Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. Social Pediatrics

This article is part of the Research TopicHealthcare and Child Protection Synergy: Preventing Maltreatment and Promoting WellbeingView all 8 articles

Bridging Access and Impact: Primary Care Parenting Intervention Reduces Early Behavior Problems in Both Virtual and In-Person Delivery Modes

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
  • 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Early childhood behavior problems are common and linked to adverse outcomes, including maltreatment. Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement in primary care (PriCARE) is an evidence-based group parenting program delivered in pediatric primary care to reduce disruptive behaviors and strengthen caregiver-child relationships. In-person RCTs have demonstrated PriCARE's efficacy, but barriers such as workforce shortages and limited behavioral health infrastructure restrict access. Virtual delivery offers a potential solution, yet its effectiveness relative to in-person delivery is not well established. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of virtual PriCARE in improving child behavioral outcomes and compare these outcomes with those from prior in-person trials. Study design: A multi-center RCT of virtual PriCARE is underway with caregivers of children aged 18 months to 6 years. Child behavior was assessed using the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) at baseline and at 6-8 month follow-up. An interim analysis was conducted to examine changes in ECBI scores from baseline to follow-up among virtual participants and to compare mean ECBI change trajectories with prior in-person trials. Attendance was compared using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Effectiveness was assessed using linear regression models with ANCOVA adjustment for baseline ECBI scores and caregiver/child demographics. Results: Subjects included 698 virtual PriCARE participants and 417 in-person PriCARE participants. Attendance was higher virtually, with 23.8% of participants completing all sessions, compared to 18.9% in-person (p < .001). Children in the virtual intervention group showed significant reductions in ECBI Intensity (-7.81 vs. 1.45, p < 0.001) and Problem scores (-3.80 vs. -1.91, p < .001) compared with usual care. The delivery mode Ă— intervention interaction was not significant for either ECBI Intensity (p = 0.833) or Problem scores (p = 0.744), suggesting no evidence of differential effects by delivery mode. Conclusions: Virtual PriCARE was associated with significant improvements in early childhood behavior problems and higher completion rates, with no evidence of differential effects by delivery mode. These findings highlight the potential of virtual behavioral interventions in pediatric primary care to expand reach, reduce access barriers, and provide scalable prevention strategies to promote child well-being and prevent maltreatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05233150. Registered 10 February 2022 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05233150

Keywords: Child maltreatment prevention, Early childhood behavior problems, Parenting program, PriCARE, Primary Care, Virtual intervention

Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 26 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Andom, Wood, Jiang, Lin and Schilling. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Fithi Andom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.