Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. Neonatology

Necrotising Enterocolitis Biomarkers: A Systematic Review

Provisionally accepted
Muhammad Ashhad  FaizanMuhammad Ashhad Faizan1,2Iffat  KhalidIffat Khalid1Asten  YeoAsten Yeo1Magdalina Mazheda  FadelMagdalina Mazheda Fadel1Alannah  McmahonAlannah Mcmahon1Philip  GaviganPhilip Gavigan1Saffron  O’NeillSaffron O’Neill1Eman  IsweisiEman Isweisi1,2,3Gregana  SemovaGregana Semova1,2,3Edna  Frances RocheEdna Frances Roche1,2,3,4Aoife  BranaganAoife Branagan1,2,5Judith  MeehanJudith Meehan1,2,3Eleanor  J MolloyEleanor J Molloy1,2,3,5,6*
  • 1Department of Paediatrics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
  • 2Trinity College Dublin Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Dublin, Ireland
  • 3Neurodisability Children’s Health Ireland (CHI) at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland
  • 4Paediatric Endocrinology, Children’s Health Ireland (CHI) at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland
  • 5Neonatology, CHI at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
  • 6The Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Word count: 271 BACKGROUND: Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe acute inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract that predominantly affects preterm neonates. The variable and often nonspecific clinical signs, followed by rapid progression into fulminant disease, and the lack of standardised definitions and biomarkers, make this condition notoriously difficult to diagnose. This systematic review aims to outline the inflammatory pathways involved in the pathogenesis of NEC and to identify potential biomarkers associated with the initial stages of disease progression. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted an electronic search of the available literature using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases with the following search terms ("necrotizing enterocolitis" OR "necrotising enterocolitis" OR "NEC") AND ('biomarker*' OR 'biological marker'). Studies reporting data on the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for NEC were included. Results were restricted to full-text articles in English, available up to November 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTS: A total of 211 studies were screened, yielding 79 studies for analysis. Most studies evaluated the ability of biomarkers to differentiate Bell's stage ≥II NEC from controls or Bell's stage II from stage III. For identifying Bell's stage ≥II, faecal calprotectin (97.14% sensitivity, 100% specificity) and serum calprotectin (100% sensitivity, 96.4% specificity), as well as a panel consisting of urine proteins including Cystatin C (CST3), Pigment Epithelium Derived Factor (PEDF), and Retinol Binding Protein 4 (RET4) (96% sensitivity, 90% specificity), and maternal human milk oligosaccharide disialyllacto-N-tetraose DSNLT (90% sensitivity and specificity) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity when sampled prior to or around the initial diagnosis of NEC. Interleukin 33 (IL-33) exhibited high accuracy

Keywords: Necrotising enterocolitis, biomarkers, Interleukins, Bell's staging, NEC (necrotizing enterocolitis)

Received: 23 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Faizan, Khalid, Yeo, Fadel, Mcmahon, Gavigan, O’Neill, Isweisi, Semova, Roche, Branagan, Meehan and Molloy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Eleanor J Molloy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.