CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Surgery
This article is part of the Research TopicPerioperative Management Strategies of Pediatric Anesthesia and Associated OutcomesView all articles
Effects of lung protective ventilation and conventional ventilation on postoperative atelectasis in neonates under general anesthesia
Provisionally accepted- Anhui Provincial Children’s Hospital, Hefei, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background. General anesthesia frequently causes atelectasis, a condition that significantly endangers patient safety during and after surgery, especially in neonates. Evidence suggests that lung protective ventilation (LPV) strategies may reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis in patients receiving general anaesthesia; however, the efficacy for neonatal patients remains controversial. This study aims to explore how LPV affects the incidence of atelectasis in neonates. Methods. This randomized controlled trial involved neonatal patients under general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation for over two hours, randomly assigned to receive LPV (including a Vt of 6 ml/kg, 5 cmH2O PEEP, and lung RMs once per hour) or conventional ventilation (including a Vt of 8–10 ml/kg without PEEP or RMs). Each infant underwent two lung ultrasound (LUS) scans at specified time points: 5 minutes post-intubation and at the conclusion of surgery. Additionally, three arterial blood gas analyses were conducted for each infant at T1 (5 minutes post-intubation), T2 (one hour after mechanical ventilation), and T3 (two hours after mechanical ventilation). HR and MAP were recorded at four time points: T1, T2, T3, and T4(at the conclusion of surgery). The primary outcomes were the incidence of significant atelectasis (defined as any area with a consolidation score of ≥ 2) and LUS scores at the conclusion of surgery. Results. The study enrolled 100 neonatal patients, divided into 50 in the LPV group and 50 in the control group. At the conclusion of surgery, the LPV group had a significantly lower incidence of significant atelectasis (18% vs. 58%) and lower median LUS scores (7 [6, 9] vs. 12 [8, 18]) than the control group did (all P < 0.001). In addition, there were differences in the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO₂) and partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO₂) between the two groups at T2 and T3, although both were within the normal range. No significant differences were observed in HR, MAP or the rate of respiratory events after surgery between the two groups. Conclusions. Compared with conventional ventilation, LPV results in a significantly lower incidence of significant postoperative atelectasis and lower LUS scores in neonates receiving general anaesthesia.
Keywords: anaesthesia, lung-protective ventilation, Lung-ultrasound, neonate, Pulmonary Atelectasis
Received: 22 Oct 2025; Accepted: 26 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Wang, Yue, Sun and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yingying Sun
Yin Xia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
