ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Neonatology
Association between birthweight discordance and extrauterine growth restriction among preterm twins: a national multi-center study in China
Provisionally accepted- 1The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- 3Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- 4Sichuan Jinxin Women's and Children's Hospital, Chengdu, China
- 5The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
- 6The Affiliated Women and Children's Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- 7The Tenth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Dongguan, China
- 8Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, China
- 9Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
- 10Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, China
- 11Affiliated Hospital of Yan an university, Yan’ an, China
- 12Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou, China
- 13Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University School of Medicine, Shaoguan, China
- 14Xiaogan Central Hospital, Xiaogan, China
- 15The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China
- 16The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- 17The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- 18Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- 19Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang, China
- 20Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
- 21Binhaiwan Central Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan, China
- 22The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: This multicenter study investigated the association between birthweight discordance (BWD) and extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) in preterm twins, and evaluated the modifying role of small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: Data from 2,496 infants (1,248 twin pairs) admitted to 22 Chinese NICUs (2018-2020) were analyzed. BWD was calculated as the percentage difference in birthweight between larger and smaller twins, categorized into four groups (≤15%, 15%-20%, 20%-25%, >25%). EUGR was defined as discharge weight below the 10th percentile for corrected gestational age and sex (Fenton’s chart). A generalized linear mixed model was employed to analyze the association between BWD and EUGR. Modification analysis was performed to assess the effect of SGA on this association. Results: BWD of >25% was associated with a significantly increased risk of EUGR compared to BWD ≤15% (adjusted OR=1.59, 95% CI:1.05-2.41). Stratified analysis revealed a consistent association in SGA infants (OR=1.38, 95% CI:1.30-1.47). Conclusion: Findings highlight BWD as a critical risk factor for EUGR, particularly in SGA twins. This association suggests that future research should investigate whether tailored monitoring and nutritional interventions in NICUs could help mitigate these growth disparities.
Keywords: birthweight discordance, Extrauterine growth restriction, small gestation age, Twin, NICu
Received: 21 Sep 2025; Accepted: 12 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Shi, Lin, Lu, Ren, Huang, Shen, Chen, Liu, Liang, Li, Jiang, Rao, Qiu, Wei, Zhang, Lin, Jiang, HAN, Wang, Zhang, Yang, Wang, Lin, Tan and Cui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Qiliang Cui
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
