- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China
Background: Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) is one of the common and serious complications of Very Low Birth Weight Infant (VLBW) that may lead to long-term neurodevelopmental deficits. Although several studies have been conducted to explore its risk factors, the results have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to identify the major risk factors for intraventricular Hemorrhage in VLBW by systematic evaluation and Meta-analysis of the available evidence.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library were systematically searched, and observational studies (case-control and cohort studies) were included from the time of library construction to 20 January 2025, and the literature that met the criteria were screened and relevant data were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software to assess the combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each risk factor.
Results: A total of 21 studies included 6 case-control studies, 15 cohort studies, involving a total of 13,800 patients, The results of the meta-analysis showed that hypotension [OR = 3.64, 95%CI (1.87, 7.08)], patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) [OR = 1.86, 95%CI (1.46, 2.36)], vaginal delivery [OR = .10, 95%CI (1.61, 2.72)], neonatal thrombocytopenia[OR = 2.43, 95%CI (1.79, 3.30)], pulmonary hemorrhage [OR = 2.45, 95%CI (1.43, 4.20)], mechanical [OR = 2.09, 95%CI (1.40, 3.10)], sepsis[OR = 2.28, 95%CI (1.77, 2.95)] were a risk factor for the development of IVH in VLBW. While antenatal corticosteroids [OR = 0.68, 95%CI (0.55, 0.84)] was a protective factor for the development of IVH in VLBW.
Conclusion: This study indicates that hypotension, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), antenatal corticosteroid use, vaginal delivery, neonatal thrombocytopenia, pulmonary hemorrhage, mechanical ventilation, and sepsis constitute the primary risk factors for IVH in VLBW infants. Although these factors exhibit strong clinical associations, current understanding of IVH pathogenesis remains largely dependent on preclinical studies. Integrating clinical and preclinical evidence facilitates a more comprehensive understanding of IVH etiology and informs early intervention strategies.
Systematic Review Registration: identifier CRD42025633474.
Background
With the continuous improvement of perinatal medicine, prenatal monitoring technology and neonatal intensive care, the survival rate of preterm infants has significantly improved, especially Very Low Birth Weight Infant (VLBW), newborns with a birth weight of less than 1,500 grams, whose survival rates have improved markedly, rising from about 66.8% in the mid-1990s (1994–1998) to around 90.0% in the mid-2010s (2014–2019) in cohort studies at tertiary centers, reflecting an approximate 23 percentage point increase over ∼25 years (1, 2). However, due to the immaturity of their physiological structures and functions, these infants are still at risk of many serious complications, of which IVH is one of the most common and potentially disabling (3). Specifically, we now state that approximately 20%–40% of children with severe IVH develop cerebral palsy, 30%–50% experience cognitive impairment, 20%–35% develop post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus, and 5%–10% develop epilepsy. IVH not only affects the mortality rate in the neonatal period, but is also associated with neurological delay, cerebral palsy, cognitive impairment, and another long-term prognosis (4, 5).
According to Papile's classification (6), IVH can be classified into grades I–IV, with grade II being periventricular hemorrhage, grade II being entry into the ventricles without ventricular dilatation, grade III being intraventricular Hemorrhage with ventricular dilatation, and grade IV being intraventricular Hemorrhage with parenchymal hemorrhage (7, 8). Higher grades of IVH often indicate more serious conditions and worse prognosis. According to relevant studies, the incidence of IVH in VLBW can be as high as 25% to 50%, with severe IVH (grade IIIIV) accounting for about 8% to 15% (9, 10). Because of the immature neurodevelopment of these infants, the thin wall of cerebral blood vessels, and the poor self-regulation ability of the brain, they are very prone to IVH under the combined effect of many internal and external factors (11).
The mechanism of IVH is a complex process with the interaction of many factors. In VLBW, the vessel wall of the germinal matrix, an embryonic structure in the brain, is weak and prone to rupture, and the cerebral blood flow is poorly regulated, which may be easily triggered by hemodynamic fluctuations (12), such as the fluctuation of blood pressure caused by rapid infusion of fluids and mechanical ventilation, or acidosis and hypoxia. In addition, perinatal hypoxia, infection, and coagulation disorders may also increase the risk of IVH (13). In addition, perinatal hypoxia, infections, and coagulation disorders also increase the risk of IVH. Therefore, an in-depth investigation of the risk factors of IVH is important for the development of effective early intervention and prevention strategies to improve the quality of neonatal survival (14).
Despite multiple observational studies (15–18) in recent years exploring potential risk factors for IVH in VLBW infants, existing evidence remains markedly inconsistent. Discrepancies in research design, sample size, regional population variations, and statistical methodologies have led to divergent findings, with some conclusions even proving contradictory. Consequently, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of these risk factors to provide clearer clinical guidance (19). This study aims to address this research gap by systematically retrieving observational studies concerning risk factors for i IVH in VLBW infants. Through meta-analysis, it will synthesize the effect sizes of relevant variables, thereby providing evidence-based support for clinicians to optimize perinatal and neonatal management strategies. Ultimately, the study seeks to reduce the incidence of IVH and improve the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants.
