Alessio Danilo Inchingolo1,†
Grazia Marinelli1,†
Luisa Limongelli1,†
Francesco Inchingolo1*
Gianfranco Favia1Laura Ferrante1Angela Di Noia1Cinzia Maspero2
Andrea Palermo3Angelo Michele Inchingolo1,2,‡
Gianna Dipalma1,2*‡
- 1Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
- 2Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Milan University, Milan, Italy
- 3Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
Aim: Chronic diseases in childhood and adolescence represent a growing global challenge, with families often seeking complementary strategies beyond pharmacological treatment. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dietary and oral supplements in pediatric chronic diseases.
Materials and methods: The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed (2005–2025). Eligible studies enrolled children and adolescents (<18 years) with chronic diseases and assessed oral dietary supplements against placebo, standard care, or no intervention. Thirteen studies were included.
Results: The studies investigated autism spectrum disorder (ASD), functional gastrointestinal disorders, cystic fibrosis (CF), type 1 diabetes (T1D), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Interventions included probiotics, omega-3/6 fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, glutathione, Kre-Celazine® and Dimercaptosuccinic Acid (DMSA). Most supplements demonstrated measurable bioactivity, such as modulation of the gut microbiota, changes in inflammatory markers, or improvements in functional indices, but clinical benefits were often inconsistent or limited to subgroups. Safety was generally favorable for probiotics, polyunsaturated fatty acids, magnesium, zinc, and vitamin A, whereas DMSA chelation raised significant safety concerns.
Conclusions: Dietary and oral supplements show promise as supportive interventions in pediatric chronic diseases but cannot yet be recommended for systematic clinical use. Larger multicenter trials with longer follow-up, standardized endpoints, and predictive biomarkers are needed to identify responder subgroups and establish evidence-based recommendations.
1 Introduction
1.1 Chronic diseases in childhood: a growing challenge
Chronic diseases in childhood and adolescence represent an increasingly important challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. Advances in neonatal care and pediatric medicine have significantly improved survival, but these gains have been accompanied by a growing prevalence of chronic conditions such as asthma, cystic fibrosis (CF), type 1 diabetes (T1D), inflammatory bowel disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (1–6). Collectively, these conditions exert a profound impact on health trajectories, school performance, psychosocial development, and quality of life. Families are often faced with the need for long-term management strategies, which extend beyond pharmacological treatment to encompass lifestyle modifications, nutritional interventions, and supportive care. The economic burden is also considerable, not only for healthcare services but also for caregivers, who must devote substantial time and resources to disease management (7–11).
1.2 The role of dietary supplements in pediatric care
Within this broad scenario, attention has increasingly turned to the potential role of dietary supplements and oral complementary interventions. These include a wide spectrum of compounds such as probiotics, vitamins, minerals, omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, and plant-derived extracts. The rationale behind their use is multifactorial. First, many chronic pediatric diseases are associated with measurable alterations in nutritional status, immune regulation, or gut microbial composition (12–14). Second, supplements are widely accessible and often perceived as safe by families, who may seek to integrate them into daily care routines. Third, the growing emphasis on personalized medicine has highlighted the potential of nutritional and microbiota-targeted strategies as adjunctive therapies capable of modifying disease courses or symptom expression (15–21).
The microbiota has emerged as a particularly relevant field in this context. A large body of preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that gut microbial composition and diversity play an important role in modulating immune responses, metabolism, and even neurodevelopmental processes (22–27). In children with chronic diseases, dysbiosis is frequently observed, raising the hypothesis that probiotic or prebiotic supplementation could restore a more favorable microbial profile, reduce inflammation, or improve gastrointestinal and systemic outcomes. While such concepts are biologically plausible, clinical translation remains complex, with variable results depending on age, baseline microbiota, disease subtype, and the specific strains administered (28–35).
1.3 Vitamins and minerals in chronic diseases
Vitamins and minerals also deserve attention. Deficiencies are common in pediatric chronic conditions due to altered absorption, increased metabolic demand, or dietary restrictions. For example, fat-soluble vitamins may be insufficient in CF, while vitamin D deficiency has been linked to respiratory and autoimmune diseases (36–41). Micronutrients such as zinc and magnesium play key roles in immune defense and metabolic regulation, and their supplementation has been tested as a strategy to improve infection resistance or functional status. Beyond correcting deficiencies, supplementation is also explored for its potential to exert pharmacological effects, such as antioxidant activity, modulation of inflammatory mediators, or support for tissue repair (42–52).
1.4 Omega-3 fatty acids and neuro-immune modulation
Omega-3 fatty acids represent another area of interest. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids such as EPA and DHA are critical components of neuronal membranes and exert anti-inflammatory properties (53–60). Their potential role in neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, and other chronic conditions has been extensively studied, with the hope that supplementation could improve behavioral, cognitive, or immunological outcomes. Despite promising mechanistic data, however, clinical evidence in children remains inconsistent, with some studies reporting modest improvements in subgroups but others showing no clear benefit (61–69).
1.5 Phytotherapeutic compounds and alternative approaches
Phytotherapeutic compounds, although less systematically investigated in pediatrics, also attract interest as families increasingly turn to plant-based remedies. Herbal preparations, antioxidant blends, and natural extracts are perceived as “gentle” alternatives, but their variability in formulation, dosing, and quality control raises concerns. Moreover, few high-quality pediatric trials exist, leaving major uncertainties regarding both efficacy and safety (70–79).
1.6 Clinical relevance and the need for systematic evaluation
Despite this growing interest, significant gaps persist in literature. Evidence is often fragmented, limited to small single-center studies with short follow-up and heterogeneous designs. Outcomes are not standardized, ranging from parent-reported symptom scales to biochemical markers, making cross-trial comparisons difficult. Placebo effects are frequent and sometimes pronounced, particularly in functional disorders, further complicating interpretation. Safety is rarely the primary endpoint, yet it is crucial when interventions are prolonged or involve vulnerable populations such as preterm infants or children with complex comorbidities. In addition, publication bias may exaggerate positive findings, while negative or inconclusive studies remain underreported (80–84). These limitations hinder the formulation of evidence-based recommendations and leave clinicians uncertain about whether, when, and how to advise families regarding supplements. Another critical issue is the lack of stratification by disease subtype or baseline biological profile. Pediatric chronic diseases are highly heterogeneous; for example, not all children with inflammatory bowel disease or ASD exhibit the same microbial or metabolic alterations. Without adequate stratification, potential benefits may be masked by overall negative results (85–92). This highlights the need for precision approaches that identify likely responders based on biomarkers, such as microbiota composition, genetic variants, or nutritional status. To date, only a minority of pediatric trials have incorporated such stratification, and this represents a major research gap (93–96).
The widespread use of supplements in clinical practice further underscores the urgency of systematic evaluation. Surveys indicate that a substantial proportion of families administer dietary supplements to their children with chronic diseases, often without medical supervision. Motivations range from the desire to strengthen immunity to hopes of improving behavioral symptoms or reducing dependence on conventional medications. While the appeal is understandable, unsupervised use raises the risk of interactions, overdosing, or disappointment when expected benefits fail to materialize. Healthcare professionals must therefore be equipped with reliable evidence to guide discussions with families, balancing potential advantages with realistic expectations and known risks.
