ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Critical Care
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1597337
This article is part of the Research TopicNovel targets in pediatrics: advances in diagnostic and therapeutic approachesView all 14 articles
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in pediatric intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted
- 1Nanjing Children's Hospital, Nanjing, China
- 2BenQ Medical Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is a common problem in mechanical ventilation, leading to an increase in MV complications. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a relatively new modality of mechanical ventilation that can be used for both invasive and non-invasive ventilation. There is evidence that NAVA reduces asynchronous events, but the sample size is small and the effect on specific physiological and clinical outcomes in children is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of NAVA on physiological parameters and clinical outcomes.We searched electronic databases up to 26 September 2024. Clinical trials comparing NAVA with conventional mechanical ventilation modes were included. The primary outcomes were physiological parameters, respiratory parameters, ventilator-related parameters, and other clinical outcomes. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool2. The certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the scoring methodology. Apply meta-analysis as much as possible, and use qualitative analysis when conditions are not met.Eleven studies involving 224 children met the inclusion criteria for this review. Four were randomized cross-over trials, three were prospective cross-over trials, and four were retrospective studies. There were significant differences in the methods and quality of the included studies.Meta-analyses revealed significant differences in PIP, RR, pO2, and the asynchronous index (AI) when compared to traditional modes of mechanical ventilation. However, no significant differences were observed in FiO2, PEEP, TV, pH, pCO2, SpO2, EAdimax, and EAdimin.This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that while NAVA has advantages for certain short-term physiological outcomes, the level of evidence remains low. Consequently, larger and higher-quality studies are necessary to identify potential short-and long-term differences between various ventilation patterns.
Keywords: neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, PICu, mechanical ventilation, Rehabilitation, pediatric
Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cai, Zuo, Ma, Li, Li and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Wenqian Cai, Nanjing Children's Hospital, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.