Methods
This systematic evaluation and meta-analysis strictly followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines (20). The systemic review was supported by the online PROSPERO international prospective register of systemic reviews of the National Institute for Health Research, registration number: (CRD42025633474).
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
The literature included in this study consisted of observational studies, such as case–control and cohort studies, conducted in very low birth weight infants (VLBW; birth weight <1,500 g). The included studies were required to provide a clear diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and to grade IVH using the Papile grading system to ensure the reliability of the results. In addition, the assessment of risk factors had to be clearly described, and the data had to be sufficiently complete to support valid statistical analyses.
Exclusion criteria
Studies were excluded if they involved infants who were not very low birth weight (i.e., birth weight ≥1,500 g), were not preterm, or had a different clinical background. Studies without a definitive diagnosis of IVH or those that did not use a standardized grading system for IVH (Papile grading) were also excluded. Furthermore, studies with incomplete data or those from which critical data could not be extracted were excluded, as were non-original research articles, including case reports, case series, review articles, and laboratory-based studies.
Literature search
A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to include observational studies (case-control and cohort studies) from the time of their construction to 20 January 2025. The search terms were (Infant, Very Low Birth Weight [MeSH Terms] OR Infant, Very Low Birth Weight [Title/Abstract] OR Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infant [Title/Abstract]) AND (Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrhage [MeSH Terms] OR Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrhage [Title/Abstract] OR (Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrhages [Title/Abstract] OR (Hemorrhage, Cerebral Intraventricular [Title/Abstract]) AND (Risk Factors [MeSH Terms] OR Risk Factors [Title/Abstract]) OR Factor, Risk [Title/Abstract] OR (Risk Factor [Title/Abstract]); and the specific search strategy is described in Supplementary Table S1.
Study selection
During the literature screening process, two researchers independently used EndNote 21 software to initially screen the literature obtained from the search, first through the titles and abstracts, and then to exclude literature that clearly did not meet the inclusion criteria. Subsequently, the remaining literature was reviewed by reading the full text in its entirety to further determine whether it met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In case of disagreement between the two researchers during the screening process, it would be resolved through discussion and negotiation; if the negotiation still failed to reach a consensus, a third researcher would be invited to adjudicate to ensure the objectivity and consistency of the screening process.
Data extractions
This study was conducted by two researchers who independently extracted relevant data from the eligible literature using an Excel sheet based on the inclusion criteria. The extraction included the basic information of the study (first author, year of publication, country and type of study), the basic characteristics of the study population (sample size, gender, and gestational age), the statistical model used in the regression analysis, and the effect sizes of the exposure factors and the outcome indexes (the ratio than the ORs and their 95% confidence intervals). In the process of data extraction, if two investigators disagreed on the data, it would be resolved through negotiation, to ensure the accuracy and consistency of data extraction. For studies with missing data, we first contact the authors. If the data can be obtained, the study is included; otherwise, it is excluded.
Quality evaluation
Quality will be evaluated using the NOS score (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) (21). This scoring system rates the quality of a study by assessing three key aspects of the study: selection bias, comparability of comparison groups (comparability) and assessment of outcomes (results). In terms of selection bias, it assesses how the study selected the study population, including whether the inclusion criteria were clearly defined and whether randomized or systematic methods were used to select the study population; in terms of comparability of the comparison group, it assesses the comparability of the control group with the experimental group in terms of the key characteristics (age, sex, BMI) and examines whether potential confounders have been controlled for; and in terms of assessment of outcome, it assesses the reliability of the outcome by including the definition of the outcome, the method of measurement, and the completeness of follow-up. The quality of the study will be assessed by assigning scores to each aspect according to the specifics of the study, resulting in an overall score. The results of the scoring will help to identify low-quality studies, thus ensuring the reliability of the Meta-analysis results.
Statistical analysis
In this study, the risk ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of each included study were combined using Stata 15 software. First, for each study, we extracted the corresponding effect size OR and its 95% confidence interval. To combine these ORs, we pooled them using a random effects model, which can account for heterogeneity between studies, i.e., variability in effect sizes across studies. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated for each study and combined into an overall effect size. Heterogeneity of the model was assessed by the I2 statistic; if the I2 was greater than 50%, it was considered that there was a high degree of heterogeneity and that the sources of heterogeneity needed to be further explored. For high heterogeneity, we may conduct sensitivity analyses to identify potential factors that may affect the combined effect sizes. In addition, funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess the likelihood of publication bias. If bias exists, it may have an impact on the interpretation of the results. The combined effect sizes will be reported as ORs and their 95% CIs to allow for interpretation of results and statistical inference. If P < 0.05, the results are statistically significant.
