ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
This article is part of the Research TopicPrecision and Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children with Gastrointestinal MalformationsView all 3 articles
Development of a Predictive Model for Surgical Intervention following Air Enema Reduction of Pediatric Intussusception
Provisionally accepted- 1The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
- 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- 3First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
- 4Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- 5Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
- 6China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Surgical intervention after air enema for paediatric intussusception is very common, and prompt surgical treatment after failure of air enema therapy is the key to reducing serious complications, such as intestinal perforation and intestinal necrosis caused by intussusception. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prediction model for surgical intervention after air enema in paediatric intussusception to reduce the incidence of serious complications. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 843 children who were successfully reduced by air enema and 120 children who underwent surgical intervention after air enema in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2021. Baseline information, clinical presentation and test results of the children on admission were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for surgical intervention after air enema for paediatric intussusception. Meanwhile, we developed a predictive model to predict surgical intervention after air enema for paediatric intussusception based on independent risk factors and validated the model using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Age, duration of symptoms, bloody stools, body temperature, lymphocyte percentage and basophil percentage were independently associated with the composite endpoint (p< 0.05). The patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3 for model construction and validation, respectively. A logistic regression model was constructed based on the above six factors and integrated into the nomogram. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram constructed by 6 independent risk factors reached 0.879, and the calibration curve was close to the ideal diagonal. In addition, DCA analysis revealed significant net benefits of the model. Conclusions: Our predictive model for surgical intervention after air enema in pediatric intussusception, developed using objectively measurable indicators, demonstrates reliable predictive capability. It provides clinicians with an effective and dependable tool for early decision-making regarding post-enema treatment strategies—whether to continue with enema or proceed to surgery.
Keywords: Air enema, basophil ratio, Intussusception, Lymphocyte ratio, Surgical intervention
Received: 25 Dec 2025; Accepted: 03 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Yang, Rao, Huang, Zhang, Guo, Rao, Duan and Cui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Shouxing Duan
Qingbo Cui
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
