ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1605498

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Recovery College model: state of the art, current research developments and future directionsView all 3 articles

The content of Recovery Colleges courses in England: a 71-college document analysis

Provisionally accepted
Simran  TakhiSimran Takhi1*Amy  RonaldsonAmy Ronaldson2Vanessa  LawrenceVanessa Lawrence2Merly  McPhilbinMerly McPhilbin1Benjamin  Rose IngallBenjamin Rose Ingall1Riddhi  DaryananiRiddhi Daryanani2Jonathan  SimpsonJonathan Simpson2Tesnime  JebaraTesnime Jebara2Simon  LawrenceSimon Lawrence2Agnieszka  KapkaAgnieszka Kapka2Yasuhiro  KoteraYasuhiro Kotera1,3Danielle  DunnettDanielle Dunnett2Daniel  HayesDaniel Hayes4Katy  StepanianKaty Stepanian2Caroline  Fox YeoCaroline Fox Yeo5Sara  MeddingsSara Meddings6Jane  RennissonJane Rennisson6Katherine  BarrettKatherine Barrett7Jason  Grant RowlesJason Grant Rowles7Rob  WhitleyRob Whitley8Yuki  MiyamotoYuki Miyamoto9Hans  KroonHans Kroon10Claire  HendersonClaire Henderson2Mike  SladeMike Slade1,11
  • 1Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
  • 2Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 3Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  • 4Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 5Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
  • 6imROC Head Office, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • 7RECOLLECT Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP), Kinds College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 8Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
  • 9Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • 10Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Well-being, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg Universitys, Tilberg, Netherlands
  • 11Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Nordland, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

AbstractIntroductionRecovery Colleges (RCs) exist in 28 countries and across five continents. The concept of recovery and recovery-oriented care has become widespread internationally and embedded in policy documentation and mental health services. As a result, Recovery Colleges, which focus on adult learning and co-production, have now developed a global presence, but many psychiatrists are unfamiliar with this intervention. RCs can be categorized as ‘Strengths Oriented’, focusing on skills and knowledge development, or ‘Community-oriented’, emphasizing strengthening community and social connections. Research has not sufficiently investigated RC curriculum and how course provision differs depending on RC orientation. The study aimed to develop a typology of RC courses and assess differences in course types across RC orientations.Method A document analysis was conducted. The websites of 88 RCs in England were searched to collect online prospectuses. Overall, 2,330 courses described in 551 documents from 71 RCs were collated. Inductive content analysis was applied to the course titles to develop a typology of courses offered. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess differences in the median number of course types offered by Strengths-Oriented versus Community-Oriented colleges.Results A typology of 14 superordinate course categories was created. The three most common course categories were Self-management of Well-being (96% RCs ≥1 course, median 10 courses per RC), Mental Health Conditions and Symptoms (85% RCs ≥1 course, 4 courses per RC), and Creativity (86% RCs ≥1 course, 3 courses per RC). The least common course categories included Issues relating to the Extended Support Network and Issues relating to Staff (38% RCs ≥1 course, 0 courses per RC) (6% RCs ≥1 course, 0 courses per RC). The median number of courses did not differ between Strengths-oriented versus Community-oriented RCs, with the exception of more Practical Life Skills (p=0.021) and Involvement, Co-production and Research (p=0.036) courses in Strengths-oriented RCs.Conclusions: RCs support mental health recovery through a diverse curriculum. Community-facing and strengths-based, health service-affiliated RCs offer similar courses. RCs prioritize equipping students with knowledge about living with mental health issues. Courses targeted to informal carers are lacking. Further cross-cultural extension of the typology is needed.

Keywords: Recovery College1, document analysis2, fidelity measure3, course content4, inductive content analysis5

Received: 03 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Takhi, Ronaldson, Lawrence, McPhilbin, Ingall, Daryanani, Simpson, Jebara, Lawrence, Kapka, Kotera, Dunnett, Hayes, Stepanian, Yeo, Meddings, Rennisson, Barrett, Rowles, Whitley, Miyamoto, Kroon, Henderson and Slade. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Simran Takhi, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, England, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.