Results
Meta-analysis screening results
A total of (n = 1,169 studies) were retrieved by searching PubMed (n = 346 studies), Embase (n = 309 studies), Cochrane library (n = 45 studies), and Web of science (n = 469 studies) by removing duplicates (n = 369 studies), removing literature by reading titles and abstracts (n = 770 studies), and by reading full text removal of literature (n = 9 studies), and finally 21 articles (22–42) were included, as shown in the search flowchart in Figure 1.
Basic characteristics of the included literature
A total of 21 studies included 6 case-control studies, 15 cohort studies, involving a total of 13,800 patients, and among these studies, there were a total of 7 studies in the United States and 4 studies in Germany. Other countries had relatively fewer studies, such as China and Israel with 2 studies each, and Poland, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Czech Republic, Italy, and Nigeria with 1 study. And the gestational age of most of the studies was between 25 and 30 weeks, all studies used logistic regression model for data analysis and the basic characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Quality assessment results
Table 2 demonstrates the quality scores of different case-control studies and cohort studies. Most of the case-control studies scored between 8 and 9, showing high quality, with C. Vogtmann (40), Fariba Khodapanahandeh (31), and H. C. Jen (29) all scoring the highest 9. The cohort studies also scored relatively well, with most of the studies scoring between 8 and 9, except for J. C. Roberts (38), which scored slightly lower (7), indicating that these cohort studies generally had good design and analytic quality. Overall, the quality of these studies was high.
Meta analysis results
Hypotension
Six studies mentioned hypotension, and the test of heterogeneity (I2 = 78.1%, P = 0.001) was analyzed using a random-effects model, and the results of the analyses (Figure 2) suggested that hypotension was a risk factor for the development of IVH in VLBW [OR = 3.64, 95%CI (1.87, 7.08)]. Due to the high heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was performed using literature-by-exclusion, and the results of the analysis (Supplementary Figure S1) suggested that the sensitivity was low and that the results of the analysis were not affected by an individual study.
Patent ductus arteriosus
Six studies mentioned patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and the pooled results (Figure 3) indicated that PDA was associated with an increased risk of IVH in VLBW infants [OR = 1.86, 95%CI (1.46, 2.36), P = 0.001].
Antenatal corticosteroids
Seven studies mentioned antenatal corticosteroids, and the pooled results (Figure 4) indicated that antenatal was associated with a decreased risk of IVH in VLBW infants [OR = 0.68, 95%CI (0.55, 0.84), P = 0.001].
Vaginal delivery
Five studies mentioned vaginal delivery, and the pooled results (Figure 5) indicated that vaginal delivery was associated with an increased risk of IVH in VLBW infants [OR = 2.10, 95%CI (1.61, 2.72), P = 0.002].
Neonatal thrombocytopenia
Five studies mentioned neonatal thrombocytopenia, and the pooled results (Figure 6) indicated that neonatal thrombocytopenia was associated with an increased risk of IVH in VLBW infants [OR = 2.43, 95%CI (1.79, 3.30), P = 0.01].
Pulmonary hemorrhage
Four studies mentioned pulmonary hemorrhage, and the pooled results (Figure 7) indicated that pulmonary hemorrhage was associated with an increased risk of IVH in VLBW infants [OR = 2.45, 95%CI (1.43, 4.20), P = 0.008]. Due to the high heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was performed using literature-by-exclusion, and the results of the analysis (Supplementary Figure S2) suggested that the sensitivity was low and that the results of the analysis were not affected by an individual study.
Mechanical
Six studies mentioned mechanical, and the pooled results (Figure 8) indicated that mechanical was associated with an increased risk of IVH in VLBW infants [OR = 2.09, 95%CI (1.40, 3.10), P = 0.02]. Due to the high heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was performed using literature-by-exclusion, and the results of the analysis (Supplementary Figure S3) suggested that the sensitivity was low and that the results of the analysis were not affected by an individual study.
Sepsis
Seven studies mentioned sepsis, and the pooled results (Figure 9) indicated that sepsis was associated with an increased risk of IVH in VLBW infants [OR = 2.28, 95%CI (1.77, 2.95), P = 0.001].
Publication bias
Funnel plot and Egger's test were used to detect publication bias in the current study and the results are shown in (Supplementary Figures S4–S11), where hypotension (P = 0.35), patent ductus arteriosus (P = 0. 338), antenatal corticosteroids (P = 0.930), vaginal delivery (P = 0.945), neonatal thrombocytopenia (P = 0.242), pulmonary hemorrhage (P = 0.689), mechanical (P = 0.642), and sepsis (P = 0.265) suggesting a low likelihood of publication bias.
