univentricular heart: neurodevelopmental outcome at age 12 months. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2009) 137(1):13945. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.06.025

  • 59.

    YoshidaTHiraiwaAIbukiKMakimotoMInomataSTamuraKet alNeurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years for infants with congenital heart disease and very-low birthweight. Pediatr Int. (2020) 62(7):797803. 10.1111/ped.14160

  • 60.

    GoldbergCSSchwartzEMBrunbergJAMoscaRSBoveELSchorkMAet alNeurodevelopmental outcome of patients after the fontan operation: a comparison between children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and other functional single ventricle lesions. J Pediatr. (2000) 137(5):64652. 10.1067/mpd.2000.108952

  • 61.

    HeyeKNKnirschWLatalBScheerIWetterlingKHahnAet alReduction of brain volumes after neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in single-ventricle congenital heart disease before fontan completion. Pediatr Res. (2018) 83(1):6370. 10.1038/pr.2017.203

  • 62.

    PuosiRKorkmanMSarajuuriAJokinenEMildhLMattilaIet alNeurocognitive development and behavioral outcome of 2-year-old children with univentricular heart. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2011) 17(6):1094103. 10.1017/S135561771100110X

  • 63.

    WernerHLatalBBuechelEVBeckILandoltMA. Health-related quality of life after open-heart surgery. J Pediatr. (2014) 164(2):2548. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.022

  • 64.

    AtallahJJoffeARRobertsonCMLeonardNBlakleyPMNettel-AguirreAet alTwo-year general and neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal complex cardiac surgery in patients with deletion 22q11.2: a comparative study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2007) 134(3):7729. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.007

  • 65.

    Garcia GuerraGRobertsonCMAltonGYJoffeARCaveDAYasminFet alNeurotoxicity of sedative and analgesia drugs in young infants with congenital heart disease: 4-year follow-up. Pediatr Anesth. (2014) 24(3):25765. 10.1111/pan.12257

  • 66.

    Garcia GuerraGRobertsonCMAltonGYJoffeARCaveDADinuIAet alNeurodevelopmental outcome following exposure to sedative and analgesic drugs for complex cardiac surgery in infancy. Pediatr Anesth. (2011) 21(9):93241. 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03581.x

  • 67.

    GrastyMAIttenbachRFKnightlyCSolotCBGerdesMBernbaumJCet alHearing loss after cardiac surgery in infancy: an unintended consequence of life-saving care. J Pediatr. (2018) 192:14451. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.049

  • 68.

    FullerSRajagopalanRJarvikGPGerdesMBernbaumJWernovskyGet alDeep hypothermic circulatory arrest does not impair neurodevelopmental outcome in school-age children after infant cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. (2010) 90(6):198595. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.08.005

  • 69.

    GaynorJWIttenbachRFGerdesMBernbaumJClancyRRMcDonald-McGinnDMet alNeurodevelopmental outcomes in preschool survivors of the fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2014) 147(4):127683. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.019

  • 70.

    SchultzAHIttenbachRFGerdesMJarvikGPWernovskyGBernbaumJet alEffect of congenital heart disease on 4-year neurodevelopment within multiple-gestation births. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2017) 154(1):27381. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.022

  • 71.

    NewburgerJWSleeperLABellingerDCGoldbergCSTabbuttSLuMet alEarly developmental outcome in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and related anomalies: the single ventricle reconstruction trial. Circulation. (2012) 125(17):208191. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.064113

  • 72.

    PeyvandiSChauVGuoTXuDGlassHCSynnesAet alNeonatal brain injury and timing of neurodevelopmental assessment in patients with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 71(18):198696. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.068

  • 73.

    ReichBHeyeKNTuuraROGBeckIWetterlingKHahnAet alInterrelationship between hemodynamics, brain volumes, and outcome in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. (2019) 107(6):183844. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.012

  • 74.

    KnirschWMayerKNScheerITuuraRSchranzDHahnAet alStructural cerebral abnormalities and neurodevelopmental status in single ventricle congenital heart disease before fontan procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2017) 51(4):7406. 10.1093/ejcts/ezw399

  • 75.

    HeyeKNKnirschWScheerIBeckIWetterlingKHahnAet alHealth-related quality of life in pre-school age children with single-ventricle CHD. Cardiol Young. (2019) 29(2):1628. 10.1017/S1047951118001993

  • 76.

    RobertsSDKazazianVFordMKMariniDMillerSPChauVet alThe association between parent stress, coping and mental health, and neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants with congenital heart disease. Clin Neuropsychol. (2021) 35(5):94872. 10.1080/13854046.2021.1896037

  • 77.

    FourdainSSt-DenisAHarveyJBircaACarmantLGallagherAet alLanguage development in children with congenital heart disease aged 12–24 months. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2019;23(3):4919. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2019.03.002

  • 78.

    LiamlahiRLatalB. Neurodevelopmental outcome of children with congenital heart disease. Handb Clin Neurol. (2019) 162:32945. 10.1016/B978-0-444-64029-1.00016-3

  • 79.

