Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. Pediatric Surgery

This article is part of the Research TopicPerioperative Management Strategies of Pediatric Anesthesia and Associated OutcomesView all articles

Effects of lung protective ventilation and conventional ventilation on postoperative atelectasis in neonates under general anesthesia

Provisionally accepted
Jingru  WangJingru WangKun  YueKun YueYingying  SunYingying Sun*Yin  XiaYin Xia*
  • Anhui Provincial Children’s Hospital, Hefei, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background. General anesthesia frequently causes atelectasis, a condition that significantly endangers patient safety during and after surgery, especially in neonates. Evidence suggests that lung protective ventilation (LPV) strategies may reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis in patients receiving general anaesthesia; however, the efficacy for neonatal patients remains controversial. This study aims to explore how LPV affects the incidence of atelectasis in neonates. Methods. This randomized controlled trial involved neonatal patients under general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation for over two hours, randomly assigned to receive LPV (including a Vt of 6 ml/kg, 5 cmH2O PEEP, and lung RMs once per hour) or conventional ventilation (including a Vt of 8–10 ml/kg without PEEP or RMs). Each infant underwent two lung ultrasound (LUS) scans at specified time points: 5 minutes post-intubation and at the conclusion of surgery. Additionally, three arterial blood gas analyses were conducted for each infant at T1 (5 minutes post-intubation), T2 (one hour after mechanical ventilation), and T3 (two hours after mechanical ventilation). HR and MAP were recorded at four time points: T1, T2, T3, and T4(at the conclusion of surgery). The primary outcomes were the incidence of significant atelectasis (defined as any area with a consolidation score of ≥ 2) and LUS scores at the conclusion of surgery. Results. The study enrolled 100 neonatal patients, divided into 50 in the LPV group and 50 in the control group. At the conclusion of surgery, the LPV group had a significantly lower incidence of significant atelectasis (18% vs. 58%) and lower median LUS scores (7 [6, 9] vs. 12 [8, 18]) than the control group did (all P < 0.001). In addition, there were differences in the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO₂) and partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO₂) between the two groups at T2 and T3, although both were within the normal range. No significant differences were observed in HR, MAP or the rate of respiratory events after surgery between the two groups. Conclusions. Compared with conventional ventilation, LPV results in a significantly lower incidence of significant postoperative atelectasis and lower LUS scores in neonates receiving general anaesthesia.

Keywords: anaesthesia, lung-protective ventilation, Lung-ultrasound, neonate, Pulmonary Atelectasis

Received: 22 Oct 2025; Accepted: 26 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Wang, Yue, Sun and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yingying Sun
Yin Xia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.