Discussion
This study identified multiple risk factors associated with IVH, including hypotension, patent ductus arteriosus, antenatal corticosteroids, vaginal delivery, neonatal thrombocytopenia, pulmonary hemorrhage, mechanical ventilation and sepsis. These findings provide valuable insights into IVH management and prevention in VLBW.
Hypotension and IVH in VLBW
Hypotension is a significant risk factor for the development of IVH in VLBW. The ratio (OR) of the meta-analysis was 3.64, suggesting that hypotension almost quadrupled the risk of developing IVH. This result is consistent with previous studies that hypotension is strongly associated with the occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage (43). Hypotension is often accompanied by poor cerebral perfusion, which increases the likelihood of hemorrhage in the fragile fetal matrix. Studies have shown that in preterm infants, due to incomplete development of the cerebral vasculature, hypotension leads to reduced cerebral blood flow, particularly in the periventricular region, which predisposes to the development of hemorrhage (44, 45). Similar studies have found that low blood pressure is positively associated with the development of IVH [Song et al., (46)].
Patent ductus arteriosus and IVH in VLBW
The association of patent ductus arteriosus with the development of IVH in VLBW has been widely reported in the literature. Hemodynamically significant PDA (hsPDA), characterized by a large ductal diameter, increased left-to-right shunt, and evidence of systemic hypoperfusion, appears to confer a higher risk of IVH (47). Moreover, differences in PDA management may further influence the risk of IVH. Infants with non-operated or conservatively managed PDA, particularly those with persistent hsPDA, may experience prolonged exposure to cerebral hypoperfusion, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia, which further increase cerebrovascular vulnerability (48). In contrast, early pharmacological or surgical closure of hsPDA may stabilize systemic and cerebral hemodynamics and potentially reduce the risk of IVH, although evidence remains inconsistent across studies. Additionally, persistent hypoxemia and hypercapnia in the absence of effective PDA closure may elevate cerebral venous pressure and disrupt fragile germinal matrix vessels, thereby increasing the likelihood of IVH (49).
Antenatal corticosteroids and IVH in VLBW
The meta-analysis of this study confirmed this protective effect with an OR of 0.69, suggesting that antenatal use of corticosteroids significantly reduces the risk of IVH in VLBW. Antenatal corticosteroids exert a protective effect by enhancing lung maturation, reducing pulmonary complications and improving neonatal stability (50). timing and completeness of treatment. Evidence suggests that administration of a complete course of antenatal corticosteroids, typically within 7 days before preterm delivery, provides the greatest reduction in IVH risk. Studies have shown that corticosteroids can reduce the risk of IVH by inducing fetal lung maturation, improving oxygen exchange, and reducing the incidence of hypoxia, thereby reducing cerebrovascular pressure (51, 52). Moreover, exposure to antenatal corticosteroids 24 h to 7 days before birth has been associated with optimal neonatal outcomes, whereas incomplete courses or administration far in advance of delivery may confer a reduced protective effect (53). Repeated or “rescue” courses remain controversial, with inconsistent evidence regarding additional benefits for IVH prevention.
Vaginal delivery and IVH in VLBW
The meta-analysis of this study found that vaginal delivery was indeed a risk factor for IVH with an OR of 2.06. This result is consistent with existing studies that the acute abdominal pressure and the pulling of the fetal head during delivery may lead to rupture of blood vessels in the brain and increase the likelihood of IVH (54). Notably, the observed association may be influenced by confounding factors such as gestational age, fetal presentation, emergency vs. elective cesarean section, and underlying maternal or fetal conditions. Therefore, although our findings suggest an increased risk of IVH associated with vaginal delivery in VLBW infants, the contradictory results across studies highlight the need for well-designed prospective studies that adequately control for these confounding factors before definitive conclusions can be drawn.
Neonatal thrombocytopenia and IVH in VLBW
Neonatal thrombocytopenia was another risk factor significantly associated with IVH with an OR of 2.43. Low platelet levels may make neonates more susceptible to hemorrhage, including cerebral hemorrhage (30). Thrombocytopenia is common in preterm infants, especially premature, low-birth-weight neonates. Platelets play an important role in blood clotting, and thrombocytopenia leads to an increased risk of blood vessel rupture (55).
Pulmonary hemorrhage and IVH in VLBW
Pulmonary hemorrhage is a common complication of VLBW and may result from pulmonary vascular immaturity and mechanical ventilation. In the present study, pulmonary hemorrhage was found to be a risk factor for IVH with an OR of 2.45. Pulmonary hemorrhage is often accompanied by severe respiratory distress and poor oxygenation, leading to hemodynamic instability and further increasing the risk of cerebral hemorrhage (56). Pulmonary hemorrhage may affect cardiopulmonary function in preterm infants, leading to changes in systemic blood flow, which in turn affects cerebrovascular perfusion (57).
Mechanical ventilation and IVH in VLBW
Mechanical ventilation is a commonly used treatment for VLBW, especially for pulmonary diseases such as neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), but it is strongly associated with the risk of IVH. In the present study (58), mechanical ventilation was found to be a risk factor for IVH with an OR of 2.09. Mechanical ventilation may lead to changes in cerebrovascular pressure by altering thoracic pressure, affecting cerebral blood flow and oxygenation status, and increasing the risk of developing IVH (59). Ventilation duration, particularly during the first few days of life, is associated with a higher incidence of IVH in VLBW infants, whereas early weaning or the use of non-invasive respiratory support may mitigate this risk (60). However, ventilation duration is often closely linked to disease severity, and residual confounding cannot be fully excluded.
Sepsis and IVH in VLBW
Sepsis is a common serious infection in preterm infants and is a significant risk factor for IVH with an OR of 2.28. Sepsis increases the risk of hemorrhage by inducing a systemic inflammatory response and hemodynamic instability that may affect cerebral perfusion (61). The systemic inflammatory response triggered by sepsis leads to increased vascular permeability and impaired blood coagulation, further contributing to the development of cerebral hemorrhage.
Comparative interpretation of effect sizes
The strength of association between different risk factors and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants varied substantially. Hypotension showed the strongest association (OR = 3.64), highlighting the role of impaired systemic and cerebral perfusion in IVH. Other risk factors, including pulmonary hemorrhage (OR = 2.45), neonatal thrombocytopenia (OR = 2.43), sepsis (OR = 2.28), mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.09), and vaginal delivery (OR = 2.06), demonstrated moderate-to-strong associations, reflecting overlapping mechanisms such as hemodynamic instability, inflammation, coagulation dysfunction, and illness severity. Patent ductus arteriosus (OR = 1.86) showed a smaller but significant effect size, likely due to variations in severity and management. Antenatal corticosteroid exposure was the only protective factor (OR = 0.69), reinforcing its role in IVH prevention. Larger effect sizes indicate direct pathophysiological drivers, while moderate ones may represent mediators or markers in a complex causal network. These results suggest that early hemodynamic stabilization and targeted preventive strategies are key to reducing IVH risk.
Clinical significance
This review identifies clinically relevant risk factors for IVH in VLBW infants, including hypotension, patent ductus arteriosus, antenatal corticosteroids, vaginal delivery, thrombocytopenia, pulmonary hemorrhage, mechanical ventilation, and sepsis. Larger effect sizes, particularly for hypotension and PDA, emphasize the need for early risk stratification, hemodynamic monitoring, and stabilization. Conditions such as thrombocytopenia, pulmonary hemorrhage, and sepsis highlight the importance of integrated supportive care to prevent cerebrovascular instability. Antenatal corticosteroids remain crucial for perinatal care, especially in preterm deliveries. The association with vaginal delivery suggests it should be considered in an individualized risk-benefit framework. Overall, these findings advocate for a multifactorial approach to IVH prevention, emphasizing early identification, optimized management, and personalized clinical decision-making.
Strengths and limitations
The study's strength lies in its comprehensive analysis of 21 high-quality studies from multiple regions, ensuring broad applicability. It identifies key clinical interventions and risk factors, with high-quality studies and strong bias assessment. However, limitations include heterogeneity in pooled analyses, particularly for hypotension and pulmonary hemorrhage, which may have reduced precision. The observational design of most studies limits causal inference and missing or inconsistent data could have introduced bias. The exclusion of non-English studies may have introduced publication and language bias. Subgroup analyses based on extreme prematurity or other strata were not possible due to inconsistent reporting, limiting refined risk assessments. Regional differences in clinical practice may further limit generalizability, especially in low-resource settings.
Conclusion
The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that significant risk factors for IVH in VLBW infants include hypotension, PDA, antenatal corticosteroid use, vaginal delivery, neonatal thrombocytopenia, pulmonary hemorrhage, mechanical ventilation, and sepsis. Whilst these factors exhibit strong clinical associations with IVH, it is noteworthy that current understanding of IVH Patho mechanisms—such as basal vascular fragility, cerebral autoregulatory dysfunction, inflammatory processes, and hemodynamic instability—primarily derives from preclinical studies. Although clinical evidence remains crucial in elucidating these mechanisms, integrating findings from preclinical research will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of IVH pathogenesis and inform early intervention strategies. Consequently, future research should strive to bridge the gap between clinical observations and preclinical studies, such as animal models, to better inform preventive measures.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
LB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1728632/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Asbury MR, Unger S, Kiss A, Ng DV, Luk Y, Bando N, et al. Optimizing the growth of very-low-birth-weight infants requires targeting both nutritional and nonnutritional modifiable factors specific to stage of hospitalization. Am J Clin Nutr. (2019) 110(6):1384–94. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz227
2. Clyman RI, Rosenstein MG, Liebowitz MC, Rogers EE, Kramer KP, Hills NK. Betamethasone treatment-to-delivery interval, retreatment, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage in infants <28 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2025) 232(4):400.e1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.048
3. Ahmadzadeh E, Kim J, Lee J, Kwon N, Kim HW, Park J, et al. Early prediction of intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants using deep neural networks with attention in low-resource settings. Sci Rep. (2025) 15(1):10102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90901-8
4. Hashemi Z, Sarook MS, Oboodi R, Moghtaderi M, Mostafavi S. Prevalence and associated risk factors of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm newborns in southwestern Iran. Childs Nerv Syst. (2024) 40(11):3563–9. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06642-y
5. Jiang MT, Liu TX, Xu SS, Mei HF, Xie T, Ma XL, et al. Analysis of the clinical features of postnatal cytomegalovirus infection in very preterm infants or very low birth weight infants. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2025) 63(3):259–65. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20241115-00832
6. Park J, Kwon Y-r, Yoon SJ, Lim JH, Han JH, Shin JE, et al. Long-term outcomes of very low birth weight infants with intraventricular hemorrhage: a nationwide population study from 2011 to 2019. World J Pediatr. (2024) 20(7):692–700. doi: 10.1007/s12519-024-00799-x
7. Rees P, Gale C, Battersby C, Williams C, Carter B, Sutcliffe A. Intraventricular hemorrhage and survival, multimorbidity, and neurodevelopment. JAMA Netw Open. (2025) 8(1):e2452883. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52883
8. Rodríguez-Barrios C, Gutiérrez-Rosa I, Lubián-Gutiérrez M, Trimarco E, Jafrasteh B, Lubián-López S, et al. Severity of germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage impacts thalamic growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants: a longitudinal magnetic resonance study. Pediatr Neurol. (2025) 167:117–24. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2025.03.015
9. Shiono A, Bonno M, Toyoda H, Ogawa M, Tanaka S, Hirayama M. Autonomic nervous system in preterm very low birth weight neonates with intraventricular hemorrhage. Am J Perinatol. (2024) 41(S 01):e577–83. doi: 10.1055/a-1926-0335
10. Stróżyk A, Romantsik O, Calevo MG, Banzi R, Ley D, Bruschettini M. Pharmacological pain and sedation interventions for the prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants on assisted ventilation—an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2023) 8(8):Cd012706. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012706.pub2
11. Wong MK, Tsalacopoulos N, Bartmann P, Wolke D. Fertility of adults born very preterm or with very low birth weight. JAMA Netw Open. (2025) 8(3):e251164. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1164
12. Yang YH, Wang T-T, Su Y-H, Chu W-Y, Lin W-T, Chen Y-J, et al. Predicting early mortality and severe intraventricular hemorrhage in very-low birth weight preterm infants: a nationwide, multicenter study using machine learning. Sci Rep. (2024) 14(1):10833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61749-1
13. Zhou M, Wang S, Zhang T, Duan S, Wang H. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm or low birth weight infants with germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Res. (2024) 95(3):625–33. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02877-8
14. Zhu J, Li SS, Gao Y, Han SP. Risk factors and adverse outcomes of initial non-invasive ventilation failure in very low birth weight infants: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2024) 62(12):1176–83. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20240513-00326
15. Kebede SD, Kefale D, Aytenew TM, Agmas K. Pooled prevalence and predictors of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in preterm neonates (28–34 weeks) in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. (2025) 25(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05462-6
16. Tedyanto CP, Prasetyadi FOH, Dewi S, Noorlaksmiatmo H. Maternal factors and perinatal outcomes associated with early-onset versus late-onset fetal growth restriction: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2025) 38(1):2505774. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2025.2505774
17. Ghaderi M, Afraie M, Pourahmad B, Amirimanesh N, Rahimi A, Sheikhahmadi S, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. (2025) 30(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02960-2
18. Haghshenas-Mojaveri M, Omran FA, Khafri S, Mehraein R, Hejazian E, Akbarian-Rad Z. The frequency of intraventricular hemorrhage and its risk factors. Curr Pediatr Rev. (2024) 20(4):548–53. doi: 10.2174/0115733963252541231214045604
19. Kenet G, Kuperman AA, Strauss T, Brenner B. Neonatal IVH–mechanisms and management. Thromb Res. (2011) 127(Suppl 3):S120–2. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(11)70032-9
20. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
21. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25(9):603–5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
22. Adegoke SA, Bankole K, Olugbemiga A, Tinuade O. Intraventricular hemorrhage in newborns weighing <1500 g: epidemiology and short-term clinical outcome in a resource-poor setting. Ann Trop Med Public Health. (2014) 7(1):48–54. doi: 10.4103/1755-6783.145013
23. Al-Mouqdad MM, Abdelrahim A, Abdalgader AT, Alyaseen N, Khalil TM, Taha MY, et al. Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants in the central region of Saudi Arabia. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. (2021) 8(2):76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2019.11.005
24. Audeh S, Smolkin T, Bental Y, Haramati Z, Blazer S, Litig E, et al. Does admission hypothermia predispose to intraventricular hemorrhage in very-low-birth-weight infants? Neonatology. (2011) 100(4):373–9. doi: 10.1159/000327370
25. Bermick J, Dechert RE, Sarkar S. Does hyperglycemia in hypernatremic preterm infants increase the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage? J Perinatol. (2016) 36(9):729–32. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.86
26. Farghaly MAA, Aziz HF, Puthuraya S, Abdalla A, Mohamed MA. Placental abruption and risk for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants: the United States national inpatient database. J Perinatol. (2024) 44(10):1504–8. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02017-y
27. Helwich E, Rutkowska M, Bokiniec R, Gulczyńska E, Hożejowski R. Intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome treated with surfactant: incidence and risk factors in the prospective cohort study. Dev Period Med. (2017) 21(4):328–35. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20172104.328335
28. Humberg A, Härtel C, Paul P, Hanke K, Bossung V, Hartz A, et al. Delivery mode and intraventricular hemorrhage risk in very-low-birth-weight infants: observational data of the German neonatal network. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. (2017) 212:144–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.032
29. Jen HC, Graber JJ, Hill JL, Alaish SM, Voigt RW, Strauch ED. Surgical necrotizing enterocotitis and intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants below 1000g. J Pediatr Surg. (2006) 41(8):1425–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.04.019
30. Kahn DJ, Richardson DK, Billett HH. Association of thrombocytopenia and delivery method with intraventricular hemorrhage among very-low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2002) 186(1):109–16. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.118268
31. Khodapanahandeh F, Khosravi N, Larijani T. Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants in Tehran, Iran. Turk J Pediatr. (2008) 50(3):247–52.18773670
32. Korcek P, Širc J, Berka I, Kučera J, Straňák Z. Does perinatal management have the potential to reduce the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants? Front Pediatr. (2024) 12:1361074. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1361074
33. Linder N, Haskin O, Levit O, Klinger G, Prince T, Naor N, et al. Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight premature infants: a retrospective case-control study. Pediatrics. (2003) 111(5 Pt 1):e590–595. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.5.e590
34. Ongun H, Ozyazici Ozkan SE. Predictors of intraventicular hemorhage in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Crit Intensive Care. (2021) 12(1):1–7. doi: 10.37678/dcybd.2021.2583
35. Parodi A, De Angelis LC, Re M, Raffa S, Malova M, Rossi A, et al. Placental pathology findings and the risk of intraventricular and cerebellar hemorrhage in preterm neonates. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:761. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00761
36. Puerta-Martínez AG, López-Garrido E, Guerrero-Nava JM, Vargas-Ruiz R, Martínez-Padrón HY. Risk factors associated with intraventricular hemorrhage in very-low-birth-weight premature infants. Childs Nerv Syst. (2024) 40(6):1743–50. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06310-1
37. Roberts JC, Javed MJ, Hocker JR, Wang H, Tarantino MD. Risk factors associated with intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely premature neonates. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. (2018) 29(1):25–9. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000661
38. Roberts JC, Javed MJ, Lundy MK, Burns RM, Wang H, Tarantino MD. Characterization of laboratory coagulation parameters and risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely premature neonates. J Thromb Haemostasis. (2022) 20(8):1797–807. doi: 10.1111/jth.15755
39. Sauer CW, Kong JY, Vaucher YE, Finer N, Proudfoot JA, Boutin MA, et al. Intubation attempts increase the risk for severe intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants—a retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr. (2016) 177:108–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.051
40. Vogtmann C, Koch R, Gmyrek D, Kaiser A, Friedrich A. Risk-adjusted intraventricular hemorrhage rates in very premature infants: towards quality assurance between neonatal units. Dtsch Arztebl Int. (2012) 109(31–32):527–33. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0527
41. Xing S, Sun HQ, Li MC. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely low birth weight infants. Natl Med J China. (2022) 102(47):3774–8.
42. Zhao Y, Zhang W, Tian X. Analysis of risk factors of early intraventricular hemorrhage in very-low-birth-weight premature infants: a single center retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2022) 22(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05245-2
43. Hwang-Bo S, Seo YM, Oh MY, Im SA, Youn YA. The prognosis of refractory hypotension and severe intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants. Medicine (Baltimore). (2022) 101(30):e29598. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029598
44. McLendon D, Check J, Carteaux P, Michael L, Moehring J, Secrest JW, et al. Implementation of potentially better practices for the prevention of brain hemorrhage and ischemic brain injury in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. (2003) 111(4 Pt 2):e497–503. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.SE1.e497
45. Usuda H, Watanabe S, Saito M, Ikeda H, Koshinami S, Sato S, et al. Successful use of an artificial placenta-based life support system to treat extremely preterm ovine fetuses compromised by intrauterine inflammation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2020) 223(5):755.e1–755.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.036
46. Song YH, Lee JA, Choi BM, Lim JW. Risk factors and prognosis in very low birth weight infants treated for hypotension during the first postnatal week from the Korean neonatal network. PLoS One. (2021) 16(10):e0258328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258328
47. Jim WT, Chiu N-C, Chen M-R, Hung H-Y, Kao H-A, Hsu C-H. Cerebral hemodynamic change and intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Ultrasound Med Biol. (2005) 31(2):197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.10.006
48. Brunner B, Hoeck M, Schermer E, Streif W, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U. Patent ductus arteriosus, low platelets, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, and intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight preterm infants. J Pediatr. (2013) 163(1):23–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.035
49. Kim S, Shin J-A, Youn Y-A. Risk factors for PDA ligation and neurodevelopmental outcomes at corrected 18–24 months in very low birth weight infants. BMC Pediatr. (2024) 24(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04860-6
50. Sehdev HM, Abbasi S, Robertson P, Fisher L, Marchiano DA, Gerdes JS, et al. The effects of the time interval from antenatal corticosteroid exposure to delivery on neonatal outcome of very low birth weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2004) 191(4):1409–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.055
51. Mori R, Kusuda S, Fujimura M. Antenatal corticosteroids promote survival of extremely preterm infants born at 22 to 23 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr. (2011) 159(1):110–114.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.12.039
52. Liu J, Feng Z-C, Yin X-J, Chen H, Lu J, Qiao X. The role of antenatal corticosteroids for improving the maturation of choroid plexus capillaries in fetal mice. Eur J Pediatr. (2008) 167(10):1209–12. doi: 10.1007/s00431-007-0649-y
53. Boscarino G, Conti MG, Esposito S, Terrin G. Pharmacological hypotensive treatment in very preterm newborns: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acta Paediatr. (2025). doi: 10.1111/apa.70411
54. Barzilay E, Mazaki-Tovi S, Amikam U, de Castro H, Haas J, Mazkereth R, et al. Mode of delivery of twin gestation with very low birthweight: is vaginal delivery safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2015) 213(2):219.e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.030
55. Beiner ME, Simchen MJ, Sivan E, Chetrit A, Kuint J, Schiff E. Risk factors for neonatal thrombocytopenia in preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. (2003) 20(1):49–54. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37948
56. Wang TT, Zhou M, Hu X-F, Liu J-Q. Perinatal risk factors for pulmonary hemorrhage in extremely low-birth-weight infants. World J Pediatr. (2020) 16(3):299–304. doi: 10.1007/s12519-019-00322-7
57. Scholl JE, Yanowitz TD. Pulmonary hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants: a case-control analysis. J Pediatr. (2015) 166(4):1083–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.032
58. Okito O, Aromolaran A, Massa-Buck B, Abdelatif D, Aly H, Mohamed MA. Antenatal magnesium sulfate and the need for mechanical ventilation in the first three days of life. Pediatr Neonatol. (2023) 64(6):644–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.10.008
59. Piatek M, Jawdeh EG, Giannone P, Miller B, Schadler A, Hanna M. Severe intraventricular hemorrhage is associated with lung injury in preterm infants on mechanical ventilation. J Pediatr Perinatol Child Health. (2023) 7(4):229–34. doi: 10.26502/jppch.74050168
60. Kamal K, Keiter JA, Binyamin TR, de la Cruz Dapula JN, Vergara AR, Hawk CW, et al. Mechanical injury and blood are drivers of spatial memory deficits after rapid intraventricular hemorrhage. Neurobiol Dis. (2020) 145:105084. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105084
Keywords: intraventricular hemorrhage, meta-analysis, risk factors, systematic review, very low birth weight infant
Citation: Bao L and Huang J (2026) Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pediatr. 13:1728632. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1728632
Received: 20 October 2025; Revised: 24 December 2025;
Accepted: 31 December 2025;
Published: 26 January 2026.
Edited by:
Licia Lugli, University Hospital of Modena, ItalyReviewed by:
Samson Nivins, Karolinska Institutet (KI), SwedenGiovanni Boscarino, Clinica Pediatrica, Ospedale Universitario di Parma, Italy
Copyright: © 2026 Bao and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jinyan Huang, MjU0NjQ4Njg4QHFxLmNvbQ==
Jinyan Huang*