A systematic review is therefore warranted to provide a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of dietary supplements and oral complementary interventions in pediatric chronic diseases. Beyond compiling the available data, such a review has the potential to clarify which interventions have shown not only measurable biological activity but also reproducible clinical benefits, and under which circumstances these benefits are most evident. At the same time, it allows a critical appraisal of methodological weaknesses that still characterize much of the literature, including small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, and heterogeneous outcome measures, all of which influence the reliability of conclusions. Equally important is the assessment of safety, particularly in vulnerable pediatric populations where long-term supplementation could carry risks that are insufficiently captured in short-term trials (97–103). Finally, by identifying the areas where evidence is scarce or inconsistent, a systematic review can help define priorities for future research, encouraging the design of adequately powered, rigorously controlled studies that focus on clinically meaningful outcomes and pave the way toward a more precise and evidence-based use of supplements in pediatric care. This concept is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Conceptual illustration of the role of dietary and complementary supplements in pediatric chronic diseases.
The objective of the present work is therefore clearly defined: to systematically review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of dietary supplements and oral complementary/alternative interventions in the management of chronic diseases in children. By providing a comprehensive synthesis, this review aims to inform clinical decision-making, support evidence-based counseling of families, and highlight priority areas for future pediatric research. The goal is to clarify the potential role of supplements within integrated care strategies, ensuring that children with chronic conditions receive interventions that are not only biologically plausible but also clinically effective and safe (104, 105).
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Protocol registration
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The protocol was [registrato/non registrato] on PROSPERO, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, under the number ID1152059.
2.2 Research question (PICO framework)
The central question of this review was formulated according to the PICO framework: “In children and adolescents with chronic diseases, does the oral administration of dietary supplements or complementary interventions, compared with placebo, no treatment, or standard care, improve clinical outcomes or safety?”.
In this context, the population considered was pediatric patients up to 18 years of age; the interventions included a wide range of oral supplements, such as probiotics, vitamins, minerals, omega-3 fatty acids and phytotherapeutic compounds; the comparators were either placebo, conventional therapy, or the absence of intervention; and the outcomes focused on both efficacy, measured through clinical and biological parameters—and safety, evaluated through tolerability and reporting of adverse events.
2.3 Search strategy
To identify all potentially relevant studies, a comprehensive literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The search covered the period from January 2005 to January 2025 and was restricted to studies published in English, involving human participants aged between 0 and 18 years. The search strategy combined controlled vocabulary (MeSH terms) and free-text words related to dietary supplements, complementary therapies, and pediatric chronic diseases. In PubMed, for example, the search string included terms such as “dietary supplements,” “probiotics,” “vitamins,” “omega-3 fatty acids,” “children,” “adolescents,” and “chronic disease”, linked with appropriate Boolean operators.
Overall, the search retrieved 3,274 records: 1,177 from PubMed, 2,059 from Scopus, and 38 from Cochrane.
2.4 Study selection
The study selection process was conducted in two stages. First, duplicates were removed, resulting in 2,028 unique records. Titles and abstracts were then screened, leading to the exclusion of 801 reviews and 1,102 articles considered off-topic because they did not involve pediatric populations, or chronic conditions. Thirteen studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final synthesis.
The inclusion criteria specified human studies enrolling children or adolescents with chronic diseases and testing oral dietary supplements with clinical or biological outcomes of efficacy and safety. Studies were excluded if they involved only adult populations, investigated parenteral supplementation, were animal or in vitro studies, or were available only as conference abstracts, editorials, or narrative reviews. Two reviewers carried out the selection independently, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.
2.5 Data extraction and quality assessment
From each eligible study, we extracted the following information: author and year of publication, study design, population and disease investigated, type of supplement and comparator, sample size, treatment duration and follow-up, main outcomes, and key findings. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool, which evaluates domains such as randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential sources of bias.
3 Results
3.1 Selected studies and their characteristics
The database search identified 3,274 records. After removing duplicates and excluding reviews or off-topic articles, 13 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review (Figure 2).
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the study selection process for systematic review. The chart details the number of records identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the final analysis, along with reasons for exclusion at each stage.
These studies, published between 2008 and 2023, were conducted in various international settings. Most were randomized controlled trials, with some pilot or open-label designs. Sample sizes ranged from small exploratory cohorts to multicenter trials with over 800 participants, and follow-up periods extended from a few weeks to 12 months.
The conditions investigated included ASD, functional gastrointestinal disorders, CF, T1D, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Interventions covered a wide range of oral supplements, most frequently probiotics, followed by omega-3/6 fatty acids, vitamins and minerals (vitamin A, vitamin D, zinc, magnesium), and a few nutraceutical or phytotherapeutic compounds such as glutathione, Kre-Celazine® and Dimercaptosuccinic Acid (DMSA).
Overall, the studies evaluated both efficacy, through clinical and biological outcomes, and safety, mainly in terms of tolerability. A summary of their main features is reported in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of included studies on oral supplements in chronic pediatric diseases.
3.2 Quality and risk of bias assessment for the included articles
The overall risk of bias across the thirteen included studies was generally moderate to high, mainly due to common methodological limitations in pediatric supplementation trials. Randomized controlled trials often reported adequate sequence generation and allocation concealment, but details of randomization and blinding procedures were frequently insufficient, limiting the assessment of selection and performance bias. Studies relying on parent-reported outcomes were particularly prone to detection and reporting bias. Other frequent issues included incomplete outcome data, small sample sizes with dropouts, short follow-up durations, and unclear pre-registration or outcome reporting. Open-label designs and underpowered pilot studies further increased the risk of bias. As summarized in Figure 3, these weaknesses indicate that results should be interpreted with caution and highlight the need for future trials with larger samples, longer follow-up, standardized endpoints, and transparent reporting.
Figure 3. Risk of bias assessment of included studies. Traffic-light plot of individual judgments for each domain and overall risk of bias. Green = low risk; yellow = some concerns; red = high risk.
Taken together, the findings of the included trials highlight substantial heterogeneity in interventions, outcomes, and methodological quality. To provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence across pediatric chronic conditions, an evidence map was generated (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Evidence map of dietary supplements tested in pediatric chronic diseases. Rows represent clinical conditions (ASD, IBS, functional constipation, CF, T1D, BPD in preterm infants, juvenile idiopathic arthritis), while columns represent supplements (probiotics, omega-3/6 fatty acids, glutathione, chelation with DMSA, magnesium, zinc, vitamin A, cetylated fatty acids). Green indicates promising findings, yellow inconclusive evidence, and red interventions not recommended due to safety concerns.
4 Discussion
In recent decades, and particularly in recent years, interest in the use of dietary supplements and oral complementary interventions as adjuvants in the management of pediatric chronic diseases has grown steadily across multiple clinical domains, ranging from child neuropsychiatry to functional gastroenterology, pulmonology, pediatric rheumatology, endocrino-metabolic disorders, and neonatology. This interest does not arise in a vacuum but reflects several converging factors: the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions in childhood, the persistent need for additional therapeutic strategies in diseases that rarely have curative treatments, the widespread perception of supplements as safer than conventional drugs, the pressure from families seeking “natural” solutions, and the growing accessibility of these products in the global market. It is therefore essential to carefully analyze the available literature in order to distinguish between documented bioactivity and actual clinical impact, while not neglecting safety concerns and the methodological weaknesses that still limit much of the evidence base (98, 117–123).