    SarajuuriAJokinenEPuosiREronenMMildhLMattilaIet alNeurodevelopmental and neuroradiologic outcomes in patients with univentricular heart aged 5 to 7 years: related risk factor analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2007) 133(6):152432. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.022

  • 80.

    GunnJKBecaJHuntRWGoldsworthyMBrizardCPFinucaneKet alPerioperative risk factors for impaired neurodevelopment after cardiac surgery in early infancy. Arch Dis Child. (2016) 101(11):10106. 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309449

  • 81.

    GunnJKBecaJHuntRWOlischarMShekerdemianLS. Perioperative amplitude-integrated EEG and neurodevelopment in infants with congenital heart disease. Intensive Care Med. (2012) 38:153947. 10.1007/s00134-012-2608-y

  • 82.

    WolfeKRBrintonJDi MariaMVMeierMLiptzinDR. Oxygen saturations and neurodevelopmental outcomes in single ventricle heart disease. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2019) 54(6):9227. 10.1002/ppul.24275

  • 83.

    RavishankarCZakVWilliamsIABellingerDCGaynorJWGhanayemNSet alAssociation of impaired linear growth and worse neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with single ventricle physiology: a report from the pediatric heart network infant single ventricle trial. J Pediatr. (2013) 162(2):2506. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.048

  • 84.

    WilliamsIAFiferWPAndrewsH. Fetal growth and neurodevelopmental outcome in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. (2015) 36:113544. 10.1007/s00246-015-1132-6

  • 85.

    RogerVLJacobsenSJPellikkaPAMillerTDBaileyKRGershBJ. Gender differences in use of stress testing and coronary heart disease mortality: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1998) 32(2):34552. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00229-0

  • 86.

    DallMKiblböckSMülleggerDFellingerJHoferJKapplmüllerRet alUnderstanding the impact of child, intervention, and family factors on developmental trajectories of children with hearing loss at preschool age: design of the AChild study. J Clin Med. (2022) 11(6):1508. 10.3390/jcm11061508

  • 87.

    LordCCharmanTHavdahlACarbonePAnagnostouEBoydBet alThe lancet commission on the future of care and clinical research in autism. Lancet. (2022) 399(10321):271334. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01541-5

  • 88.

    Torras-MañáMGuillamón-ValenzuelaMRamírez-MallafréABrun-GascaCFornieles-DeuA. Usefulness of the bayley scales of infant and toddler development,third edition, in the early diagnosis of language disorder. Psicothema. (2014) 26(3):34956. 10.7334/psicothema2014.29

  • 89.

    ActonBVBiggsWSCreightonDEPennerKASwitzerHNThomasJHet alOverestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery. Pediatrics. (2011) 128(4):e794800. 10.1542/peds.2011-0331

  • 90.

    GoldstoneABBaiocchiMWypijDStoppCAndropoulosDBAtallahJet alThe Bayley-III scale may underestimate neurodevelopmental disability after cardiac surgery in infants. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2020) 57(1):6371. 10.1093/ejcts/ezz123

  • 91.

    RasheedMAKvestadIShaheenFMemonUStrandTA. The predictive validity of Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development-III at 2 years for later general abilities: findings from a rural, disadvantaged cohort in Pakistan. PLOS Glob Public Health. (2023) 3(1):e0001485. 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001485

  • 92.

    FlynnRSHuberMDDeMauroSB. Predictive value of the BSID-II and the Bayley-III for early school age cognitive function in very preterm infants. Glob Pediatr Health. (2020) 7:2333794X20973146. 10.1177/2333794X20973146

  • 93.

    AndersonPJTreyvaudKSpittleAJ. Early developmental interventions for infants born very preterm—what works?Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. (2020) 25(3):101119. 10.1016/j.siny.2020.101119

  • 94.

    SpittleAOrtonJAndersonPJBoydRDoyleLW. Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2015) 2015(11):CD005495. 10.1002/14651858.CD005495

  • 95.

    SandbankMBottema-BeutelKCrowleySCassidyMDunhamKFeldmanJIet alProject AIM: autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children. Psychol Bull. (2020) 146(1):129. 10.1037/bul0000215

  • 96.

    HolzingerDHoferJDallMFellingerJ. Multidimensional family-centred early intervention in children with hearing loss: a conceptual model. J Clin Med. (2022) 11(6):1548. 10.3390/jcm11061548

Summary

Keywords

complex congenital heart defects (CHD), neurodevelopment, social communication, speech motor, malleable predictors, assessment

Citation

Hofer J, Blum M, Wiltsche R, Deluggi N, Holzinger D, Fellinger J, Tulzer G, Blum G and Oberhuber R (2024) Research gaps in the neurodevelopmental assessment of children with complex congenital heart defects: a scoping review. Front. Pediatr. 12:1340495. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1340495

Received

21 November 2023

Accepted

15 April 2024

Published

23 May 2024

Volume

12 - 2024

Edited by

Eva Goossens, University of Antwerp, Belgium

Reviewed by

Kathleen Mussatto, Milwaukee School of Engineering, United States

Samantha Butler, Harvard Medical School, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Johannes Hofer

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics