ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
This article is part of the Research TopicCelebrating 45 Years of the Chilean Society of Pharmacology, Volume IIView all 4 articles
Combined ACEI and ARB therapy and ICU Mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study
Provisionally accepted- 1Laboratorio de Modelamiento en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
- 2Unidad de Estudios Clínicos, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
- 3Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Dr. Gustavo Fricke, Viña del Mar, Chile
- 4Laboratorio de Estructura y Función Celular, Facultad de Medicina, Valparaiso, Chile
- 5Escuela de Química y Farmacia, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaiso, Chile
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The safety and potential benefits of renin-angiotensin system (RAAS) blockers in COVID-19 remain controversial. While monotherapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has been widely studied, the impact of combined ACEI+ARB therapy in critically ill patients is unknown. Acid-base balance may also influence prognosis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) atof Hospital Dr. Gustavo Fricke (Chile) between March 2020 and December 2021. Patients were stratified by RAAS therapy at admission (none, ACEI only, ARB only, ACEI+ARB) and by arterial bicarbonate (HCO₃-) levels: low (<21 mEq/L), normal (21–27 mEq/L), or high (>27 mEq/L). Changes in HCO₃ -during the first 48 hours were also assessed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Group comparisons used chi-square test and non-parametric statistics. Among 2838 hospitalized patients, 671 (23.6%) required ICU admission, with an overall ICU mortality of 34.2%. Mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving combined ACEI+ARB therapy (16.9%) compared with those not on RAAS inhibitors (38.3%; p<0.05). No significant mortality differences were observed with ACEI or ARB monotherapy. In patients with low or normal admission HCO₃-, an increase during the first 48 hours was associated with reduced mortality (χ²= 7.9183, p = 0.01). Patients with high baseline HCO₃-who survived required longer ICU stays and mechanical ventilation. These findings suggest a potential synergistic protective effect of dual RAAS blockade, mediated through modulation of RAAS pathways and renal acid-base homeostasis, underscoring the relevance of dynamic acid-base monitoring in the ICU. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to confirm these observations and to define personalized strategies integrating metabolic biomarkers.
Keywords: acid-base imbalance5, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor3, Angiotensinreceptor antagonists4, COVID-191, Intensive care unit2, mortality6
Received: 27 Sep 2025; Accepted: 27 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Marchant, Balcazar, Pozo, Olivero and Espinoza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ivanny Carolina Marchant
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