One of the most extensively studied areas is ASD, a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by persistent impairments in communication and social interaction, together with restricted and repetitive behaviors, with an estimated prevalence of 1%–2% in Western pediatric populations. The interest in supplements for ASD has been stimulated by several biological observations, including alterations of the gut microbiota, imbalances in oxidative and inflammatory metabolism, and hypotheses of specific nutritional deficiencies. In this context, Li et al. (2021) conducted a randomized trial in preschool children, showing that the addition of a multi-strain probiotic to intensive Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy was associated with greater improvement in Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) scores and favorable modulation of fecal composition, with enrichment of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus (106). While methodologically interesting for the integration of a standardized behavioral intervention, the study presented non-negligible limitations, including the small sample size, short follow-up, reliance on parent-reported outcomes, and publication in Chinese, all of which warrant caution in interpretation. Along a similar line, though with a different focus, Keim et al. (2022) investigated the efficacy of omega-3/6 fatty acids in children aged 2 to <6 years with recent ASD diagnosis, documenting a significant increase in RBC EPA/DHA levels and a reduction in IL-2, clear signals of bioavailability and immunological impact, yet without evidence of parallel robust behavioral improvements in the short term (107). Boone et al. (2017), focusing on preterm toddlers with autistic symptomatology, found improvements in both active and placebo groups, but with a non-significant medium-to-large effect size in sensory sensitivity favoring omega-3/6 supplementation, suggesting the possibility of particularly responsive subgroups that merit further investigation in larger studies (19). Kern et al. (2011) explored the antioxidant pathway with glutathione, administered orally or transdermally, documenting biochemical modifications such as increased plasma reduced GSH (oral only) and higher cysteine, taurine, and sulfate levels, without evidence of substantial clinical change (108). The open-label design, lack of placebo control, and predominantly biochemical focus limit the clinical applicability of these findings. Even more controversial, Adams et al. (2009) investigated the safety and efficacy of chelation therapy with DMSA in children with ASD, observing some biochemical effects but no consistent clinical benefit; this approach remains strongly discouraged today in the absence of heavy metal intoxication, due to the risk of essential mineral depletion and systemic adverse effects (109).
Beyond neuropsychiatry, pediatric gastroenterology has represented another fertile ground for supplement research. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a frequent functional condition in childhood, was investigated in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial by Vázquez-Frías et al. (2023), which failed to demonstrate superiority of Bacillus clausii over placebo at week 8 for the primary endpoint, though secondary signals of efficacy were observed, including reduced abdominal pain at 4 weeks and decreased bloating in the IBS-C subtype at 4 and 16 weeks. It is noteworthy that this trial was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and reported an unusually high placebo response rate, probably amplified by behavioral, dietary, and psychosocial changes (110, 124). Also in the gastrointestinal field, Russo et al. (2017) examined the efficacy of a probiotic mixture in functional constipation, showing improvements in stool frequency and consistency, though in a context of considerable heterogeneity of strains, dosages, and endpoints, which complicate comparisons and calls for cautious interpretation (111).
Another paradigmatic condition in which management remains challenging is represented by CF. Ray et al. (2022) conducted a 12-month randomized trial with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), reporting that children who developed a “Bifidobacteria-dominated” microbiota experienced fewer pulmonary exacerbations, higher FEV1, lower fecal calprotectin, and fewer antibiotic days compared with “Bacteroides-dominated” subjects, despite no significant mean benefit in the primary analysis (112, 125, 126). These findings suggest that clinical response may depend less on the intervention itself and more on the induced microbial profile, opening the way to a precision nutrition approach. Regarding micronutrients, Gontijo-Amaral et al. (2012), in a randomized crossover trial, found that oral magnesium supplementation improved some clinical and functional indices, while Abdulhamid (2008) reported a possible reduction in the incidence and duration of respiratory infections with zinc supplementation. Both approaches appear promising but require confirmation through larger and longer studies, since current evidence derives from small samples and short observation periods (113, 114).
From the endocrinology perspective, T1D has been addressed as a chronic condition requiring continuous metabolic control. Shabani-Mirzaee et al. (2023) evaluated probiotic supplementation over 90 days, finding no significant effect on HbA1c but a reduction in fasting glucose (97). While partial, this result suggests a possible complementary role of probiotics in modulating daily glycemic balance, warranting further investigation in longer studies with predefined clinical endpoints such as hypoglycemia frequency, glycemic variability, and insulin requirement. In neonatology, Rakshasbhuvankar et al. (2017) explored whether enteral vitamin A supplementation in preterm infants could reduce the severity of BPD. Interpretation of results, however, must take into account methodological variables such as dosing, timing of administration, co-interventions, and assessment of medium-term respiratory outcomes (115, 127–131). Finally, in pediatric rheumatology, Golini et al. (2014) conducted a pilot study on Kre-Celazine® (cetylated fatty acids plus omega-3) in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, reporting potential benefits in pain and inflammation reduction, though within the limits of small sample size and preliminary design, which render conclusions still exploratory (116).
Taken together, these thirteen studies highlight several cross-cutting considerations. On one hand, many supplements demonstrate measurable bioactivity, such as modulation of gut microbiota, increase in long-chain fatty acids in red blood cells, changes in inflammatory cytokines, improvements in respiratory function indices, or reduction of fasting glucose. On the other hand, the translation of these biological signals into robust, reproducible, and generalizable clinical outcomes remains inconsistent or limited to subgroups of patients. Safety appears generally favorable, particularly for probiotics, omega-3/6 fatty acids, magnesium, zinc, and vitamin A within physiological ranges, while controversial approaches such as DMSA chelation carry significant risks and lack support in clinical practice outside clear toxicological indications. Finally, heterogeneity in study design, included populations (often mixing children and adolescents), supplement dosages and formulations, and even comparators (sometimes “active” placebos such as canola oil) complicates meta-analysis and explains divergent results, especially in functional gastroenterology (132–137).
This perspective is summarized in a conceptual framework (Figure 5) and in Table 2, outlining how different classes of dietary supplements may act through pathways such as microbiota modulation, anti-inflammatory effects, and metabolic or immune support, with the ultimate goal of improving neurocognitive, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and metabolic outcomes.
Figure 5. Conceptual framework for dietary supplements in pediatric chronic diseases. Core conditions are potentially modulated by various classes of supplements (probiotics, omega-3/6 fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, chelation). Proposed pathways of action include microbiota modulation, anti-inflammatory effects, correction of deficiencies, and metabolic or immune support, ultimately aiming at improvements in neurocognitive, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and metabolic outcomes.
Table 2. Oral dietary supplements investigated in pediatric chronic diseases.
4.1 Limitations and clinical implications
In light of these findings, the implications for future research are clear. Large, multicenter randomized trials with adequate duration are needed to determine whether the observed biological changes translate into sustainable long-term clinical benefits. The use of predictive biomarkers, ranging from baseline microbiota composition and membrane lipid profiles to micronutritional and genetic status, will be a decisive step toward identifying responder subgroups and advancing true precision nutrition. Equally important will be the adoption of truly inert comparators and standardized, objective clinical endpoints, such as hospitalizations, respiratory exacerbations, pulmonary function tests, and measurable neurocognitive parameters. Cost-effectiveness analyses should also be integrated, considering quality of life, treatment adherence, and family preferences. Only through this approach will it be possible to establish which supplements hold genuine clinical value and which remain confined to biologically interesting but therapeutically inconsequential signals (138–140).
5 Conclusions
Dietary and oral supplements represent a promising yet still exploration in the management of pediatric chronic diseases. Current evidence, although preliminary, suggests that in conditions such as ASD, probiotics, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and glutathione may modulate behavioral symptoms, inflammatory parameters, and oxidative metabolism, while in CF, enrichment of the microbiota with Bifidobacteria has been associated with better respiratory outcomes and reduced inflammation. By contrast, in children with IBS, results remain uncertain and are often influenced by the high placebo effect and underlying clinical heterogeneity. Overall, these interventions appear generally safe and well tolerated, but the available evidence is not yet sufficient to recommend their systematic use in clinical practice. The heterogeneity of observed responses highlights the need for a personalized approach, in which supplements are not regarded as universal solutions but as complementary tools to be integrated within multidisciplinary care strategies. The challenge for the scientific community will be to translate preliminary signals into validated protocols through large, randomized trials with extended follow-up and the incorporation of predictive biomarkers. Oral supplements in pediatric populations show considerable potential as supportive strategies in the management of chronic diseases, but their use should remain cautious and guided by more robust clinical evidence.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
AI: Resources, Software, Writing – review & editing. GM: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – original draft. LL: Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – original draft. FI: Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft. GF: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. LF: Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. AD: Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – original draft. CM: Software, Writing – review & editing. AP: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. AI: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. GD: Conceptualization, Software, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnote
Abbreviations ABA, applied behavior analysis; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; ATEC, autism treatment evaluation checklist; BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; CF, cystic fibrosis; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; DMSA, dimercaptosuccinic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1s; GSH, glutathione; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IL-2, interleukin-2; JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis; LGG, lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; PICO, population, intervention, comparator, outcome; PRISMA, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; PROSPERO, international prospective register of systematic reviews; RBC, red blood cells; RoB 2.0, cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0; RTIs, respiratory tract infections; T1D, type 1 diabetes.
References
1. Allen T, Reda S, Martin S, Long P, Franklin A, Bedoya SZ, et al. The needs of adolescents and young adults with chronic illness: results of a quality improvement survey. Children. (2022) 9:500. doi: 10.3390/children9040500
2. Sawyer SM, Drew S, Yeo MS, Britto MT. Adolescents with a chronic condition: challenges living, challenges treating. Lancet. (2007) 369:1481–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60370-5
3. Schmidt S, Herrmann-Garitz C, Bomba F, Thyen U. A multicenter prospective quasi-experimental study on the impact of a transition-oriented generic patient education program on health service participation and quality of life in adolescents and young adults. Patient Educ Couns. (2016) 99:421–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.024
4. Contaldo M, Fusco A, Stiuso P, Lama S, Gravina AG, Itro A, et al. Oral microbiota and salivary levels of oral pathogens in gastro-intestinal diseases: current knowledge and exploratory study. Microorganisms. (2021) 9:1064. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051064
5. Isacco CG, Ballini A, De Vito D, Nguyen KCD, Cantore S, Bottalico L, et al. Rebalancing the oral microbiota as an efficient tool in endocrine, metabolic and immune disorders. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. (2021) 21:777–84. doi: 10.2174/1871530320666200729142504
6. Isacco CG, Nguyen KCD, Pham VH, Di Palma G, Aityan SK, Tomassone D, et al. Searching for a link between bone decay and diabetes type 2. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. (2022) 22:904–10. doi: 10.2174/1871530322666220324150327
7. Valanju R, Barani M, Mautner D, Al Hadaya I, Cross A, Gunawardana M, et al. Youth Perspective on Chronic Disease Prevention. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2022) 6:456–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00131-6
8. Pyatak EA, Sequeira PA, Vigen CLP, Weigensberg MJ, Wood JR, Montoya L, et al. Clinical and psychosocial outcomes of a structured transition program among young adults with type 1 diabetes. J Adolesc Health. (2017) 60:212–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.004
9. Little JM, Odiaga JA, Minutti CZ. Implementation of a diabetes transition of care program. J Pediatr Health Care. (2017) 31:215–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2016.08.009
10. Owusu SA, Sridhar S, Enimil A, Martyn-Dickens C, Mahama H, Ratner L. Enhancing resilience in adolescents with chronic medical illnesses through patient-centered care: a call to action on thriving and not only surviving. J Adolesc Health. (2025) 76:337–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.11.004
11. Waite-Jones JM, Rodriguez AM. The impact of long-term conditions during childhood and adolescence. In: Waite-Jones JM, Rodriguez AM, editors. In Psychosocial Approaches to Child and Adolescent Health and Wellbeing. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2022). p. 195–225.
12. Kalogerakou T, Antoniadou M. The role of dietary antioxidants, food supplements and functional foods for energy enhancement in healthcare professionals. Antioxidants. (2024) 13:1508. doi: 10.3390/antiox13121508
13. Vignesh A, Amal TC, Sarvalingam A, Vasanth K. A review on the influence of nutraceuticals and functional foods on health. Food Chem Adv. (2024) 5:100749. doi: 10.1016/j.focha.2024.100749
14. Pandit M. Critical factors for successful management of VUCA times. BMJ Lead. (2021) 5:121–3. doi: 10.1136/leader-2020-000305
15. Ballini A, Signorini L, Inchingolo AM, Saini R, Gnoni A, Scacco S, et al. Probiotics may improve serum folate availability in pregnant women: a pilot study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. (2020) 8:1124–30. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2020.5494
16. Ballini A, Santacroce L, Cantore S, Bottalico L, Dipalma G, Topi S, et al. Probiotics efficacy on oxidative stress values in inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled pilot study. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. (2019) 19:373–81. doi: 10.2174/1871530319666181221150352
17. Andersson H, Asp N-G, Bruce Å, Roos S, Wadström T, Wold AE. Health effects of probiotics and prebiotics A literature review on human studies. Food Nutr Res. (2001) 45:58–75. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v45i0.1790
18. Bijle MN, Ekambaram M, Lo ECM, Yiu CKY. Synbiotics in caries prevention: a scoping review. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0237547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237547
19. Boone KM, Gracious B, Klebanoff MA, Rogers LK, Rausch J, Coury DL, et al. Omega-3 and -6 fatty acid supplementation and sensory processing in toddlers with ASD symptomology born preterm: a randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev. (2017) 115:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.09.015
20. Corriero A, Gadaleta RM, Puntillo F, Inchingolo F, Moschetta A, Brienza N. The central role of the gut in intensive care. Critical Care. (2022) 26:379. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04259-8
21. Di Cosola M, Cazzolla AP, Charitos IA, Ballini A, Inchingolo F, Santacroce L. Candida albicans and oral carcinogenesis. A brief review. J Fungi. (2021) 7:476. doi: 10.3390/jof7060476
22. Ma T, Shen X, Shi X, Sakandar HA, Quan K, Li Y, et al. Targeting gut microbiota and metabolism as the major probiotic mechanism—an evidence-based review. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2023) 138:178–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.06.013
23. Abenavoli L, Scarpellini E, Colica C, Boccuto L, Salehi B, Sharifi-Rad J, et al. Gut microbiota and obesity: a role for probiotics. Nutrients. (2019) 11:2690. doi: 10.3390/nu11112690
24. Hrncir T. Gut microbiota dysbiosis: triggers, consequences, diagnostic and therapeutic options. Microorganisms. (2022) 10:578. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030578
25. Abeltino A, Hatem D, Serantoni C, Riente A, De Giulio MM, De Spirito M, et al. Unraveling the gut microbiota: implications for precision nutrition and personalized medicine. Nutrients. (2024) 16:3806. doi: 10.3390/nu16223806
26. Robles Alonso V, Guarner F. Linking the gut microbiota to human health. Br J Nutr. (2013) 109(Suppl 2):S21–26. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512005235
27. Inchingolo R, Bayram I, Uluata S, Kiralan SS, Rodriguez-Estrada MT, McClements DJ, et al. Ability of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles to increase the antioxidant activity of α-tocopherol. J Agric Food Chem. (2021) 69:5702–8. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01199
28. Farias da Cruz M, Baraúna Magno M, Alves Jural L, Pimentel TC, Masterson Tavares Pereira Ferreira D, Almeida Esmerino E, et al. Probiotics and dairy products in dentistry: a bibliometric and critical review of randomized clinical trials. Food Res Int. (2022) 157:111228. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111228
29. Ferrer MD, López-López A, Nicolescu T, Perez-Vilaplana S, Boix-Amorós A, Dzidic M, et al. Topic application of the probiotic streptococcus dentisani improves clinical and microbiological parameters associated with oral health. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2020) 10:465. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00465
30. Ferrés-Amat E, Espadaler-Mazo J, Calvo-Guirado JL, Ferrés-Amat E, Mareque-Bueno J, Salavert A, et al. Probiotics diminish the post-operatory pain following mandibular third molar extraction: a randomised double-blind controlled trial (pilot study). Benefic Microbes. (2020) 11:631–40. doi: 10.3920/BM2020.0090
31. Gargiulo Isacco C, Ballini A, De Vito D, Michele Inchingolo A, Cantore S, Paduanelli G, et al. Probiotics in health and immunity: a first step toward understanding the importance of microbiota system in translational medicine. In: IntechOpen. (2020). doi: 10.5772/intechopen.88601
32. Inchingolo AD. Correlation between occlusal trauma and oral microbiota: a microbiological investigation. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. (2021) 35:295–302. doi: 10.23812/21-2supp1-29
33. Inchingolo AD, Cazzolla AP, Di Cosola M, Greco Lucchina A, Santacroce L, Charitos IA, et al. The integumentary system and its microbiota between health and disease. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. (2021) 35:303–21. doi: 10.23812/21-2supp1-30
34. Hasslöf P, Granqvist L, Stecksén-Blicks C, Twetman S. Prevention of recurrent childhood caries with probiotic supplements: a randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. (2022) 14:384–90. doi: 10.1007/s12602-022-09913-9
35. Guilleminault C, Stoohs R. Chronic snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children. Lung. (1990) 168:912–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02718227
36. Godswill AG, Somtochukwu IV, Ikechukwu AO, Kate EC. Health benefits of micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) and their associated deficiency diseases: a systematic review. Int J Food Sci. (2025) 3(1):1–32. doi: 10.47604/ijf.1024
37. Brown KH, Hess SY, Moore SE, Combs GF, Cashman KD, McNulty H, et al. Neglected micronutrients—considering a broader set of vitamins and minerals in public health nutrition programs worldwide: a narrative review. Am J Clin Nutr. (2025) 122:680–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.030
38. Thaler DS. Is global microbial biodiversity increasing, decreasing, or staying the same? Front Ecol Evol. (2021) 9:565649. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.565649
39. Malcangi G, Inchingolo AD, Trilli I, Ferrante L, Casamassima L, Nardelli P, et al. Recent use of hyaluronic acid in dental medicine. Materials (Basel). (2025) 18:1863. doi: 10.3390/ma18081863
40. Malcangi G, Patano A, Ciocia AM, Netti A, Viapiano F, Palumbo I, et al. Benefits of natural antioxidants on oral health. Antioxidants. (2023) 12:1309. doi: 10.3390/antiox12061309
41. Tepedino M, Esposito R, Potrubacz MI, Xhanari D, Ciavarella D. Evaluation of the relationship between incisor torque and profile aesthetics in patients having orthodontic extractions compared to non-extractions. Clin Oral Investig. (2023) 27:5233–48. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05143-7
42. Bailey RL, West KP, Black RE. The epidemiology of global micronutrient deficiencies. Ann Nutr Metab. (2015) 66(Suppl 2):22–33. doi: 10.1159/000371618
43. Role of Micronutrients (Vitamins & Minerals). Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383133371_Role_of_Micronutrients_Vitamins_Minerals (Accessed September 17, 2025).
44. Razzaque MS, Wimalawansa SJ. Minerals and human health: from deficiency to toxicity. Nutrients. (2025) 17:454. doi: 10.3390/nu17030454
45. Weyh C, Krüger K, Peeling P, Castell L. The role of minerals in the optimal functioning of the immune system. Nutrients. (2022) 14:644. doi: 10.3390/nu14030644
46. Kim M-H, Choi M-K. Seven dietary minerals (ca, P, mg, fe, zn, cu, and mn) and their relationship with blood pressure and blood lipids in healthy adults with self-selected diet. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2013) 153:69–75. doi: 10.1007/s12011-013-9656-1
47. Allen LH. Micronutrients — assessment, requirements, deficiencies, and interventions | N Engl J Med. (2025) 392:1175–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2314150
48. Ciavarella D, Luciano R, Lorusso M, Cazzolla AP, Laurenziello M, Fanelli C, et al. Evaluation of facial aesthetic changes in growing class II patients treated with herbst or elastodontics: a retrospective study. Dent J. (2024) 12:411. doi: 10.3390/dj12120411
49. Saccomanno S, Di Tullio A, D’Alatri L, Grippaudo C. Proposal for a myofunctional therapy protocol in case of altered lingual frenulum. A pilot study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. (2019) 20:67–72. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.01.13
50. Saccomanno S, Martini C, D’Alatri L, Farina S, Grippaudo C. A specific protocol of myo-functional therapy in children with down syndrome. A pilot study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. (2018) 19:243–6. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.03.14
51. Farronato M, Cossellu G, Farronato G, Inchingolo F, Blasi S, Angiero F. Physico-chemical characterization of a smart thermo-responsive fluoride-releasing poloxamer-based gel. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. (2019) 33:1309–14. doi: 10.54517/jbrha4588
52. Maspero C, Abate A, Inchingolo F, Dolci C, Cagetti MG, Tartaglia GM. Incidental finding in pre-orthodontic treatment radiographs of an aural foreign body: a case report. Children. (2022) 9:421. doi: 10.3390/children9030421
53. Abdulkareem AA, Al-Taweel FB, Al-Sharqi AJB, Gul SS, Sha A, Chapple ILC. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of periodontitis: from symbiosis to dysbiosis. J Oral Microbiol. (2023) 15:2197779. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2023.2197779
54. Afacan B, Öztürk VÖ, Emingil G, Köse T, Mitsakakis K, Bostanci N. Salivary secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor levels in patients with stage 3 grade C periodontitis: a comparative cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:21267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24295-2
55. Al-Abdaly MMAA, Alharbi FST, Almoalem AM, Awaji NAT. The influence of kidney stones and salivary uric acid on dental calculus formation and periodontal status among some Saudi patients aged 25–70 years. Int J Clin Med. (2020) 11:565–78. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2020.1110049
56. Amerongen AVN, Veerman ECI. Saliva–the defender of the oral cavity. Oral Dis. (2002) 8:12–22. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.1o816.x
57. Amou T, Hinode D, Yoshioka M, Grenier D. Relationship between halitosis and periodontal disease—associated oral bacteria in tongue coatings. Int J Dent Hyg. (2014) 12:145–51. doi: 10.1111/idh.12046
58. Aranda-Rivera AK, Cruz-Gregorio A, Arancibia-Hernández YL, Hernández-Cruz EY, Pedraza-Chaverri J. RONS and oxidative stress: an overview of basic concepts. Oxygen. (2022) 2:437–78. doi: 10.3390/oxygen2040030
59. Arulselvan P, Fard MT, Tan WS, Gothai S, Fakurazi S, Norhaizan ME, et al. Role of antioxidants and natural products in inflammation. Oxid Med Cell Longevity. (2016) 2016:5276130. doi: 10.1155/2016/5276130
60. Azizi A, Sarlati F, Parchakani A, Alirezaei S. Evaluation of whole saliva antioxidant capacity in patients with periodontal diseases. Open J Stomatol. (2014) 4:228–31. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2014.44031
61. Van Dael P. Role of N-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human nutrition and health: review of recent studies and recommendations. Nutr Res Pract. (2021) 15:137–59. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2021.15.2.137
62. Mendis S, Davis S, Norrving B. Organizational update: the world health organization global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014; one more landmark step in the combat against stroke and vascular disease. Stroke. (2015) 46:e121–122. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008097
63. Wang Z, Yang Y, Tang F, Wu M. Recent applications and prospects of omega-3 fatty acids: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis in 2014–2023. Prost Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. (2024) 201:102615. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2024.102615
64. Jiang H, Wang L, Wang D, Yan N, Li C, Wu M, et al. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid biomarkers and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality. Clin Nutr. (2022) 41:1798–807. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.06.034
65. Omega-3 Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, EPA and DHA: Bridging the Gap between Supply and Demand Available online at: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/1/89 (Accessed September 17, 2025).
66. Connolly SJ, Gillis AM. Therapies for the prevention of stroke and other vascular events in atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Can J Cardiol. (2005) 21(Suppl B):71B–3B.16239992
67. Willeboordse M, Jansen MW, van den Heijkant SN, Simons A, Winkens B, de Groot RHM, et al. The healthy primary school of the future: study protocol of a quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health. (2016) 16:639. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3301-9
68. Malcangi G, Inchingolo AD, Inchingolo AM, Santacroce L, Marinelli G, Mancini A, et al. COVID-19 infection in children, infants and pregnant subjects: an overview of recent insights and therapies. Microorganisms. (2021) 9:1964. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091964
69. Charitos IA, Inchingolo AM, Ferrante L, Inchingolo F, Inchingolo AD, Castellaneta F, et al. The gut microbiota’s role in neurological, psychiatric, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Nutrients. (2024) 16:4404. doi: 10.3390/nu16244404
70. Iriti M. Natural products & phytotherapeutics: why a new section? Drug Target Insights. (2023) 17:1–4. doi: 10.33393/dti.2023.2548
71. Petkova V, Hadzhieva B, Nedialkov P. Phytotherapeutic approaches to treatment and prophylaxis in pediatric practice. PHARMACIA. (2019) 66:115–9. doi: 10.3897/pharmacia.66.e37954
72. Zeppa L, Aguzzi C, Morelli MB. Exploring the therapeutic potential of natural compounds and plant extracts in human health. Biomolecules. (2025) 15:774. doi: 10.3390/biom15060774
73. Balkrishna A, Sharma N, Srivastava D, Kukreti A, Srivastava S, Arya V. Exploring the safety, efficacy, and bioactivity of herbal medicines: bridging traditional wisdom and modern science in healthcare. Future Integr Med. (2025) 3(1):35–49. doi: 10.14218/FIM.2023.00086
74. Mallhi AI, Butt DFS, Umar DH, Sikdar B, Naz DZ, Rana MRR. Contemporary significance of phytotherapeutic preparations. J Popl Ther Clin Pharmacol. (2024) 31:1844–51. doi: 10.53555/jptcp.v31i3.5203
75. Ming K, Peng L, Pan Y, Zhu M, Xiao Y, Ye S, et al. Investigating the antifibrotic action of Foeniculum Vulgare root bark volatile oil through the HK2/PKM2/LDHA pathway. Phytother Res. (2025) 39:4934–49. doi: 10.1002/ptr.70050
76. Mtewa AG, Egbuna C, Beressa TB, Ngwira KJ, Lampiao F. Chapter 2—phytopharmaceuticals: efficacy, safety, and regulation. In: Egbuna C, Mishra AP, Goyal MR, editors. Preparation of Phytopharmaceuticals for the Management of Disorders. London: Academic Press (2021). p. 25–38.
77. Phytotherapy: the science behind herbal remedies and their therapeutic benefits. In: Khan A, Hussain R, Tahir S, Ghafoor N, editors. Medicinal Plants and Aromatics: A Holistic Health Perspective. Faisalabad: Unique Scientific Publishers (2025).
78. Jenča A, Mills DK, Ghasemi H, Saberian E, Jenča A, Karimi Forood AM, et al. Herbal therapies for cancer treatment: a review of phytotherapeutic efficacy. Biol Targets Ther. (2024) 18:229–55. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S484068
79. Malcangi G, Marinelli G, Inchingolo AD, Trilli I, Ferrante L, Casamassima L, et al. Salivaomics: new frontiers in studying the relationship between periodontal disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Metabolites. (2025) 15:389. doi: 10.3390/metabo15060389
80. Abu-Odah H, Said NB, Nair SC, Allsop MJ, Currow DC, Salah MS, et al. Identifying barriers and facilitators of translating research evidence into clinical practice: a systematic review of reviews. Health Soc Care Community. (2022) 30:e3265–76. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13898
81. Biesbroek R, Nalau J, Howes M. Across the Great Divide: A Systematic Literature Review to Address the Gap Between Theory and Practice—Estefania Arteaga, (2024). Available online at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/21582440241228019 (Accessed September 18, 2025).
82. (PDF) Identifying and Addressing Research Gaps: A Comprehensive Guide Definition of Research Gap Available online: Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387770690_Identifying_and_Addressing_Research_Gaps_A_Comprehensive_Guide_Definition_of_Research_Gap (Accessed September 18, 2025).
83. Dwivedi YK, Jeyaraj A, Hughes L, Davies GH, Ahuja M, Albashrawi MA, et al. Real impact”: challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice—making a difference in industry, policy, and society. Int J Inf Manage. (2024) 78:102750. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102750
84. Bin R. Islam strategic methods for emerging scholars: identifying research gaps to enhance scholarly work. World J Adv Res Rev. (2024) 23:679–83. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2711
85. Alghadir AH, Zafar H, Al-Eisa ES, Iqbal ZA. Effect of posture on swallowing. Afr Health Sci. (2017) 17:133–7. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i1.17
86. Adina S, Dipalma G, Bordea IR, Lucaciu O, Feurdean C, Inchingolo AD, et al. Orthopedic joint stability influences growth and maxillary development: clinical aspects. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. (2020) 34:747–56. doi: 10.23812/20-204-E-52
87. Alghadir AH, Zafar H, Iqbal ZA. Effect of tongue position on postural stability during quiet standing in healthy young males. Somatosens Mot Res. (2015) 32:183–6. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2015.1043120
88. Ballini A, Cantore S, Scacco S, Perillo L, Scarano A, Aityan SK, et al. A comparative study on different stemness gene expression between dental pulp stem cells vs. dental bud stem cells. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2019) 23:1626–33. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201902_17122
89. Balou M, Herzberg EG, Kamelhar D, Molfenter SM. An intensive swallowing exercise protocol for improving swallowing physiology in older adults with radiographically confirmed dysphagia. Clin Interv Aging. (2019) 14:283–8. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S194723
90. Boccalari E, Khijmatgar S, Occhipinti C, Del Fabbro M, Inchingolo F, Tartaglia GM. Effect of hydrogen peroxide and hyaluronic acid in mouth rinse after third molar extraction: a triple-blind parallel randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2024) 28:3946–57. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202407_36527
91. Caruso S, Nota A, Darvizeh A, Severino M, Gatto R, Tecco S. Poor oral habits and malocclusions after usage of orthodontic pacifiers: an observational study on 3–5 years old children. BMC Pediatr. (2019) 19:294. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1668-3
92. Cantore S, Mirgaldi R, Ballini A, Coscia MF, Scacco S, Papa F, et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms associate with microbiogical agents in periodontal disease: our experience. Int J Med Sci. (2014) 11:674–9. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6962
93. Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation—a scoping review. Healthcare. (2016) 4:36. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030036
94. The Limitations of Evidence-Based Medicine Compel the Practice of Personalized Medicine/Intensive Care Medicine. Available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-024-07528-y (Accessed September 18, 2025).
95. Shafaghat T, Imani Nasab MH, Bahrami MA, Kavosi Z, Roozrokh Arshadi Montazer M, Rahimi Zarchi MK, et al. A mapping of facilitators and barriers to evidence-based management in health systems: a scoping review study. Syst Rev. (2021) 10:42. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01595-8
96. Maspero C, Abate A, Cavagnetto D, Fama A, Stabilini A, Farronato G, et al. Operculectomy and spontaneous eruption of impacted second molars: a retrospective study. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. (2019) 33:1909–12. doi: 10.23812/19-302-L
97. Shabani-Mirzaee H, Haghshenas Z, Malekiantaghi A, Vigeh M, Mahdavi F, Eftekhari K. The effect of oral probiotics on glycated haemoglobin levels in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus—a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. (2023) 29:128–33. doi: 10.5114/pedm.2023.132025
98. Yatoo MI, Gopalakrishnan A, Saxena A, Parray OR, Tufani NA, Chakraborty S, et al. Anti-Inflammatory drugs and herbs with special emphasis on herbal medicines for countering inflammatory diseases and disorders—a review. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. (2018) 12:39–58. doi: 10.2174/1872213X12666180115153635
99. Effect of Bovine Milk Fermented with Lactobacillus Rhamnosus L8020 on Periodontal Disease in Individuals with Intellectual Disability: A Randomized Clinical Trial—PMC Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690713/ (Accessed July, 12 2023).
100. Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis as Adjunct to Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment in Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial—PubMed. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36697840/ (Accessed July 12, 2023).
101. Probiotic Strains of Lactobacillus Brevis and Lactobacillus Plantarum as Adjunct to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: 3-Month Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342937654_Probiotic_strains_of_Lactobacillus_brevis_and_Lactobacillus_plantarum_as_adjunct_to_non-surgical_periodontal_therapy_3-month_results_of_a_randomized_controlled_clinical_trial (Accessed July 12, 2023).
102. Staszczyk M, Jamka-Kasprzyk M, Kościelniak D, Cienkosz-Stepańczak B, Krzyściak W, Jurczak A. Effect of a short-term intervention with lactobacillus salivarius probiotic on early childhood caries-an open label randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:12447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912447
103. Sharma A, Rath GK, Chaudhary SP, Thakar A, Mohanti BK, Bahadur S. Lactobacillus Brevis CD2 lozenges reduce radiation- and chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Cancer. (2012) 48:875–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.010
104. Mancin S, Sguanci M, Anastasi G, Godino L, Lo Cascio A, Morenghi E, et al. A methodological framework for rigorous systematic reviews: tailoring comprehensive analyses to clinicians and healthcare professionals. Methods. (2024) 225:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.03.006
105. Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. (2019) 104:333–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
106. Li Y-Q, Sun Y-H, Liang Y-P, Zhou F, Yang J, Jin S-L. Effect of probiotics combined with applied behavior analysis in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. (2021) 23:1103–10. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2108085
107. Keim SA, Jude A, Smith K, Khan AQ, Coury DL, Rausch J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of omega-3 and -6 fatty acid supplementation to reduce inflammatory markers in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. (2022) 52:5342–55. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05396-9
108. Kern JK, Geier DA, Adams JB, Garver CR, Audhya T, Geier MR. A clinical trial of glutathione supplementation in autism spectrum disorders. Med Sci Monit. (2011) 17:CR677–82. doi: 10.12659/MSM.882125
109. Adams JB, Baral M, Geis E, Mitchell J, Ingram J, Hensley A, et al. Safety and efficacy of oral DMSA therapy for children with autism spectrum disorders: part A—medical results. BMC Clin Pharmacol. (2009) 9:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-9-16
110. Vázquez-Frias R, Consuelo-Sánchez A, Acosta-Rodríguez-Bueno CP, Blanco-Montero A, Robles DC, Cohen V, et al. Efficacy and safety of the adjuvant use of probiotic bacillus clausii strains in pediatric irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Paediatr Drugs. (2023) 25:115–26. doi: 10.1007/s40272-022-00536-9
111. Russo M, Giugliano FP, Quitadamo P, Mancusi V, Miele E, Staiano A. Efficacy of a mixture of probiotic agents as complementary therapy for chronic functional constipation in childhood. Ital J Pediatr. (2017) 43:24. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0334-3
112. Ray KJ, Santee C, McCauley K, Panzer AR, Lynch SV. Gut bifidobacteria enrichment following oral lactobacillus-supplementation is associated with clinical improvements in children with cystic fibrosis. BMC Pulm Med. (2022) 22:287. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02078-9
113. Gontijo-Amaral C, Guimarães EV, Camargos P. Oral magnesium supplementation in children with cystic fibrosis improves clinical and functional variables: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Am J Clin Nutr. (2012) 96:50–6. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.034207
114. Abdulhamid I, Beck FWJ, Millard S, Chen X, Prasad A. Effect of zinc supplementation on respiratory tract infections in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2008) 43:281–7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20771
115. Rakshasbhuvankar A, Patole S, Simmer K, Pillow JJ. Enteral vitamin A for reducing severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. (2017) 17:204. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0958-x
116. Golini J, Jones WL. Kre-Celazine(®) as a viable treatment for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis/juvenile idiopathic arthritis—a pilot study. J Med Food. (2014) 17:1022–6. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2013.0169
117. Leather SR. Influential entomology: a short review of the scientific, societal, economic and educational services provided by entomology. Ecol Entomol. (2015) 40:36–44. doi: 10.1111/een.12207
118. Tiwari R, Latheef SK, Ahmed I, Iqbal HMN, Bule MH, Dhama K, et al. Herbal immunomodulators—a remedial panacea for designing and developing effective drugs and medicines: current scenario and future prospects. Curr Drug Metab. (2018) 19:264–301. doi: 10.2174/1389200219666180129125436
119. Dhama K, Karthik K, Khandia R, Munjal A, Tiwari R, Rana R, et al. Medicinal and therapeutic potential of herbs and plant metabolites/extracts countering viral pathogens—current knowledge and future prospects. Curr Drug Metab. (2018) 19:236–63. doi: 10.2174/1389200219666180129145252
120. Choudhury AA, Choudhury NA, Bhattarai A, Dhanasekaran S;V, Phytoprospection DR. Ethnomedicine, phytochemistry, and pharmacological potentials of solanum torvum swartz: a comprehensive phytotherapeutic review. Pharmacol Res—Nat Prod. (2025) 7:100237. doi: 10.1016/j.prenap.2025.100237
121. Jeong B, Jung CH, Lee Y, Shin I, Kim H, Bae S-J, et al. A novel imaging platform for non-invasive screening of abnormal glucose tolerance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2016) 116:83–5. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.03.014
122. Nasim N, Sandeep IS, Mohanty S. Plant-derived natural products for drug discovery: current approaches and prospects. Nucleus. (2022) 65:399–411. doi: 10.1007/s13237-022-00405-3
123. Akter A, Islam F, Bepary S, Al-Amin M, Begh ZA, Islam M, et al. CNS depressant activities of averrhoa carambola leaves extract in thiopental-sodium model of swiss albino mice: implication for neuro-modulatory properties. Biologia. (2022) 77:1337–46. doi: 10.1007/s11756-022-01057-z
124. Santacroce L, Inchingolo F, Topi S, Del Prete R, Di Cosola M, Charitos IA, et al. Potential beneficial role of probiotics on the outcome of COVID-19 patients: an evolving perspective. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. (2021) 15:295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.040
125. Hassard JS, Wolfram Cox J. Developing challenging theory in management and organization studies. Acad Manage Proc. (2025) 2025:23396. doi: 10.5465/AMPROC.2025.480bp
126. Anand A, Singh SK, Bowen M, Rangarajan D. Strategic renewal during crises—a pragmatist proposition for multinational enterprises in a globalized world. J Int Manage. (2024) 30:101134. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2024.101134
127. Batir-Marin D, Ștefan CS, Boev M, Gurău G, Popa GV, Matei MN, et al. A multidisciplinary approach of type 1 diabetes: the intersection of technology, immunotherapy, and personalized medicine. J Clin Med. (2025) 14:2144. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072144
128. Nwosu BU. The theory of hyperlipidemic memory of type 1 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2022) 13:819544. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.819544
129. Nwosu BU. The partial clinical remission phase of type 1 diabetes: early-onset dyslipidemia, long-term complications, and disease-modifying therapies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2025) 16:1462249. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1462249
130. O’Donovan AJ, Gorelik S, Nally LM. Shifting the paradigm of type 1 diabetes: a narrative review of disease modifying therapies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2024) 15:1477101. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1477101
131. Michels AW, Brusko TM, Evans-Molina C, Homann D. Challenges and opportunities for understanding the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes: an endocrine society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. (2025) 110:2496–2518. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf267
132. Llanos-Ruiz D, Abella-García V, Ausín-Villaverde V. Virtual reality in higher education: a systematic review aligned with the sustainable development goals. Societies. (2025) 15:251. doi: 10.3390/soc15090251
133. Menezes MSS, Almeida CMM. Structural, functional, nutritional and clinical aspects of vitamin A: a review. PharmaNutrition. (2024) 27:100383. doi: 10.1016/j.phanu.2024.100383
134. Debelo H, Novotny JA, Ferruzzi MG. Vitamin A. Adv Nutr. (2017) 8:992–4. doi: 10.3945/an.116.014720
135. Chen G, Weiskirchen S, Weiskirchen R. Vitamin A: too good to be bad? Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1186336. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1186336
136. The Biological Significance of Vitamin A in Humans: A Review of Nutritional Aspects and Clinical Considerations. Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225187885_The_biological_significance_of_vitamin_A_in_humans_A_review_of_nutritional_aspects_and_clinical_considerations (Accessed September 17, 2025).
137. Bain DL, Heneghan AF, Connaghan-Jones KD, Miura MT. Nuclear receptor structure: implications for function. Annu Rev Physiol. (2007) 69:201–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.031905.160308
138. Ott DE. Limitations in medical research: recognition, influence, and warning. JSLS J Soc Laparosc Robot Surg. (2024) 28:e2023.00049. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00049
139. Braga LH, Farrokhyar F, Dönmez Mİ, Nelson CP, Haid B, Herbst K, et al. Randomized controlled trials—the what, when, how and why. J Pediatr Urol. (2025) 21:397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.11.021
Keywords: alternative medicine, children, chronic diseases, dietary supplements, omega-3 fatty acids, probiotics, vitamins
Citation: Inchingolo AD, Marinelli G, Limongelli L, Inchingolo F, Favia G, Ferrante L, Di Noia A, Maspero C, Palermo A, Inchingolo AM and Dipalma G (2026) Dietary and complementary oral supplements for the management of chronic diseases in children: a systematic review. Front. Pediatr. 13:1710200. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1710200
Received: 23 September 2025; Revised: 11 December 2025;
Accepted: 19 December 2025;
Published: 14 January 2026.
Edited by:
Pedro Gutierrez-Castrellon, International Scientific Council for Probiotics A.C., MexicoReviewed by:
Nilton Carlos Machado, Sao Paulo State University, BrazilMonika Maćków, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland
Copyright: © 2026 Inchingolo, Marinelli, Limongelli, Inchingolo, Favia, Ferrante, Di Noia, Maspero, Palermo, Inchingolo and Dipalma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gianna Dipalma, Z2lhbm5hLmRpcGFsbWFAdW5pYmEuaXQ=; Francesco Inchingolo, ZnJhbmNlc2NvLmluY2hpbmdvbG9AdW5pYmEuaXQ=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship